SB 1086 — AHCCCS; noncontracting providers; reimbursement
Last action — House Second Reading
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
31 added · 41 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Bill SB 1086 includes a key new provision stating that contractors must reimburse noncontracting providers for laboratory services referred by contracted providers, but this reimbursement cannot exceed what would be paid to contracted providers. Additionally, it clarifies that contractors cannot require prior authorization for diagnostic services, and they cannot retaliate against contracted providers for making referrals to noncontracted providers. These changes are important because they aim to ensure fair treatment of noncontracting providers and encourage competition within the healthcare market, which could lead to better options and prices for patients.
Fifty-seventhSenate LegislatureEngrossed HealthAHCCCS; and Human Services Second Regular Session S.B.
1086noncontracting PROPOSEDproviders; SENATE AMENDMENTS TO S.B.
reimbursement State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session SENATE BILL 1086 (ReferenceAN toACT printedAMENDING bill)TITLE Amendment36, instructionCHAPTER key:29, ARTICLE 1, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 36-2905.05;
[GREENRELATING UNDERLININGTO INTHE BRACKETS]ARIZONA indicatesHEALTH textCARE addedCOST toCONTAINMENT statuteSYSTEM. or previously enacted session law.
[Green(TEXT underliningOF inBILL brackets]BEGINS indicatesON textNEXT addedPAGE) to- newi session- lawS.B. or text restoring existing law.
[GREEN1086 STRIKEOUTBe INit BRACKETS]enacted indicatesby newthe textLegislature removedof fromthe statuteState orof previouslyArizona: enacted session law.
[Green strikeout in brackets] indicates text removed from existing statute, previously enacted session law or new session law.
<<Green carets>> indicate a section added to the bill.
<<Green strikeout in carets>> indicates a section removed from the bill.
The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows:
prohibitions [A.A.
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER LAW TO THE CONTRARY:]CONTRARY: [A.] [1.] A CONTRACTOR SHALL REIMBURSE A NONCONTRACTING PROVIDER FOR LABORATORY SERVICES RENDERED TO A MEMBER WHO IS ENROLLED WITH THE CONTRACTOR IF THE MEMBER WAS REFERRED BY A CONTRACTED PROVIDER [OF THE CONTRACTOR AT A RATE THAT IS NOT MORE THAN THE RATE THAT WOULD BE REIMBURSED TO A CONTRACTING PROVIDER].
[B.]1. [2.] A CONTRACTOR MAY NOT REQUIRE PRIOR AUTHORIZATION FOR DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES.
[C.]A [B.]CONTRACTOR SHALL REIMBURSE A CONTRACTORNONCONTRACTING MAYPROVIDER NOTFOR TAKELABORATORY ORSERVICES THREATENRENDERED TO TAKEA RETALIATORYMEMBER ACTIONWHO AGAINSTIS ENROLLED WITH THE CONTRACTOR IF THE MEMBER WAS REFERRED BY A CONTRACTED PROVIDER FOROF REFERRINGTHE CONTRACTOR AT A MEMBERRATE THAT IS NOT MORE THAN THE RATE THAT WOULD BE REIMBURSED TO A NONCONTRACTEDCONTRACTING PROVIDER.
Senate Amendments to S.B.
1086 Sec.
A CONTRACTOR MAY NOT REQUIRE PRIOR AUTHORIZATION FOR DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES.
B.
A CONTRACTOR MAY NOT TAKE OR THREATEN TO TAKE RETALIATORY ACTION AGAINST A CONTRACTED PROVIDER FOR REFERRING A MEMBER TO A NONCONTRACTED PROVIDER.
Sec.
2.
Enroll- and1 engross- to conform Amend title to conform CARINE WERNER 1086WERNER.docx 02/10/2026 2:33 PM C:
MH 130NVVHHL -2-
View plain text versions (3)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version (03/16/2026) Current pdf
- SENATE - Health and Human Services View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
W/D
-
DPA
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
-
Prefiled.
Sponsors
- Mark Finchem · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 8 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Mark Finchem Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 2 | 7 | 0 | 4 |
| Republican | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 18 | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 27% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Analise Ortiz | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Yea |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Nay |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Nay |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Kiana Sears | Democrat | Yea |
| Lauren Kuby | Democrat | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Nay |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Carine Werner | Republican | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| Hildy Angius | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Nay |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Payne | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Finchem | Republican | Yea |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy "Tim" Dunn | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1086?
- SB 1086 is sponsored by Mark Finchem (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1086?
- This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1086?
- Track SB 1086 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1086
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1086
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →