SB 1234 — juvenile court proceedings; appointment; attorney
Last action — House Second Reading
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
87 added · 68 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to Senate Bill 1234 emphasizes the importance of appointing an attorney for children involved in dependency or parental rights termination cases before the first court hearing. It requires that these attorneys assess whether the child can understand and express their own wishes, and meet with children aged five and older at least once a month. If a normal attorney-client relationship cannot be maintained due to the child's capacity, the attorney must act based on what would be in the child's best interest. This change is significant because it ensures children have a dedicated legal advocate who is attuned to their needs throughout the legal process.
Fifty-seventhSenate LegislatureEngrossed Judiciaryjuvenile andcourt Electionsproceedings; Second Regular Session S.B.
1234appointment; PROPOSED SENATE AMENDMENTS TO S.B.
attorney State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session SENATE BILL 1234 (ReferenceAN toACT printedAMENDING bill)SECTION Amendment8-221, instructionARIZONA key:REVISED STATUTES;
[GREENRELATING UNDERLININGTO INJUVENILE BRACKETS]COURT. indicates text added to statute or previously enacted session law.
[Green(TEXT underliningOF inBILL brackets]BEGINS indicatesON textNEXT addedPAGE) to- newi session- lawS.B. or text restoring existing law.
[GREEN1234 STRIKEOUTBe INit BRACKETS]enacted indicatesby newthe textLegislature removedof fromthe statuteState orof previouslyArizona: enacted session law.
[Green strikeout in brackets] indicates text removed from existing statute, previously enacted session law or new session law.
<<Green carets>> indicate a section added to the bill.
<<Green strikeout in carets>> indicates a section removed from the bill.
The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows:
Juveniles;Counsel right of juvenile, parent or guardian;
parents and guardians;
right to counsel;
INThe A DELINQUENCY PROCEEDING, the court shall appoint the CHILD'S attorney before the first hearing.
THE COURT SHALL APPOINT AN ATTORNEY FOR A CHILD IN ALL PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING DEPENDENCY OR TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING.
THE APPOINTED ATTORNEY SHALL DETERMINE WHETHER THE CHILD HAS DIMINISHED CAPACITY THAT WOULD IMPACT THE CHILD'S ABILITY TO EXPRESS THE CHILD'S OWN OPINION OR TO MAKE DECISIONS FOR THE CHILD.
IN MAKING THIS DETERMINATION, THE APPOINTED ATTORNEY SHALL CONSULT WITH THE CHILD, THE CHILD'S FAMILY AND ANY OTHER INDIVIDUALS WHO KNOW THE CHILD.
IF THE CHILD IS AT LEAST FIVE YEARS OF AGE, THE APPOINTED ATTORNEY SHALL MEET WITH THE CHILD NOT LESS THAN ONCE A MONTH.
C.
IF AN ATTORNEY WHO IS APPOINTED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION B OF THIS SECTION DETERMINES THAT A NORMAL ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP IS NOT REASONABLY POSSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND THAT THE CHILD IS NOT ABLE TO DIRECT THE LEGAL REPRESENTATION DUE TO DIMINISHED CAPACITY OR THE CHILD'S INABILITY TO EXPRESS THE CHILD'S OWN OPINION, THE APPOINTED ATTORNEY SHALL USE SUBSTITUTED JUDGMENT TO DETERMINE WHAT THE CHILD WOULD DECIDE IF THE CHILD WAS CAPABLE OF MAKING AN ADEQUATELY CONSIDERED DECISION WHEN CONSIDERING WHAT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD.
THE APPOINTED ATTORNEY SHALL DO ALL OF THE FOLLOWING:
1.
MAKE A GOOD FAITH EFFORT TO DETERMINE THE CHILD'S NEEDS AND WISHES.
2.
CONSULT WITH THE CHILD, THE CHILD'S FAMILY AND ANY OTHER INDIVIDUALS WHO KNOW THE CHILD.
3.
REPRESENT THE CHILD IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETERMINATION OF THE CHILD'S NEEDS AND WISHES.
D.
IF IN THE COURSE OF REPRESENTING THE CHILD AN ATTORNEY WHO IS APPOINTED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION B OF THIS SECTION REASONABLY BELIEVES THAT A CHILD IS AT RISK OF SUBSTANTIAL PHYSICAL, FINANCIAL OR OTHER HARM AND THAT THE CHILD DOES NOT HAVE THE CAPACITY TO ADEQUATELY ACT IN THE CHILD'S OWN INTEREST, THE APPOINTED ATTORNEY SHALL DO EITHER OF THE FOLLOWING:
1.
INFORM THE COURT OF THE SUBSTANTIAL RISK OF HARM, TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE WISHES AND VALUES OF THE CHILD AND THE CHILD'S BEST INTERESTS AND RESPECTING THE CHILD'S FAMILY AND SOCIAL CONNECTIONS.
- 1 - S.B.
1234 2.
REQUEST THAT THE COURT APPOINT A GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR THE CHILD.
B.
E.
F.
G.
H.
Senate2. Amendments to S.B.
Show all 49 changed lines (9 more)
1234 2.
InI. all juvenile court proceedings in which the dependency petition includes an allegation that the juvenile is abused or neglected DEPENDENCY PROCEEDINGS OR TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS PROCEEDINGS THAT ARE CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO THIS TITLE, the court may SHALL appoint a guardian ad litem to protect the juvenile's best interests.
ThisIn THEall juvenile court proceedings in which the dependency petition includes an allegation that the juvenile is abused or neglected, the court may appoint a guardian ad litem shallto beprotect anthe attorney.juvenile's best interests.
TheThis guardian ad litem isshall notbe thean child'sattorney. DEPENDING ON THE CHILD'S AGE AND ABILITY TO EXPRESS AN OPINION, THE COURT MAY ALSO APPOINT AN attorney FOR THE CHILD.
[AThe GUARDIANguardian ADad LITEMlitem WHOis ISnot APPOINTEDthe PURSUANTchild's TOattorney. THIS SUBSECTION SHALL HAVE THE SAME AUTHORITY TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY DEPENDENCY PROCEEDING OR TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS PROCEEDING AS ANOTHER ATTORNEY WHO IS PARTICIPATING IN THE SAME PROCEEDING.] G.
G.
J.
Enroll- and2 engross- to conform Amend title to conform WENDY ROGERS 1234ROGERS.docx 02/19/2026 03:35 PM C:
LAT 130OJQWSM -2-
Show all 49 changed rows (9 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version (03/17/2026) Current pdf
- SENATE - Judiciary and Elections View text pdf
- Amended SENATE - Werner flr amend (ref Bill) (sub JUDE) adopted pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DPA
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
Sponsors
- Hildy Angius · Cosponsor
- Carine Werner · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 91 not signed on · 10 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Carine Werner Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- Hildy Angius Republican
Not signed on (91)
91 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 91 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 9 | 0 | 4 |
| Republican | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 10 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 33% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Analise Ortiz | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Nay |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Nay |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Nay |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Kiana Sears | Democrat | Nay |
| Lauren Kuby | Democrat | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Nay |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Carine Werner | Republican | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| Hildy Angius | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Nay |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Payne | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Finchem | Republican | Yea |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy "Tim" Dunn | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1234?
- SB 1234 is sponsored by Hildy Angius (Republican) and Carine Werner (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1234?
- This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1234?
- Track SB 1234 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1234
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1234
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →