parents' bill of rights; remedies
This means families will have clearer rights to participate in their children's education and access related information.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 2249 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 2249.
You're tracking HB 2249
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 2249 — parents' bill of rights; remedies
Last action — Vetoed by Governor
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Vetoed by Governor Katie Hobbs (Democratic) on June 19, 2026.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
In plain language
This bill establishes specific rights for parents regarding their children's education.
The bill outlines a set of rights that parents have in relation to their children's education, including access to information and involvement in decision-making. It aims to strengthen parental authority in the education system.
What this means for you
- Families: This means families will have clearer rights to participate in their children's education and access related information.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
148 added · 205 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent changes to House Bill 2249 involve the addition of specific language that outlines a "parents' bill of rights" and related remedies. This means the bill is now more focused on ensuring that parents have certain rights and ways to address grievances. These amendments are significant because they clarify and strengthen parental involvement in decisions that affect their children, potentially leading to better outcomes for families.
Senate Engrossed House BillEngrossed parents' bill of rights;
A SCHOOL DISTRICT OR SCHOOL EMPLOYEE MAY NOT FACILITATE OR IMPLEMENT ANY FORM OF SOCIAL TRANSITIONING FOR A MINOR CHILD WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF EACH OF THE PARENTS OF THE MINOR CHILD.
THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE, A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR AN INSTITUTION MAY NOT MAINTAIN A -POLICY 2THAT -ALLOWS H.B.AN EMPLOYEE TO FACILITATE, ENCOURAGE OR COERCE A MINOR CHILD TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION FROM THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT.
2249- POLICY2 THAT- ALLOWSH.B. AN EMPLOYEE TO FACILITATE, ENCOURAGE OR COERCE A MINOR CHILD TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION FROM THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT.
2249 D.
Except as prescribed in subsections F and G H of this section, this state, a political subdivision of this state or any other governmental entity, or any official of this state, a political subdivision of this state or any other governmental entity acting under color of law, shall not interfere with or usurp the fundamental right of parents to direct the upbringing, education, health care and mental health of their children.
IN ANY ACTION BROUGHT UNDER THIS SECTION, A SHOWING OF A VIOLATION OF THE RIGHTS GUARANTEED OR RECOGNIZED BY THIS SECTION ESTABLISHES A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION OF IRREPARABLE HARM.
THISA STATE,governmental ANYentity POLITICALor SUBDIVISIONofficial OFdescribed THISin STATEsubsection ORE ANYof OFFICIALthis ACTINGsection UNDERmay COLORinterfere OFwith LAWor EXPRESSLYusurp WAIVESthe ALLfundamental CLAIMSright TOof SOVEREIGN,parents QUALIFIEDto ORdirect DISCRETIONARYthe IMMUNITYupbringing, FOReducation, ANYhealth VIOLATIONcare OFand THISmental SECTION.health of their children only if the governmental entity or official successfully demonstrates both elements described in subsection F of this section.
G.
H.
A governmental entity or official described in subsection E of this section may interfere with or usurp the fundamental right of parents to direct the upbringing, education, health care and mental health of their children only if the governmental entity or official successfully - 3 - H.B.
2249 demonstrates both elements described in subsection F of this section.
AT A MINIMUM, THE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY IS LIABLE TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT IN AN AMOUNT OF $500,000 FOR EACH INSTANCE OF INTERFERING WITH OR USURPING A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT, AND A GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL IS PERSONALLY LIABLE TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT IN AN AMOUNT OF $20,000 FOR EACH SEPARATE INSTANCE OF INTERFERING WITH OR USURPING A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT.
A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY THAT EMPLOYS THE OFFICIAL- MAY3 NOT- INDEMNIFYH.B. AN OFFENDING OFFICIAL AND MAY NOT USE PUBLIC MONIES TO PAY FOR THE OFFICIAL'S LIABILITY.
THE2249 RIGHTOFFICIAL TOMAY SUENOT BELONGSINDEMNIFY INDIVIDUALLYAN TOOFFENDING EACHOFFICIAL OF THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENTS, AND ONE PARENT MAY FILENOT SUITUSE EVENPUBLIC IFMONIES THETO MINORPAY CHILD'SFOR OTHER PARENT DOES NOT CONSENT TO THE ACTION.OFFICIAL'S LIABILITY.
I.THE RIGHT TO SUE BELONGS INDIVIDUALLY TO EACH OF THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENTS AND ONE PARENT MAY FILE SUIT EVEN IF THE MINOR CHILD'S OTHER PARENT DOES NOT CONSENT TO THE ACTION.
INH. ADDITION TO SUBSECTION H OF THIS SECTION, A MINOR CHILD'S PARENT MAY BRING SUIT AGAINST AN EMPLOYEE WHO HAS OR WHO HAS ATTEMPTED TO FACILITATE, ENCOURAGE OR COERCE A MINOR CHILD TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION FROM THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT.
ATIN AADDITION MINIMUM,TO ANSUBSECTION EMPLOYEEG WHO IS FOUND LIABLE IS PERSONALLY LIABLE IN AN AMOUNT OF $20,000THIS FORSECTION, EACHA INSTANCE IN WHICH INFORMATION WAS WITHHELD FROM THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT,PARENT ANDMAY ABRING GOVERNMENTALSUIT ENTITYAGAINST THATAN EMPLOYSEMPLOYEE THEWHO EMPLOYEEHAS MAYOR NOTWHO INDEMNIFYHAS ANATTEMPTED OFFENDINGTO EMPLOYEEFACILITATE, ANDENCOURAGE MAYOR NOTCOERCE USEA PUBLICMINOR MONIESCHILD TO PAYWITHHOLD FORINFORMATION FROM THE EMPLOYEE'SMINOR LIABILITY.CHILD'S PARENT.
AT A MINIMUM, AN EMPLOYEE WHO IS FOUND LIABLE IS PERSONALLY LIABLE IN AN AMOUNT OF $20,000 AND A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY THAT EMPLOYS THE EMPLOYEE MAY NOT INDEMNIFY AN OFFENDING EMPLOYEE AND MAY NOT USE PUBLIC MONIES TO PAY FOR THE EMPLOYEE'S LIABILITY.
AT A MINIMUM, THE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR INSTITUTION THAT MAINTAINED THE POLICY IS LIABLE TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT FOR $500,000 FOR EACH INSTANCEOCCURRENCE INWHERE WHICH INFORMATION WAS WITHHELD FROM THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT.
THE RIGHT TO SUE BELONGS INDIVIDUALLY TO EACH OF THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENTS,PARENTS AND ONE PARENT MAY FILE SUIT EVEN IF THE MINOR CHILD'S OTHER PARENT DOES NOT CONSENT TO THE ACTION.
J.I.
-3. 4 - H.B.
2249 3.
AJ. CAUSE OF ACTION ACCRUES SEPARATELY FOR EACH INSTANCE OF FACILITATING, ENCOURAGING OR COERCING A MINOR CHILD TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION FROM THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT.
FAILINGWITHIN SIX MONTHS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS AMENDMENT TO ABIDETHIS BYSECTION, THIS STATE, A PARENT'SPOLITICAL EXPRESSSUBDIVISION REQUESTOF THIS STATE OR HIDINGA THEGOVERNMENTAL ISSUEENTITY FROMOR INSTITUTION, INCLUDING AN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION, OR AN EMPLOYEE OF THIS STATE, A PARENTPOLITICAL CONSTITUTESSUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE OR A SEPARATEGOVERNMENTAL VIOLATIONENTITY OR INSTITUTION THAT TRIGGERSFACILITATED, ENCOURAGED OR COERCED, OR ATTEMPTED TO FACILITATE, ENCOURAGE OR COERCE, A NEWMINOR ACCRUALCHILD DATE,TO REGARDLESSWITHHOLD OFINFORMATION WHENFROM THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT FIRSTBEFORE SUSPECTEDTHE AEFFECTIVE SOCIALDATE TRANSITIONOF WASTHIS OCCURRING.AMENDMENT TO THIS SECTION SHALL DISCLOSE THE OFFENDING ACTION TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT.
K.THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS - 4 - H.B.
WITHIN2249 SIX MONTHS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS AMENDMENT TO THIS SECTION, THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE OR A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR INSTITUTION, INCLUDING AN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION, HAS AN AFFIRMATIVE DUTY TO INVESTIGATE AND DISCOVER ALL PREVIOUS INSTANCES IN WHICH IT OR AN EMPLOYEE OF THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE OR A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR INSTITUTION FACILITATED,IS ENCOURAGEDCIVILLY ORLIABLE COERCED, OR ATTEMPTED TO FACILITATE,THE ENCOURAGEPARENT OROF COERCE, A MINOR CHILD TOFOR WITHHOLDANY INFORMATIONVIOLATION FROMTHAT THEWAS MINORNOT CHILD'SDISCLOSED PARENTPURSUANT BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS AMENDMENT TO THIS SECTION.SUBSECTION.
THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE OR A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR INSTITUTION, INCLUDING AN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION, ORIS ANLIABLE EMPLOYEE OF THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE OR A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR INSTITUTION WHO FACILITATED, ENCOURAGED OR COERCED, OR ATTEMPTED TO FACILITATE, ENCOURAGE OR COERCE, A MINOR CHILD TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION FROM THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT BEFOREFOR THEAT EFFECTIVELEAST DATE$500,000 OFFOR THISEACH AMENDMENTSEPARATE TOACT THISTHAT SECTIONWAS SHALLNOT DISCLOSEDISCLOSED ANY KNOWN OFFENDING ACTION TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT.
THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE OR A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR INSTITUTION, INCLUDING AN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION, OR AN EMPLOYEE OF THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE OR A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR INSTITUTION IS CIVILLYPERSONALLY LIABLE TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT OFFOR AAT MINORLEAST CHILD$20,000 FOR ANYEACH VIOLATIONSEPARATE ACT THAT WAS NOT DISCLOSED PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION IF THE VIOLATIONMINOR WASCHILD'S ACTUALLYPARENT. KNOWN OR WOULD HAVE BEEN DISCOVERED WITH REASONABLE DILIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION.
THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE OR A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR INSTITUTION, INCLUDING AN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION, IS LIABLE TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT FOR AT LEAST $500,000 FOR EACH INSTANCE THAT WAS NOT DISCLOSED TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT.
AN EMPLOYEE OF THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE OR A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR INSTITUTION IS PERSONALLY LIABLE TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT FOR AT LEAST $20,000 FOR EACH INSTANCE THAT WAS NOT DISCLOSED TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT.
L.K.
"DISTINCT ACT OR OMISSION" MEANS AN ACT OR OMISSION THAT DIFFERS FROM ANOTHER ACT OR OMISSION IN ONE OF THE FOLLOWING WAYS:
- 5 - H.B.
2249 (a) THE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR OFFICIAL WHO PERFORMED OR DIRECTED THE ACT OR OMISSION IS DIFFERENT.
(b) THE SPECIFIC FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT THAT IS INVOLVED IS DIFFERENT.
(c) THE OCCASION OR EPISODE DURING WHICH THE ACT OR OMISSION OCCURRED IS DIFFERENT AND THERE IS NOT A SINGLE, CONTINUOUS, UNINTERRUPTED EXERCISE OF AUTHORITY.
(d) THE ACT OR OMISSION OCCURRED AFTER THE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR OFFICIAL RECEIVED ACTUAL OR CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE, WHETHER THROUGH A WRITTEN DEMAND, A PREVIOUS COURT ORDER OR AN EXPRESS ORAL OR WRITTEN OBJECTION FROM THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT.
2.
Show all 49 changed lines (9 more)
3.2.
"INSTANCE" MEANS EACH SEPARATE ACT OR OMISSION THAT INTERFERES WITH OR USURPS A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT EXCEPT THAT EACH DISTINCT ACT OR OMISSION BEYOND THE FIRST ACT OR OMISSION CONSTITUTES AN ADDITIONAL INSTANCE, UNLESS IT IS BY THE SAME GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR OFFICIAL ENGAGING IN REPEATED ACTS OF THE SAME NATURE, DIRECTED AT THE SAME MINOR CHILD AND THE SAME FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT AND OCCURS WITHIN A SINGLE SCHOOL YEAR OR A TWELVE-MONTH PERIOD, THEN THE REPEATED ACTS CONSTITUTE A MINIMUM OF ONE INSTANCE PER SCHOOL YEAR OR TWELVE-MONTH PERIOD.
4.
5.3.
6.- 5 -
"WITHOLD":
(a) MEANS TO KNOWINGLY FAIL TO DISCLOSE, CONCEAL OR PREVENT THE COMMUNICATION OF INFORMATION TO A PARENT, WHETHER BY AN AFFIRMATIVE ACT OF CONCEALMENT, BY DECLINING TO RESPOND TO A PARENT'S INQUIRY OR BY OMITTING INFORMATION FROM A COMMUNICATION WITH THE PARENT IF THE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR EMPLOYEE KNOWS OR REASONABLY SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT THE PARENT WAS ENTITLED TO THAT INFORMATION PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION.
(b) DOES NOT INCLUDE A GOOD FAITH DELAY IN PROVIDING INFORMATION THAT IS PENDING VERIFICATION OF THE INFORMATION'S ACCURACY IF THE INFORMATION IS DISCLOSED TO THE PARENT WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME AND NOT LATER THAN FIVE BUSINESS DAYS AFTER THE GOOD FAITH DELAY BEGINS.
- 6 -
Show all 49 changed rows (9 more)
View plain text versions (6)
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version (02/25/2026) pdf
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version (04/21/2026) Current pdf
- SENATE - Education View text pdf
- Amended SENATE - Mesnard flr amend (ref ED) adopted pdf
- Amended SENATE - Mesnard flr amend (ref Senate Engrossed House Bill) adopted pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill strengthens parental rights and establishes significant liabilities for governmental entities or officials who interfere with those rights.
-
1-602
THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE, A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR AN INSTITUTION MAY NOT MAINTAIN A POLICY THAT ALLOWS AN EMPLOYEE TO FACILITATE, ENCOURAGE OR COERCE A MINOR CHILD TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION FROM THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT.→ THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE, A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR AN INSTITUTION MAY NOT MAINTAIN A POLICY THAT ALLOWS AN EMPLOYEE TO FACILITATE, ENCOURAGE OR COERCE A MINOR CHILD TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION FROM THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT.Clarifies that no governmental entity may have a policy allowing employees to facilitate minors in withholding information from parents.
-
1-602
G. THIS STATE, ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE OR ANY OFFICIAL ACTING UNDER COLOR OF LAW EXPRESSLY WAIVES ALL CLAIMS TO SOVEREIGN, QUALIFIED OR DISCRETIONARY IMMUNITY FOR ANY VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION.→ G. H. A governmental entity or official described in subsection E of this section may interfere with or usurp the fundamental right of parents to direct the upbringing, education, health care and mental health of their children only if the governmental entity or official successfully demonstrates both elements described in subsection F of this section.Modifies the waiver of immunity and clarifies that governmental entities must meet specific criteria to justify interference with parental rights.
-
1-602
AT A MINIMUM, THE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY IS LIABLE TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT IN AN AMOUNT OF $500,000 FOR EACH INSTANCE OF INTERFERING WITH OR USURPING A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT, AND A GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL IS PERSONALLY LIABLE TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT IN AN AMOUNT OF $20,000 FOR EACH INSTANCE OF INTERFERING WITH OR USURPING A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT.→ AT A MINIMUM, THE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY IS LIABLE TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT IN AN AMOUNT OF $500,000 FOR EACH INSTANCE OF INTERFERING WITH OR USURPING A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT, AND A GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL IS PERSONALLY LIABLE TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT IN AN AMOUNT OF $20,000 FOR EACH INSTANCE OF INTERFERING WITH OR USURPING A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT. A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY THAT EMPLOYS THE OFFICIAL MAY NOT INDEMNIFY AN OFFENDING OFFICIAL AND MAY NOT USE PUBLIC MONIES TO PAY FOR THE OFFICIAL'S LIABILITY.Increases accountability for governmental entities and officials by barring them from indemnifying employees for violations of parental rights.
-
1-602
A parent may bring suit against a governmental entity or official described in this subsection based on any violation of the statutory rights set forth in this chapter or any other action that interferes with or usurps the fundamental right of parents to direct the upbringing, education, health care and mental health of their children in the superior court in the county in which the violation or other action occurs or in federal court, if authorized by federal law, or before an administrative tribunal of appropriate jurisdiction.→ A parent may bring suit against a governmental entity or official described in this subsection based on any violation of the statutory rights set forth in this chapter or any other action that interferes with or usurps the fundamental right of parents to direct the upbringing, education, health care and mental health of their children in the superior court in the county in which the violation or other action occurs or in federal court, if authorized by federal law, or before an administrative tribunal of appropriate jurisdiction. A parent may raise a violation of this chapter as a claim or a defense.Expands the legal recourse available to parents by allowing violations to be raised as claims or defenses in court.
-
1-602
IN ANY ACTION BROUGHT UNDER THIS SECTION, A SHOWING OF A VIOLATION OF THE RIGHTS GUARANTEED OR RECOGNIZED BY THIS SECTION ESTABLISHES A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION OF IRREPARABLE HARM.→ A SHOWING OF A VIOLATION OF THE RIGHTS GUARANTEED OR RECOGNIZED BY THIS SECTION ESTABLISHES A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION OF IRREPARABLE HARM.Establishes a rebuttable presumption of harm if parental rights are violated, simplifying the burden of proof for parents.
Action History
-
Vetoed by Governor
-
Transmit to Governor
-
PASSED
-
PASSED
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
PASSED
-
PASSED
-
PASSED
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DPA
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
-
Transmit to Senate
-
PASSED
-
DP
-
House Placed on Consent Calendar
-
House Second Reading
-
DP
-
House First Reading.
Sponsors
- Lisa Fink · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 39 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Lisa Fink Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 24 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 31 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 31 | 24 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 52% | 40% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (60)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron Márquez | Democrat | Nay |
| Alma Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Anna Abeytia | Democrat | Nay |
| Betty J Villegas | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Garcia | Democrat | Nay |
| Cesar Aguilar | Democrat | Nay |
| Christopher Mathis | Democrat | Nay |
| Consuelo Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Elda Luna-Nájera | Democrat | Nay |
| Janeen Connolly | Democrat | Nay |
| Junelle Cavero | Democrat | Nay |
| Kevin Volk | Democrat | Nay |
| Lorena Austin | Democrat | Nay |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Lydia Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Mae Peshlakai | Democrat | Nay |
| Mariana Sandoval | Democrat | Nay |
| Myron Tsosie | Democrat | Nay |
| Nancy Gutierrez | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Oscar De Los Santos | Democrat | Nay |
| Patty Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Quantá Crews | Democrat | Nay |
| Sarah Liguori | Democrat | Nay |
| Seth Blattman | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Stacey Travers | Democrat | Nay |
| Stephanie Simacek | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Stephanie Stahl Hamilton | Democrat | Nay |
| Alexander Kolodin | Republican | Yea |
| Beverly Pingerelli | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Lopez | Republican | Yea |
| Cody Reim | Republican | Yea |
| David Livingston | Republican | Not Voting |
| Gail Griffin | Republican | Yea |
| James Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Weninger | Republican | Yea |
| John Gillette | Republican | Yea |
| Julie Willoughby | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Olson | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Wilmeth | Republican | Not Voting |
| Khyl Powell | Republican | Yea |
| Laurin Hendrix | Republican | Yea |
| Leo Biasiucci | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Fink | Republican | Yea |
| Lupe Diaz | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Gress | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Carbone | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Way | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Peña | Republican | Yea |
| Neal Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Nick Kupper | Republican | Yea |
| Pamela Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Quang H Nguyen | Republican | Yea |
| Rachel Keshel | Republican | Yea |
| Ralph Heap | Republican | Yea |
| Selina Bliss | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Montenegro | Republican | Yea |
| Sylvia Allen | Republican | Yea |
| Teresa Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Rivero | Republican | Yea |
| Walt Blackman | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 40% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Analise Ortiz | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Nay |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Nay |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Nay |
| Kiana Sears | Democrat | Nay |
| Lauren Kuby | Democrat | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Nay |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Nay |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Nay |
| Carine Werner | Republican | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| Hildy Angius | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Yea |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Payne | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Finchem | Republican | Yea |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy "Tim" Dunn | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 10 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 10 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 33% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Analise Ortiz | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Nay |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Nay |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Nay |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Nay |
| Kiana Sears | Democrat | Nay |
| Lauren Kuby | Democrat | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Carine Werner | Republican | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| Hildy Angius | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Yea |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Payne | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Finchem | Republican | Yea |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy "Tim" Dunn | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 23 | 0 | 4 |
| Republican | 31 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 31 | 23 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 52% | 38% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (60)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron Márquez | Democrat | Nay |
| Alma Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Anna Abeytia | Democrat | Nay |
| Betty J Villegas | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Garcia | Democrat | Nay |
| Cesar Aguilar | Democrat | Nay |
| Christopher Mathis | Democrat | Nay |
| Consuelo Hernandez | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Elda Luna-Nájera | Democrat | Nay |
| Janeen Connolly | Democrat | Nay |
| Junelle Cavero | Democrat | Nay |
| Kevin Volk | Democrat | Nay |
| Lorena Austin | Democrat | Nay |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Lydia Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Mae Peshlakai | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Mariana Sandoval | Democrat | Nay |
| Myron Tsosie | Democrat | Nay |
| Nancy Gutierrez | Democrat | Nay |
| Oscar De Los Santos | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Patty Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Quantá Crews | Democrat | Nay |
| Sarah Liguori | Democrat | Nay |
| Seth Blattman | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Stacey Travers | Democrat | Nay |
| Stephanie Simacek | Democrat | Nay |
| Stephanie Stahl Hamilton | Democrat | Nay |
| Alexander Kolodin | Republican | Yea |
| Beverly Pingerelli | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Lopez | Republican | Yea |
| David Livingston | Republican | Yea |
| David Marshall, Sr. | Republican | Yea |
| Gail Griffin | Republican | Yea |
| James Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Weninger | Republican | Yea |
| John Gillette | Republican | Yea |
| Joseph Chaplik | Republican | Not Voting |
| Julie Willoughby | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Olson | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Wilmeth | Republican | Yea |
| Khyl Powell | Republican | Yea |
| Laurin Hendrix | Republican | Not Voting |
| Leo Biasiucci | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Fink | Republican | Yea |
| Lupe Diaz | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Gress | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Carbone | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Way | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Peña | Republican | Yea |
| Neal Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Nick Kupper | Republican | Yea |
| Pamela Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Quang H Nguyen | Republican | Yea |
| Rachel Keshel | Republican | Yea |
| Ralph Heap | Republican | Yea |
| Selina Bliss | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Montenegro | Republican | Yea |
| Teresa Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Rivero | Republican | Yea |
| Walt Blackman | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2249?
- HB 2249 is sponsored by Lisa Fink (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 2249?
- This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 2249?
- Track HB 2249 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2249
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2249
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →