Arizona 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 1 R cosponsors

SB 1005 — cosmetics sales; animal testing; prohibitions

Last action — House Second Reading

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

6 added · 8 removed

Plain-language change summary

The changes in Senate Bill 1005 involve the removal of the prefiled date and some repetitive citations of the bill. While these adjustments don’t alter the substance of the bill, they streamline the presentation of the legislation. This is important as it helps to clarify the focus on prohibiting animal testing for cosmetics sales, making it easier for the public and lawmakers to understand the primary goal of the bill.

→
Previous
Latest
PREFILED DEC 01 2025 REFERENCE TITLE:
Senate Engrossed cosmetics sales;
cosmetics sales;
prohibitions State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session SB 1005 Introduced by Senator Kavanagh AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 44, CHAPTER 11, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING ARTICLE 12.1;
prohibitions State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session SENATE BILL 1005 AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 44, CHAPTER 11, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING ARTICLE 12.1;
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - SB 1005 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - S.B.
1005 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
THE EXCEPTION PROVIDED IN THIS PARAGRAPH - 1 - SB 1005 APPLIES ONLY IF THERE IS NO EVIDENCE RESULTING FROM THE TESTING THAT IS RELIED ON TO SUBSTANTIATE THE SAFETY OF THE COSMETIC INGREDIENT OR COSMETIC PRODUCT BEING SOLD BY THE MANUFACTURER IN THIS STATE.
THE EXCEPTION PROVIDED IN THIS PARAGRAPH - 1 - S.B.
1005 APPLIES ONLY IF THERE IS NO EVIDENCE RESULTING FROM THE TESTING THAT IS RELIED ON TO SUBSTANTIATE THE SAFETY OF THE COSMETIC INGREDIENT OR COSMETIC PRODUCT BEING SOLD BY THE MANUFACTURER IN THIS STATE.
- 2 - SB 1005 2.
- 2 - S.B.
1005 2.
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. House Second Reading

  2. House First Reading.

  3. Transmit to House

  4. PASSED

  5. DP

  6. Senate Second Reading

  7. Senate First Reading

  8. Prefiled.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 8 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (92)

92 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 92 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed

Passed 22 Yea · 8 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 13000
Republican 9800
Total 22800
% of votes cast 73%27%0%0%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Analise Ortiz Democrat Yea
Brian Fernandez Democrat Yea
Catherine Miranda Democrat Yea
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Yea
Eva Diaz Democrat Yea
Flavio Bravo Democrat Yea
Kiana Sears Democrat Yea
Lauren Kuby Democrat Yea
Lela Alston Democrat Yea
Priya Sundareshan Democrat Yea
Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat Yea
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Yea
Theresa Hatathlie Democrat Yea
Carine Werner Republican Yea
David C. Farnsworth Republican Nay
David Gowan Republican Nay
Frank Carroll Republican Nay
Hildy Angius Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Yea
Jake Hoffman Republican Nay
Janae Shamp Republican Nay
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Kevin Payne Republican Nay
Mark Finchem Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican Yea
Venden "Vince" Leach Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Nay
Wendy Rogers Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

civil-rights technology agriculture
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 1005?
SB 1005 is sponsored by John Kavanagh (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 1005?
This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1005?
Track SB 1005 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1005

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 1005

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →