TO AMEND THE LAW CONCERNING THE SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF A PERSON'S DRIVER'S LICENSE FOR FAILURE TO PAY ...
The changes can help families maintain access to transportation by allowing for restricted permits instead of full license suspensions.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 513 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 513.
You're tracking SB 513
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 513 — TO AMEND THE LAW CONCERNING THE SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF A PERSON'S DRIVER'S LICENSE FOR FAILURE TO PAY OR FAILURE TO APPEAR; AND TO AMEND THE LAW CONCERNING A RESTRICTED DRIVER'S PERMIT ISSUED UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES.
Last action — Notification that SB513 is now Act 1049
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 09, 2021. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
6 sponsors
2 primary, 4 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
The bill changes rules about license suspension for unpaid fines or missed court dates.
This bill amends regulations on suspending or revoking driver's licenses due to unpaid fines or failure to appear in court. It allows for the issuance of restricted driving permits and ensures that licenses can be reinstated without fees if charges are dismissed or acquitted.
What this means for you
- Workers: This bill may ease the burden on workers by preventing license suspensions solely due to unpaid court fines.
- Families: The changes can help families maintain access to transportation by allowing for restricted permits instead of full license suspensions.
Bill Text
- SB 513 Current pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill modifies the procedures related to the suspension or revocation of driver's licenses for failure to pay fines or failure to appear in court, including the establishment of restricted driving permits under certain circumstances.
-
16-13-708
The→ AChanges the article from 'The' to 'A' at the beginning of the sentence for grammatical consistency.
-
16-13-708
Department of Finance and Administration revoke, suspend, or refuse to renew the debtor's motor vehicle registration or driver's license of a person who has failed to make satisfactory arrangements for the payment of a court-ordered fine.→ department to Department of Finance and Administration revoke, suspend, or refuse to renew the debtor's motor vehicle registration or driver's license.Clarifies the authority of the department by removing redundant language.
-
16-13-708
However, the court shall not make a request to the department as described under subdivision (a)(1) of this section before the court has scheduled a hearing to address the person’s nonpayment of the court-ordered fine and the person has failed to appear at the hearing.Establishes a requirement that a court must schedule a hearing before requesting to suspend a driver's license.
-
16-17-131
Suspension of license for failure Failure to appear — Required appearance — Suspension of driver's license.→ Suspension of license for failure to appear — Required appearance — Suspension of driver's license.Corrects a typographical error in the title of the section.
-
16-17-131
If a person fails to appear as required in subsection (a) of this section, the presiding judge may suspend the person's driver's license.→ If a person has failed to appear in district court, the district court may suspend the person's driver's license if the district court:Changes the authority from a presiding judge to the district court, providing a more specific context.
-
16-17-131
The license shall be suspended until the person appears and completes the sentence ordered by the court.Clarifies the conditions under which a person's driver's license will be suspended.
-
16-17-131
To suspend a driver's license, the district court must provide the department with the reason for the suspension and the person's full name, date of birth, and last known address.Outlines specific requirements for the district court to provide when suspending a driver’s license.
-
16-17-131
the Department of Finance and Administration department shall assess the current fees for reinstatement of a driver's license.→ the department shall assess the current fees for reinstatement of a driver's license.Removes redundant language for clarity.
-
27-16-916
Other driver's license suspensions — Restricted driving permits.
Adds a new section outlining the provision for restricted driving permits under certain circumstances.
-
27-16-916
Unless the person is eligible for a restricted driver's license as provided under this title, a district court may authorize a restricted driving permit upon the suspension of a person’s driver’s license under § 16-13-708 or § 16-17-131 and may permit a person whose driving privileges are suspended to drive to and from the following: ...
Establishes conditions for issuing restricted driving permits and specifies locations that a permit would allow a person to drive to.
Amendments
2 amendments- Amendment H1 April 20, 2021 Show changes
- Amendment S1 March 11, 2021 Show changes
Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Notification that SB513 is now Act 1049
-
DELIVERED TO GOVERNOR.
-
Reported correctly enrolled and ordered delivered to the Governor.
-
ORDERED ENROLLED
-
Read the third time and passed.
-
Rules suspended.
-
House Amendment No. 1 read first time, rule suspended, read second time and concurred in.
-
Placed on second reading for purpose of amendment.
-
Returned by the Committee with the recommendation that it Do Pass concur in House Amendment No. 1
-
Re-referred to JUDICIARY COMMITTEE - SENATE
-
Returned from the House as passed as amended, Amendment #1.
-
Returned To Senate as passed, as amended # 1
-
Read the third time and passed and ordered transmitted to the Senate.
-
REPORTED CORRECTLY ENGROSSED
-
Amendment No. 1 read and adopted and the bill ordered engrossed.
-
Placed on second reading for the purpose of amendment.
-
Returned by the Committee with the recommendation that it do pass as amended 1
-
Read the first time, rules suspended, read the second time and referred to the Committee on JUDICIARY COMMITTEE- HOUSE
-
RECEIVED FROM THE SENATE
-
Ordered immediately transmitted to the House.
-
Read the third time and passed.
-
Returned by the Committee, with the recommendation that it Do Pass
-
Re-referred to JUDICIARY COMMITTEE - SENATE
-
REPORTED CORRECTLY ENGROSSED
-
Amendment # 1 read the first time, rules suspended, read the second time and adopted, ordered engrossed.
-
Withdrawn from Committee for purpose of amendment # 1
-
Read first time, rules suspended, read second time, referred to JUDICIARY COMMITTEE - SENATE
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Alan Clark · Primary
- Austin McCollum · Primary
- Andrew Collins · Cosponsor
- Ben Gilmore · Cosponsor
- Clarke Tucker · Cosponsor
- T. Garner · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 132 not signed on · 7 voted No
Sponsors (2)
Co-sponsors (4)
Not signed on (132)
132 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 132 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (35)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beckham | — | Yea |
| Bledsoe | — | Yea |
| Elliott | — | Yea |
| Rapert | — | Yea |
| Teague | — | Yea |
| Alan Clark | — | Yea |
| B. Ballinger | — | Yea |
| B. Sample | — | Yea |
| Bart Hester | — | Yea |
| Ben Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Blake Johnson | — | Yea |
| Breanne Davis | — | Yea |
| C. Tucker | — | Yea |
| Dan Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Dave Wallace | — | Yea |
| G. Stubblefield | — | Yea |
| Greg Leding | — | Yea |
| J. Hendren | — | Yea |
| J. Sturch | — | Yea |
| Jane English | — | Yea |
| Jimmy Hickey, Jr | — | Yea |
| Jonathan Dismang | — | Yea |
| K. Ingram | — | Yea |
| Kim Hammer | — | Yea |
| L. Chesterfield | — | Yea |
| L. Eads | — | Yea |
| M. Pitsch | — | Yea |
| Mark Johnson | — | Yea |
| Missy Irvin | — | Yea |
| Ricky Hill | — | Yea |
| Ronald Caldwell | — | Yea |
| S. Flowers | — | Yea |
| Scott Flippo | — | Yea |
| T. Garner | — | Yea |
| Terry Rice | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 89 | 10 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 89 | 10 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 10% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (100)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (35)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beckham | — | Yea |
| Bledsoe | — | Yea |
| Elliott | — | Yea |
| Rapert | — | Yea |
| Teague | — | Yea |
| Alan Clark | — | Yea |
| B. Ballinger | — | Yea |
| B. Sample | — | Yea |
| Bart Hester | — | Yea |
| Ben Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Blake Johnson | — | Yea |
| Breanne Davis | — | Yea |
| C. Tucker | — | Yea |
| Dan Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Dave Wallace | — | Yea |
| G. Stubblefield | — | Yea |
| Greg Leding | — | Yea |
| J. Hendren | — | Yea |
| J. Sturch | — | Yea |
| Jane English | — | Yea |
| Jimmy Hickey, Jr | — | Yea |
| Jonathan Dismang | — | Yea |
| K. Ingram | — | Yea |
| Kim Hammer | — | Yea |
| L. Chesterfield | — | Yea |
| L. Eads | — | Yea |
| M. Pitsch | — | Yea |
| Mark Johnson | — | Yea |
| Missy Irvin | — | Yea |
| Ricky Hill | — | Yea |
| Ronald Caldwell | — | Yea |
| S. Flowers | — | Yea |
| Scott Flippo | — | Yea |
| T. Garner | — | Yea |
| Terry Rice | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 513?
- SB 513 is sponsored by Alan Clark, Austin McCollum, Andrew Collins, Ben Gilmore, Clarke Tucker, and T. Garner.
- What is the current status of SB 513?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 09, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 513?
- Track SB 513 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 513
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 513
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →