private property; design; regulations; prohibition
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 2319 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 2319.
You're tracking HB 2319
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 2319 — private property; design; regulations; prohibition
Last action — House Second Reading
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
Died in session
This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced Version Current pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
This bill adds a new section to Arizona law that prohibits municipalities from imposing certain regulations on privately owned single-family lots.
-
Title 9, chapter 4, article 6, Arizona Revised Statutes
9-461.19. Private property; rights; state preemption; design; materials; regulations; prohibition; applicability; definitions A. PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THE REGULATION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS ARE A MATTER OF STATEWIDE CONCERN. THE REGULATION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION IS NOT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REGULATION BY A CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE. B. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER LAW, A MUNICIPALITY MAY NOT ADOPT OR ENFORCE ANY REGULATION, STANDARD, STIPULATION OR OTHER REQUIREMENT ON AN INDIVIDUALLY OWNED SINGLE-FAMILY LOT THAT DOES ANY OF THE FOLLOWING: 1. LIMITS THE USE OF A BUILDING MATERIAL OR PRODUCT, UNLESS THE SPECIFIC USE OF THE BUILDING MATERIAL OR PRODUCT WOULD VIOLATE AN APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE. 2. IMPOSES AN AESTHETIC DESIGN REQUIREMENT OR ANY OTHER REQUIREMENT THAT VIOLATES THE FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES. 3. IMPOSES ANY REQUIREMENT THAT DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY LIMITS THE USE, PLACEMENT OR ENJOYMENT OF TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY. 4. DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY PROHIBITS THE SALE OR TRANSFER AND COMPATIBLE USE OF ANY PORTION OF A PARCEL OR LOT. 5. IS NOT UNIFORMLY VERIFIABLE BY REFERENCE TO AN EXTERNAL AND UNIFORM BENCHMARK, STANDARD OR CRITERION THAT IS AVAILABLE AND KNOWABLE TO THE PROPERTY OWNER. 6. PREVENTS THE INSTALLATION OR USE OF ENERGY OR WATER CONSERVATION PRODUCTS OR MATERIALS. 7. REQUIRES A SINGLE-FAMILY HOME, ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT AS DEFINED IN SECTION 9-461.18, WALL, FENCE OR OTHER STRUCTURE TO INCLUDE A SPECIFIC DESIGN, LAYOUT, MATERIAL, FEATURE, PRODUCT OR ANY REQUIREMENT THAT IS RELATED TO THE FORM OR DESIGN OF OFF-STREET VEHICLE PARKING. 8. REQUIRES A FEATURE, PRODUCT OR DESIGN ELEMENT THAT THE PROPERTY OWNER DOES NOT WANT OR CANNOT AFFORD. 9. DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY LIMITS A PROPERTY OWNER FROM GROWING FOOD ON THEIR PROPERTY. 10. REQUIRES A SHARED FEATURE, SHARED AMENITY OR INFRASTRUCTURE THAT WOULD REQUIRE A HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION OR OTHER ASSOCIATION AS DEFINED IN SECTION 33-1802 TO MAINTAIN OR OPERATE, UNLESS REQUIRED BY FEDERAL LAW. C. THIS SECTION DOES NOT APPLY IF THE REGULATION, STANDARD, STIPULATION OR OTHER REQUIREMENT IS OBJECTIVE AND STRICTLY NECESSARY TO PROTECT PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY OR PREVENT A SIGNIFICANT EXTERNALITY AND IS THROUGH THE LEAST RESTRICTIVE MEANS. D. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION: 1. "OBJECTIVE" MEANS INVOLVING NO PERSONAL OR SUBJECTIVE JUDGMENT BY A MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEE OR OFFICIAL AND BEING UNIFORMLY VERIFIABLE BY REFERENCE TO AN EXTERNAL AND UNIFORM BENCHMARK, STANDARD OR CRITERION THAT IS AVAILABLE AND KNOWABLE BY BOTH A PROPERTY OWNER AND A MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEE OR OFFICIAL. 2. "SIGNIFICANT EXTERNALITY": (a) MEANS A NONTRIVIAL NEGATIVE IMPACT ON A PERSON BEYOND THE PROPERTY LINES OR SOCIETY AT LARGE. (b) INCLUDES NOISE, LIGHT OR AIR POLLUTION. (c) DOES NOT INCLUDE A SUBJECTIVE PREFERENCE.
This creates a new section prohibiting municipalities from regulating various aspects of private property rights related to single-family lots.
Action History
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
Sponsors
- Nick Kupper · Cosponsor
- Laurin Hendrix · Cosponsor
- Michael Carbone · Cosponsor
- John Gillette · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 89 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- John Gillette Republican
Co-sponsors (3)
- Nick Kupper Republican
- Laurin Hendrix Republican
- Michael Carbone Republican
Not signed on (89)
89 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 89 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2319?
- HB 2319 is sponsored by Nick Kupper (Republican), Laurin Hendrix (Republican), Michael Carbone (Republican), and John Gillette (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 2319?
- This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 2319?
- Track HB 2319 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2319
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2319
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →