Arizona 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session Status: To Executive 2 R cosponsors

SB 1573 — judicial determinations; religious sectarian laws

Last action — Vetoed by Governor

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

Vetoed by Governor Katie Hobbs (Democratic) on June 19, 2026.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

In plain language

The bill relates to judicial determinations for religious sectarian laws.

This bill involves how courts deal with laws that pertain to religious sects. It aims to clarify judicial processes in these cases.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

142 added · 175 removed

Plain-language change summary

The changes to SB 1573 clarify that courts cannot use or refer to religious sectarian laws in their decisions, but the previous wording included harsher consequences, such as making any judgment based on such laws void and grounds for impeachment of judges. The revised language is simpler and specifically states that courts should not use these laws as persuasive authority, which aims to emphasize the separation of religion from legal matters. This change matters because it provides clearer guidelines on how religious laws are treated in court, potentially reducing confusion over legal interpretations while still upholding foundational legal principles.

→
Previous
Latest
Bill Number:
Senate Engrossed judicial determinations;
S.B.
religious sectarian laws State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session SENATE BILL 1573 AN ACT AMENDING SECTIONS 12-3101 AND 12-3102, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
1573 Rogers Floor Amendment Reference to:
AMENDING TITLE 12, CHAPTER 22, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING ARTICLE 2;
printed bill Amendment drafted by:
RELATING TO JUDICIAL DETERMINATIONS.
Leg.
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - S.B.
Council FLOOR AMENDMENT EXPLANATION 1.
1573 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
Specifies that a court is prohibited from relying on any religious sectarian law as controlling or persuasive authority.
2.
Removes language stating that a decision or ratification of a private agreement by a judge who relies on sectarian law is void, constitutes appealable error and is grounds for impeachment.
3.
Modifies the definition of religious sectarian law by removing the specific inclusion of Sharia law, Canon law, Halacha and Karma.
4.
Modifies the legislative findings clause.
5.
Makes technical and conforming changes.
Amendment explanation prepared by Michelle Young 3/2/2026 Fifty-seventh Legislature Rogers Second Regular Session S.B.
1573 ROGERS FLOOR AMENDMENT SENATE AMENDMENTS TO S.B.
1573 (Reference to printed bill) Amendment instruction key:
[GREEN UNDERLINING IN BRACKETS] indicates text added to statute or previously enacted session law.
[Green underlining in brackets] indicates text added to new session law or text restoring existing law.
[GREEN STRIKEOUT IN BRACKETS] indicates new text removed from statute or previously enacted session law.
[Green strikeout in brackets] indicates text removed from existing statute, previously enacted session law or new session law.
<<Green carets>> indicate a section added to the bill.
<<Green strikeout in carets>> indicates a section removed from the bill.
The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows:
Senate Amendments to S.B.
Sec.
1573 Sec.
A COURT SHALL NOT [USE, IMPLEMENT, REFER TO OR INCORPORATE A TENET OF] [RELY ON] ANY [BODY OF] RELIGIOUS SECTARIAN LAW [INTO ANY DECISION, FINDING OR OPINION] AS CONTROLLING OR [INFLUENTIAL] [PERSUASIVE] AUTHORITY.
A COURT SHALL NOT RELY ON ANY RELIGIOUS SECTARIAN LAW AS CONTROLLING OR PERSUASIVE AUTHORITY.
[B.
B.
ANY DECISION OR RATIFICATION OF A PRIVATE AGREEMENT THAT IS DETERMINED, ON THE MERITS, BY A JUDGE IN THIS STATE WHO RELIES ON ANY BODY OF RELIGIOUS SECTARIAN LAW IS VOID, IS APPEALABLE ERROR AND IS GROUNDS FOR IMPEACHMENT AND REMOVAL FROM OFFICE.] [C.] [B.] THIS SECTION APPLIES TO A FEDERAL COURT SITTING IN DIVERSITY JURISDICTION.
THIS SECTION APPLIES TO A FEDERAL COURT SITTING IN DIVERSITY JURISDICTION.
[D.] [C.] THIS SECTION DOES NOT APPLY TO:
C.
THIS SECTION DOES NOT APPLY TO:
[E.] [D.] FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "RELIGIOUS SECTARIAN LAW"[:
D.
1.] MEANS ANY STATUTE, TENET OR BODY OF LAW EVOLVING WITHIN AND BINDING A SPECIFIC RELIGIOUS SECT OR TRIBE.
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "RELIGIOUS SECTARIAN LAW":
[RELIGIOUS SECTARIAN LAW INCLUDES SHARIA LAW, CANON LAW, HALACHA AND KARMA BUT] [2.] DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY LAW OF THE UNITED STATES OR THE INDIVIDUAL STATES BASED ON ANGLO-AMERICAN LEGAL TRADITION AND PRINCIPLES ON WHICH THE UNITED STATES WAS FOUNDED.
1.
MEANS ANY STATUTE, TENET OR BODY OF LAW EVOLVING WITHIN AND BINDING A SPECIFIC RELIGIOUS SECT OR TRIBE.
- 1 - S.B.
1573 2.
DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY LAW OF THE UNITED STATES OR THE INDIVIDUAL STATES BASED ON ANGLO-AMERICAN LEGAL TRADITION AND PRINCIPLES ON WHICH THE UNITED STATES WAS FOUNDED.
As a matter of compact between the state and people of Arizona and the United States as of the time Arizona was admitted to statehood on February 14, 1912, the tenth amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees to the state and people of Arizona that other than the -2- Senate Amendments to S.B.
As a matter of compact between the state and people of Arizona and the United States as of the time Arizona was admitted to statehood on February 14, 1912, the tenth amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees to the state and people of Arizona that other than the enumerated powers expressly granted to the United States under article I, section 8 of the United States Constitution, Congress and the federal government will not exercise any purported control over or commandeer the courts of the state of Arizona.
Show all 51 changed rows (11 more)
Previous
Latest
1573 enumerated powers expressly granted to the United States under article I, section 8 of the United States Constitution, Congress and the federal government will not exercise any purported control over or commandeer the courts of the state of Arizona.
5.
- 2 - S.B.
1573 5.
[7.
7.
The Congress has no authority to preempt state regulation of state courts.] [8.] [7.] Under the tenth amendment of the United States Constitution, the people and state of Arizona retain their exclusive power to regulate the state courts of Arizona subject only to the fourteenth -3- Senate Amendments to S.B.
Under the tenth amendment of the United States Constitution, the people and state of Arizona retain their exclusive power to regulate the state courts of Arizona subject only to the fourteenth amendment's guarantee that the people and state of Arizona shall exercise such sovereign power in accordance with each citizen's lawful privileges or immunities, and in compliance with the requirements of due process and equal protection of the law.
1573 amendment's guarantee that the people and state of Arizona shall exercise such sovereign power in accordance with each citizen's lawful privileges or immunities, and in compliance with the requirements of due process and equal protection of the law.
8.
[9.] [8.] The ninth amendment of the United States Constitution secures and reserves to the people of Arizona as against the federal government their natural rights to life, liberty and property as entailed by the traditional Anglo-American conception of ordered liberty and as secured by state law, including their rights as they were understood and secured by the law at the time the amendment was ratified on December 15, 1791, as well as their rights as they were understood and secured by the law in the state of Arizona at the time the Arizona Constitution was adopted on December 9, 1910.
The ninth amendment of the United States Constitution secures and reserves to the people of Arizona as against the federal government their natural rights to life, liberty and property as entailed by the traditional Anglo-American conception of ordered liberty and as secured by state law, including their rights as they were understood and secured by the law at the time the amendment was ratified on December 15, 1791, as well as their rights as they were understood and secured by the law in the state of Arizona at the time the Arizona Constitution was adopted on December 9, 1910.
3.
- 3 - S.B.
1573 3.
Enroll and engross to conform Amend title to conform WENDY ROGERS 1573FloorROGERS.docx 02/26/2026 08:46 AM C:
- 4 -
JV 130ULUZEU -4-
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Vetoed by Governor

  2. Transmit to Governor

  3. Transmit to Senate

  4. PASSED

  5. DP

  6. House Placed on Consent Calendar

  7. DP

  8. House Second Reading

  9. House First Reading.

  10. Transmit to House

  11. PASSED

  12. DPA

  13. DP

  14. Senate Second Reading

  15. Senate First Reading

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 91 not signed on · 34 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (1)

Not signed on (91)

91 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 91 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed

Passed 33 Yea · 21 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 02106
Republican 33000
Total 332106
% of votes cast 55%35%0%10%
How each member voted (60)
Member Party Vote
Aaron Márquez Democrat Nay
Alma Hernandez Democrat Nay
Anna Abeytia Democrat Nay
Betty J Villegas Democrat Nay
Brian Garcia Democrat Nay
Cesar Aguilar Democrat Nay
Christopher Mathis Democrat Nay
Consuelo Hernandez Democrat Nay
Elda Luna-Nájera Democrat Nay
Janeen Connolly Democrat Not Voting
Junelle Cavero Democrat Nay
Kevin Volk Democrat Nay
Lorena Austin Democrat Nay
Lupe Contreras Democrat Nay
Lydia Hernandez Democrat Not Voting
Mae Peshlakai Democrat Nay
Mariana Sandoval Democrat Nay
Myron Tsosie Democrat Not Voting
Nancy Gutierrez Democrat Not Voting
Oscar De Los Santos Democrat Nay
Patty Contreras Democrat Nay
Quantá Crews Democrat Nay
Sarah Liguori Democrat Nay
Seth Blattman Democrat Not Voting
Stacey Travers Democrat Nay
Stephanie Simacek Democrat Not Voting
Stephanie Stahl Hamilton Democrat Nay
Alexander Kolodin Republican Yea
Beverly Pingerelli Republican Yea
Chris Lopez Republican Yea
Cody Reim Republican Yea
David Livingston Republican Yea
Gail Griffin Republican Yea
James Taylor Republican Yea
Jeff Weninger Republican Yea
John Gillette Republican Yea
Julie Willoughby Republican Yea
Justin Olson Republican Yea
Justin Wilmeth Republican Yea
Khyl Powell Republican Yea
Laurin Hendrix Republican Yea
Leo Biasiucci Republican Yea
Lisa Fink Republican Yea
Lupe Diaz Republican Yea
Matt Gress Republican Yea
Michael Carbone Republican Yea
Michael Way Republican Yea
Michele Peña Republican Yea
Neal Carter Republican Yea
Nick Kupper Republican Yea
Pamela Carter Republican Yea
Quang H Nguyen Republican Yea
Rachel Keshel Republican Yea
Ralph Heap Republican Yea
Selina Bliss Republican Yea
Steve Montenegro Republican Yea
Sylvia Allen Republican Yea
Teresa Martinez Republican Yea
Tony Rivero Republican Yea
Walt Blackman Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed

Passed 16 Yea · 13 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 01300
Republican 16001
Total 161301
% of votes cast 53%43%0%3%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Analise Ortiz Democrat Nay
Brian Fernandez Democrat Nay
Catherine Miranda Democrat Nay
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Nay
Eva Diaz Democrat Nay
Flavio Bravo Democrat Nay
Kiana Sears Democrat Nay
Lauren Kuby Democrat Nay
Lela Alston Democrat Nay
Priya Sundareshan Democrat Nay
Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat Nay
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Nay
Theresa Hatathlie Democrat Nay
Carine Werner Republican Yea
David C. Farnsworth Republican Yea
David Gowan Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
Hildy Angius Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Yea
Jake Hoffman Republican Yea
Janae Shamp Republican Yea
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Kevin Payne Republican Yea
Mark Finchem Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican Yea
Venden "Vince" Leach Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Yea
Wendy Rogers Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 1573?
SB 1573 is sponsored by Mark Finchem (Republican) and Wendy Rogers (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 1573?
This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1573?
Track SB 1573 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1573

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1573

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →