CONCERNING THE REIMBURSEMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING COSTS OR EXPENSES.
For law enforcement officers, this ensures training costs are shared between agencies when they change jobs.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 302 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 302.
You're tracking SB 302
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 302 — CONCERNING THE REIMBURSEMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING COSTS OR EXPENSES.
Last action — Notification that SB302 is now Act 325
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 08, 2021. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
The bill mandates reimbursement for law enforcement training costs when officers move between agencies.
This legislation requires a county, city, town, or state agency to reimburse training costs for law enforcement officers if they are employed by another agency within eighteen months of completing training. The reimbursement amount varies based on how soon after training the officer is hired.
What this means for you
- Workers: For law enforcement officers, this ensures training costs are shared between agencies when they change jobs.
Bill Text
- SB 302 Current pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill updates terminology and clarifies reimbursement provisions for law enforcement training costs.
-
12-9-209
cost costs or→ costs orThe change corrects a grammatical error.
-
12-9-209
the a state-funded or municipally operated law enforcement training academy→ a state-funded or municipally operated law enforcement training academyThis change simplifies the reference to the training academy.
-
12-9-209(a)(1)
the law enforcement officer→ law enforcement officerThis change removes unnecessary articles for clarity.
-
12-9-209(a)(1)
that employs the law enforcement officer→ employing the law enforcement officerThis change enhances the flow of the text.
-
12-9-209(a)(3)(A)
the costs or expenses of training→ the total cost of the trainingThis change specifies the reimbursement amount for immediate employment post-training.
-
12-9-209(a)(3)(B)
the costs or expenses of training→ cost of the costs or expenses of trainingThis change maintains consistency in phrasing across conditions.
-
12-9-209(b)(1)
which that employs an a law enforcement officer→ that employs a law enforcement officerThis change simplifies the language by removing redundant words.
-
12-9-209(b)(1)
whose training expense was costs or expenses of training→ whose training expenses were paid by another county, city, town, or state agencyThis change clarifies the source of training expenses.
-
12-9-209(b)(2)
which that is entitled to the reimbursement under the provisions of this section→ entitled to reimbursement under the provisions of this sectionThis change streamlines the sentence structure.
Action History
-
Notification that SB302 is now Act 325
-
DELIVERED TO GOVERNOR.
-
Reported correctly enrolled and ordered delivered to the Governor.
-
ORDERED ENROLLED
-
Returned from the House as passed.
-
Returned To the Senate as passed.
-
Read the third time and passed and ordered transmitted to the Senate.
-
Returned by the Committee Do Pass
-
Read the first time, rules suspended, read the second time and referred to the Committee on CITY, COUNTY & LOCAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE- HOUSE
-
RECEIVED FROM THE SENATE
-
Ordered immediately transmitted to the House.
-
Read the third time and passed.
-
Returned by the Committee, with the recommendation that it Do Pass
-
Read first time, rules suspended, read second time, referred to CITY, COUNTY & LOCAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE - SENATE
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Mark Perry · Primary
- K. Ingram · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 136 not signed on · 5 voted No
Sponsors (2)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (136)
136 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 136 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 94 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 94 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 6% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (100)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (35)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beckham | — | Yea |
| Bledsoe | — | Yea |
| Elliott | — | Yea |
| Rapert | — | Yea |
| Teague | — | Yea |
| Alan Clark | — | Yea |
| B. Ballinger | — | Yea |
| B. Sample | — | Yea |
| Bart Hester | — | Yea |
| Ben Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Blake Johnson | — | Yea |
| Breanne Davis | — | Yea |
| C. Tucker | — | Yea |
| Dan Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Dave Wallace | — | Yea |
| G. Stubblefield | — | Yea |
| Greg Leding | — | Yea |
| J. Hendren | — | Yea |
| J. Sturch | — | Yea |
| Jane English | — | Yea |
| Jimmy Hickey, Jr | — | Yea |
| Jonathan Dismang | — | Yea |
| K. Ingram | — | Yea |
| Kim Hammer | — | Yea |
| L. Chesterfield | — | Yea |
| L. Eads | — | Yea |
| M. Pitsch | — | Yea |
| Mark Johnson | — | Yea |
| Missy Irvin | — | Yea |
| Ricky Hill | — | Yea |
| Ronald Caldwell | — | Yea |
| S. Flowers | — | Yea |
| Scott Flippo | — | Yea |
| T. Garner | — | Yea |
| Terry Rice | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 302?
- SB 302 is sponsored by Mark Perry and K. Ingram.
- What is the current status of SB 302?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 08, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 302?
- Track SB 302 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 302
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 302
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →