SB 1049 — spousal maintenance; income; property
Last action — PASSED
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
In plain language
The bill addresses spousal maintenance related to income and property.
This bill focuses on how spousal maintenance is determined based on a person's income and property. It outlines factors that may influence these decisions.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
89 added · 137 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to SB 1049 introduces a maximum limit of four years for spousal maintenance awards, which means that courts can only grant financial support for that duration unless special circumstances warrant otherwise. Additionally, it specifies that the guidelines for determining the amount of maintenance will consider various factors, such as the couple's standard of living during marriage and the financial abilities of both spouses. This change aims to provide clearer expectations for both parties during divorce proceedings and to encourage fair and equitable outcomes in spousal support cases.
House Engrossed Senate BillEngrossed spousal maintenance;
termination of spousal maintenance;
factors;
-1. 1 - S.B.
1049 1.
2.- 1 - S.B.
1049 2.
UNLESS THERE IS A WRITTEN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES THAT PROVIDES OTHERWISE, THE COURT SHALL TERMINATE SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE IF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING OCCURS:
1.
THE SPOUSE WHO IS RECEIVING SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE REMARRIES.
- 2 - S.B.
1049 2.
THE COURT FINDS BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE THAT THE SPOUSE WHO IS RECEIVING SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE HAS HABITUALLY COHABITATED FOR ONE YEAR OR MORE WITH ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL IN A RELATIONSHIP THAT IS ANALOGOUS TO A MARRIAGE.
3.
THE COURT FINDS BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE THAT THE SPOUSE WHO IS RECEIVING SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE HAD HABITUALLY COHABITATED WITH ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL IN A RELATIONSHIP ANALOGOUS TO A MARRIAGE AND FAILED TO DISCLOSE THE COHABITATION DURING THE DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE OR LEGAL SEPARATION PROCEEDING THAT RESULTED IN AN AWARD OF SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE.
F.
IF THE COURT TERMINATES AN AWARD OF SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION E OF THIS SECTION, THE SPOUSE WHO IS PAYING THE SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE IS ENTITLED TO REIMBURSEMENT FOR ANY SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE THAT WAS PAID BEGINNING ON THE DATE THAT THE SPOUSE WHO IS RECEIVING SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE REMARRIED OR BEGAN HABITUALLY COHABITATING WITH ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL IN A RELATIONSHIP ANALOGOUS TO A MARRIAGE.
THE COURT SHALL ENTER AN AWARD OF PARTIAL OR FULL REIMBURSEMENT TO THE SPOUSE WHO IS PAYING SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE.
G.
THE COURT MAY CONSIDER ALL OF THE FOLLOWING FACTORS WHEN DETERMINING WHETHER THE SPOUSE WHO IS RECEIVING SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE HAS HABITUALLY COHABITATED WITH ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL IN A RELATIONSHIP THAT IS ANALOGOUS TO A MARRIAGE:
1.
AN ORAL OR WRITTEN STATEMENT OR REPRESENTATION THAT IS MADE TO A THIRD PARTY REGARDING THE COHABITATING RELATIONSHIP.
2.
THE ECONOMIC DEPENDENCE OF THE COUPLE WHO ARE COHABITATING OR THE ECONOMIC DEPENDENCE OF ONE PERSON ON THE OTHER.
3.
THE CONDUCT OR COLLABORATIVE ROLES OF THE COUPLE WHO ARE COHABITATING IN FURTHERANCE OF THE COUPLE'S LIFE TOGETHER.
4.
THE BENEFIT OF THE RELATIONSHIP ON THE LIFE OF ONE OR BOTH OF THE PEOPLE WHO ARE COHABITATING.
5.
THE COMMUNITY REPUTATION OF THE COUPLE WHO ARE COHABITATING.
6.
ANY OTHER FACTOR THAT THE COURT FINDS RELEVANT AND MATERIAL.
H.
A SPOUSE MAY PETITION FOR TERMINATION OF AN AWARD OF SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION AT ANY TIME.
THIS SECTION APPLIES TO ALL PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE, REGARDLESS OF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
1.
THE DATE OF THE FILING OF A PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE OR LEGAL SEPARATION THAT RESULTED IN AN AWARD OF SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE.
2.
THE DATE OF ENTRY OF AN AWARD OF SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE.
3.
Show all 47 changed lines (7 more)
THE DATE OF THE FILING OF A PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE.
- 3 - S.B.
1049 E.
I.
J.- 2 - S.B.
1049 F.
- 43 -
Show all 47 changed rows (7 more)
View plain text versions (5)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version (02/23/2026) pdf
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version (06/11/2026) Current pdf
- SENATE - Judiciary and Elections View text pdf
- Amended HOUSE - Floor Amend to Bill - Nguyen - passed pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
PASSED
-
FAILED
-
DPA
-
PASSED
-
DP
-
House Placed on Consent Calendar
-
DP
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DPA
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
-
Prefiled.
Sponsors
- Wendy Rogers · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 40 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Wendy Rogers Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 25 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 28 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 28 | 29 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 47% | 48% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (60)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron Márquez | Democrat | Nay |
| Alma Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Anna Abeytia | Democrat | Nay |
| Betty J Villegas | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Garcia | Democrat | Nay |
| Cesar Aguilar | Democrat | Nay |
| Christopher Mathis | Democrat | Nay |
| Consuelo Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Elda Luna-Nájera | Democrat | Nay |
| Janeen Connolly | Democrat | Nay |
| Junelle Cavero | Democrat | Nay |
| Kevin Volk | Democrat | Nay |
| Lorena Austin | Democrat | Nay |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Lydia Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Mae Peshlakai | Democrat | Nay |
| Mariana Sandoval | Democrat | Nay |
| Myron Tsosie | Democrat | Nay |
| Nancy Gutierrez | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Oscar De Los Santos | Democrat | Nay |
| Patty Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Quantá Crews | Democrat | Nay |
| Sarah Liguori | Democrat | Nay |
| Seth Blattman | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Stacey Travers | Democrat | Nay |
| Stephanie Simacek | Democrat | Nay |
| Stephanie Stahl Hamilton | Democrat | Nay |
| Alexander Kolodin | Republican | Yea |
| Beverly Pingerelli | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Lopez | Republican | Yea |
| Cody Reim | Republican | Yea |
| David Livingston | Republican | Yea |
| Gail Griffin | Republican | Yea |
| James Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Weninger | Republican | Yea |
| John Gillette | Republican | Yea |
| Julie Willoughby | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Olson | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Wilmeth | Republican | Yea |
| Khyl Powell | Republican | Nay |
| Laurin Hendrix | Republican | Yea |
| Leo Biasiucci | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Fink | Republican | Yea |
| Lupe Diaz | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Gress | Republican | Nay |
| Michael Carbone | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Way | Republican | Not Voting |
| Michele Peña | Republican | Yea |
| Neal Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Nick Kupper | Republican | Yea |
| Pamela Carter | Republican | Nay |
| Quang H Nguyen | Republican | Yea |
| Rachel Keshel | Republican | Yea |
| Ralph Heap | Republican | Yea |
| Selina Bliss | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Montenegro | Republican | Yea |
| Sylvia Allen | Republican | Yea |
| Teresa Martinez | Republican | Nay |
| Tony Rivero | Republican | Yea |
| Walt Blackman | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 11 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 16 | 11 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 37% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Analise Ortiz | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Nay |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Nay |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Nay |
| Kiana Sears | Democrat | Nay |
| Lauren Kuby | Democrat | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Nay |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Nay |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Carine Werner | Republican | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| Hildy Angius | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Yea |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Not Voting |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Payne | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Finchem | Republican | Yea |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy "Tim" Dunn | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1049?
- SB 1049 is sponsored by Wendy Rogers (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1049?
- This bill died with 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1049?
- Track SB 1049 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1049
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1049
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →