Arizona 57th Legislature - First Regular Session Status: Passed House Bipartisan · 13 R · 3 D cosponsors

HB 2736 — cybersecurity; data encryption; pilot program

Last action — DPA

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

110 added · 160 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendments to House Bill 2736 introduce a new seven-year pilot program focused on cybersecurity and data encryption, which is aimed at protecting sensitive information from unauthorized access. This initiative, led by the Arizona Department of Homeland Security, will enhance the state's cybersecurity infrastructure. These changes are significant because they emphasize the importance of safeguarding technology systems in an increasingly digital world, ensuring better protection for public and private data.

→
Previous
Latest
Fifty-seventh Legislature Federalism First Regular Session H.B.
House Engrossed cybersecurity;
2736 PROPOSED SENATE AMENDMENTS TO H.B.
data encryption;
2736 (Reference to House engrossed bill) Amendment instruction key:
pilot program State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-seventh Legislature First Regular Session HOUSE BILL 2736 AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 26, CHAPTER 1, ARTICLE 1, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 26-108;
[GREEN UNDERLINING IN BRACKETS] indicates text added to statute or previously enacted session law.
RELATING TO CYBERSECURITY.
[Green underlining in brackets] indicates text added to new session law or text restoring existing law.
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - H.B.
[GREEN STRIKEOUT IN BRACKETS] indicates new text removed from statute or previously enacted session law.
2736 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
[Green strikeout in brackets] indicates text removed from existing statute, previously enacted session law or new session law.
Section 1.
<<Green carets>> indicate a section added to the bill.
<<Green strikeout in carets>> indicates a section removed from the bill.
The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows:
<<Section 1.
THE RESULTS OF THE AUDIT SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC ON THE DEPARTMENT'S WEBSITE WITHIN FORTY-EIGHT HOURS AFTER THE AUDIT'S COMPLETION.>> Senate Amendments to H.B.
THE RESULTS OF THE AUDIT SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC ON THE DEPARTMENT'S WEBSITE WITHIN FORTY-EIGHT HOURS AFTER THE AUDIT'S COMPLETION.
2736 <<Section 1.
Sec.
Section 26-183, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
26-183.
National guard cyberattack prevention, response and support activities;
national guard cyber response revolving fund;
purpose;
exemption A.
The national guard of this state may engage in [cyber-attack] [CYBERATTACK] prevention, response and support activities for this state and political subdivisions of this state.
B.
The national guard of this state may enter into mutual aid agreements pertaining to cyber response and protection activities with state agencies and political subdivisions of this state as authorized by section 26-309.
C.
The national guard cyber response revolving fund is established consisting of monies appropriated by the legislature and monies received as reimbursement for costs incurred by this state while rendering aid pursuant to subsection A of this section.
The department of emergency and military affairs shall administer the fund.
Monies in the fund are continuously appropriated and are exempt from the provisions of section 35-190 relating to lapsing of appropriations.
D.
Monies in the fund shall be used for the costs incurred by this state while assisting agencies and political subdivisions of this state, or as directed by the governor, with cyber support activities pursuant to subsection A of this section.
[E.
SUBJECT TO AVAILABLE MONIES, CYBERATTACK PREVENTION, RESPONSE AND SUPPORT ACTIVITIES MAY INCLUDE CONDUCTING AN ASSESSMENT OF A TECHNOLOGICAL PRODUCT THAT IS OR MAY BE PURCHASED BY THIS STATE OR A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE.
THE ASSESSMENT MAY INCLUDE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
1.
PENETRATION TESTING TO IDENTIFY VULNERABILITIES AND ASSESS THE ROBUSTNESS OF CYBERSECURITY DEFENSES.
HARDWARE NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING TO EVALUATE THE INTEGRITY AND SECURITY COMPLIANCE OF PHYSICAL SECURITY COMPONENTS.
3.
VENDOR-CAPABILITY VERIFICATION TO CONFIRM THAT A VENDOR THAT CONTRACTS WITH THIS STATE OR A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE IS ABLE TO MEET A CONTRACT'S TECHNICAL OBLIGATIONS AND CYBERSECURITY STANDARDS.
F.
THE ADJUTANT GENERAL'S ANNUAL REPORT THAT IS SUBMITTED TO THE GOVERNOR, THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE AND THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES PURSUANT TO SECTION 26-102 SHALL INCLUDE A GENERALIZED REPORT ON THE CYBERATTACK PREVENTION, RESPONSE AND SUPPORT ACTIVITIES PERFORMED BY THE NATIONAL GUARD OF THIS STATE.]>> Sec.
2.
The Arizona department of homeland security shall implement a seven-year data encryption and cybersecurity study that is designed to protect information technology data against unauthorized access through the use of a software and hardware solution and to upgrade the - 2 - Senate Amendments to H.B.
The Arizona department of homeland security shall implement a seven-year data encryption and cybersecurity study that is designed to protect information technology data against unauthorized access through the use of a software and hardware solution and to upgrade the cybersecurity infrastructure of information technology systems in this state.
Show all 49 changed rows (9 more)
Previous
Latest
2736 cybersecurity infrastructure of information technology systems in this state.
In fiscal year 2026-2027, the assessing entity shall perform a study of the cybersecurity needs of the secretary of state's office and prepare a report with proposed solutions, cost estimates, and model implementing legislation, for review by the president of the senate, the speaker of the house of representatives and the house of representatives and senate committees with jurisdiction over elections.
In fiscal year 2026-2027, the assessing entity shall perform a study of the cybersecurity needs of the secretary of state's office and prepare a report with proposed solutions, cost estimates, and model implementing legislation, for review by the president of the senate, the - 1 - H.B.
2736 speaker of the house of representatives and the house of representatives and senate committees with jurisdiction over elections.
- 3 - Senate Amendments to H.B.
9.
2736 9.
For the purposes of this paragraph, "penetration testing" means a simulated [cyber attack] [cyberattack] that is authorized to evaluate the security of the system.
For the purposes of this paragraph, - 2 - H.B.
2736 "penetration testing" means a simulated cyber attack that is authorized to evaluate the security of the system.
Enroll and engross to conform Amend title to conform KEVIN PAYNE 2736PAYNE.docx 03/21/2025 12:01 PM C:
- 3 -
SP - 4 -
View plain text versions (5)

Action History

  1. DPA

  2. Senate Second Reading

  3. Senate First Reading

  4. Transmit to Senate

  5. PASSED

  6. DPA

  7. PASSED

  8. DPA

  9. House Placed on Consent Calendar

  10. W/D

  11. DP

  12. House Second Reading

  13. House First Reading.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 15 co-sponsors · 77 not signed on · 22 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (15)

Not signed on (77)

77 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 77 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed

Passed 35 Yea · 22 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 42201
Republican 31002
Total 352203
% of votes cast 58%37%0%5%
How each member voted (60)
Member Party Vote
Aaron Márquez Democrat Nay
Alma Hernandez Democrat Nay
Anna Abeytia Democrat Nay
Betty J Villegas Democrat Nay
Brian Garcia Democrat Nay
Cesar Aguilar Democrat Nay
Christopher Mathis Democrat Nay
Consuelo Hernandez Democrat Nay
Elda Luna-Nájera Democrat Nay
Janeen Connolly Democrat Nay
Junelle Cavero Democrat Nay
Kevin Volk Democrat Yea
Lorena Austin Democrat Nay
Lupe Contreras Democrat Nay
Lydia Hernandez Democrat Yea
Mae Peshlakai Democrat Nay
Mariana Sandoval Democrat Nay
Myron Tsosie Democrat Not Voting
Nancy Gutierrez Democrat Nay
Oscar De Los Santos Democrat Nay
Patty Contreras Democrat Nay
Quantá Crews Democrat Nay
Sarah Liguori Democrat Nay
Seth Blattman Democrat Yea
Stacey Travers Democrat Yea
Stephanie Simacek Democrat Nay
Stephanie Stahl Hamilton Democrat Nay
Alexander Kolodin Republican Yea
Beverly Pingerelli Republican Yea
Chris Lopez Republican Yea
David Livingston Republican Yea
David Marshall, Sr. Republican Yea
Gail Griffin Republican Yea
James Taylor Republican Yea
Jeff Weninger Republican Yea
John Gillette Republican Yea
Joseph Chaplik Republican Not Voting
Julie Willoughby Republican Yea
Justin Olson Republican Yea
Justin Wilmeth Republican Yea
Khyl Powell Republican Yea
Laurin Hendrix Republican Yea
Leo Biasiucci Republican Yea
Lisa Fink Republican Yea
Lupe Diaz Republican Yea
Matt Gress Republican Yea
Michael Carbone Republican Yea
Michael Way Republican Yea
Michele Peña Republican Yea
Neal Carter Republican Yea
Nick Kupper Republican Yea
Pamela Carter Republican Yea
Quang H Nguyen Republican Yea
Rachel Keshel Republican Yea
Ralph Heap Republican Not Voting
Selina Bliss Republican Yea
Steve Montenegro Republican Yea
Teresa Martinez Republican Yea
Tony Rivero Republican Yea
Walt Blackman Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 2736?
HB 2736 is sponsored by Kevin Payne (Republican), John Kavanagh (Republican), David Gowan (Republican), Brian Fernandez (Democrat), Hildy Angius (Republican), Justin Wilmeth (Republican), Michael Way (Republican), Kevin Volk (Democrat), Stacey Travers (Democrat), Quang H Nguyen (Republican), Teresa Martinez (Republican), Laurin Hendrix (Republican), Neal Carter (Republican), Selina Bliss (Republican), Leo Biasiucci (Republican), and John Gillette (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 2736?
This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 2736?
Track HB 2736 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 2736

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 2736

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →