Arizona 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 1 R cosponsors

SB 1049 — spousal maintenance; income; property

Last action — PASSED

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

In plain language

The bill addresses spousal maintenance related to income and property.

This bill focuses on how spousal maintenance is determined based on a person's income and property. It outlines factors that may influence these decisions.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

89 added · 137 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment to SB 1049 introduces a maximum limit of four years for spousal maintenance awards, which means that courts can only grant financial support for that duration unless special circumstances warrant otherwise. Additionally, it specifies that the guidelines for determining the amount of maintenance will consider various factors, such as the couple's standard of living during marriage and the financial abilities of both spouses. This change aims to provide clearer expectations for both parties during divorce proceedings and to encourage fair and equitable outcomes in spousal support cases.

→
Previous
Latest
House Engrossed Senate Bill spousal maintenance;
Senate Engrossed spousal maintenance;
termination of spousal maintenance;
factors;
- 1 - S.B.
1.
1049 1.
2.
- 1 - S.B.
1049 2.
UNLESS THERE IS A WRITTEN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES THAT PROVIDES OTHERWISE, THE COURT SHALL TERMINATE SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE IF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING OCCURS:
1.
THE SPOUSE WHO IS RECEIVING SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE REMARRIES.
- 2 - S.B.
1049 2.
THE COURT FINDS BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE THAT THE SPOUSE WHO IS RECEIVING SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE HAS HABITUALLY COHABITATED FOR ONE YEAR OR MORE WITH ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL IN A RELATIONSHIP THAT IS ANALOGOUS TO A MARRIAGE.
3.
THE COURT FINDS BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE THAT THE SPOUSE WHO IS RECEIVING SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE HAD HABITUALLY COHABITATED WITH ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL IN A RELATIONSHIP ANALOGOUS TO A MARRIAGE AND FAILED TO DISCLOSE THE COHABITATION DURING THE DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE OR LEGAL SEPARATION PROCEEDING THAT RESULTED IN AN AWARD OF SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE.
F.
IF THE COURT TERMINATES AN AWARD OF SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION E OF THIS SECTION, THE SPOUSE WHO IS PAYING THE SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE IS ENTITLED TO REIMBURSEMENT FOR ANY SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE THAT WAS PAID BEGINNING ON THE DATE THAT THE SPOUSE WHO IS RECEIVING SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE REMARRIED OR BEGAN HABITUALLY COHABITATING WITH ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL IN A RELATIONSHIP ANALOGOUS TO A MARRIAGE.
THE COURT SHALL ENTER AN AWARD OF PARTIAL OR FULL REIMBURSEMENT TO THE SPOUSE WHO IS PAYING SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE.
G.
THE COURT MAY CONSIDER ALL OF THE FOLLOWING FACTORS WHEN DETERMINING WHETHER THE SPOUSE WHO IS RECEIVING SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE HAS HABITUALLY COHABITATED WITH ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL IN A RELATIONSHIP THAT IS ANALOGOUS TO A MARRIAGE:
1.
AN ORAL OR WRITTEN STATEMENT OR REPRESENTATION THAT IS MADE TO A THIRD PARTY REGARDING THE COHABITATING RELATIONSHIP.
2.
THE ECONOMIC DEPENDENCE OF THE COUPLE WHO ARE COHABITATING OR THE ECONOMIC DEPENDENCE OF ONE PERSON ON THE OTHER.
3.
THE CONDUCT OR COLLABORATIVE ROLES OF THE COUPLE WHO ARE COHABITATING IN FURTHERANCE OF THE COUPLE'S LIFE TOGETHER.
4.
THE BENEFIT OF THE RELATIONSHIP ON THE LIFE OF ONE OR BOTH OF THE PEOPLE WHO ARE COHABITATING.
5.
THE COMMUNITY REPUTATION OF THE COUPLE WHO ARE COHABITATING.
6.
ANY OTHER FACTOR THAT THE COURT FINDS RELEVANT AND MATERIAL.
H.
A SPOUSE MAY PETITION FOR TERMINATION OF AN AWARD OF SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION AT ANY TIME.
THIS SECTION APPLIES TO ALL PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE, REGARDLESS OF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
1.
THE DATE OF THE FILING OF A PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE OR LEGAL SEPARATION THAT RESULTED IN AN AWARD OF SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE.
2.
THE DATE OF ENTRY OF AN AWARD OF SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE.
3.
Show all 47 changed rows (7 more)
Previous
Latest
THE DATE OF THE FILING OF A PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE.
- 3 - S.B.
1049 E.
I.
J.
- 2 - S.B.
1049 F.
- 4 -
- 3 -
View plain text versions (5)

Action History

  1. PASSED

  2. FAILED

  3. DPA

  4. PASSED

  5. DP

  6. House Placed on Consent Calendar

  7. DP

  8. House Second Reading

  9. House First Reading.

  10. Transmit to House

  11. PASSED

  12. DPA

  13. DPA

  14. Senate Second Reading

  15. Senate First Reading

  16. Prefiled.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 40 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (92)

92 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 92 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

failed to pass

Failed 28 Yea · 29 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 02502
Republican 28401
Total 282903
% of votes cast 47%48%0%5%
How each member voted (60)
Member Party Vote
Aaron Márquez Democrat Nay
Alma Hernandez Democrat Nay
Anna Abeytia Democrat Nay
Betty J Villegas Democrat Nay
Brian Garcia Democrat Nay
Cesar Aguilar Democrat Nay
Christopher Mathis Democrat Nay
Consuelo Hernandez Democrat Nay
Elda Luna-Nájera Democrat Nay
Janeen Connolly Democrat Nay
Junelle Cavero Democrat Nay
Kevin Volk Democrat Nay
Lorena Austin Democrat Nay
Lupe Contreras Democrat Nay
Lydia Hernandez Democrat Nay
Mae Peshlakai Democrat Nay
Mariana Sandoval Democrat Nay
Myron Tsosie Democrat Nay
Nancy Gutierrez Democrat Not Voting
Oscar De Los Santos Democrat Nay
Patty Contreras Democrat Nay
Quantá Crews Democrat Nay
Sarah Liguori Democrat Nay
Seth Blattman Democrat Not Voting
Stacey Travers Democrat Nay
Stephanie Simacek Democrat Nay
Stephanie Stahl Hamilton Democrat Nay
Alexander Kolodin Republican Yea
Beverly Pingerelli Republican Yea
Chris Lopez Republican Yea
Cody Reim Republican Yea
David Livingston Republican Yea
Gail Griffin Republican Yea
James Taylor Republican Yea
Jeff Weninger Republican Yea
John Gillette Republican Yea
Julie Willoughby Republican Yea
Justin Olson Republican Yea
Justin Wilmeth Republican Yea
Khyl Powell Republican Nay
Laurin Hendrix Republican Yea
Leo Biasiucci Republican Yea
Lisa Fink Republican Yea
Lupe Diaz Republican Yea
Matt Gress Republican Nay
Michael Carbone Republican Yea
Michael Way Republican Not Voting
Michele Peña Republican Yea
Neal Carter Republican Yea
Nick Kupper Republican Yea
Pamela Carter Republican Nay
Quang H Nguyen Republican Yea
Rachel Keshel Republican Yea
Ralph Heap Republican Yea
Selina Bliss Republican Yea
Steve Montenegro Republican Yea
Sylvia Allen Republican Yea
Teresa Martinez Republican Nay
Tony Rivero Republican Yea
Walt Blackman Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed

Passed 16 Yea · 11 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 01102
Republican 16001
Total 161103
% of votes cast 53%37%0%10%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Analise Ortiz Democrat Nay
Brian Fernandez Democrat Nay
Catherine Miranda Democrat Nay
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Nay
Eva Diaz Democrat Not Voting
Flavio Bravo Democrat Nay
Kiana Sears Democrat Nay
Lauren Kuby Democrat Nay
Lela Alston Democrat Nay
Priya Sundareshan Democrat Nay
Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat Nay
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Nay
Theresa Hatathlie Democrat Not Voting
Carine Werner Republican Yea
David C. Farnsworth Republican Yea
David Gowan Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
Hildy Angius Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Yea
Jake Hoffman Republican Yea
Janae Shamp Republican Not Voting
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Kevin Payne Republican Yea
Mark Finchem Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican Yea
Venden "Vince" Leach Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Yea
Wendy Rogers Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 1049?
SB 1049 is sponsored by Wendy Rogers (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 1049?
This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1049?
Track SB 1049 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1049

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1049

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →