Arizona 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 1 R cosponsors

SB 1086 — AHCCCS; noncontracting providers; reimbursement

Last action — House Second Reading

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

31 added · 41 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of Bill SB 1086 includes a key new provision stating that contractors must reimburse noncontracting providers for laboratory services referred by contracted providers, but this reimbursement cannot exceed what would be paid to contracted providers. Additionally, it clarifies that contractors cannot require prior authorization for diagnostic services, and they cannot retaliate against contracted providers for making referrals to noncontracted providers. These changes are important because they aim to ensure fair treatment of noncontracting providers and encourage competition within the healthcare market, which could lead to better options and prices for patients.

→
Previous
Latest
Fifty-seventh Legislature Health and Human Services Second Regular Session S.B.
Senate Engrossed AHCCCS;
1086 PROPOSED SENATE AMENDMENTS TO S.B.
noncontracting providers;
1086 (Reference to printed bill) Amendment instruction key:
reimbursement State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session SENATE BILL 1086 AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 36, CHAPTER 29, ARTICLE 1, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 36-2905.05;
[GREEN UNDERLINING IN BRACKETS] indicates text added to statute or previously enacted session law.
RELATING TO THE ARIZONA HEALTH CARE COST CONTAINMENT SYSTEM.
[Green underlining in brackets] indicates text added to new session law or text restoring existing law.
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - S.B.
[GREEN STRIKEOUT IN BRACKETS] indicates new text removed from statute or previously enacted session law.
1086 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
[Green strikeout in brackets] indicates text removed from existing statute, previously enacted session law or new session law.
<<Green carets>> indicate a section added to the bill.
<<Green strikeout in carets>> indicates a section removed from the bill.
The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows:
prohibitions [A.
prohibitions A.
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER LAW TO THE CONTRARY:] [A.] [1.] A CONTRACTOR SHALL REIMBURSE A NONCONTRACTING PROVIDER FOR LABORATORY SERVICES RENDERED TO A MEMBER WHO IS ENROLLED WITH THE CONTRACTOR IF THE MEMBER WAS REFERRED BY A CONTRACTED PROVIDER [OF THE CONTRACTOR AT A RATE THAT IS NOT MORE THAN THE RATE THAT WOULD BE REIMBURSED TO A CONTRACTING PROVIDER].
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER LAW TO THE CONTRARY:
[B.] [2.] A CONTRACTOR MAY NOT REQUIRE PRIOR AUTHORIZATION FOR DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES.
1.
[C.] [B.] A CONTRACTOR MAY NOT TAKE OR THREATEN TO TAKE RETALIATORY ACTION AGAINST A CONTRACTED PROVIDER FOR REFERRING A MEMBER TO A NONCONTRACTED PROVIDER.
A CONTRACTOR SHALL REIMBURSE A NONCONTRACTING PROVIDER FOR LABORATORY SERVICES RENDERED TO A MEMBER WHO IS ENROLLED WITH THE CONTRACTOR IF THE MEMBER WAS REFERRED BY A CONTRACTED PROVIDER OF THE CONTRACTOR AT A RATE THAT IS NOT MORE THAN THE RATE THAT WOULD BE REIMBURSED TO A CONTRACTING PROVIDER.
Senate Amendments to S.B.
1086 Sec.
A CONTRACTOR MAY NOT REQUIRE PRIOR AUTHORIZATION FOR DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES.
B.
A CONTRACTOR MAY NOT TAKE OR THREATEN TO TAKE RETALIATORY ACTION AGAINST A CONTRACTED PROVIDER FOR REFERRING A MEMBER TO A NONCONTRACTED PROVIDER.
Sec.
2.
Enroll and engross to conform Amend title to conform CARINE WERNER 1086WERNER.docx 02/10/2026 2:33 PM C:
- 1 -
MH 130NVVHHL -2-
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. House Second Reading

  2. House First Reading.

  3. Transmit to House

  4. PASSED

  5. DPA

  6. W/D

  7. DPA

  8. Senate Second Reading

  9. Senate First Reading

  10. Prefiled.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 8 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (92)

92 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 92 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed

Passed 18 Yea · 8 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 2704
Republican 16100
Total 18804
% of votes cast 60%27%0%13%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Analise Ortiz Democrat Nay
Brian Fernandez Democrat Not Voting
Catherine Miranda Democrat Yea
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Nay
Eva Diaz Democrat Nay
Flavio Bravo Democrat Not Voting
Kiana Sears Democrat Yea
Lauren Kuby Democrat Nay
Lela Alston Democrat Nay
Priya Sundareshan Democrat Nay
Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat Not Voting
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Nay
Theresa Hatathlie Democrat Not Voting
Carine Werner Republican Yea
David C. Farnsworth Republican Yea
David Gowan Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
Hildy Angius Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Yea
Jake Hoffman Republican Nay
Janae Shamp Republican Yea
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Kevin Payne Republican Yea
Mark Finchem Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican Yea
Venden "Vince" Leach Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Yea
Wendy Rogers Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 1086?
SB 1086 is sponsored by Mark Finchem (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 1086?
This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1086?
Track SB 1086 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1086

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1086

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →