Arizona 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 2 R cosponsors

SB 1234 — juvenile court proceedings; appointment; attorney

Last action — House Second Reading

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

87 added · 68 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendment to Senate Bill 1234 emphasizes the importance of appointing an attorney for children involved in dependency or parental rights termination cases before the first court hearing. It requires that these attorneys assess whether the child can understand and express their own wishes, and meet with children aged five and older at least once a month. If a normal attorney-client relationship cannot be maintained due to the child's capacity, the attorney must act based on what would be in the child's best interest. This change is significant because it ensures children have a dedicated legal advocate who is attuned to their needs throughout the legal process.

→
Previous
Latest
Fifty-seventh Legislature Judiciary and Elections Second Regular Session S.B.
Senate Engrossed juvenile court proceedings;
1234 PROPOSED SENATE AMENDMENTS TO S.B.
appointment;
1234 (Reference to printed bill) Amendment instruction key:
attorney State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session SENATE BILL 1234 AN ACT AMENDING SECTION 8-221, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
[GREEN UNDERLINING IN BRACKETS] indicates text added to statute or previously enacted session law.
RELATING TO JUVENILE COURT.
[Green underlining in brackets] indicates text added to new session law or text restoring existing law.
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - S.B.
[GREEN STRIKEOUT IN BRACKETS] indicates new text removed from statute or previously enacted session law.
1234 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
[Green strikeout in brackets] indicates text removed from existing statute, previously enacted session law or new session law.
<<Green carets>> indicate a section added to the bill.
<<Green strikeout in carets>> indicates a section removed from the bill.
The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows:
Juveniles;
Counsel right of juvenile, parent or guardian;
parents and guardians;
right to counsel;
IN A DELINQUENCY PROCEEDING, the court shall appoint the CHILD'S attorney before the first hearing.
The court shall appoint the CHILD'S attorney before the first hearing.
THE COURT SHALL APPOINT AN ATTORNEY FOR A CHILD IN ALL PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING DEPENDENCY OR TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING.
THE APPOINTED ATTORNEY SHALL DETERMINE WHETHER THE CHILD HAS DIMINISHED CAPACITY THAT WOULD IMPACT THE CHILD'S ABILITY TO EXPRESS THE CHILD'S OWN OPINION OR TO MAKE DECISIONS FOR THE CHILD.
IN MAKING THIS DETERMINATION, THE APPOINTED ATTORNEY SHALL CONSULT WITH THE CHILD, THE CHILD'S FAMILY AND ANY OTHER INDIVIDUALS WHO KNOW THE CHILD.
IF THE CHILD IS AT LEAST FIVE YEARS OF AGE, THE APPOINTED ATTORNEY SHALL MEET WITH THE CHILD NOT LESS THAN ONCE A MONTH.
C.
IF AN ATTORNEY WHO IS APPOINTED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION B OF THIS SECTION DETERMINES THAT A NORMAL ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP IS NOT REASONABLY POSSIBLE TO MAINTAIN AND THAT THE CHILD IS NOT ABLE TO DIRECT THE LEGAL REPRESENTATION DUE TO DIMINISHED CAPACITY OR THE CHILD'S INABILITY TO EXPRESS THE CHILD'S OWN OPINION, THE APPOINTED ATTORNEY SHALL USE SUBSTITUTED JUDGMENT TO DETERMINE WHAT THE CHILD WOULD DECIDE IF THE CHILD WAS CAPABLE OF MAKING AN ADEQUATELY CONSIDERED DECISION WHEN CONSIDERING WHAT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD.
THE APPOINTED ATTORNEY SHALL DO ALL OF THE FOLLOWING:
1.
MAKE A GOOD FAITH EFFORT TO DETERMINE THE CHILD'S NEEDS AND WISHES.
2.
CONSULT WITH THE CHILD, THE CHILD'S FAMILY AND ANY OTHER INDIVIDUALS WHO KNOW THE CHILD.
3.
REPRESENT THE CHILD IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETERMINATION OF THE CHILD'S NEEDS AND WISHES.
D.
IF IN THE COURSE OF REPRESENTING THE CHILD AN ATTORNEY WHO IS APPOINTED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION B OF THIS SECTION REASONABLY BELIEVES THAT A CHILD IS AT RISK OF SUBSTANTIAL PHYSICAL, FINANCIAL OR OTHER HARM AND THAT THE CHILD DOES NOT HAVE THE CAPACITY TO ADEQUATELY ACT IN THE CHILD'S OWN INTEREST, THE APPOINTED ATTORNEY SHALL DO EITHER OF THE FOLLOWING:
1.
INFORM THE COURT OF THE SUBSTANTIAL RISK OF HARM, TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE WISHES AND VALUES OF THE CHILD AND THE CHILD'S BEST INTERESTS AND RESPECTING THE CHILD'S FAMILY AND SOCIAL CONNECTIONS.
- 1 - S.B.
1234 2.
REQUEST THAT THE COURT APPOINT A GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR THE CHILD.
B.
E.
F.
G.
H.
Senate Amendments to S.B.
2.
Show all 49 changed rows (9 more)
Previous
Latest
1234 2.
In all juvenile court proceedings in which the dependency petition includes an allegation that the juvenile is abused or neglected DEPENDENCY PROCEEDINGS OR TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS PROCEEDINGS THAT ARE CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO THIS TITLE, the court may SHALL appoint a guardian ad litem to protect the juvenile's best interests.
I.
This THE guardian ad litem shall be an attorney.
In all juvenile court proceedings in which the dependency petition includes an allegation that the juvenile is abused or neglected, the court may appoint a guardian ad litem to protect the juvenile's best interests.
The guardian ad litem is not the child's DEPENDING ON THE CHILD'S AGE AND ABILITY TO EXPRESS AN OPINION, THE COURT MAY ALSO APPOINT AN attorney FOR THE CHILD.
This guardian ad litem shall be an attorney.
[A GUARDIAN AD LITEM WHO IS APPOINTED PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION SHALL HAVE THE SAME AUTHORITY TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY DEPENDENCY PROCEEDING OR TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS PROCEEDING AS ANOTHER ATTORNEY WHO IS PARTICIPATING IN THE SAME PROCEEDING.] G.
The guardian ad litem is not the child's attorney.
G.
J.
Enroll and engross to conform Amend title to conform WENDY ROGERS 1234ROGERS.docx 02/19/2026 03:35 PM C:
- 2 -
LAT 130OJQWSM -2-
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. House Second Reading

  2. House First Reading.

  3. Transmit to House

  4. PASSED

  5. DPA

  6. DPA

  7. Senate Second Reading

  8. Senate First Reading

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 91 not signed on · 10 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (1)

Not signed on (91)

91 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 91 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed

Passed 16 Yea · 10 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 0904
Republican 16100
Total 161004
% of votes cast 53%33%0%13%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Analise Ortiz Democrat Nay
Brian Fernandez Democrat Not Voting
Catherine Miranda Democrat Nay
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Nay
Eva Diaz Democrat Nay
Flavio Bravo Democrat Not Voting
Kiana Sears Democrat Nay
Lauren Kuby Democrat Nay
Lela Alston Democrat Nay
Priya Sundareshan Democrat Nay
Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat Not Voting
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Nay
Theresa Hatathlie Democrat Not Voting
Carine Werner Republican Yea
David C. Farnsworth Republican Yea
David Gowan Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
Hildy Angius Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Yea
Jake Hoffman Republican Nay
Janae Shamp Republican Yea
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Kevin Payne Republican Yea
Mark Finchem Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican Yea
Venden "Vince" Leach Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Yea
Wendy Rogers Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 1234?
SB 1234 is sponsored by Hildy Angius (Republican) and Carine Werner (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 1234?
This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1234?
Track SB 1234 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1234

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1234

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →