Arizona 57th Legislature - First Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 1 R cosponsors

SB 1331 — income tax subtraction; capital gains

Last action — DP

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

224 added · 235 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent changes to Senate Bill 1331 include adding a reference to income tax subtraction for capital gains, while removing some introductory text and repetitive mentions of the bill. This shift clarifies the bill's focus on providing potential tax benefits related to capital gains income. The adjustment matters because it helps ensure that the intention of the bill is clearer to both lawmakers and the public, highlighting its aim to address taxation on investment income.

→
Previous
Latest
Fifty-seventh Legislature Finance First Regular Session S.B.
Senate Engrossed income tax subtraction;
1331 PROPOSED SENATE AMENDMENTS TO S.B.
capital gains State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature First Regular Session SENATE BILL 1331 AN ACT AMENDING SECTION 43-1022, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
1331 (Reference to printed bill) Amendment instruction key:
RELATING TO INCOME TAX.
[GREEN UNDERLINING IN BRACKETS] indicates text added to statute or previously enacted session law.
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - S.B.
[Green underlining in brackets] indicates text added to new session law or text restoring existing law.
1331 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
[GREEN STRIKEOUT IN BRACKETS] indicates new text removed from statute or previously enacted session law.
[Green strikeout in brackets] indicates text removed from existing statute, previously enacted session law or new session law.
<<Green carets>> indicate a section added to the bill.
<<Green strikeout in carets>> indicates a section removed from the bill.
The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows:
Senate Amendments to S.B.
5.
1331 5.
The amount of exploration expenses that is determined pursuant to section 617 of the internal revenue code, that has been deferred in a taxable year ending before January 1, 1990 and for which a subtraction has not previously been made.
The amount of exploration expenses that is determined pursuant to section 617 of the internal revenue code, that has been deferred in a taxable year ending before January 1, 1990 and for which a subtraction has - 1 - S.B.
1331 not previously been made.
Any amount of qualified educational expenses that is distributed from a qualified state tuition program determined pursuant to -2- Senate Amendments to S.B.
Any amount of qualified educational expenses that is distributed from a qualified state tuition program determined pursuant to section 529 of the internal revenue code and that is included in income in computing federal adjusted gross income.
1331 section 529 of the internal revenue code and that is included in income in computing federal adjusted gross income.
(b) In taxable years beginning from and after December 31, 2012 through December 31, 2013, an amount determined in the year the asset was placed in service based on the calculation in subdivision (a) of this paragraph.
(b) In taxable years beginning from and after December 31, 2012 through December 31, 2013, an amount determined in the year the asset was placed in service based on the calculation in subdivision (a) of this - 2 - S.B.
1331 paragraph.
-3- Senate Amendments to S.B.
19.
1331 19.
The portion of the net operating loss carryforward that would have been allowed as a deduction in the current year pursuant to section 172 of the internal revenue code if the election described in section 172(b)(1)(H) of the internal revenue code had not been made in the year of the loss that exceeds the actual net operating loss carryforward that was deducted in arriving at federal adjusted gross income.
The portion of the net operating loss carryforward that would have been allowed as a deduction in the current year pursuant to section - 3 - S.B.
1331 172 of the internal revenue code if the election described in section 172(b)(1)(H) of the internal revenue code had not been made in the year of the loss that exceeds the actual net operating loss carryforward that was deducted in arriving at federal adjusted gross income.
[THIS PARAGRAPH ONLY APPLIES TO TAXPAYERS WITH AN ARIZONA ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME OF $250,000 FOR A SINGLE INDIVIDUAL OR HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD AND $500,000 FOR A MARRIED COUPLE FILING JOINTLY.] For the purposes of this paragraph, a transferee that receives an asset by gift or at the death of a transferor is considered to have acquired the asset when the asset was acquired by the transferor.
For the purposes of this paragraph, a transferee that receives an asset by gift or at the death of a transferor is considered to have acquired the asset when the asset was acquired by the transferor.
If the date an asset -4- Senate Amendments to S.B.
If the date an asset is acquired cannot be verified, a subtraction under this paragraph is not allowed.
1331 is acquired cannot be verified, a subtraction under this paragraph is not allowed.
(a) "Legal tender" means a medium of exchange, including specie, that is authorized by the United States Constitution or Congress to pay debts, public charges, taxes and dues.
- 4 - S.B.
1331 (a) "Legal tender" means a medium of exchange, including specie, that is authorized by the United States Constitution or Congress to pay debts, public charges, taxes and dues.
To the extent not already excluded from Arizona gross income under the internal revenue code, the value of virtual currency and -5- Senate Amendments to S.B.
To the extent not already excluded from Arizona gross income under the internal revenue code, the value of virtual currency and non-fungible tokens the taxpayer received pursuant to an airdrop at the time of the airdrop.
1331 non-fungible tokens the taxpayer received pursuant to an airdrop at the time of the airdrop.
(b) "Non-fungible token" has the same meaning prescribed in section 43-1028.
- 5 - S.B.
1331 (b) "Non-fungible token" has the same meaning prescribed in section 43-1028.
Enroll and engross to conform Amend title to conform DENISE “MITZI” EPSTEIN 13310353.docx 02/07/2025 03:53 PM S:
- 6 -
MG/ci -6-
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. DP

  2. House Second Reading

  3. House First Reading.

  4. Transmit to House

  5. PASSED

  6. DP

  7. DP

  8. Senate Second Reading

  9. Senate First Reading

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 12 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (92)

92 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 92 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed

Passed 17 Yea · 12 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 01201
Republican 17000
Total 171201
% of votes cast 57%40%0%3%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Analise Ortiz Democrat Nay
Brian Fernandez Democrat Nay
Catherine Miranda Democrat Nay
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Nay
Eva Burch Democrat Nay
Eva Diaz Democrat Nay
Flavio Bravo Democrat Nay
Lauren Kuby Democrat Nay
Lela Alston Democrat Nay
Priya Sundareshan Democrat Nay
Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat Nay
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Nay
Theresa Hatathlie Democrat Not Voting
Carine Werner Republican Yea
David C. Farnsworth Republican Yea
David Gowan Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
Hildy Angius Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Yea
Jake Hoffman Republican Yea
Janae Shamp Republican Yea
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Kevin Payne Republican Yea
Mark Finchem Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican Yea
Venden "Vince" Leach Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Yea
Wendy Rogers Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 1331?
SB 1331 is sponsored by J.D. Mesnard (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 1331?
This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1331?
Track SB 1331 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1331

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1331

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →