Arizona 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session Status: To Executive 1 R cosponsors

HB 2249 — parents' bill of rights; remedies

Last action — Vetoed by Governor

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

Vetoed by Governor Katie Hobbs (Democratic) on June 19, 2026.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

In plain language

This bill establishes specific rights for parents regarding their children's education.

The bill outlines a set of rights that parents have in relation to their children's education, including access to information and involvement in decision-making. It aims to strengthen parental authority in the education system.

What this means for you
  • Families: This means families will have clearer rights to participate in their children's education and access related information.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

148 added · 205 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent changes to House Bill 2249 involve the addition of specific language that outlines a "parents' bill of rights" and related remedies. This means the bill is now more focused on ensuring that parents have certain rights and ways to address grievances. These amendments are significant because they clarify and strengthen parental involvement in decisions that affect their children, potentially leading to better outcomes for families.

→
Previous
Latest
Senate Engrossed House Bill parents' bill of rights;
House Engrossed parents' bill of rights;
A SCHOOL DISTRICT OR SCHOOL EMPLOYEE MAY NOT FACILITATE OR IMPLEMENT ANY FORM OF SOCIAL TRANSITIONING FOR A MINOR CHILD WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF EACH OF THE PARENTS OF THE MINOR CHILD.
THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE, A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR AN INSTITUTION MAY NOT MAINTAIN A - 2 - H.B.
THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE, A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR AN INSTITUTION MAY NOT MAINTAIN A POLICY THAT ALLOWS AN EMPLOYEE TO FACILITATE, ENCOURAGE OR COERCE A MINOR CHILD TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION FROM THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT.
2249 POLICY THAT ALLOWS AN EMPLOYEE TO FACILITATE, ENCOURAGE OR COERCE A MINOR CHILD TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION FROM THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT.
- 2 - H.B.
D.
2249 D.
Except as prescribed in subsections F and G H of this section, this state, a political subdivision of this state or any other governmental entity, or any official of this state, a political subdivision of this state or any other governmental entity acting under color of law, shall not interfere with or usurp the fundamental right of parents to direct the upbringing, education, health care and mental health of their children.
Except as prescribed in subsections F and G of this section, this state, a political subdivision of this state or any other governmental entity, or any official of this state, a political subdivision of this state or any other governmental entity acting under color of law, shall not interfere with or usurp the fundamental right of parents to direct the upbringing, education, health care and mental health of their children.
IN ANY ACTION BROUGHT UNDER THIS SECTION, A SHOWING OF A VIOLATION OF THE RIGHTS GUARANTEED OR RECOGNIZED BY THIS SECTION ESTABLISHES A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION OF IRREPARABLE HARM.
THIS STATE, ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE OR ANY OFFICIAL ACTING UNDER COLOR OF LAW EXPRESSLY WAIVES ALL CLAIMS TO SOVEREIGN, QUALIFIED OR DISCRETIONARY IMMUNITY FOR ANY VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION.
A governmental entity or official described in subsection E of this section may interfere with or usurp the fundamental right of parents to direct the upbringing, education, health care and mental health of their children only if the governmental entity or official successfully demonstrates both elements described in subsection F of this section.
G.
H.
A governmental entity or official described in subsection E of this section may interfere with or usurp the fundamental right of parents to direct the upbringing, education, health care and mental health of their children only if the governmental entity or official successfully - 3 - H.B.
2249 demonstrates both elements described in subsection F of this section.
AT A MINIMUM, THE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY IS LIABLE TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT IN AN AMOUNT OF $500,000 FOR EACH INSTANCE OF INTERFERING WITH OR USURPING A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT, AND A GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL IS PERSONALLY LIABLE TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT IN AN AMOUNT OF $20,000 FOR EACH INSTANCE OF INTERFERING WITH OR USURPING A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT.
AT A MINIMUM, THE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY IS LIABLE TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT IN AN AMOUNT OF $500,000 AND A GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL IS PERSONALLY LIABLE TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT IN AN AMOUNT OF $20,000 FOR EACH SEPARATE INSTANCE OF INTERFERING WITH OR USURPING A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT.
A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY THAT EMPLOYS THE OFFICIAL MAY NOT INDEMNIFY AN OFFENDING OFFICIAL AND MAY NOT USE PUBLIC MONIES TO PAY FOR THE OFFICIAL'S LIABILITY.
A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY THAT EMPLOYS THE - 3 - H.B.
THE RIGHT TO SUE BELONGS INDIVIDUALLY TO EACH OF THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENTS, AND ONE PARENT MAY FILE SUIT EVEN IF THE MINOR CHILD'S OTHER PARENT DOES NOT CONSENT TO THE ACTION.
2249 OFFICIAL MAY NOT INDEMNIFY AN OFFENDING OFFICIAL AND MAY NOT USE PUBLIC MONIES TO PAY FOR THE OFFICIAL'S LIABILITY.
I.
THE RIGHT TO SUE BELONGS INDIVIDUALLY TO EACH OF THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENTS AND ONE PARENT MAY FILE SUIT EVEN IF THE MINOR CHILD'S OTHER PARENT DOES NOT CONSENT TO THE ACTION.
IN ADDITION TO SUBSECTION H OF THIS SECTION, A MINOR CHILD'S PARENT MAY BRING SUIT AGAINST AN EMPLOYEE WHO HAS OR WHO HAS ATTEMPTED TO FACILITATE, ENCOURAGE OR COERCE A MINOR CHILD TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION FROM THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT.
H.
AT A MINIMUM, AN EMPLOYEE WHO IS FOUND LIABLE IS PERSONALLY LIABLE IN AN AMOUNT OF $20,000 FOR EACH INSTANCE IN WHICH INFORMATION WAS WITHHELD FROM THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT, AND A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY THAT EMPLOYS THE EMPLOYEE MAY NOT INDEMNIFY AN OFFENDING EMPLOYEE AND MAY NOT USE PUBLIC MONIES TO PAY FOR THE EMPLOYEE'S LIABILITY.
IN ADDITION TO SUBSECTION G OF THIS SECTION, A MINOR CHILD'S PARENT MAY BRING SUIT AGAINST AN EMPLOYEE WHO HAS OR WHO HAS ATTEMPTED TO FACILITATE, ENCOURAGE OR COERCE A MINOR CHILD TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION FROM THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT.
AT A MINIMUM, AN EMPLOYEE WHO IS FOUND LIABLE IS PERSONALLY LIABLE IN AN AMOUNT OF $20,000 AND A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY THAT EMPLOYS THE EMPLOYEE MAY NOT INDEMNIFY AN OFFENDING EMPLOYEE AND MAY NOT USE PUBLIC MONIES TO PAY FOR THE EMPLOYEE'S LIABILITY.
AT A MINIMUM, THE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR INSTITUTION THAT MAINTAINED THE POLICY IS LIABLE TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT FOR $500,000 FOR EACH INSTANCE IN WHICH INFORMATION WAS WITHHELD FROM THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT.
AT A MINIMUM, THE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR INSTITUTION THAT MAINTAINED THE POLICY IS LIABLE TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT FOR $500,000 FOR EACH OCCURRENCE WHERE INFORMATION WAS WITHHELD FROM THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT.
THE RIGHT TO SUE BELONGS INDIVIDUALLY TO EACH OF THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENTS, AND ONE PARENT MAY FILE SUIT EVEN IF THE MINOR CHILD'S OTHER PARENT DOES NOT CONSENT TO THE ACTION.
THE RIGHT TO SUE BELONGS INDIVIDUALLY TO EACH OF THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENTS AND ONE PARENT MAY FILE SUIT EVEN IF THE MINOR CHILD'S OTHER PARENT DOES NOT CONSENT TO THE ACTION.
J.
I.
- 4 - H.B.
3.
2249 3.
A CAUSE OF ACTION ACCRUES SEPARATELY FOR EACH INSTANCE OF FACILITATING, ENCOURAGING OR COERCING A MINOR CHILD TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION FROM THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT.
J.
FAILING TO ABIDE BY A PARENT'S EXPRESS REQUEST OR HIDING THE ISSUE FROM A PARENT CONSTITUTES A SEPARATE VIOLATION THAT TRIGGERS A NEW ACCRUAL DATE, REGARDLESS OF WHEN THE PARENT FIRST SUSPECTED A SOCIAL TRANSITION WAS OCCURRING.
WITHIN SIX MONTHS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS AMENDMENT TO THIS SECTION, THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE OR A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR INSTITUTION, INCLUDING AN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION, OR AN EMPLOYEE OF THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE OR A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR INSTITUTION THAT FACILITATED, ENCOURAGED OR COERCED, OR ATTEMPTED TO FACILITATE, ENCOURAGE OR COERCE, A MINOR CHILD TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION FROM THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS AMENDMENT TO THIS SECTION SHALL DISCLOSE THE OFFENDING ACTION TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT.
K.
THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS - 4 - H.B.
WITHIN SIX MONTHS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS AMENDMENT TO THIS SECTION, THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE OR A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR INSTITUTION, INCLUDING AN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION, HAS AN AFFIRMATIVE DUTY TO INVESTIGATE AND DISCOVER ALL PREVIOUS INSTANCES IN WHICH IT OR AN EMPLOYEE OF THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE OR A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR INSTITUTION FACILITATED, ENCOURAGED OR COERCED, OR ATTEMPTED TO FACILITATE, ENCOURAGE OR COERCE, A MINOR CHILD TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION FROM THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS AMENDMENT TO THIS SECTION.
2249 STATE OR A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR INSTITUTION, INCLUDING AN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION, OR AN EMPLOYEE OF THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE OR A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR INSTITUTION IS CIVILLY LIABLE TO THE PARENT OF A MINOR CHILD FOR ANY VIOLATION THAT WAS NOT DISCLOSED PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION.
THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE OR A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR INSTITUTION, INCLUDING AN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION, OR AN EMPLOYEE OF THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE OR A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR INSTITUTION WHO FACILITATED, ENCOURAGED OR COERCED, OR ATTEMPTED TO FACILITATE, ENCOURAGE OR COERCE, A MINOR CHILD TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION FROM THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS AMENDMENT TO THIS SECTION SHALL DISCLOSE ANY KNOWN OFFENDING ACTION TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT.
THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE OR A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR INSTITUTION, INCLUDING AN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION, IS LIABLE TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT FOR AT LEAST $500,000 FOR EACH SEPARATE ACT THAT WAS NOT DISCLOSED TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT.
THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE OR A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR INSTITUTION, INCLUDING AN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION, OR AN EMPLOYEE OF THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE OR A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR INSTITUTION IS CIVILLY LIABLE TO THE PARENT OF A MINOR CHILD FOR ANY VIOLATION THAT WAS NOT DISCLOSED PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION IF THE VIOLATION WAS ACTUALLY KNOWN OR WOULD HAVE BEEN DISCOVERED WITH REASONABLE DILIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION.
AN EMPLOYEE OF THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE OR A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR INSTITUTION IS PERSONALLY LIABLE TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT FOR AT LEAST $20,000 FOR EACH SEPARATE ACT THAT WAS NOT DISCLOSED TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT.
THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE OR A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR INSTITUTION, INCLUDING AN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION, IS LIABLE TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT FOR AT LEAST $500,000 FOR EACH INSTANCE THAT WAS NOT DISCLOSED TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT.
AN EMPLOYEE OF THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE OR A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR INSTITUTION IS PERSONALLY LIABLE TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT FOR AT LEAST $20,000 FOR EACH INSTANCE THAT WAS NOT DISCLOSED TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT.
L.
K.
"DISTINCT ACT OR OMISSION" MEANS AN ACT OR OMISSION THAT DIFFERS FROM ANOTHER ACT OR OMISSION IN ONE OF THE FOLLOWING WAYS:
- 5 - H.B.
2249 (a) THE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR OFFICIAL WHO PERFORMED OR DIRECTED THE ACT OR OMISSION IS DIFFERENT.
(b) THE SPECIFIC FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT THAT IS INVOLVED IS DIFFERENT.
(c) THE OCCASION OR EPISODE DURING WHICH THE ACT OR OMISSION OCCURRED IS DIFFERENT AND THERE IS NOT A SINGLE, CONTINUOUS, UNINTERRUPTED EXERCISE OF AUTHORITY.
(d) THE ACT OR OMISSION OCCURRED AFTER THE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR OFFICIAL RECEIVED ACTUAL OR CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE, WHETHER THROUGH A WRITTEN DEMAND, A PREVIOUS COURT ORDER OR AN EXPRESS ORAL OR WRITTEN OBJECTION FROM THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT.
2.
Show all 49 changed rows (9 more)
Previous
Latest
3.
2.
"INSTANCE" MEANS EACH SEPARATE ACT OR OMISSION THAT INTERFERES WITH OR USURPS A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT EXCEPT THAT EACH DISTINCT ACT OR OMISSION BEYOND THE FIRST ACT OR OMISSION CONSTITUTES AN ADDITIONAL INSTANCE, UNLESS IT IS BY THE SAME GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR OFFICIAL ENGAGING IN REPEATED ACTS OF THE SAME NATURE, DIRECTED AT THE SAME MINOR CHILD AND THE SAME FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT AND OCCURS WITHIN A SINGLE SCHOOL YEAR OR A TWELVE-MONTH PERIOD, THEN THE REPEATED ACTS CONSTITUTE A MINIMUM OF ONE INSTANCE PER SCHOOL YEAR OR TWELVE-MONTH PERIOD.
4.
5.
3.
6.
- 5 -
"WITHOLD":
(a) MEANS TO KNOWINGLY FAIL TO DISCLOSE, CONCEAL OR PREVENT THE COMMUNICATION OF INFORMATION TO A PARENT, WHETHER BY AN AFFIRMATIVE ACT OF CONCEALMENT, BY DECLINING TO RESPOND TO A PARENT'S INQUIRY OR BY OMITTING INFORMATION FROM A COMMUNICATION WITH THE PARENT IF THE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR EMPLOYEE KNOWS OR REASONABLY SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT THE PARENT WAS ENTITLED TO THAT INFORMATION PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION.
(b) DOES NOT INCLUDE A GOOD FAITH DELAY IN PROVIDING INFORMATION THAT IS PENDING VERIFICATION OF THE INFORMATION'S ACCURACY IF THE INFORMATION IS DISCLOSED TO THE PARENT WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME AND NOT LATER THAN FIVE BUSINESS DAYS AFTER THE GOOD FAITH DELAY BEGINS.
- 6 -
View plain text versions (6)

How this bill changes current law

5 changes Share ↗

AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.

The bill strengthens parental rights and establishes significant liabilities for governmental entities or officials who interfere with those rights.

  • 1-602

    THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE, A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR AN INSTITUTION MAY NOT MAINTAIN A POLICY THAT ALLOWS AN EMPLOYEE TO FACILITATE, ENCOURAGE OR COERCE A MINOR CHILD TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION FROM THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT. → THIS STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE, A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY OR AN INSTITUTION MAY NOT MAINTAIN A POLICY THAT ALLOWS AN EMPLOYEE TO FACILITATE, ENCOURAGE OR COERCE A MINOR CHILD TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION FROM THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT.

    Clarifies that no governmental entity may have a policy allowing employees to facilitate minors in withholding information from parents.

  • 1-602

    G. THIS STATE, ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE OR ANY OFFICIAL ACTING UNDER COLOR OF LAW EXPRESSLY WAIVES ALL CLAIMS TO SOVEREIGN, QUALIFIED OR DISCRETIONARY IMMUNITY FOR ANY VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION. → G. H. A governmental entity or official described in subsection E of this section may interfere with or usurp the fundamental right of parents to direct the upbringing, education, health care and mental health of their children only if the governmental entity or official successfully demonstrates both elements described in subsection F of this section.

    Modifies the waiver of immunity and clarifies that governmental entities must meet specific criteria to justify interference with parental rights.

  • 1-602

    AT A MINIMUM, THE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY IS LIABLE TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT IN AN AMOUNT OF $500,000 FOR EACH INSTANCE OF INTERFERING WITH OR USURPING A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT, AND A GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL IS PERSONALLY LIABLE TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT IN AN AMOUNT OF $20,000 FOR EACH INSTANCE OF INTERFERING WITH OR USURPING A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT. → AT A MINIMUM, THE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY IS LIABLE TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT IN AN AMOUNT OF $500,000 FOR EACH INSTANCE OF INTERFERING WITH OR USURPING A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT, AND A GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL IS PERSONALLY LIABLE TO THE MINOR CHILD'S PARENT IN AN AMOUNT OF $20,000 FOR EACH INSTANCE OF INTERFERING WITH OR USURPING A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT. A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY THAT EMPLOYS THE OFFICIAL MAY NOT INDEMNIFY AN OFFENDING OFFICIAL AND MAY NOT USE PUBLIC MONIES TO PAY FOR THE OFFICIAL'S LIABILITY.

    Increases accountability for governmental entities and officials by barring them from indemnifying employees for violations of parental rights.

  • 1-602

    A parent may bring suit against a governmental entity or official described in this subsection based on any violation of the statutory rights set forth in this chapter or any other action that interferes with or usurps the fundamental right of parents to direct the upbringing, education, health care and mental health of their children in the superior court in the county in which the violation or other action occurs or in federal court, if authorized by federal law, or before an administrative tribunal of appropriate jurisdiction. → A parent may bring suit against a governmental entity or official described in this subsection based on any violation of the statutory rights set forth in this chapter or any other action that interferes with or usurps the fundamental right of parents to direct the upbringing, education, health care and mental health of their children in the superior court in the county in which the violation or other action occurs or in federal court, if authorized by federal law, or before an administrative tribunal of appropriate jurisdiction. A parent may raise a violation of this chapter as a claim or a defense.

    Expands the legal recourse available to parents by allowing violations to be raised as claims or defenses in court.

  • 1-602

    IN ANY ACTION BROUGHT UNDER THIS SECTION, A SHOWING OF A VIOLATION OF THE RIGHTS GUARANTEED OR RECOGNIZED BY THIS SECTION ESTABLISHES A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION OF IRREPARABLE HARM. → A SHOWING OF A VIOLATION OF THE RIGHTS GUARANTEED OR RECOGNIZED BY THIS SECTION ESTABLISHES A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION OF IRREPARABLE HARM.

    Establishes a rebuttable presumption of harm if parental rights are violated, simplifying the burden of proof for parents.

Action History

  1. Vetoed by Governor

  2. Transmit to Governor

  3. PASSED

  4. PASSED

  5. Transmit to House

  6. PASSED

  7. DPA

  8. PASSED

  9. PASSED

  10. PASSED

  11. Transmit to House

  12. PASSED

  13. DPA

  14. DPA

  15. Senate Second Reading

  16. Senate First Reading

  17. Transmit to Senate

  18. PASSED

  19. DP

  20. House Placed on Consent Calendar

  21. House Second Reading

  22. DP

  23. House First Reading.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 39 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (92)

92 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 92 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed

Passed 31 Yea · 24 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 02403
Republican 31002
Total 312405
% of votes cast 52%40%0%8%
How each member voted (60)
Member Party Vote
Aaron Márquez Democrat Nay
Alma Hernandez Democrat Nay
Anna Abeytia Democrat Nay
Betty J Villegas Democrat Nay
Brian Garcia Democrat Nay
Cesar Aguilar Democrat Nay
Christopher Mathis Democrat Nay
Consuelo Hernandez Democrat Nay
Elda Luna-Nájera Democrat Nay
Janeen Connolly Democrat Nay
Junelle Cavero Democrat Nay
Kevin Volk Democrat Nay
Lorena Austin Democrat Nay
Lupe Contreras Democrat Nay
Lydia Hernandez Democrat Nay
Mae Peshlakai Democrat Nay
Mariana Sandoval Democrat Nay
Myron Tsosie Democrat Nay
Nancy Gutierrez Democrat Not Voting
Oscar De Los Santos Democrat Nay
Patty Contreras Democrat Nay
Quantá Crews Democrat Nay
Sarah Liguori Democrat Nay
Seth Blattman Democrat Not Voting
Stacey Travers Democrat Nay
Stephanie Simacek Democrat Not Voting
Stephanie Stahl Hamilton Democrat Nay
Alexander Kolodin Republican Yea
Beverly Pingerelli Republican Yea
Chris Lopez Republican Yea
Cody Reim Republican Yea
David Livingston Republican Not Voting
Gail Griffin Republican Yea
James Taylor Republican Yea
Jeff Weninger Republican Yea
John Gillette Republican Yea
Julie Willoughby Republican Yea
Justin Olson Republican Yea
Justin Wilmeth Republican Not Voting
Khyl Powell Republican Yea
Laurin Hendrix Republican Yea
Leo Biasiucci Republican Yea
Lisa Fink Republican Yea
Lupe Diaz Republican Yea
Matt Gress Republican Yea
Michael Carbone Republican Yea
Michael Way Republican Yea
Michele Peña Republican Yea
Neal Carter Republican Yea
Nick Kupper Republican Yea
Pamela Carter Republican Yea
Quang H Nguyen Republican Yea
Rachel Keshel Republican Yea
Ralph Heap Republican Yea
Selina Bliss Republican Yea
Steve Montenegro Republican Yea
Sylvia Allen Republican Yea
Teresa Martinez Republican Yea
Tony Rivero Republican Yea
Walt Blackman Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed

Passed 17 Yea · 12 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 01201
Republican 17000
Total 171201
% of votes cast 57%40%0%3%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Analise Ortiz Democrat Nay
Brian Fernandez Democrat Nay
Catherine Miranda Democrat Not Voting
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Nay
Eva Diaz Democrat Nay
Flavio Bravo Democrat Nay
Kiana Sears Democrat Nay
Lauren Kuby Democrat Nay
Lela Alston Democrat Nay
Priya Sundareshan Democrat Nay
Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat Nay
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Nay
Theresa Hatathlie Democrat Nay
Carine Werner Republican Yea
David C. Farnsworth Republican Yea
David Gowan Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
Hildy Angius Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Yea
Jake Hoffman Republican Yea
Janae Shamp Republican Yea
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Kevin Payne Republican Yea
Mark Finchem Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican Yea
Venden "Vince" Leach Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Yea
Wendy Rogers Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed

Passed 17 Yea · 10 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 01003
Republican 17000
Total 171003
% of votes cast 57%33%0%10%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Analise Ortiz Democrat Nay
Brian Fernandez Democrat Nay
Catherine Miranda Democrat Nay
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Nay
Eva Diaz Democrat Nay
Flavio Bravo Democrat Nay
Kiana Sears Democrat Nay
Lauren Kuby Democrat Nay
Lela Alston Democrat Nay
Priya Sundareshan Democrat Not Voting
Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat Not Voting
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Nay
Theresa Hatathlie Democrat Not Voting
Carine Werner Republican Yea
David C. Farnsworth Republican Yea
David Gowan Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
Hildy Angius Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Yea
Jake Hoffman Republican Yea
Janae Shamp Republican Yea
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Kevin Payne Republican Yea
Mark Finchem Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican Yea
Venden "Vince" Leach Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Yea
Wendy Rogers Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed

Passed 31 Yea · 23 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 02304
Republican 31002
Total 312306
% of votes cast 52%38%0%10%
How each member voted (60)
Member Party Vote
Aaron Márquez Democrat Nay
Alma Hernandez Democrat Nay
Anna Abeytia Democrat Nay
Betty J Villegas Democrat Nay
Brian Garcia Democrat Nay
Cesar Aguilar Democrat Nay
Christopher Mathis Democrat Nay
Consuelo Hernandez Democrat Not Voting
Elda Luna-Nájera Democrat Nay
Janeen Connolly Democrat Nay
Junelle Cavero Democrat Nay
Kevin Volk Democrat Nay
Lorena Austin Democrat Nay
Lupe Contreras Democrat Nay
Lydia Hernandez Democrat Nay
Mae Peshlakai Democrat Not Voting
Mariana Sandoval Democrat Nay
Myron Tsosie Democrat Nay
Nancy Gutierrez Democrat Nay
Oscar De Los Santos Democrat Not Voting
Patty Contreras Democrat Nay
Quantá Crews Democrat Nay
Sarah Liguori Democrat Nay
Seth Blattman Democrat Not Voting
Stacey Travers Democrat Nay
Stephanie Simacek Democrat Nay
Stephanie Stahl Hamilton Democrat Nay
Alexander Kolodin Republican Yea
Beverly Pingerelli Republican Yea
Chris Lopez Republican Yea
David Livingston Republican Yea
David Marshall, Sr. Republican Yea
Gail Griffin Republican Yea
James Taylor Republican Yea
Jeff Weninger Republican Yea
John Gillette Republican Yea
Joseph Chaplik Republican Not Voting
Julie Willoughby Republican Yea
Justin Olson Republican Yea
Justin Wilmeth Republican Yea
Khyl Powell Republican Yea
Laurin Hendrix Republican Not Voting
Leo Biasiucci Republican Yea
Lisa Fink Republican Yea
Lupe Diaz Republican Yea
Matt Gress Republican Yea
Michael Carbone Republican Yea
Michael Way Republican Yea
Michele Peña Republican Yea
Neal Carter Republican Yea
Nick Kupper Republican Yea
Pamela Carter Republican Yea
Quang H Nguyen Republican Yea
Rachel Keshel Republican Yea
Ralph Heap Republican Yea
Selina Bliss Republican Yea
Steve Montenegro Republican Yea
Teresa Martinez Republican Yea
Tony Rivero Republican Yea
Walt Blackman Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 2249?
HB 2249 is sponsored by Lisa Fink (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 2249?
This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 2249?
Track HB 2249 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 2249

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 2249

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →