SB 1725 — marijuana smoke; public; private nuisance
Last action — House Placed on Consent Calendar
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
99 added · 176 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Senate Bill 1725 introduces a new section that specifically addresses excessive marijuana smoke or odor as a private nuisance when it interferes with the use and enjoyment of neighboring properties. This change means that if someone's marijuana use significantly impacts a neighbor’s quality of life, that neighbor can seek legal action. It also clarifies that having a valid marijuana registration card may be considered by a court but doesn’t automatically exempt someone from being held liable for the nuisance. This matters because it balances the rights of marijuana users with the rights of neighbors to enjoy their property without unpleasant odors.
Fifty-seventhSenate LegislatureEngrossed Judiciarymarijuana andsmoke; Elections Second Regular Session S.B.
1725public; PROPOSED SENATE AMENDMENTS TO S.B.
private nuisance State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session SENATE BILL 1725 (ReferenceAN toACT printedAMENDING bill)TITLE Amendment12, instructionCHAPTER key:7, ARTICLE 12, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 12-991.01;
[GREENAMENDING UNDERLININGSECTION IN13-2917, BRACKETS]ARIZONA indicatesREVISED textSTATUTES; added to statute or previously enacted session law.
[GreenRELATING underliningTO inPUBLIC brackets]AND indicatesPRIVATE textNUISANCES. added to new session law or text restoring existing law.
[GREEN(TEXT STRIKEOUTOF INBILL BRACKETS]BEGINS indicatesON newNEXT textPAGE) removed- fromi statute- orS.B. previously enacted session law.
[Green1725 strikeoutBe init brackets]enacted indicatesby textthe removedLegislature fromof existingthe statute,State previouslyof enactedArizona: session law or new session law.
<<GreenSection carets>>1. indicate a section added to the bill.
<<GreenTitle strikeout12, inchapter carets>>7, indicatesarticle a12, sectionArizona removedRevised fromStatutes, theis bill.amended by adding section 12-991.01, to read:
The12-991.01. bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows:
<<SectionExcessive 1.marijuana odor;
Sectioninterference; 12-991, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
12-991.nuisance;
Nuisance;failure to comply;
applicability;violation;
residentialclassification; property used for crime;
actiondefinition toA. abate and prevent;
notice;EXCESSIVE MARIJUANA SMOKE OR ODOR THAT CROSSES A PROPERTY BOUNDARY AND SUBSTANTIALLY AND UNREASONABLY INTERFERES WITH THE USE AND ENJOYMENT OF NEARBY PRIVATE PROPERTY CONSTITUTES A PRIVATE NUISANCE.
definitionsLAWFUL A.POSSESSION OR USE OF MARIJUANA DOES NOT PRECLUDE A FINDING OF NUISANCE UNDER THIS SECTION, EXCEPT THAT A COURT MAY CONSIDER AS A MITIGATING FACTOR POSSESSION OF A VALID REGISTRY IDENTIFICATION CARD AS DEFINED IN SECTION 36-2801.
Residential property that is regularly used in the commission of a crime is a nuisance, and the criminal activity causing the nuisance shall be enjoined, abated and prevented.
If there is reason to believe that a nuisance as described in subsection A ofPERSON thisIS sectionNOT exists,LIABLE theUNDER attorneyTHIS general,SECTION theUNLESS countyTHE attorney,PERSON theHAS cityRECEIVED attorney,NOTICE anOF associationTHE ofINTERFERENCE homeownersAND orFAILS propertyTO ownersABATE establishedIT byWITHIN aFIVE recordedDAYS. contract or other declaration, including a condominium association as defined in section 33-1202 and a planned community association as defined in section 33-1802, or a resident of a county or city who is affected by the nuisance may bring an action in superior court against the owner, the owner's managing agent or any other party responsible for the property to abate and prevent the criminal activity.
TheAN courtAFFECTED shallPROPERTY notOWNER assessOR aRESIDENT civilMAY penaltySEEK againstINJUNCTIVE anyRELIEF, personCOMPENSATORY unlessDAMAGES thatFOR personLOSS knewOF orUSE hadAND reasonENJOYMENT, toCOSTS knowAND ofREASONABLE theATTORNEY criminalFEES activity.AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF THE COURT DEEMS APPROPRIATE.
AnTHIS injunctionSECTION thatDOES isNOT orderedPREEMPT pursuantA toLOCAL thisORDINANCE articleTHAT shallIS beMORE necessaryPROTECTIVE toOF protectPRIVATE thePROPERTY healthRIGHTS. and safety of the public or prevent further criminal activity.
IF A CITY, TOWN OR COUNTY HAS ADOPTED AN ORDINANCE REGULATING EXCESSIVE MARIJUANA SMOKE OR ODOR, AN AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNER OR RESIDENT SHALL FIRST FILE A COMPLAINT WITH THE LOCAL JURISDICTION BEFORE FILING AN ACTION UNDER THIS SECTION.
IF THE LOCAL JURISDICTION DECLINES TO ACT OR DOES NOT TAKE FINAL ACTION WITHIN THIRTY DAYS AFTER THE COMPLAINT IS FILED, THE AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNER OR RESIDENT MAY BRING AN ACTION IN JUSTICE COURT.
THIS SECTION DOES NOT PRECLUDE A HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION OR CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION FROM TAKING ACTION AGAINST A PROPERTY OWNER.
AnA orderPERSON shallCOMMITS notFAILURE affectTO theCOMPLY owner'sWITH interestA inMARIJUANA theSMOKE propertyNUISANCE unlessABATEMENT allORDER ofIF theBOTH followingOF apply:THE FOLLOWING EXIST:
TheA ownerCOURT isOF aCOMPETENT defendantJURISDICTION inOR theA action.CITY, TOWN OR COUNTY ACTING UNDER LAWFUL AUTHORITY HAS ISSUED A WRITTEN ORDER DIRECTING THE PERSON TO ABATE EXCESSIVE MARIJUANA SMOKE OR ODOR THAT CONSTITUTES A NUISANCE PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION OR AN APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCE.
TheTHE ownerPERSON knewKNOWINGLY ofVIOLATES theOR criminalREFUSES activity.TO COMPLY WITH THE ORDER.
Senate Amendments to S.B.
1725 3.
The owner failed to take reasonable, legally available actions to abate the nuisance.
IfEACH theDAY owner,A theVIOLATION owner'sCONTINUES managingAFTER agentTHE orORDER theIS partySERVED responsibleCONSTITUTES forA theSEPARATE propertyOFFENSE. knows or has reason to know of the criminal activity and fails to take reasonable, legally available actions to abate the nuisance, a governmental authority may abate the nuisance.
The court may assess the owner for the cost of abating the nuisance.
On recording with the county recorder in the county in which the property is located, the assessment is prior to all other liens, obligations or encumbrances except for prior recorded mortgages, restitution liens, child support liens and general tax liens.
A city, town or county may bring an action to enforce the assessment in the superior court in the county in which the property is located.
ForFAILURE purposesTO ofCOMPLY thisWITH section,A anMARIJUANA owner,SMOKE theNUISANCE owner'sABATEMENT managingORDER agentIS orA thePETTY partyOFFENSE. responsible for the property is deemed to know or have reason to know of the nuisance if the owner, the owner's managing agent or the party responsible for the property has received notice from a governmental authority of documented reports of criminal offenses occurring on the residential property.
AFOR lawTHE enforcementPURPOSES agency,OF aTHIS citySECTION, attorney,"EXCESSIVE aMARIJUANA countySMOKE attorney,OR theODOR" attorneyMEANS generalAIRBORNE orEMISSIONS anyRESULTING otherFROM personTHE whoBURNING, isHEATING atOR leastVAPORIZING twenty-oneOF yearsMARIJUANA ofOR ageMARIJUANA mayPRODUCTS serveTHAT theBOTH: notice provided for in subsection G of this section, either personally or by certified mail.
If- personal1 service- orS.B. service by certified mail cannot be completed or the address of the person to be notified is unknown, notice may be served by publishing the notice three times within ten consecutive days in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the property is located.
In1725 all1. cases a copy of the notice shall be posted on the premises where the nuisance exists.
Show all 90 changed lines (50 more)
I.ARE DETECTABLE BY A REASONABLE PERSON OF ORDINARY SENSIBILITIES ON OTHER PRIVATE PROPERTY.
The notice shall be printed in at least twelve-point type in substantially the following form:
Notice This is formal notice that the property at (insert address and unit number if applicable) has had (insert number of) arrests or (insert number of) documented reports of alleged criminal activity and is considered a nuisance under section 12-991, Arizona Revised Statutes.
A copy of the police report numbers is attached.
Police reports are available at (insert applicable police agency).
Within five business days you must begin to take action that is legally available to you to abate the nuisance from the property.
If you fail to do so, a restraining order to abate and prevent continuing or recurring criminal activity will be pursued.
If you fail to cooperate to abate the nuisance, the appropriate authorities will abate the nuisance and their costs will be a lien on the property.
-2- Senate Amendments to S.B.
1725 You may contact (local agency) in order to obtain information on how to abate the nuisance.
J.
For the purposes of this article:
1.
"CRIME" INCLUDES THE CREATION OF EXCESSIVE MARIJUANA SMOKE AND ODOR.
1.
"Owner"OCCUR meansFOR aMORE personTHAN orTHIRTY personsCONSECUTIVE orMINUTES aON legalA entitySINGLE listedOCCASION asOR theON currentTHREE titleOR holderMORE asSEPARATE recordedDAYS inWITHIN theA officialTHIRTY-DAY recordsPERIOD. of the county recorder in the county in which the title is recorded.
2.
3.
"Owner's managing agent" means a person, corporation, partnership or limited liability company that is authorized by the owner to operate and manage the property.>> <<Section 1.
Section 13-2901, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
13-2901.
Definitions In this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
1.
["EXCESSIVE MARIJUANA SMOKE OR ODOR" MEANS MARIJUANA SMOKE OR ODOR THAT IS CAPABLE OF BEING DETECTED BY A PERSON ON THE PRIVATE PROPERTY OF ANOTHER PERSON.
2.] "Marijuana"[:
(a)] Means all parts of any plant of the genus cannabis[,] from which the resin has not been extracted, whether growing or not, and the seeds of such [A] plant.
[Marijuana] [(b)] Does not include the mature stalks of such [A] plant[,] or the sterilized seed of such [A] plant [which] [THAT] is incapable of germination.
[2.] [3.] "Public" means affecting or likely to affect a substantial group of persons.>> Sec.
2.
Section 13-2908, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
13-2908.
Criminal nuisance;
presumption;
classification A.
A person commits criminal nuisance:
1.
If, by conduct either unlawful in itself or unreasonable under the circumstances, such THE person recklessly creates or maintains a condition which THAT endangers the safety or health of others.
2.
By knowingly conducting or maintaining any premises, place or resort where persons gather for purposes of engaging in unlawful conduct.
B.
IT IS PRESUMED THAT A PERSON WHO CREATES EXCESSIVE MARIJUANA SMOKE [AND] [OR] ODOR CAUSES A CONDITION THAT ENDANGERS THE SAFETY OR HEALTH OF OTHERS.
B.
C.
Criminal nuisance is a class 3 misdemeanor.
3.2.
-3-1. Senate Amendments to S.B.
1725 1.
IT IS PRESUMED THAT THE CREATION OF EXCESSIVE MARIJUANA SMOKE [AND]OR [OR] ODOR ISPURSUANT INJURIOUS TO HEALTH,SECTION INDECENT,12-991.01 OFFENSIVEIS TOA PUBLIC NUISANCE IF THE SENSESPERSON'S ANDCONDUCT ANIS OBSTRUCTIONINTENTIONAL TOOR THE FREEPERSON USEKNOWINGLY OFAND PROPERTYSUBSTANTIALLY THAT INTERFERES WITH THE COMFORTABLE ENJOYMENT OF LIFE OR PROPERTYPROPERTY. AND IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE.
Enroll- and2 engross- to conform Amend title to conform WENDY ROGERS 1725ROGERS.docx 02/19/2026 4:05 PM C:
CT 130LFZHMB -4-
Show all 90 changed rows (50 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version (03/09/2026) Current pdf
- SENATE - Judiciary and Elections View text pdf
- Amended SENATE - Mesnard flr amend (ref JUDE) adopted pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
House Placed on Consent Calendar
-
DP
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DPA
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
Sponsors
- J.D. Mesnard · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 9 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- J.D. Mesnard Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 14 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 20 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 30% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Analise Ortiz | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Yea |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Nay |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Yea |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Yea |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Yea |
| Kiana Sears | Democrat | Yea |
| Lauren Kuby | Democrat | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Nay |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Nay |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Yea |
| Carine Werner | Republican | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| Hildy Angius | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Nay |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Payne | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Finchem | Republican | Yea |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy "Tim" Dunn | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Not Voting |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1725?
- SB 1725 is sponsored by J.D. Mesnard (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1725?
- This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1725?
- Track SB 1725 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1725
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1725
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →