TO MODIFY THE STATUTES CONCERNING COVENANT NOT TO COMPETE AGREEMENTS.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 665 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 665.
You're tracking SB 665
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 665 — TO MODIFY THE STATUTES CONCERNING COVENANT NOT TO COMPETE AGREEMENTS.
Last action — Died in Senate Committee at Sine Die adjournment.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
- SB 665 Current pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
This bill modifies the statute concerning covenants not to compete in Arkansas, primarily by imposing stricter limitations on their enforceability and defining terms related to protectable business interests.
-
4-75-101(d)
two (2) years→ one (1) yearReduces the presumptively reasonable duration of post-termination restrictions from two years to one year.
-
4-75-101(b)(1)(E)
his or her→ the employer'sClarifies the language regarding the knowledge of the employer's business practices.
-
4-75-101(c)(1)
covenant not to compete agreement satisfies the requirements of subsection (a) of this section.→ whether or not aAdds clarity to the consideration of geographic descriptive restrictions in covenants not to compete.
-
4-75-101(f)(1)
covenant not to compete agreement is unenforceable.→ the court shall reform the covenant not to compete agreement to the extent necessary to:Changes language to mandate that courts reform unreasonable covenants instead of making them unenforceable.
-
4-75-101(j)(1)
This section shall does not apply→ This section shall does not apply to other types of agreementsClarifies that the provisions do not apply to agreements unrelated to competition.
-
4-75-101(k)(2)
the employer is responsible for the attorney's fees incurred by the employee.→ the employer that does not prevail in the employer's attempt to enforce a covenant not to compete agreement against an employee is responsible for the attorney's fees incurred by the employee.Specifies that employers failing to enforce covenants are liable for employee attorney fees.
-
4-75-101(h)(1)
the covenant not to compete agreement that is ancillary to other contractual relationships, including any type of agreement for the sale and purchase of a business, franchise agreement, and any other agreement not ancillary to an employment relationship or employment contract.→ a covenant not to compete agreement that is ancillary to other contractual relationships, including any type of agreement for the sale and purchase of a business, franchise agreement, and any other agreement not ancillary to an employment relationship or employment contract.Clarifies what types of covenants not to compete are excluded from the statute.
Action History
-
Died in Senate Committee at Sine Die adjournment.
-
Read first time, rules suspended, read second time, referred to INSURANCE & COMMERCE - SENATE
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Ricky Hill · Cosponsor
- Gonzales · Primary
- B. Ballinger · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 135 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Gonzales
- B. Ballinger
Co-sponsors (1)
Not signed on (135)
135 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 135 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 665?
- SB 665 is sponsored by Ricky Hill, Gonzales, and B. Ballinger.
- What is the current status of SB 665?
- This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 665?
- Track SB 665 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 665
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 665
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →