HB 2939 — qualified facilities; tax credit; amount
Last action — DP
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
498 added · 522 removedPlain-language change summary
The changes to House Bill 2939 clarify the tax credit amounts for companies based on their total qualifying investment. If a company invests less than $2 billion, it can receive $200,000 for each new job created. However, for investments of $2 billion or more, the credit increases to $300,000 per job, establishing a clear incentive for larger investments. This matters because it aims to encourage companies to invest more in the local economy and create more jobs.
ARIZONAHouse HOUSEEngrossed OFqualified REPRESENTATIVESfacilities; FLOOR AMENDMENT EXPLANATION 57th Legislature, 2nd Regular Session Majority Research Staff HB 2939:
qualified facilities;
amount MARTINEZState FLOORof AMENDMENTArizona 1.House of Representatives Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session HOUSE BILL 2939 AN ACT AMENDING SECTIONS 41-1512, 43-1083.03 AND 43-1164.04, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
AltersRELATING theTO additionalINCOME taxTAX creditCREDITS. amount of $250,000 as applicable to total qualifying investments of less than $2,000,000,000 rather than $2,000,000,000 or more.
PAUL(TEXT BENNYOF 2/17/2026BILL (602)BEGINS 926-3848ON Fifty-seventhNEXT LegislaturePAGE) Martinez- Secondi Regular- Session H.B.
2939 ADDITIONALBe COWit MARTINEZenacted FLOORby AMENDMENTthe HOUSELegislature OFof REPRESENTATIVESthe AMENDMENTSState TOof H.B.Arizona:
2939 (Reference to House engrossed bill) Amendment instruction key:
[GREEN UNDERLINING IN BRACKETS] indicates text added to statute or previously enacted session law.
[Green underlining in brackets] indicates text added to new session law or text restoring existing law.
[GREEN STRIKEOUT IN BRACKETS] indicates new text removed from statute or previously enacted session law.
[Green strikeout in brackets] indicates text removed from existing statute, previously enacted session law or new session law.
<<Green carets>> indicate a section added to the bill.
<<Green strikeout in carets>> indicates a section removed from the bill.
The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows:
House(b) AmendmentsA list of full-time employment positions, the estimated number of employees to H.B.be hired for the positions each year during the first five years of operation and the annual wages for each position, calculated without employee-related benefits.
2939 (b) A list of full-time employment positions, the estimated number of employees to be hired for the positions each year during the first five years of operation and the annual wages for each position, calculated without employee-related benefits.
(d)- Authorizes1 the- departmentH.B. of revenue to provide tax information to the authority pursuant to section 42-2003 for the purpose of determining any inconsistency in information furnished by the applicant.
2939 (d) Authorizes the department of revenue to provide tax information to the authority pursuant to section 42-2003 for the purpose of determining any inconsistency in information furnished by the applicant.
-2-E. House Amendments to H.B.
2939 E.
(c) IF THE TOTAL QUALIFYING INVESTMENT IS [LESSLESS THAN]THAN $2,000,000,000$2,000,000,000, [OR MORE], $250,000 FOR EACH NET NEW FULL-TIME EMPLOYMENT POSITION PROJECTED BY THE APPLICANT- THAT2 HAS- JOBH.B. DUTIES ASSOCIATED WITH A QUALIFIED FACILITY THAT IS IN A RURAL LOCATION.
2939 APPLICANT THAT HAS JOB DUTIES ASSOCIATED WITH A QUALIFIED FACILITY THAT IS IN A RURAL LOCATION.
-3-K. House Amendments to H.B.
2939 K.
Preapproval under this section lapses, the application is void and the amount of the preapproved income tax credits does not apply against the dollar limit prescribed by subsection J of this section if, within twelve months after preapproval, the business fails to provide to the- authority3 documentation- ofH.B. its expenditure of $250,000 in qualifying investment or, if the period over which the qualifying investment will be made exceeds twelve months, documentation of additional expenditures as required in this subsection for each twelve-month period.
2939 the authority documentation of its expenditure of $250,000 in qualifying investment or, if the period over which the qualifying investment will be made exceeds twelve months, documentation of additional expenditures as required in this subsection for each twelve-month period.
If the chief executive officer rejects all or part of the managed -4-review, Housethe Amendmentschief toexecutive H.B.officer shall provide written reasons for the rejection.
2939 review, the chief executive officer shall provide written reasons for the rejection.
If the amount of qualifying investment- actually4 spent- isH.B. less than the amount preapproved for income tax credits, the preapproved amount not incurred lapses and does not apply against the dollar limit prescribed by subsection J of this section for that year.
2939 investment actually spent is less than the amount preapproved for income tax credits, the preapproved amount not incurred lapses and does not apply against the dollar limit prescribed by subsection J of this section for that year.
The transfer of -5-part Houseor Amendmentsall toof H.B.a company's assets that are then leased back by the company is not considered a liquidation under this section.
2939 part or all of a company's assets that are then leased back by the company is not considered a liquidation under this section.
V.- 5 - H.B.
2939 V.
-6-5. House Amendments to H.B.
2939 5.
7.- 6 - H.B.
2939 7.
The taxpayer must meet the -7-employee Housecompensation Amendmentsand toemployee H.B.health benefit requirements prescribed by section 41-1512.
2939 employee compensation and employee health benefit requirements prescribed by section 41-1512.
Show all 57 changed lines (17 more)
(i)- If7 the- totalH.B. qualifying investment is less than $2,000,000,000, $200,000 for each net new full-time employment position that has duties associated with the qualified facility.
2939 (i) If the total qualifying investment is less than $2,000,000,000, $200,000 for each net new full-time employment position that has duties associated with the qualified facility.
(iii) IF THE TOTAL QUALIFYING INVESTMENT IS [LESSLESS THAN]THAN $2,000,000,000$2,000,000,000, [OR MORE], $250,000 FOR EACH NET NEW FULL-TIME EMPLOYMENT POSITION PROJECTED BY THE APPLICANT THAT HAS JOB DUTIES ASSOCIATED WITH A QUALIFIED FACILITY THAT IS IN A RURAL LOCATION AS DEFINED IN SECTION 41-1512.
-8-E. House Amendments to H.B.
2939 E.
The total of the credits allowed all- owners8 of- theH.B. business may not exceed the amount that would have been allowed for a sole owner of the business.
2939 all owners of the business may not exceed the amount that would have been allowed for a sole owner of the business.
Notify the department, on a form prescribed by the department, of any full-time employment position for which a credit was claimed under -9-this Housesection Amendmentsand that was vacant for more than one hundred fifty days after the date the full-time employment position was originally filled to H.B.the end of that taxable year.
2939The thisperiod section and that wasa vacant for more than one hundred fifty days after the date the full-time employment position- was9 originally- filledH.B. to the end of that taxable year.
The2939 period that a full-time employment position was vacant may not include the period before the full-time employment position was filled for the first time.
(iii) IF THE TOTAL QUALIFYING INVESTMENT IS [LESSLESS THAN]THAN $2,000,000,000$2,000,000,000, [OR MORE], $250,000 FOR EACH NET NEW FULL-TIME EMPLOYMENT POSITION PROJECTED BY THE APPLICANT THAT HAS JOB DUTIES ASSOCIATED WITH A QUALIFIED FACILITY THAT IS IN A RURAL LOCATION AS DEFINED IN SECTION 41-1512.
(b) The taxpayer may claim all five annual installments of a credit that was preapproved before January 1, 2031 by the Arizona commerce -10-authority Housenotwithstanding Amendmentsany tointervening H.B.repeal or other termination of the credit.
2939- authority10 notwithstanding- anyH.B. intervening repeal or other termination of the credit.
2939 C.
This subsection applies only in the case of the termination or revocation of a certification of -11-- House11 Amendments- to H.B.
Enroll- and12 engross- to conform Amend title to conform TERESA MARTINEZ 2939FloorMARTINEZ.docx 02/11/2026 11:40 AM C:
ED 130YIHYEE -12-
Show all 57 changed rows (17 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version (03/03/2026) Current pdf
- Amended HOUSE - Floor Amend to Engrossed Bill - Martinez - passed pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
DP
-
DP
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
-
Transmit to Senate
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
PASSED
-
House Placed on Consent Calendar
-
DP
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
Sponsors
- Thomas "T.J." Shope · Cosponsor
- Chris Lopez · Cosponsor
- Teresa Martinez · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 90 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Teresa Martinez Republican
Co-sponsors (2)
- Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican
- Chris Lopez Republican
Not signed on (90)
90 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 90 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 24 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 31 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 55 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 2% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (60)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron Márquez | Democrat | Yea |
| Alma Hernandez | Democrat | Yea |
| Anna Abeytia | Democrat | Yea |
| Betty J Villegas | Democrat | Yea |
| Brian Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Cesar Aguilar | Democrat | Yea |
| Christopher Mathis | Democrat | Yea |
| Consuelo Hernandez | Democrat | Yea |
| Elda Luna-Nájera | Democrat | Yea |
| Janeen Connolly | Democrat | Yea |
| Junelle Cavero | Democrat | Yea |
| Kevin Volk | Democrat | Yea |
| Lorena Austin | Democrat | Yea |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Lydia Hernandez | Democrat | Yea |
| Mae Peshlakai | Democrat | Yea |
| Mariana Sandoval | Democrat | Yea |
| Myron Tsosie | Democrat | Yea |
| Nancy Gutierrez | Democrat | Yea |
| Oscar De Los Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Patty Contreras | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Quantá Crews | Democrat | Yea |
| Sarah Liguori | Democrat | Yea |
| Seth Blattman | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Stacey Travers | Democrat | Yea |
| Stephanie Simacek | Democrat | Yea |
| Stephanie Stahl Hamilton | Democrat | Yea |
| Alexander Kolodin | Republican | Yea |
| Beverly Pingerelli | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Lopez | Republican | Yea |
| David Livingston | Republican | Yea |
| David Marshall, Sr. | Republican | Yea |
| Gail Griffin | Republican | Yea |
| James Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Weninger | Republican | Yea |
| John Gillette | Republican | Yea |
| Joseph Chaplik | Republican | Not Voting |
| Julie Willoughby | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Olson | Republican | Nay |
| Justin Wilmeth | Republican | Yea |
| Khyl Powell | Republican | Yea |
| Laurin Hendrix | Republican | Yea |
| Leo Biasiucci | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Fink | Republican | Yea |
| Lupe Diaz | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Gress | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Carbone | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Way | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Peña | Republican | Yea |
| Neal Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Nick Kupper | Republican | Yea |
| Pamela Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Quang H Nguyen | Republican | Yea |
| Rachel Keshel | Republican | Yea |
| Ralph Heap | Republican | Yea |
| Selina Bliss | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Montenegro | Republican | Yea |
| Teresa Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Rivero | Republican | Yea |
| Walt Blackman | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2939?
- HB 2939 is sponsored by Thomas "T.J." Shope (Republican), Chris Lopez (Republican), and Teresa Martinez (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 2939?
- This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 2939?
- Track HB 2939 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2939
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2939
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →