Arizona 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session Status: To Executive 1 R cosponsors

HB 2289 — truth in taxation; bonds; notices

Last action — Vetoed by Governor

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

Vetoed by Governor Katie Hobbs (Democratic) on April 07, 2026.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1534 added · 1559 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent changes to House Bill 2289 involve adjustments to the valuation range for single-family homes, specifying that the bill now applies to homes valued between $100,000 and $300,000, rather than up to $400,000. This is important because it narrows the scope of properties covered by the bill, potentially affecting how school districts can raise funds through bonds and impacting taxpayers with homes in the specified range. Overall, these amendments could influence the financial responsibilities of homeowners and how school district funding is managed.

→
Previous
Latest
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES FLOOR AMENDMENT EXPLANATION 57th Legislature, 2nd Regular Session Majority Research Staff HB 2289:
House Engrossed truth in taxation;
truth in taxation;
notices OLSON FLOOR AMENDMENT 1.
notices State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session HOUSE BILL 2289 AN ACT AMENDING SECTIONS 15-481, 15-491, 15-905.01, 15-1461.01, 35-454, 41-1276, 42-17107 AND 48-254, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
Reduces the proposed amount from $400,000 to $300,000 for purposes of calculating the tax impact for residential properties in both the informational pamphlets and Truth-in-Taxation notices.
RELATING TO TAXATION.
(Sec.
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - H.B.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8) VINCE PEREZ 1/27/2026 (602) 926-3848 Fifty-seventh Legislature Olson Second Regular Session H.B.
2289 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
2289 OLSON FLOOR AMENDMENT HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO H.B.
2289 (Reference to printed bill) Amendment instruction key:
[GREEN UNDERLINING IN BRACKETS] indicates text added to statute or previously enacted session law.
[Green underlining in brackets] indicates text added to new session law or text restoring existing law.
[GREEN STRIKEOUT IN BRACKETS] indicates new text removed from statute or previously enacted session law.
[Green strikeout in brackets] indicates text removed from existing statute, previously enacted session law or new session law.
<<Green carets>> indicate a section added to the bill.
<<Green strikeout in carets>> indicates a section removed from the bill.
The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows:
House Amendments to H.B.
B.
2289 B.
5.
- 1 - H.B.
2289 5.
If submitted, additional arguments in favor of the proposed increase in the budget shall be provided in writing with a -2- House Amendments to H.B.
If submitted, additional arguments in favor of the proposed increase in the budget shall be provided in writing with a signed, sworn statement by those in favor.
2289 signed, sworn statement by those in favor.
Any argument that is submitted and that does not comply with this paragraph may not be included in the pamphlet.
Any argument that is submitted and that - 2 - H.B.
2289 does not comply with this paragraph may not be included in the pamphlet.
-3- House Amendments to H.B.
12.
2289 12.
(c) The tax rate associated with each of the proposed capital improvements and the estimated cost of each capital improvement for the owner of a single family home that is valued at $80,000 $100,000 AND [$400,000] [$300,000].
(c) The tax rate associated with each of the proposed capital improvements and the estimated cost of each capital improvement for the owner of a single family home that is valued at $80,000 $100,000 AND $300,000.
C.
- 3 - H.B.
2289 C.
The ballot shall also contain the amount of the proposed increase of the proposed budget over the alternate budget, a statement that the amount of the proposed increase will be based on a percentage of the school district's revenue control -4- House Amendments to H.B.
The ballot shall also contain the amount of the proposed increase of the proposed budget over the alternate budget, a statement that the amount of the proposed increase will be based on a percentage of the school district's revenue control limit in future years, if applicable, as provided in subsection P of this section and the following statement:
2289 limit in future years, if applicable, as provided in subsection P of this section and the following statement:
Based on the current net assessed valuation used for secondary property tax purposes, to fund the proposed increase in the school district's budget would require an estimated tax rate of $_____________ per $100 of net assessed valuation used for secondary property tax purposes and is in addition to the school district's tax rate that will be levied to fund the school district's revenue control limit allowed by law.
Based on the current net assessed valuation used for secondary property tax purposes, to fund the proposed increase in the school district's budget would require an estimated tax rate of $_____________ per $100 of - 4 - H.B.
2289 net assessed valuation used for secondary property tax purposes and is in addition to the school district's tax rate that will be levied to fund the school district's revenue control limit allowed by law.
-5- House Amendments to H.B.
H.
2289 H.
(a) For common or unified districts with a student count of less than one hundred fifty-four in kindergarten programs and grades one through eight, the limit computed as prescribed in item (i) or (ii) of this subdivision, whichever is appropriate:
- 5 - H.B.
2289 (a) For common or unified districts with a student count of less than one hundred fifty-four in kindergarten programs and grades one through eight, the limit computed as prescribed in item (i) or (ii) of this subdivision, whichever is appropriate:
(i) Small School Support Level Weight Phase Down Student Student for Small Isolated Reduction Count Count Limit School Districts Base Level Factor — 100 x 1.468 + (0.0005 x x $ = $ __ (500 — Student Count)) Small Isolated Phase Down Phase Down District Base Reduction Factor Secondary Limit $350,000 — $ = $ -6- House Amendments to H.B.
(i) Small School Support Level Weight Phase Down Student Student for Small Isolated Reduction Count Count Limit School Districts Base Level Factor — 100 x 1.468 + (0.0005 x x $ = $ __ (500 — Student Count)) Small Isolated Phase Down Phase Down District Base Reduction Factor Secondary Limit $350,000 — $ = $ (ii) Small School Support Level Weight Phase Down Student Student for Small Reduction Count Count Limit School Districts Base Level_ Factor — 100 x 1.398 + (0.0004 x x $ = $ (500 - Student Count)) - 6 - H.B.
2289 (ii) Small School Support Level Weight Phase Down Student Student for Small Reduction Count Count Limit School Districts Base Level_ Factor — 100 x 1.398 + (0.0004 x x $ = $ (500 - Student Count)) Small Phase Down Phase Down School District Base Reduction Factor Secondary Limit $350,000 — $ = $ (c) If both subdivisions (a) and (b) of this paragraph apply to a unified school district, its limit for the purposes of this paragraph is the combination of its elementary limit and its secondary limit.
2289 Small Phase Down Phase Down School District Base Reduction Factor Secondary Limit $350,000 — $ = $ (c) If both subdivisions (a) and (b) of this paragraph apply to a unified school district, its limit for the purposes of this paragraph is the combination of its elementary limit and its secondary limit.
-7- House Amendments to H.B.
Any budget increase authorized by this election shall be entirely funded by a levy of taxes on the taxable property within this school district for the year for which adopted and for _____ subsequent years, shall not be realized from monies furnished by the state and shall not be subject to the - 7 - H.B.
2289 Any budget increase authorized by this election shall be entirely funded by a levy of taxes on the taxable property within this school district for the year for which adopted and for _____ subsequent years, shall not be realized from monies furnished by the state and shall not be subject to the limitation on taxes specified in article IX, section 18, Constitution of Arizona.
2289 limitation on taxes specified in article IX, section 18, Constitution of Arizona.
Show all 149 changed rows (109 more)
Previous
Latest
For a union high school district, five -8- House Amendments to H.B.
For a union high school district, five percent of the revenue control limit means five percent of the revenue control limit attributable to the weighted student count in grades nine through twelve.
2289 percent of the revenue control limit means five percent of the revenue control limit attributable to the weighted student count in grades nine through twelve.
- 8 - H.B.
L.
2289 L.
If the election is to exceed a combination of the revenue control limit as provided in subsection E or F of this section, the revenue control limit as provided in subsection I or J of this section or district additional assistance as provided in subsection L or M of this section, the ballot shall be prepared so that the voters may vote on each -9- House Amendments to H.B.
If the election is to exceed a combination of the revenue control limit as provided in subsection E or F of this section, the revenue control limit as provided in subsection I or J of this section or district additional assistance as provided in subsection L or M of this section, the ballot shall be prepared so that the voters may vote on each proposed increase separately and shall contain statements required in the same manner as if each proposed increase were submitted separately.
2289 proposed increase separately and shall contain statements required in the same manner as if each proposed increase were submitted separately.
- 9 - H.B.
O.
2289 O.
-10- House Amendments to H.B.
- 10 - H.B.
For overrides approved by a vote of the qualified electors of the school district at an election held from and after -11- House Amendments to H.B.
For overrides approved by a vote of the qualified - 11 - H.B.
2289 October 31, 1998, the period of the additional increase prescribed in this subsection shall not exceed seven years for any capital override election.
2289 electors of the school district at an election held from and after October 31, 1998, the period of the additional increase prescribed in this subsection shall not exceed seven years for any capital override election.
Under the students first capital funding system, _________ school district is entitled to state monies for new construction and renovation of school buildings in accordance with state law.
Under the students first capital funding system, _________ school district is entitled - 12 - H.B.
-12- House Amendments to H.B.
2289 to state monies for new construction and renovation of school buildings in accordance with state law.
2289 2.
2.
If a budget in excess of district additional assistance was previously adopted by the voters in a school district and will be in effect for the budget year or budget year and subsequent years, as provided in subsection L or M of this section, the governing board may request an additional budget in excess of district additional assistance.
If a budget in excess of district additional assistance was previously adopted by the voters in a school district and will be in effect for the budget year or budget year and subsequent years, as provided in subsection L or M of this section, the governing board may - 13 - H.B.
2289 request an additional budget in excess of district additional assistance.
-13- House Amendments to H.B.
AA.
2289 AA.
Any budget increase continuation authorized by this election shall be entirely funded by a levy of taxes on the taxable property in this school district for the year for which adopted and for ______ subsequent years, shall not be realized from monies furnished by the state and shall not be subject to the limitation on taxes specified in article IX, section 18, Constitution of Arizona.
- 14 - H.B.
Based on the current net assessed -14- House Amendments to H.B.
2289 Any budget increase continuation authorized by this election shall be entirely funded by a levy of taxes on the taxable property in this school district for the year for which adopted and for ______ subsequent years, shall not be realized from monies furnished by the state and shall not be subject to the limitation on taxes specified in article IX, section 18, Constitution of Arizona.
2289 valuation used for secondary property tax purposes, to fund the proposed continuation of the increase in the school district's budget would require an estimated continuation of a tax rate of $______________ per $100 of net assessed valuation used for secondary property tax purposes and is in addition to the school district's tax rate that will be levied to fund the school district's revenue control limit allowed by law.
Based on the current net assessed valuation used for secondary property tax purposes, to fund the proposed continuation of the increase in the school district's budget would require an estimated continuation of a tax rate of $______________ per $100 of net assessed valuation used for secondary property tax purposes and is in addition to the school district's tax rate that will be levied to fund the school district's revenue control limit allowed by law.
If the governing board does not enter into a lease of twenty or more years of the school buildings or grounds listed on the ballot within twenty years after the date of the election and the board continues to seek such a lease, the governing board shall call a special election to reauthorize the board to negotiate for and to enter into a lease of twenty or more years.
If the governing board does not - 15 - H.B.
2289 enter into a lease of twenty or more years of the school buildings or grounds listed on the ballot within twenty years after the date of the election and the board continues to seek such a lease, the governing board shall call a special election to reauthorize the board to negotiate for and to enter into a lease of twenty or more years.
-15- House Amendments to H.B.
6.
2289 6.
Bond counsel fees, financial advisory fees, printing costs and paying agent and registrar fees for bonds issued pursuant to an election under this section shall be paid from either the amount authorized by the qualified electors of the school district or current operating funds.
Bond counsel fees, financial advisory fees, printing costs and paying agent and registrar fees for bonds issued pursuant to an election - 16 - H.B.
2289 under this section shall be paid from either the amount authorized by the qualified electors of the school district or current operating funds.
-16- House Amendments to H.B.
1.
2289 1.
(b) A complete list of each proposed capital improvement that will be funded with the proceeds of the bonds and a description of the proposed cost of each improvement, including a separate aggregation of capital improvements for administrative purposes as defined by the school facilities oversight board.
- 17 - H.B.
-17- House Amendments to H.B.
2289 (b) A complete list of each proposed capital improvement that will be funded with the proceeds of the bonds and a description of the proposed cost of each improvement, including a separate aggregation of capital improvements for administrative purposes as defined by the school facilities oversight board.
2289 (c) The tax rate associated with each of the proposed capital improvements and the estimated cost of each capital improvement for the owner of a single family home that is valued at $100,000 AND [$400,000] [$300,000].
(c) The tax rate associated with each of the proposed capital improvements and the estimated cost of each capital improvement for the owner of a single family home that is valued at $100,000 AND $300,000.
(d) A complete list of each proposed capital improvement that will be funded with the proceeds of the bonds and a description of the proposed cost of each improvement, including a separate aggregation of capital improvements for administrative purposes as defined by the school facilities oversight board.
(d) A complete list of each proposed capital improvement that will be funded with the proceeds of the bonds and a description of the proposed - 18 - H.B.
2289 cost of each improvement, including a separate aggregation of capital improvements for administrative purposes as defined by the school facilities oversight board.
-18- House Amendments to H.B.
(f) A statement that if the bonds are approved, the first priority for the impact aid will be to pay the debt service for the bonds and that other uses of the monies are prohibited until the debt service obligation is met.
2289 (f) A statement that if the bonds are approved, the first priority for the impact aid will be to pay the debt service for the bonds and that other uses of the monies are prohibited until the debt service obligation is met.
(a) The date of the election.
- 19 - H.B.
2289 (a) The date of the election.
(d) A complete list of each proposed capital improvement that is in addition to the initial capital improvements presented in the informational pamphlet when the bonds were approved and the proposed cost of each improvement, including a separate aggregation of capital -19- House Amendments to H.B.
(d) A complete list of each proposed capital improvement that is in addition to the initial capital improvements presented in the informational pamphlet when the bonds were approved and the proposed cost of each improvement, including a separate aggregation of capital improvements for administrative purposes as defined by the school facilities oversight board.
2289 improvements for administrative purposes as defined by the school facilities oversight board.
3.
- 20 - H.B.
2289 3.
-20- House Amendments to H.B.
(a) Desegregation pursuant to section 15-910.
2289 (a) Desegregation pursuant to section 15-910.
(b) The notice shall be published in a location other than the classified or legal advertising section of the newspaper in which it is published.
- 21 - H.B.
2289 (b) The notice shall be published in a location other than the classified or legal advertising section of the newspaper in which it is published.
Truth in Taxation Hearing Notice of Tax Increase In compliance with section 15-905.01, Arizona Revised Statutes, _________ school district is notifying its property taxpayers of _________ school district's intention to raise -21- House Amendments to H.B.
Truth in Taxation Hearing Notice of Tax Increase In compliance with section 15-905.01, Arizona Revised Statutes, _________ school district is notifying its property taxpayers of _________ school district's intention to raise its primary property taxes over the current level to pay for increased expenditures in those areas where the governing board has the authority to increase property taxes for the fiscal year beginning July 1, ____.
2289 its primary property taxes over the current level to pay for increased expenditures in those areas where the governing board has the authority to increase property taxes for the fiscal year beginning July 1, ____.
The amount proposed above will cause _________ school district's primary property taxes on a $100,000 AND [$400,000] [$300,000] home to be $_________ AND $_______, RESPECTIVELY (the amount used to pay for the budget year's proposed truth in taxation base limit and adjacent ways levy, including adjacent ways and liabilities in excess of the school district budget [the amount divided by the current net assessed value available February 10 pursuant to section 42-17052] applied to $100,000 AND [$400,000] [$300,000]).
The amount proposed above will cause _________ school district's primary property taxes on a $100,000 AND $300,000 home to be $_________ AND $_______, RESPECTIVELY (the amount used to pay for the budget year's proposed truth in taxation base limit and adjacent ways levy, including adjacent ways and liabilities in excess of the school district budget [the amount divided by the current net assessed value available February 10 pursuant to section 42-17052] applied to $100,000 AND $300,000).
Without the tax increase, the total taxes that would be owed would have been $_________ AND $_______, RESPECTIVELY (the amount used to pay for the current year's truth in taxation base limit [the amount divided by the current net assessed value available February 10 pursuant to section 42-17052] applied to $100,000 AND [$400,000] [$300,000]).
Without the tax increase, the total taxes that would be owed would have been $_________ AND $_______, RESPECTIVELY (the amount used to pay for the current year's truth in taxation base limit [the amount divided by the current net assessed value available February 10 pursuant to section 42-17052] applied to $100,000 AND $300,000).
2.
- 22 - H.B.
2289 2.
-22- House Amendments to H.B.
5.
2289 5.
If the proposed primary property tax levy, excluding amounts that are attributable to new construction, is greater than the amount levied in the preceding tax year by the district:
If the proposed primary property tax levy, excluding amounts that are - 23 - H.B.
2289 attributable to new construction, is greater than the amount levied in the preceding tax year by the district:
-23- House Amendments to H.B.
(d) Is in the following form, with the "truth in taxation hearing-notice of tax increase" headline in at least eighteen-point type:
2289 (d) Is in the following form, with the "truth in taxation hearing-notice of tax increase" headline in at least eighteen-point type:
For example, the proposed tax increase will cause (name of community college district's) primary property taxes on a $100,000 AND [$400,000] [$300,000] home to be $(total proposed taxes including the tax increase) AND $(TOTAL PROPOSED TAXES INCLUDING THE TAX INCREASE), RESPECTIVELY.
For example, the proposed tax increase will cause (name of community college district's) primary property taxes on a $100,000 AND $300,000 home to be $(total proposed taxes including the tax increase) AND $(TOTAL PROPOSED TAXES INCLUDING THE TAX INCREASE), RESPECTIVELY.
Without the proposed tax increase, the total taxes that would be owed on a $100,000 AND [$400,000] [$300,000] home would have been $_____ AND $_____, RESPECTIVELY.
Without the proposed tax increase, the total taxes that would be owed on a $100,000 AND $300,000 home would have been $_____ AND $_____, RESPECTIVELY.
2.
- 24 - H.B.
2289 2.
If the proposed levy, exclusive of increased property taxes received from new construction, constitutes an -24- House Amendments to H.B.
If the proposed levy, exclusive of increased property taxes received from new construction, constitutes an increase over the preceding tax year's levy by fifteen percent or more, the motion to levy the increased property taxes must be approved by a unanimous roll call vote of the district board.
2289 increase over the preceding tax year's levy by fifteen percent or more, the motion to levy the increased property taxes must be approved by a unanimous roll call vote of the district board.
Sec.
- 25 - H.B.
2289 Sec.
In preparing this information and the information prescribed by subdivision (c) of this paragraph, the projected total -25- House Amendments to H.B.
In preparing this information and the information prescribed by subdivision (c) of this paragraph, the projected total annual increase in net assessed valuation for any future year shall not exceed:
2289 annual increase in net assessed valuation for any future year shall not exceed:
The tax impact over the term of the bonds on an owner-occupied residence valued by the county assessor at $250,000 AND [$400,000] [$300,000] is estimated to be $___ per year for __ years, or $___ total cost AND $___ PER YEAR FOR ___ YEARS, OR $___ TOTAL COST, RESPECTIVELY.
- 26 - H.B.
2289 The tax impact over the term of the bonds on an owner-occupied residence valued by the county assessor at $250,000 AND $300,000 is estimated to be $___ per year for __ years, or $___ total cost AND $___ PER YEAR FOR ___ YEARS, OR $___ TOTAL COST, RESPECTIVELY.
-26- House Amendments to H.B.
(l) Polling location for the addressee.
2289 (l) Polling location for the addressee.
2.
- 27 - H.B.
2289 2.
-27- House Amendments to H.B.
D.
2289 D.
G.
- 28 - H.B.
2289 G.
-28- House Amendments to H.B.
C.
2289 C.
Except as provided in subsections E and G of this section, the qualifying tax rate for a high school district or a common school district within a high school district that does not offer instruction in high school subjects and the qualifying tax rate for a unified school district, a common school district not within a high school district or a common school district within a high school district that offers instruction in high school subjects for the following fiscal year shall be the rate determined by the joint legislative budget committee pursuant to subsection C of this section.
Except as provided in subsections E and G of this section, the qualifying tax rate for a high school district or a common school district within a high school district that does not offer instruction in high school subjects and the qualifying tax rate for a unified school district, a common school district not within a high school district or a common school district within a high school district that offers instruction in high school subjects for the following fiscal year shall be the rate determined by the joint legislative budget committee pursuant to - 29 - H.B.
2289 subsection C of this section.
-29- House Amendments to H.B.
Truth in Taxation Hearing Notice of Tax Increase In compliance with section 41-1276, Arizona Revised Statutes, the state legislature is notifying property taxpayers in Arizona of the legislature's intention to raise the property tax levy over last year's level.
2289 Truth in Taxation Hearing Notice of Tax Increase In compliance with section 41-1276, Arizona Revised Statutes, the state legislature is notifying property taxpayers in Arizona of the legislature's intention to raise the property tax levy over last year's level.
The proposed tax increase will cause the taxes on a $100,000 AND $300,000 home to be $(total proposed taxes including the tax increase) AND $(TOTAL PROPOSED TAXES INCLUDING THE TAX INCREASE), RESPECTIVELY.
The proposed tax increase will cause the taxes on a $100,000 AND [$400,000] [$300,000] home to be $(total proposed taxes including the tax increase) AND $(TOTAL PROPOSED TAXES INCLUDING THE TAX INCREASE), RESPECTIVELY.
Without the proposed tax increase, the total taxes that would be owed on a $100,000 AND $300,000 home would have been $_______ AND $_______, RESPECTIVELY.
Without the proposed tax increase, the total taxes that would be owed on a $100,000 AND [$400,000] [$300,000] home would have been $_______ AND $_______, RESPECTIVELY.
(e) For the purposes of computing the tax increase on a $100,000 AND [$400,000] [$300,000] home as required by the notice, the joint meeting of the house of representatives ways and means committee and the senate finance committee, or their successor committees, shall consider the difference between the truth in taxation rate and the proposed increased rate.
(e) For the purposes of computing the tax increase on a $100,000 AND $300,000 home as required by the notice, the joint meeting of the house of representatives ways and means committee and the senate finance committee, or their successor committees, shall consider the difference between the truth in taxation rate and the proposed increased rate.
2.
- 30 - H.B.
2289 2.
-30- House Amendments to H.B.
The legislature shall not set a county equalization assistance for education rate that exceeds $0.5123.
2289 The legislature shall not set a county equalization assistance for education rate that exceeds $0.5123.
If the proposed primary property tax levy, excluding amounts that are attributable to new construction, is greater than the amount levied by the county, city or town in the preceding tax year in the county, city or town:
If the proposed primary property tax levy, excluding amounts that are attributable to new construction, is greater than the amount - 31 - H.B.
2289 levied by the county, city or town in the preceding tax year in the county, city or town:
For example, the proposed tax increase will cause (name of county, city or town)'s primary property taxes on a $100,000 AND [$400,000] [$300,000] home to be $(total proposed taxes including the tax increase) AND $(TOTAL PROPOSED TAXES -31- House Amendments to H.B.
For example, the proposed tax increase will cause (name of county, city or town)'s primary property taxes on a $100,000 AND $300,000 home to be $(total proposed taxes including the tax increase) AND $(TOTAL PROPOSED TAXES INCLUDING THE TAX INCREASE), RESPECTIVELY.
2289 INCLUDING THE TAX INCREASE), RESPECTIVELY.
Without the proposed tax increase, the total taxes that would be owed on a $100,000 AND $300,000 home would have been $_____ AND $_____, RESPECTIVELY.
Without the proposed tax increase, the total taxes that would be owed on a $100,000 AND [$400,000] [$300,000] home would have been $_____ AND $_____, RESPECTIVELY.
In lieu of publishing the truth in taxation notice, the governing body may mail the truth in taxation notice prescribed by paragraph 1, subdivision (d) of this subsection to all registered voters in the county, city or town at least ten but not more than twenty days before the date of the hearing on the estimates pursuant to section 42-17104.
In lieu of publishing the truth in taxation notice, the governing body may mail the truth in taxation notice prescribed by paragraph 1, subdivision (d) of this subsection to all registered voters - 32 - H.B.
2289 in the county, city or town at least ten but not more than twenty days before the date of the hearing on the estimates pursuant to section 42-17104.
-32- House Amendments to H.B.
C.
2289 C.
If the proposed secondary property tax levy of the special taxing district, excluding amounts attributable to new construction, is greater than the amount levied by the special taxing district in the preceding tax year:
- 33 - H.B.
2289 If the proposed secondary property tax levy of the special taxing district, excluding amounts attributable to new construction, is greater than the amount levied by the special taxing district in the preceding tax year:
For example, the proposed tax increase will cause (name of special taxing district)'s secondary property taxes on a $100,000 AND [$400,000] [$300,000] home to be $(total proposed taxes including the tax increase) AND $(TOTAL PROPOSED TAXES -33- House Amendments to H.B.
For example, the proposed tax increase will cause (name of special taxing district)'s secondary property taxes on a $100,000 AND $300,000 home to be $(total proposed taxes including the tax increase) AND $(TOTAL PROPOSED TAXES INCLUDING THE TAX INCREASE), RESPECTIVELY.
2289 INCLUDING THE TAX INCREASE), RESPECTIVELY.
Without the proposed tax increase, the total taxes that would be owed on a $100,000 AND $300,000 home would have been $_______ AND $_____, RESPECTIVELY.
Without the proposed tax increase, the total taxes that would be owed on a $100,000 AND [$400,000] [$300,000] home would have been $_______ AND $_____, RESPECTIVELY.
2.
- 34 - H.B.
2289 2.
-34- House Amendments to H.B.
C.
2289 C.
Enroll and engross to conform Amend title to conform JUSTIN OLSON 2289FloorOLSON.docx 01/27/2026 10:15 AM C:
- 35 -
ED 130GIJNWR -35-
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Vetoed by Governor

  2. Transmit to Governor

  3. Transmit to House

  4. PASSED

  5. DP

  6. DP

  7. Senate Second Reading

  8. Senate First Reading

  9. Transmit to Senate

  10. PASSED

  11. DPA

  12. House Placed on Consent Calendar

  13. DP

  14. House Second Reading

  15. House First Reading.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 35 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (92)

92 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 92 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed

Passed 17 Yea · 11 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 01102
Republican 17000
Total 171102
% of votes cast 57%37%0%7%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Analise Ortiz Democrat Nay
Brian Fernandez Democrat Not Voting
Catherine Miranda Democrat Nay
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Nay
Eva Diaz Democrat Nay
Flavio Bravo Democrat Nay
Kiana Sears Democrat Nay
Lauren Kuby Democrat Nay
Lela Alston Democrat Nay
Priya Sundareshan Democrat Nay
Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat Nay
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Nay
Theresa Hatathlie Democrat Not Voting
Carine Werner Republican Yea
David C. Farnsworth Republican Yea
David Gowan Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
Hildy Angius Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Yea
Jake Hoffman Republican Yea
Janae Shamp Republican Yea
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Kevin Payne Republican Yea
Mark Finchem Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican Yea
Venden "Vince" Leach Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Yea
Wendy Rogers Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed

Passed 32 Yea · 24 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 02403
Republican 32001
Total 322404
% of votes cast 53%40%0%7%
How each member voted (60)
Member Party Vote
Aaron Márquez Democrat Nay
Alma Hernandez Democrat Nay
Anna Abeytia Democrat Nay
Betty J Villegas Democrat Nay
Brian Garcia Democrat Nay
Cesar Aguilar Democrat Nay
Christopher Mathis Democrat Nay
Consuelo Hernandez Democrat Nay
Elda Luna-Nájera Democrat Nay
Janeen Connolly Democrat Nay
Junelle Cavero Democrat Nay
Kevin Volk Democrat Nay
Lorena Austin Democrat Nay
Lupe Contreras Democrat Not Voting
Lydia Hernandez Democrat Nay
Mae Peshlakai Democrat Nay
Mariana Sandoval Democrat Nay
Myron Tsosie Democrat Nay
Nancy Gutierrez Democrat Nay
Oscar De Los Santos Democrat Nay
Patty Contreras Democrat Not Voting
Quantá Crews Democrat Nay
Sarah Liguori Democrat Nay
Seth Blattman Democrat Not Voting
Stacey Travers Democrat Nay
Stephanie Simacek Democrat Nay
Stephanie Stahl Hamilton Democrat Nay
Alexander Kolodin Republican Yea
Beverly Pingerelli Republican Yea
Chris Lopez Republican Yea
David Livingston Republican Yea
David Marshall, Sr. Republican Yea
Gail Griffin Republican Yea
James Taylor Republican Yea
Jeff Weninger Republican Yea
John Gillette Republican Yea
Joseph Chaplik Republican Not Voting
Julie Willoughby Republican Yea
Justin Olson Republican Yea
Justin Wilmeth Republican Yea
Khyl Powell Republican Yea
Laurin Hendrix Republican Yea
Leo Biasiucci Republican Yea
Lisa Fink Republican Yea
Lupe Diaz Republican Yea
Matt Gress Republican Yea
Michael Carbone Republican Yea
Michael Way Republican Yea
Michele Peña Republican Yea
Neal Carter Republican Yea
Nick Kupper Republican Yea
Pamela Carter Republican Yea
Quang H Nguyen Republican Yea
Rachel Keshel Republican Yea
Ralph Heap Republican Yea
Selina Bliss Republican Yea
Steve Montenegro Republican Yea
Teresa Martinez Republican Yea
Tony Rivero Republican Yea
Walt Blackman Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 2289?
HB 2289 is sponsored by Justin Olson (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 2289?
This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 2289?
Track HB 2289 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 2289

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 2289

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →