SCM 1003 — campaign finance; state authority.
Last action — House First Reading.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
In plain language
This bill addresses campaign finance regulations at the state level.
The bill modifies state laws governing campaign finance, impacting how campaigns are funded and reported. It aims to establish clearer regulations on financial contributions for political campaigns.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
5 added · 7 removedPlain-language change summary
The changes to Bill SCM 1003 involve the addition of a specific reference to the authority over campaign finance at the state level. This means the bill is now more focused on how state regulations can govern campaign financing rather than being a general statement on the issue. This matters because clarifying state authority could strengthen local policies on campaign finance, potentially increasing transparency and accountability in elections.
PREFILEDSenate DECEngrossed 29campaign 2025finance; REFERENCE TITLE:
campaign finance;
State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session SCMSENATE 1003CONCURRENT IntroducedMEMORIAL by1003 Senator Finchem A CONCURRENT MEMORIAL URGING THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO AMEND THE CONSTITUTION TO ALLOW STATES TO REGULATE AND LIMIT CAMPAIGN FINANCE.
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - SCMS.C.M. 1003 To the Congress of the United States of America:
1003 To the Congress of the United States of America:
and - 1 - SCMS.C.M. 1003 Whereas, the constitutional amendment process provides an avenue for reaffirming the role of the states in overseeing elections and ensuring that their authority in this realm is preserved.
1003 Whereas, the constitutional amendment process provides an avenue for reaffirming the role of the states in overseeing elections and ensuring that their authority in this realm is preserved.
View plain text versions (2)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version (02/19/2026) Current pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
House First Reading.
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DP
-
W/D
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
-
Prefiled.
Sponsors
- Mark Finchem · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Mark Finchem Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 14 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 25 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 7% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Analise Ortiz | Democrat | Yea |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Yea |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Yea |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Yea |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Yea |
| Kiana Sears | Democrat | Yea |
| Lauren Kuby | Democrat | Yea |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Yea |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Yea |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Yea |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Carine Werner | Republican | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| Hildy Angius | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Nay |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Nay |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Payne | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Finchem | Republican | Not Voting |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy "Tim" Dunn | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SCM 1003?
- SCM 1003 is sponsored by Mark Finchem (Republican).
- What is the current status of SCM 1003?
- This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SCM 1003?
- Track SCM 1003 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SCM 1003
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SCM 1003
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →