homeowners' associations; meetings; quorum
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1722 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1722.
You're tracking SB 1722
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1722 — homeowners' associations; meetings; quorum
Last action — Senate Second Reading
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced Version Current pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill modifies regulations regarding open meetings and notice requirements for homeowners' associations in Arizona.
-
33-1248
F. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION REGARDING OPEN MEETINGS AND NOTICES DO NOT APPLY TO CASUAL DISCUSSION OF ASSOCIATION ISSUES IN INFORMAL GATHERINGS, EVEN IF A QUORUM OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS PARTICIPATES, IF THE DIRECTORS ARE ACTING IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AS MEMBERS OF THE ASSOCIATION AND NOT IN THEIR CAPACITY AS DIRECTORS.→ F. G. It is the policy of this state as reflected in this section that all meetings of a condominium, whether meetings of the unit owners' association or meetings of the board of directors of the association, be conducted openly and that notices and agendas be provided in advance for those meetings that contain the information that is reasonably necessary to inform the unit owners of the matters to be discussed or decided and to ensure that unit owners have the ability to speak after discussion of agenda items, but before a vote of the board of directors or members is taken. Toward this end, any person or entity that is charged with the interpretation of these provisions, including members of the board of directors and any community manager, shall take into account this declaration of policy and shall construe any provision of this section in favor of open meetings.The change clarifies the importance of open meetings and the necessity for proper notice and agendas, while removing the exemption for informal gatherings from open meeting requirements.
-
33-1804
F. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION REGARDING OPEN MEETINGS AND NOTICES DO NOT APPLY TO CASUAL DISCUSSION OF ASSOCIATION ISSUES IN INFORMAL GATHERINGS, EVEN IF A QUORUM OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS PARTICIPATES, IF THE DIRECTORS ARE ACTING IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AS MEMBERS OF THE ASSOCIATION AND NOT IN THEIR CAPACITY AS DIRECTORS.→ F. G. It is the policy of this state as reflected in this section that all meetings of a condominium, whether meetings of the unit owners' association or meetings of the board of directors of the association, be conducted openly and that notices and agendas be provided in advance for those meetings that contain the information that is reasonably necessary to inform the unit owners of the matters to be discussed or decided and to ensure that unit owners have the ability to speak after discussion of agenda items, but before a vote of the board of directors or members is taken. Toward this end, any person or entity that is charged with the interpretation of these provisions, including members of the board of directors and any community manager, shall take into account this declaration of policy and shall construe any provision of this section in favor of open meetings.The amendment ensures that meetings and discussions are open and require proper notice, eliminating the prior exemption for casual discussions in informal settings.
Action History
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
Sponsors
- J.D. Mesnard · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- J.D. Mesnard Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1722?
- SB 1722 is sponsored by J.D. Mesnard (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1722?
- This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1722?
- Track SB 1722 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1722
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1722
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →