Arizona 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session Status: To Executive 1 R cosponsors

SB 1053 — concealed weapons permits; fees

Last action — Vetoed by Governor

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

Vetoed by Governor Katie Hobbs (Democratic) on June 19, 2026.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

In plain language

The bill relates to fees for concealed weapons permits.

This bill addresses the fees associated with obtaining concealed weapons permits. It aims to modify existing fee structures in relation to these permits.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

9 added · 11 removed

Plain-language change summary

In the latest version of Senate Bill 1053, the language has been adjusted to directly reference concealed weapons permits and their associated fees. Specifically, some details were removed for clarity or simplification. This change is important because it helps clarify the focus of the bill, ensuring that discussions and provisions will center specifically on the costs related to obtaining concealed weapons permits. This could impact how much individuals will need to pay and what the requirements will be moving forward.

→
Previous
Latest
PREFILED DEC 19 2025 REFERENCE TITLE:
Senate Engrossed concealed weapons permits;
concealed weapons permits;
fees State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session SENATE BILL 1053 AN ACT AMENDING SECTION 13-3112, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
fees State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature Second Regular Session SB 1053 Introduced by Senator Rogers AN ACT AMENDING SECTION 13-3112, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - SB 1053 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - S.B.
1053 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
Is twenty-one years of age or older or is at least nineteen years of age and provides evidence of current military service or proof of - 1 - SB 1053 honorable discharge or general discharge under honorable conditions from the United States armed forces, the United States armed forces reserve or a state national guard.
Is twenty-one years of age or older or is at least nineteen years of age and provides evidence of current military service or proof of - 1 - S.B.
1053 honorable discharge or general discharge under honorable conditions from the United States armed forces, the United States armed forces reserve or a state national guard.
FOR AN APPLICANT WHO IS A - 2 - SB 1053 RESIDENT OF THIS STATE, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL CHARGE A FEE THAT IS TEN PERCENT OF THE NONRESIDENT FEE.
FOR AN APPLICANT WHO IS A - 2 - S.B.
1053 RESIDENT OF THIS STATE, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL CHARGE A FEE THAT IS TEN PERCENT OF THE NONRESIDENT FEE.
A criminal justice agency shall not use the computerized permit record system to conduct inquiries on whether a person is a concealed weapons permit holder unless the criminal justice agency has reasonable suspicion to believe the person is carrying a concealed weapon and the - 3 - SB 1053 person is subject to a lawful criminal investigation, arrest, detention or investigatory stop.
A criminal justice agency shall not use the computerized permit record system to conduct inquiries on whether a person is a concealed weapons permit holder unless the criminal justice agency has reasonable suspicion to believe the person is carrying a concealed weapon and the - 3 - S.B.
1053 person is subject to a lawful criminal investigation, arrest, detention or investigatory stop.
- 4 - SB 1053 6.
- 4 - S.B.
1053 6.
A law enforcement or - 5 - SB 1053 prosecutorial agency shall issue to a qualified retired law enforcement officer who has honorably retired a photographic identification that states that the officer has honorably retired from the agency.
A law enforcement or - 5 - S.B.
1053 prosecutorial agency shall issue to a qualified retired law enforcement officer who has honorably retired a photographic identification that states that the officer has honorably retired from the agency.
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (2)

How this bill changes current law

3 changes Share ↗

AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.

The bill amends the existing law regarding concealed weapons permits, specifically addressing fees and other procedural aspects.

  • Section 13-3112

    a reasonable RESIDENT OR NONRESIDENT fee, AS APPLICABLE, determined by the director of the department. → a reasonable RESIDENT OR NONRESIDENT fee, AS APPLICABLE, determined by the director of the department. FOR AN APPLICANT WHO IS A RESIDENT OF THIS STATE, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL CHARGE A FEE THAT IS TEN PERCENT OF THE NONRESIDENT FEE.

    This change introduces a specific fee structure for residents compared to non-residents.

  • Section 13-3112

    a reasonable RESIDENT OR NONRESIDENT fee, AS APPLICABLE, determined by the director of the department. → a reasonable RESIDENT OR NONRESIDENT fee, AS APPLICABLE, determined by the director of the department. FOR AN APPLICANT WHO IS A RESIDENT OF THIS STATE, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL CHARGE A FEE THAT IS TEN PERCENT OF THE NONRESIDENT FEE.

    The amendment clarifies the fee for resident applicants compared to non-resident applicants.

  • Section 13-3112

    a reasonable RESIDENT OR NONRESIDENT fee, AS APPLICABLE, determined by the director of the department. → a reasonable RESIDENT OR NONRESIDENT fee, AS APPLICABLE, determined by the director of the department. FOR AN APPLICANT WHO IS A RESIDENT OF THIS STATE, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL CHARGE A FEE THAT IS TEN PERCENT OF THE NONRESIDENT FEE.

    Establishes that resident applicants will pay significantly less for the permit than non-resident applicants.

Action History

  1. Vetoed by Governor

  2. Transmit to Governor

  3. Transmit to Senate

  4. PASSED

  5. DP

  6. House Placed on Consent Calendar

  7. DP

  8. House Second Reading

  9. House First Reading.

  10. Transmit to House

  11. PASSED

  12. DP

  13. Senate Second Reading

  14. DP

  15. Senate First Reading

  16. Prefiled.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 35 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (92)

92 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 92 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed

Passed 32 Yea · 25 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 02502
Republican 32001
Total 322503
% of votes cast 53%42%0%5%
How each member voted (60)
Member Party Vote
Aaron Márquez Democrat Nay
Alma Hernandez Democrat Nay
Anna Abeytia Democrat Nay
Betty J Villegas Democrat Nay
Brian Garcia Democrat Nay
Cesar Aguilar Democrat Nay
Christopher Mathis Democrat Nay
Consuelo Hernandez Democrat Nay
Elda Luna-Nájera Democrat Nay
Janeen Connolly Democrat Nay
Junelle Cavero Democrat Nay
Kevin Volk Democrat Nay
Lorena Austin Democrat Nay
Lupe Contreras Democrat Nay
Lydia Hernandez Democrat Nay
Mae Peshlakai Democrat Nay
Mariana Sandoval Democrat Nay
Myron Tsosie Democrat Nay
Nancy Gutierrez Democrat Not Voting
Oscar De Los Santos Democrat Nay
Patty Contreras Democrat Nay
Quantá Crews Democrat Nay
Sarah Liguori Democrat Nay
Seth Blattman Democrat Not Voting
Stacey Travers Democrat Nay
Stephanie Simacek Democrat Nay
Stephanie Stahl Hamilton Democrat Nay
Alexander Kolodin Republican Yea
Beverly Pingerelli Republican Yea
Chris Lopez Republican Yea
Cody Reim Republican Yea
David Livingston Republican Yea
Gail Griffin Republican Yea
James Taylor Republican Yea
Jeff Weninger Republican Yea
John Gillette Republican Yea
Julie Willoughby Republican Yea
Justin Olson Republican Yea
Justin Wilmeth Republican Yea
Khyl Powell Republican Yea
Laurin Hendrix Republican Yea
Leo Biasiucci Republican Yea
Lisa Fink Republican Yea
Lupe Diaz Republican Yea
Matt Gress Republican Yea
Michael Carbone Republican Yea
Michael Way Republican Not Voting
Michele Peña Republican Yea
Neal Carter Republican Yea
Nick Kupper Republican Yea
Pamela Carter Republican Yea
Quang H Nguyen Republican Yea
Rachel Keshel Republican Yea
Ralph Heap Republican Yea
Selina Bliss Republican Yea
Steve Montenegro Republican Yea
Sylvia Allen Republican Yea
Teresa Martinez Republican Yea
Tony Rivero Republican Yea
Walt Blackman Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed

Passed 17 Yea · 10 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 11002
Republican 16001
Total 171003
% of votes cast 57%33%0%10%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Analise Ortiz Democrat Nay
Brian Fernandez Democrat Yea
Catherine Miranda Democrat Nay
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Nay
Eva Diaz Democrat Not Voting
Flavio Bravo Democrat Nay
Kiana Sears Democrat Nay
Lauren Kuby Democrat Nay
Lela Alston Democrat Nay
Priya Sundareshan Democrat Nay
Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat Nay
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Nay
Theresa Hatathlie Democrat Not Voting
Carine Werner Republican Yea
David C. Farnsworth Republican Yea
David Gowan Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
Hildy Angius Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Yea
Jake Hoffman Republican Yea
Janae Shamp Republican Not Voting
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Kevin Payne Republican Yea
Mark Finchem Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican Yea
Venden "Vince" Leach Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Yea
Wendy Rogers Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 1053?
SB 1053 is sponsored by Wendy Rogers (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 1053?
This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1053?
Track SB 1053 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1053

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 1053

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →