HB 2633 — special actions; public participation; postconviction
Last action — Senate Second Reading
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
248 added · 255 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to House Bill 2633 clarifies that courts must consider whether a state actor was aware of an individual's constitutional rights or political beliefs when initiating legal actions. It also emphasizes that evidence is needed to demonstrate a lack of retaliation against individuals for their political or religious views. This change aims to ensure that people can express their opinions and engage in advocacy without fear of legal repercussions, which is important for protecting free speech and civic engagement.
Fifty-seventhHouse LegislatureEngrossed Firstspecial Regularactions; Session COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO H.B.
2633public (Referenceparticipation; to printed bill) Amendment instruction key:
[GREENpostconviction UNDERLININGState INof BRACKETS]Arizona indicatesHouse textof addedRepresentatives toFifty-seventh statuteLegislature orFirst previouslyRegular enactedSession sessionHOUSE law.BILL 2633 AN ACT AMENDING SECTION 12-751, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
[GreenAMENDING underliningTITLE in13, brackets]CHAPTER indicates38, textARTICLE added29, toARIZONA newREVISED sessionSTATUTES, lawBY orADDING textSECTION restoring13-4242; existing law.
[GREENRELATING STRIKEOUTTO INREMEDIES. BRACKETS] indicates new text removed from statute or previously enacted session law.
[Green(TEXT strikeoutOF inBILL brackets]BEGINS indicatesON textNEXT removedPAGE) from- existingi statute,- previouslyH.B. enacted session law or new session law.
<<Green2633 carets>>Be indicateit aenacted sectionby addedthe toLegislature of the bill.State of Arizona:
<<Green strikeout in carets>> indicates a section removed from the bill.
The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows:
The moving person may submit evidence based on the record, a sworn affidavit or other evidence that is Housesubmitted Amendmentswith the motion to H.B.dismiss or quash OR PETITION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF.
2633 submitted with the motion to dismiss or quash OR PETITION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF.
(a) Establishing that the person who initiated and conducted an investigation- that1 resulted- inH.B. the legal action and that WHO made the decision to pursue the legal action was unaware of the movant's lawful exercise of the constitutional right OR POLITICAL BELIEFS OR ADVOCACY.
2633 investigation that resulted in the legal action and that WHO made the decision to pursue the legal action was unaware of the movant's lawful exercise of the constitutional right OR POLITICAL BELIEFS OR ADVOCACY.
-2-E. House Amendments to H.B.
2633 E.
For the purposes of this subsection, "costs" means all costs that are reasonably incurred and includes filing fees,- record2 preparation- andH.B. document copying fees, documented time away from employment to confer with counsel or attend case related proceedings, expert witness fees, travel expenses and any other costs that the court deems appropriate.
2633 fees, record preparation and document copying fees, documented time away from employment to confer with counsel or attend case related proceedings, expert witness fees, travel expenses and any other costs that the court deems appropriate.
A STATE ACTOR IS LIABLE FOR INTENTIONALLY BRINGING OR MAINTAINING, CONSPIRING TO BRING OR MAINTAIN OR AIDING AND ABETTING THE PURSUIT OR MAINTENANCE OF A [NONCRIMINALNONCRIMINAL OR TRAFFIC]TRAFFIC LEGAL ACTION WHEN A SUBSTANTIAL MOTIVATION FOR THE STATE ACTOR IS A DESIRE TO DETER, RETALIATE AGAINST OR PREVENT ANY PERSON FROM HOLDING OR EXPRESSING POLITICAL OR RELIGIOUS VIEWS, FROM FREE POLITICAL ASSOCIATION OR FROM ENGAGING IN POLITICALLY RELATED ADVOCACY.
IF A MOTION FILED PURSUANT TO -3-SUBSECTION HouseA AmendmentsOF toTHIS H.B.SECTION WAS MADE IN THE UNDERLYING LEGAL ACTION AND WAS UNSUCCESSFUL, THE COURT, IN ITS DISCRETION, MAY ALLOW A JURY TO CONSIDER THIS FACT BUT THE DISPOSITION OF THE MOTION IS NOT BINDING ON THE JURY.
2633 SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION WAS MADE IN THE UNDERLYING LEGAL ACTION AND WAS UNSUCCESSFUL, THE COURT, IN ITS DISCRETION, MAY ALLOW A JURY TO CONSIDER THIS FACT BUT THE DISPOSITION OF THE MOTION IS NOT BINDING ON THE JURY.
IF AN INDIVIDUAL IS FOUND LIABLE, THE INDIVIDUAL MAY [NOT] BE INDEMNIFIED BY THIS STATE OR A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE OR THE STATE'S OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISION'S INSURER.
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS SUBSECTION, THE EXCLUSIVE MEANS OF REDRESS FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION WITH RESPECT TO LEGAL- ACTIONS3 SET- FORTHH.B. IN SUBSECTION L, PARAGRAPH 1, SUBDIVISION (a), ITEM (ii) OF THIS SECTION SHALL BE AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 13-4242.
2633 LEGAL ACTIONS SET FORTH IN SUBSECTION L, PARAGRAPH 1, SUBDIVISION (a), ITEM (ii) OF THIS SECTION SHALL BE AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 13-4242.
-4-(b) HouseAny Amendmentsbranch, todepartment, H.B.board, bureau, commission, council, PROFESSIONAL OR OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING OR REGULATORY ORGANIZATION IN WHICH MEMBERSHIP IS MANDATORY FOR INDUSTRY PARTICIPANTS or committee of an entity included in subdivision (a) of this paragraph.
2633 (b) Any branch, department, board, bureau, commission, council, PROFESSIONAL OR OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING OR REGULATORY ORGANIZATION IN WHICH MEMBERSHIP IS MANDATORY FOR INDUSTRY PARTICIPANTS or committee of an entity included in subdivision (a) of this paragraph.
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER LAW, A DEFENDANT WHO HAS BEEN CONVICTED OF A CRIMINAL OFFENSE IN A LEGAL ACTION COMMENCED OR MAINTAINED IN- VIOLATION4 OF- SECTIONH.B. 12-751 AND WHO IS AN ELIGIBLE PETITIONER MAY FILE A PETITION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION AND SECTION 13-4231, PARAGRAPH 2, EXCEPT THAT RELIEF MAY NOT BE PRECLUDED FOR THE FAILURE TO TIMELY RAISE THE ISSUE OR ON THE GROUNDS THAT THE ACCUSED CONSENTED TO JURISDICTION OF THE COURT.
2633 IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 12-751 AND WHO IS AN ELIGIBLE PETITIONER MAY FILE A PETITION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION AND SECTION 13-4231, PARAGRAPH 2, EXCEPT THAT RELIEF MAY NOT BE PRECLUDED FOR THE FAILURE TO TIMELY RAISE THE ISSUE OR ON THE GROUNDS THAT THE ACCUSED CONSENTED TO JURISDICTION OF THE COURT.
-5-(d) HouseA AmendmentsCURRENT toOR H.B.FORMER PUBLIC FIGURE AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED AT COMMON LAW.
2633 (d) A CURRENT OR FORMER PUBLIC FIGURE AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED AT COMMON LAW.
Sec.- 5 - H.B.
2633 Sec.
Enroll- and6 engross- to conform Amend title to conform And, as so amended, it do pass QUANG H.
NGUYEN CHAIRMAN 2633JUDICIARY.docx 02/05/2025 10:11 AM H:
NM/ls -6-
View plain text versions (4)
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version Current pdf
- HOUSE - 2633JUDICIARY.PDF View text pdf
- HOUSE - Judiciary View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
-
Transmit to Senate
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DPA
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
Sponsors
- Nick Kupper · Cosponsor
- Rachel Keshel · Cosponsor
- Alexander Kolodin · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 90 not signed on · 26 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Alexander Kolodin Republican
Co-sponsors (2)
- Nick Kupper Republican
- Rachel Keshel Republican
Not signed on (90)
90 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 90 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 26 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 33 | 26 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 43% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (60)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron Márquez | Democrat | Nay |
| Alma Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Anna Abeytia | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Betty J Villegas | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Garcia | Democrat | Nay |
| Cesar Aguilar | Democrat | Nay |
| Christopher Mathis | Democrat | Nay |
| Consuelo Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Elda Luna-Nájera | Democrat | Nay |
| Janeen Connolly | Democrat | Nay |
| Junelle Cavero | Democrat | Nay |
| Kevin Volk | Democrat | Nay |
| Lorena Austin | Democrat | Nay |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Lydia Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Mae Peshlakai | Democrat | Nay |
| Mariana Sandoval | Democrat | Nay |
| Myron Tsosie | Democrat | Nay |
| Nancy Gutierrez | Democrat | Nay |
| Oscar De Los Santos | Democrat | Nay |
| Patty Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Quantá Crews | Democrat | Nay |
| Sarah Liguori | Democrat | Nay |
| Seth Blattman | Democrat | Nay |
| Stacey Travers | Democrat | Nay |
| Stephanie Simacek | Democrat | Nay |
| Stephanie Stahl Hamilton | Democrat | Nay |
| Alexander Kolodin | Republican | Yea |
| Beverly Pingerelli | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Lopez | Republican | Yea |
| David Livingston | Republican | Yea |
| David Marshall, Sr. | Republican | Yea |
| Gail Griffin | Republican | Yea |
| James Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Weninger | Republican | Yea |
| John Gillette | Republican | Yea |
| Joseph Chaplik | Republican | Yea |
| Julie Willoughby | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Olson | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Wilmeth | Republican | Yea |
| Khyl Powell | Republican | Yea |
| Laurin Hendrix | Republican | Yea |
| Leo Biasiucci | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Fink | Republican | Yea |
| Lupe Diaz | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Gress | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Carbone | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Way | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Peña | Republican | Yea |
| Neal Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Nick Kupper | Republican | Yea |
| Pamela Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Quang H Nguyen | Republican | Yea |
| Rachel Keshel | Republican | Yea |
| Ralph Heap | Republican | Yea |
| Selina Bliss | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Montenegro | Republican | Yea |
| Teresa Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Rivero | Republican | Yea |
| Walt Blackman | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2633?
- HB 2633 is sponsored by Nick Kupper (Republican), Rachel Keshel (Republican), and Alexander Kolodin (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 2633?
- This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 2633?
- Track HB 2633 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2633
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2633
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →