Arizona 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 R cosponsors

SB 1723 — domestic violence; release conditions

Last action — Signed by Governor

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 05, 2026. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Katie Hobbs (Democratic) on June 22, 2026.

Prognosis

Advancing 56% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).

  • Mixed recorded votes

    3 passed, 3 failed in recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

In plain language

The bill addresses release conditions for individuals involved in domestic violence cases.

This bill modifies the conditions under which individuals accused of domestic violence can be released before trial. It aims to establish specific requirements to ensure safety and accountability.

What this means for you
  • Families: This means families affected by domestic violence may experience increased safety measures during legal proceedings.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

273 added · 401 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of Bill SB 1723 has removed a section about bail and replaced or clarified details regarding protective orders, specifically about how they can be modified to facilitate parenting time between a defendant and a common child. Additionally, it has clarified the timeframe for serving an order of protection—now an order expires if not served within one year and lasts up to two years once served. These changes aim to better protect the interests of children while ensuring that court orders are enforceable and structured clearly.

→
Previous
Latest
Senate Engrossed domestic violence;
House Engrossed Senate Bill domestic violence;
release conditions State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session SENATE BILL 1723 AN ACT AMENDING SECTIONS 13-3602, 13-3967 AND 25-403.03, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
release conditions State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session CHAPTER 242 SENATE BILL 1723 AN ACT AMENDING SECTIONS 13-3602 AND 13-3967, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
RELATING TO BAIL.
RELATING TO COURT ORDERS.
AFTER A HEARING UNDER THIS PARAGRAPH HAS BEEN CONDUCTED, THE SUPERIOR COURT IN A TITLE 25 ACTION MAY MODIFY THE ORDER OF PROTECTION ONLY AS TO A CHILD WHO IS COMMON TO THE PARTIES AND WHO IS INCLUDED ON THE ORDER OF PROTECTION.
SUCH A MODIFICATION MAY ONLY BE MADE IF IT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD, AND THE MODIFICATION SHALL BE LIMITED SOLELY TO EFFECTUATING PARENTING TIME ORDERS BETWEEN THE DEFENDANT AND THE COMMON CHILD.
A peace officer, with or without a warrant, may arrest a person if the peace officer has probable cause to believe that the person has violated section 13-2810 by disobeying or resisting an order that is issued in any jurisdiction in this state pursuant to this section, whether or not such violation occurred in the presence of the officer.
A peace officer, with or without a warrant, may arrest a person if the peace officer has probable cause to believe that the person has violated section 13-2810 by disobeying or resisting an order that is issued in any jurisdiction in this state pursuant to this section, whether - 5 - S.B.
1723 or not such violation occurred in the presence of the officer.
For the purposes of this section, any court in this state has jurisdiction to enforce a valid - 5 - S.B.
For the purposes of this section, any court in this state has jurisdiction to enforce a valid order of protection that is issued in this state and that has been violated in any jurisdiction in this state.
1723 order of protection that is issued in this state and that has been violated in any jurisdiction in this state.
No AN order of protection shall NOT be invalid or determined to be ineffective merely because it was issued by a lower court at a time when an action for maternity or paternity, annulment, legal separation or dissolution of marriage was pending in a higher court.
No AN order of protection shall NOT be invalid or determined to be ineffective merely because it was issued by a lower court at a time when an action for maternity or paternity, annulment, legal separation or - 6 - S.B.
1723 dissolution of marriage was pending in a higher court.
An order that is entered by a justice court or municipal court after a hearing pursuant to this section may be appealed to the superior court as provided in title 22, chapter 2, article 4, section - 6 - S.B.
An order that is entered by a justice court or municipal court after a hearing pursuant to this section may be appealed to the superior court as provided in title 22, chapter 2, article 4, section 22-425, subsection B and the superior court rules of civil appellate procedure without regard to an amount in controversy.
1723 22-425, subsection B and the superior court rules of civil appellate procedure without regard to an amount in controversy.
A mutual protection order that is issued against both the party who filed a petition or a complaint or otherwise filed a written pleading for protection against abuse and the person against whom the filing was made is not entitled to full faith and credit if either:
A mutual protection order that is issued against both the party who filed a petition or a complaint or otherwise filed a written pleading - 7 - S.B.
1723 for protection against abuse and the person against whom the filing was made is not entitled to full faith and credit if either:
- 7 - S.B.
4.
1723 4.
9.
- 8 - S.B.
1723 9.
- 8 - S.B.
14.
1723 14.
2.
- 9 - S.B.
1723 2.
- 9 - S.B.
3.
1723 3.
Sec.
- 10 - APPROVED BY THE GOVERNOR JUNE 22, 2026.
3.
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE JUNE 22, 2026.
Section 25-403.03, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
25-403.03.
Domestic violence;
court considerations;
presumption;
conditions on parenting time;
definition A.
Notwithstanding subsection SUBSECTIONS D AND F of this section, NEITHER joint legal decision-making NOR UNSUPERVISED PARENTING TIME shall not be awarded if the court makes a finding of the existence of - 10 - S.B.
1723 significant domestic violence pursuant to section 13-3601 or if the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that there has been a significant history of domestic violence.
TO DETERMINE WHETHER SIGNIFICANT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE OR A SIGNIFICANT HISTORY OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HAS OCCURRED, THE COURT SHALL CONSIDER ALL OF THE FOLLOWING:
1.
THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE PARTICULAR ACT OR ACTS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.
2.
Show all 140 changed rows (100 more)
Previous
Latest
THE FREQUENCY OR PERVASIVENESS OF THE ACT OR ACTS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.
3.
THE AMOUNT OF TIME SINCE THE ACT OR ACTS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE OCCURRED.
4.
THE IMPACT OF THE ACT OR ACTS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.
B.
The court shall consider evidence of domestic violence as being contrary to the best interests of the child.
The court shall consider the safety and well-being of the child TO BE THE CONTROLLING FACTOR IN ANY DETERMINATION OF LEGAL DECISION-MAKING OR PARENTING TIME MATTER and THE SAFETY of the victim of the act of domestic violence to be of primary importance.
The court shall consider a perpetrator's history of causing or threatening to cause physical harm to another person.
C.
To determine if a person has committed an act of domestic violence the court, subject to the rules of evidence, shall consider all relevant factors, including the following:
1.
Findings from another court of competent jurisdiction.
2.
Police reports.
3.
Medical reports.
4.
Records of the department of child safety.
5.
Domestic violence shelter records.
6.
School records.
7.
Witness testimony.
D.
If the court determines that a parent who is seeking sole or joint legal decision-making has committed an act of domestic violence against the other parent, there is a rebuttable presumption that an award of sole or joint legal decision-making to the parent who committed the act of domestic violence is contrary to the child's best interests.
This presumption does not apply if both parents have committed an act of domestic violence.
For the purposes of this subsection, a person commits an act of domestic violence if that person does any of the following:
1.
Intentionally, knowingly or recklessly causes or attempts to cause sexual assault or serious physical injury.
2.
Places a person in reasonable apprehension of imminent serious physical injury to any person.
3.
Engages in a pattern of behavior for which a court may issue an ex parte order to protect the other parent who is seeking child custody or to protect the child and the child's siblings.
- 11 - S.B.
1723 E.
To determine if WHETHER the parent has rebutted the presumption PRESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION D OF THIS SECTION, the court shall consider all of the following:
1.
Whether the parent has demonstrated that being awarded sole or joint legal decision-making or substantially equal parenting time is in the child's best interests.
2.
Whether the parent has successfully completed a batterer's prevention program.
3.
Whether the parent has successfully completed a program of alcohol or drug abuse counseling, if the court determines that counseling is appropriate.
4.
Whether the parent has successfully completed a parenting class, if the court determines that a parenting class is appropriate.
5.
2.
If the parent is on probation, parole or community supervision, whether the parent is restrained by a protective order that was granted after a hearing.
6.
3.
Whether the parent has committed any further acts of domestic violence.
4.
WHETHER THE PARENT HAS COMPLETED ANY OF THE FOLLOWING PROGRAMS OR CLASSES, BUT THE COURT MAY NOT CONSIDER THE COMPLETION OF ANY PROGRAM OR CLASS ALONE AS PROOF OF REHABILITATION OR THAT THE PARENT HAS REBUTTED THE PRESUMPTION PRESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION D OF THIS SECTION:
(a) A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROGRAM.
(b) AN ALCOHOL OR DRUG ABUSE COUNSELING PROGRAM.
(c) A PARENTING CLASS.
F.
If the court finds that a parent has committed an act of domestic violence, that parent has the burden of proving to the court's satisfaction that parenting time will not endanger the child or significantly impair the child's emotional development.
If the parent meets this burden to the court's satisfaction, the court shall place conditions on parenting time that best protect the child and the other parent from further harm.
The court may:
1.
Order that an exchange of the child must occur in a protected setting as specified by the court.
2.
Order that an agency specified by the court must supervise parenting time.
If the court allows a family or household member to supervise parenting time, the court shall establish conditions that this person must follow during parenting time.
3.
Order the parent who committed the act of domestic violence to attend and complete, to the court's satisfaction, a program of intervention for perpetrators of domestic violence and any other counseling the court orders.
4.
Order the parent who committed the act of domestic violence to abstain from possessing or consuming alcohol or controlled substances during parenting time and for twenty-four hours before parenting time.
- 12 - S.B.
1723 5.
Order the parent who committed the act of domestic violence to pay a fee for the costs of supervised parenting time.
6.
Prohibit overnight parenting time.
7.
Require a bond from the parent who committed the act of domestic violence for the child's safe return.
8.
Order that the address of the child and the other parent remain confidential.
9.
Impose any other condition that the court determines is necessary to protect the child, the other parent and any other family or household member.
G.
The court shall not order joint counseling between a victim and the perpetrator of domestic violence.
The court may provide a victim with written information about available community resources related to domestic violence.
H.
The court may request or order the services of the department of child safety if the court believes that a child may be the victim of child abuse or neglect as defined in section 8-201.
I.
In determining whether the absence or relocation of a parent shall be weighed against that parent in determining legal decision-making or parenting time, the court may consider whether the absence or relocation was caused by an act of domestic violence by the other parent.
J.
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "SIGNIFICANT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE" INCLUDES ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
1.
THE THREATENED, RISKED OR INFLICTED PHYSICAL INJURY OR EMOTIONAL TRAUMA, INCLUDING SEXUAL ASSAULT, BY A PARENT ON A CHILD OR THE OTHER PARENT.
2.
AN ACT OR ACTS BY A PARENT THAT INVOLVE THE THREAT, USE OR BRANDISHING OF A FIREARM OR OTHER DANGEROUS WEAPON TO THREATEN OR INTIMIDATE A CHILD OR THE OTHER PARENT.
3.
A PARENT'S PATTERN OF COERCIVE OR CONTROLLING BEHAVIOR THAT IS INTENDED TO DOMINATE, INTIMIDATE, ISOLATE OR RESTRICT THE AUTONOMY OF THE OTHER PARENT, INCLUDING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
(a) CONTROLLING OR MONITORING DAILY ACTIVITIES, MOVEMENTS, COMMUNICATIONS, FINANCES, TRAVEL, ASSOCIATIONS OR ACCESS TO SERVICES.
(b) ISOLATING THE OTHER PARENT FROM FAMILY OR SUPPORT SYSTEMS.
(c) USING THREATS, INCLUDING THREATS OF SELF-HARM OR SUICIDE, TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE.
- 13 -
View plain text versions (7)

Action History

  1. Signed by Governor

  2. Transmit to Governor

  3. PASSED

  4. PASSED

  5. Transmit to Senate

  6. PASSED

  7. DPA

  8. House Placed on Consent Calendar

  9. DP

  10. House Second Reading

  11. House First Reading.

  12. Transmit to House

  13. PASSED

  14. PASSED

  15. PASSED

  16. DPA

  17. DPA

  18. Senate Second Reading

  19. Senate First Reading

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (92)

92 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 92 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed

Passed 51 Yea · 0 Nay · 9 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 22005
Republican 29004
Total 51009
% of votes cast 85%0%0%15%
How each member voted (60)
Member Party Vote
Aaron Márquez Democrat Yea
Alma Hernandez Democrat Yea
Anna Abeytia Democrat Yea
Betty J Villegas Democrat Yea
Brian Garcia Democrat Yea
Cesar Aguilar Democrat Yea
Christopher Mathis Democrat Yea
Consuelo Hernandez Democrat Yea
Elda Luna-Nájera Democrat Yea
Janeen Connolly Democrat Yea
Junelle Cavero Democrat Yea
Kevin Volk Democrat Yea
Lorena Austin Democrat Yea
Lupe Contreras Democrat Yea
Lydia Hernandez Democrat Yea
Mae Peshlakai Democrat Yea
Mariana Sandoval Democrat Yea
Myron Tsosie Democrat Yea
Nancy Gutierrez Democrat Not Voting
Oscar De Los Santos Democrat Not Voting
Patty Contreras Democrat Yea
Quantá Crews Democrat Not Voting
Sarah Liguori Democrat Yea
Seth Blattman Democrat Not Voting
Stacey Travers Democrat Yea
Stephanie Simacek Democrat Yea
Stephanie Stahl Hamilton Democrat Not Voting
Alexander Kolodin Republican Yea
Beverly Pingerelli Republican Yea
Chris Lopez Republican Yea
Cody Reim Republican Yea
David Livingston Republican Yea
Gail Griffin Republican Yea
James Taylor Republican Not Voting
Jeff Weninger Republican Yea
John Gillette Republican Yea
Julie Willoughby Republican Yea
Justin Olson Republican Yea
Justin Wilmeth Republican Not Voting
Khyl Powell Republican Yea
Laurin Hendrix Republican Yea
Leo Biasiucci Republican Yea
Lisa Fink Republican Yea
Lupe Diaz Republican Yea
Matt Gress Republican Yea
Michael Carbone Republican Yea
Michael Way Republican Not Voting
Michele Peña Republican Yea
Neal Carter Republican Yea
Nick Kupper Republican Not Voting
Pamela Carter Republican Yea
Quang H Nguyen Republican Yea
Rachel Keshel Republican Yea
Ralph Heap Republican Yea
Selina Bliss Republican Yea
Steve Montenegro Republican Yea
Sylvia Allen Republican Yea
Teresa Martinez Republican Yea
Tony Rivero Republican Yea
Walt Blackman Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed

Passed 28 Yea · 1 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 13000
Republican 15101
Total 28101
% of votes cast 93%3%0%3%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Analise Ortiz Democrat Yea
Brian Fernandez Democrat Yea
Catherine Miranda Democrat Yea
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Yea
Eva Diaz Democrat Yea
Flavio Bravo Democrat Yea
Kiana Sears Democrat Yea
Lauren Kuby Democrat Yea
Lela Alston Democrat Yea
Priya Sundareshan Democrat Yea
Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat Yea
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Yea
Theresa Hatathlie Democrat Yea
Carine Werner Republican Yea
David C. Farnsworth Republican Yea
David Gowan Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
Hildy Angius Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Yea
Jake Hoffman Republican Nay
Janae Shamp Republican Yea
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Kevin Payne Republican Yea
Mark Finchem Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican Yea
Venden "Vince" Leach Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Yea
Wendy Rogers Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 1723?
SB 1723 is sponsored by J.D. Mesnard (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 1723?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 05, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 1723?
Track SB 1723 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1723

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1723

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →