SB 1573 — judicial determinations; religious sectarian laws
Last action — Vetoed by Governor
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Vetoed by Governor Katie Hobbs (Democratic) on June 19, 2026.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
In plain language
The bill relates to judicial determinations for religious sectarian laws.
This bill involves how courts deal with laws that pertain to religious sects. It aims to clarify judicial processes in these cases.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
142 added · 175 removedPlain-language change summary
The changes to SB 1573 clarify that courts cannot use or refer to religious sectarian laws in their decisions, but the previous wording included harsher consequences, such as making any judgment based on such laws void and grounds for impeachment of judges. The revised language is simpler and specifically states that courts should not use these laws as persuasive authority, which aims to emphasize the separation of religion from legal matters. This change matters because it provides clearer guidelines on how religious laws are treated in court, potentially reducing confusion over legal interpretations while still upholding foundational legal principles.
BillSenate Number:Engrossed judicial determinations;
S.B.religious sectarian laws State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session SENATE BILL 1573 AN ACT AMENDING SECTIONS 12-3101 AND 12-3102, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
1573AMENDING RogersTITLE Floor12, AmendmentCHAPTER Reference22, to:ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING ARTICLE 2;
printedRELATING billTO AmendmentJUDICIAL draftedDETERMINATIONS. by:
Leg.(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - S.B.
Council1573 FLOORBe AMENDMENTit EXPLANATIONenacted 1.by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
Specifies that a court is prohibited from relying on any religious sectarian law as controlling or persuasive authority.
2.
Removes language stating that a decision or ratification of a private agreement by a judge who relies on sectarian law is void, constitutes appealable error and is grounds for impeachment.
3.
Modifies the definition of religious sectarian law by removing the specific inclusion of Sharia law, Canon law, Halacha and Karma.
4.
Modifies the legislative findings clause.
5.
Makes technical and conforming changes.
Amendment explanation prepared by Michelle Young 3/2/2026 Fifty-seventh Legislature Rogers Second Regular Session S.B.
1573 ROGERS FLOOR AMENDMENT SENATE AMENDMENTS TO S.B.
1573 (Reference to printed bill) Amendment instruction key:
[GREEN UNDERLINING IN BRACKETS] indicates text added to statute or previously enacted session law.
[Green underlining in brackets] indicates text added to new session law or text restoring existing law.
[GREEN STRIKEOUT IN BRACKETS] indicates new text removed from statute or previously enacted session law.
[Green strikeout in brackets] indicates text removed from existing statute, previously enacted session law or new session law.
<<Green carets>> indicate a section added to the bill.
<<Green strikeout in carets>> indicates a section removed from the bill.
The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows:
SenateSec. Amendments to S.B.
1573 Sec.
A COURT SHALL NOT [USE,RELY IMPLEMENT,ON REFER TO OR INCORPORATE A TENET OF] [RELY ON] ANY [BODY OF] RELIGIOUS SECTARIAN LAW [INTO ANY DECISION, FINDING OR OPINION] AS CONTROLLING OR [INFLUENTIAL]PERSUASIVE [PERSUASIVE] AUTHORITY.
[B.B.
ANY DECISION OR RATIFICATION OF A PRIVATE AGREEMENT THAT IS DETERMINED, ON THE MERITS, BY A JUDGE IN THIS STATE WHO RELIES ON ANY BODY OF RELIGIOUS SECTARIAN LAW IS VOID, IS APPEALABLE ERROR AND IS GROUNDS FOR IMPEACHMENT AND REMOVAL FROM OFFICE.] [C.] [B.] THIS SECTION APPLIES TO A FEDERAL COURT SITTING IN DIVERSITY JURISDICTION.
[D.]C. [C.] THIS SECTION DOES NOT APPLY TO:
THIS SECTION DOES NOT APPLY TO:
[E.]D. [D.] FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "RELIGIOUS SECTARIAN LAW"[:
1.]FOR MEANSTHE ANYPURPOSES STATUTE, TENET OR BODY OF LAWTHIS EVOLVINGSECTION, WITHIN"RELIGIOUS ANDSECTARIAN BINDINGLAW": A SPECIFIC RELIGIOUS SECT OR TRIBE.
[RELIGIOUS1. SECTARIAN LAW INCLUDES SHARIA LAW, CANON LAW, HALACHA AND KARMA BUT] [2.] DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY LAW OF THE UNITED STATES OR THE INDIVIDUAL STATES BASED ON ANGLO-AMERICAN LEGAL TRADITION AND PRINCIPLES ON WHICH THE UNITED STATES WAS FOUNDED.
MEANS ANY STATUTE, TENET OR BODY OF LAW EVOLVING WITHIN AND BINDING A SPECIFIC RELIGIOUS SECT OR TRIBE.
- 1 - S.B.
1573 2.
DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY LAW OF THE UNITED STATES OR THE INDIVIDUAL STATES BASED ON ANGLO-AMERICAN LEGAL TRADITION AND PRINCIPLES ON WHICH THE UNITED STATES WAS FOUNDED.
As a matter of compact between the state and people of Arizona and the United States as of the time Arizona was admitted to statehood on February 14, 1912, the tenth amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees to the state and people of Arizona that other than the -2-enumerated Senatepowers Amendmentsexpressly granted to S.B.the United States under article I, section 8 of the United States Constitution, Congress and the federal government will not exercise any purported control over or commandeer the courts of the state of Arizona.
Show all 51 changed lines (11 more)
1573 enumerated powers expressly granted to the United States under article I, section 8 of the United States Constitution, Congress and the federal government will not exercise any purported control over or commandeer the courts of the state of Arizona.
5.- 2 - S.B.
1573 5.
[7.7.
The Congress has no authority to preempt state regulation of state courts.] [8.] [7.] Under the tenth amendment of the United States Constitution, the people and state of Arizona retain their exclusive power to regulate the state courts of Arizona subject only to the fourteenth -3-amendment's Senateguarantee Amendmentsthat tothe S.B.people and state of Arizona shall exercise such sovereign power in accordance with each citizen's lawful privileges or immunities, and in compliance with the requirements of due process and equal protection of the law.
15738. amendment's guarantee that the people and state of Arizona shall exercise such sovereign power in accordance with each citizen's lawful privileges or immunities, and in compliance with the requirements of due process and equal protection of the law.
[9.] [8.] The ninth amendment of the United States Constitution secures and reserves to the people of Arizona as against the federal government their natural rights to life, liberty and property as entailed by the traditional Anglo-American conception of ordered liberty and as secured by state law, including their rights as they were understood and secured by the law at the time the amendment was ratified on December 15, 1791, as well as their rights as they were understood and secured by the law in the state of Arizona at the time the Arizona Constitution was adopted on December 9, 1910.
3.- 3 - S.B.
1573 3.
Enroll- and4 engross- to conform Amend title to conform WENDY ROGERS 1573FloorROGERS.docx 02/26/2026 08:46 AM C:
JV 130ULUZEU -4-
Show all 51 changed rows (11 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version (03/09/2026) Current pdf
- Amended SENATE - Rogers flr amend (ref Bill) adopted pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
Vetoed by Governor
-
Transmit to Governor
-
Transmit to Senate
-
PASSED
-
DP
-
House Placed on Consent Calendar
-
DP
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DP
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
Sponsors
- Mark Finchem · Cosponsor
- Wendy Rogers · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 91 not signed on · 34 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Wendy Rogers Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- Mark Finchem Republican
Not signed on (91)
91 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 91 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 21 | 0 | 6 |
| Republican | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 33 | 21 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 35% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (60)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron Márquez | Democrat | Nay |
| Alma Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Anna Abeytia | Democrat | Nay |
| Betty J Villegas | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Garcia | Democrat | Nay |
| Cesar Aguilar | Democrat | Nay |
| Christopher Mathis | Democrat | Nay |
| Consuelo Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Elda Luna-Nájera | Democrat | Nay |
| Janeen Connolly | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Junelle Cavero | Democrat | Nay |
| Kevin Volk | Democrat | Nay |
| Lorena Austin | Democrat | Nay |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Lydia Hernandez | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Mae Peshlakai | Democrat | Nay |
| Mariana Sandoval | Democrat | Nay |
| Myron Tsosie | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Nancy Gutierrez | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Oscar De Los Santos | Democrat | Nay |
| Patty Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Quantá Crews | Democrat | Nay |
| Sarah Liguori | Democrat | Nay |
| Seth Blattman | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Stacey Travers | Democrat | Nay |
| Stephanie Simacek | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Stephanie Stahl Hamilton | Democrat | Nay |
| Alexander Kolodin | Republican | Yea |
| Beverly Pingerelli | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Lopez | Republican | Yea |
| Cody Reim | Republican | Yea |
| David Livingston | Republican | Yea |
| Gail Griffin | Republican | Yea |
| James Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Weninger | Republican | Yea |
| John Gillette | Republican | Yea |
| Julie Willoughby | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Olson | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Wilmeth | Republican | Yea |
| Khyl Powell | Republican | Yea |
| Laurin Hendrix | Republican | Yea |
| Leo Biasiucci | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Fink | Republican | Yea |
| Lupe Diaz | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Gress | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Carbone | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Way | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Peña | Republican | Yea |
| Neal Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Nick Kupper | Republican | Yea |
| Pamela Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Quang H Nguyen | Republican | Yea |
| Rachel Keshel | Republican | Yea |
| Ralph Heap | Republican | Yea |
| Selina Bliss | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Montenegro | Republican | Yea |
| Sylvia Allen | Republican | Yea |
| Teresa Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Rivero | Republican | Yea |
| Walt Blackman | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 16 | 13 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 43% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Analise Ortiz | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Nay |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Nay |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Nay |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Nay |
| Kiana Sears | Democrat | Nay |
| Lauren Kuby | Democrat | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Nay |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Nay |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Nay |
| Carine Werner | Republican | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| Hildy Angius | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Yea |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Payne | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Finchem | Republican | Yea |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy "Tim" Dunn | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Not Voting |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1573?
- SB 1573 is sponsored by Mark Finchem (Republican) and Wendy Rogers (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1573?
- This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1573?
- Track SB 1573 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1573
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1573
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →