AN ACT FOR THE SAU-TECH SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 92 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 92.
You're tracking SB 92
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 92 — AN ACT FOR THE SAU-TECH SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION.
Last action — Notification that SB92 is now Act 156
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 16, 2022. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
68 added · 69 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to Senate Bill 92 has removed a reference to Act 156 of the Fiscal Session, which was unrelated to the primary focus of the bill. This change helps clarify the bill's intent, ensuring that the supplemental funds for SAU-Tech remain directly related to the prior appropriation established by Act 166 of 2021. By streamlining the language, it makes the bill easier to understand and implement—this matters for ensuring that SAU-Tech receives its necessary funding without confusion over previous acts.
Act 156 of the Fiscal Session 2 State of Arkansas 93rd General Assembly A Bill Fiscal Session, 2022 SENATE BILL 92 65 By:
Joint Budget Committee 87 For An Act To Be Entitled AN ACT TO MAKE AN APPROPRIATION FOR OPERATING EXPENSES FOR THE SAU-TECH WHICH SHALL BE SUPPLEMENTAL AND IN ADDITION TO THOSE FUNDS APPROPRIATED BY ACT 166 OF 2021;
0 TOTAL AMOUNT APPROPRIATED $190,420 *HAR122* 2/16/2022 11:11:32 AM HAR122 SB92 2 SECTION 2.
APPROVED:2 2/16/2022 11:11:32 AM HAR122
3/7/22 2/16/2022 11:11:32 AM HAR122
Action History
-
Notification that SB92 is now Act 156
-
DELIVERED TO GOVERNOR.
-
Reported correctly enrolled and ordered delivered to the Governor.
-
ORDERED ENROLLED
-
Returned from the House as passed.
-
Returned To Senate as Passed.
-
EMERGENCY CLAUSE ADOPTED
-
Read the third time and passed and ordered transmitted to the Senate.
-
Considered in the Committee of the Whole, and recommended do pass.
-
RULES SUSPENDED
-
Returned from the Senate
-
Ordered Immediately transmitted to the House.
-
EMERGENCY CLAUSE ADOPTED
-
Rules suspended.
-
Returned From the House as requested.
-
Returned To the Senate as requested.
-
The Senate requests the return of SB92 from the House.
-
Read the first time, rules suspended, read the second time and placed on the CALENDAR.
-
RECEIVED FROM THE SENATE
-
Ordered Immediately transmitted to the House.
-
Read the third time and passed.
-
Returned by the Committee, with the recommendation that it Do Pass
-
Read first time, rules suspended, read second time, referred to JOINT BUDGET COMMITTEE
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Joint Budget Committee · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 137 not signed on · 3 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Joint Budget Committee
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (137)
137 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 137 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 98 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 98 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 2% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (100)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 33 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 3% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beckham | — | Yea |
| Bledsoe | — | Yea |
| Elliott | — | Yea |
| Rapert | — | Yea |
| Teague | — | Yea |
| Alan Clark | — | Nay |
| B. Ballinger | — | Yea |
| B. Sample | — | Yea |
| Bart Hester | — | Yea |
| Ben Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Blake Johnson | — | Yea |
| Breanne Davis | — | Yea |
| C. Tucker | — | Yea |
| Dan Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Dave Wallace | — | Yea |
| G. Stubblefield | — | Yea |
| Greg Leding | — | Yea |
| J. Hendren | — | Yea |
| J. Sturch | — | Yea |
| Jane English | — | Yea |
| Jimmy Hickey, Jr | — | Yea |
| Jonathan Dismang | — | Yea |
| K. Ingram | — | Yea |
| Kim Hammer | — | Yea |
| L. Chesterfield | — | Yea |
| M. Pitsch | — | Yea |
| Mark Johnson | — | Yea |
| Missy Irvin | — | Yea |
| Ricky Hill | — | Yea |
| Ronald Caldwell | — | Yea |
| S. Flowers | — | Yea |
| Scott Flippo | — | Yea |
| T. Garner | — | Yea |
| Terry Rice | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 31 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 31 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 9% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beckham | — | Yea |
| Elliott | — | Yea |
| Teague | — | Yea |
| Bledsoe | — | Nay |
| Rapert | — | Nay |
| Alan Clark | — | Yea |
| B. Ballinger | — | Yea |
| B. Sample | — | Yea |
| Bart Hester | — | Yea |
| Ben Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Blake Johnson | — | Yea |
| Breanne Davis | — | Yea |
| C. Tucker | — | Yea |
| Dan Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Dave Wallace | — | Yea |
| G. Stubblefield | — | Nay |
| Greg Leding | — | Yea |
| J. Hendren | — | Yea |
| J. Sturch | — | Yea |
| Jane English | — | Yea |
| Jimmy Hickey, Jr | — | Yea |
| Jonathan Dismang | — | Yea |
| K. Ingram | — | Yea |
| Kim Hammer | — | Yea |
| L. Chesterfield | — | Yea |
| M. Pitsch | — | Yea |
| Mark Johnson | — | Yea |
| Missy Irvin | — | Yea |
| Ricky Hill | — | Yea |
| Ronald Caldwell | — | Yea |
| S. Flowers | — | Yea |
| Scott Flippo | — | Yea |
| T. Garner | — | Yea |
| Terry Rice | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 92?
- SB 92 is sponsored by Joint Budget Committee.
- What is the current status of SB 92?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 16, 2022. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 92?
- Track SB 92 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 92
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 92
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →