SB 1044 — property tax; exemption; virtual currency
Last action — House Second Reading
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
18 added · 27 removedPlain-language change summary
Senate Bill 1044 has been updated to include an exemption from property taxes specifically for virtual currency. This change aims to provide financial relief to individuals and businesses dealing with virtual currencies, encouraging their use and investment. The removal of some initial text streamlined the bill's language, focusing on the key tax exemption aspect, which matters because it could impact how cryptocurrencies are treated in the state's tax system.
Fifty-seventhSenate LegislatureEngrossed Financeproperty Secondtax; Regular Session S.B.
1044exemption; PROPOSED SENATE AMENDMENTS TO S.B.
virtual currency State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session SENATE BILL 1044 (ReferenceAN toACT printedAMENDING bill)TITLE Amendment42, instructionCHAPTER key:11, ARTICLE 3, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 42-11134;
[GREENRELATING UNDERLININGTO INPROPERTY BRACKETS]TAX indicatesEXEMPTIONS. text added to statute or previously enacted session law.
[Green(TEXT underliningOF inBILL brackets]BEGINS indicatesON textNEXT addedPAGE) to- newi session- lawS.B. or text restoring existing law.
[GREEN1044 STRIKEOUTBe INit BRACKETS]enacted indicatesby newthe textLegislature removedof fromthe statuteState orof previouslyArizona: enacted session law.
[Green strikeout in brackets] indicates text removed from existing statute, previously enacted session law or new session law.
<<Green carets>> indicate a section added to the bill.
<<Green strikeout in carets>> indicates a section removed from the bill.
The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows:
Conditional enactment This act does not become effective unless the Constitution of Arizona is amended by a vote of the people at the next general election by passage of Senate Concurrent Resolution [____]1003, [1003], fifty-seventh legislature, second regular session, relating to property tax exemptions.
Enroll- and1 engross- to conform Amend title to conform J.D.
MESNARD 10440904.docx 01/23/2026 09:04 AM S:
MG/ci 130HWVRYL
View plain text versions (3)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version (02/25/2026) Current pdf
- SENATE - Finance View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DPA
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
-
Prefiled.
Sponsors
- Wendy Rogers · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 11 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Wendy Rogers Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 11 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 16 | 11 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 37% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Analise Ortiz | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Nay |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Nay |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Nay |
| Kiana Sears | Democrat | Nay |
| Lauren Kuby | Democrat | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Nay |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Nay |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Nay |
| Carine Werner | Republican | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| Hildy Angius | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Yea |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Not Voting |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Payne | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Finchem | Republican | Yea |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy "Tim" Dunn | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1044?
- SB 1044 is sponsored by Wendy Rogers (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1044?
- This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1044?
- Track SB 1044 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1044
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1044
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →