SB 1052 — all-terrain vehicles; definition
Last action — FAILED
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 56th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 47 removedPlain-language change summary
SB 1052 has undergone some changes, primarily in the way it presents the definition of all-terrain vehicles. The title section has been removed, and the bill’s introduction now focuses directly on the legislative content rather than who introduced it. These changes help streamline the bill, making it clearer and more straightforward for readers to understand its purpose. This matters because it enhances readability and can make it easier for lawmakers and the public to engage with the topic.
House Engrossed Senate BillEngrossed all-terrain vehicles;
Sec.- 15 -
4.
Legislative intent The legislature intends that:
1.
After the effective date of this act the Arizona state parks board continues to use the increased user fees described in section 5 of this act for the purposes described in section 5, subsection A of this act.
2.
The increase in the user fees described in section 5 of this act shall be used to protect private property rights and personal property that is located on real property from any damage that is caused by an operator's unintentional or intentional misuse of an all-terrain vehicle.
Any additional increase in the user fees beyond the increase described in section 5 of this act shall be used as prescribed in section 28-1177, Arizona Revised Statutes, as amended by this act.
3.
The user fees described in section 5 of this act place the responsibility on the all-terrain vehicle community to fund increased law enforcement resources to enable law enforcement to better identify and fine persons who violate the laws and to provide additional resources to the off-highway vehicle recreation fund established by section 28-1176, Arizona Revised Statutes, to mitigate any private property damage that is caused by all-terrain vehicle operators.
- 15 - S.B.
1052 Sec.
5.
Conditional enactment;
notice;
definition A.
This act does not become effective unless on or before September 1, 2027 the department of transportation increases the user fees for a resident off-highway vehicle user indicia and a nonresident off-highway vehicle user indicia that are issued pursuant to section 28-1177, Arizona Revised Statutes, as amended by this act, and the Arizona state parks board uses the monies that are from the increased user fees and that are deposited in the off-highway vehicle recreation fund established by section 28-1176, Arizona Revised Statutes, sufficient to do both of the following:
1.
Mitigate damages to land, including private property, that result from all-terrain vehicles and allow private individuals to directly receive monies from the off-highway vehicle recreation fund for monies to use for remediation.
2.
Fund a county sheriff law enforcement program relating to the all-terrain vehicle laws in this state to enable a county sheriff to enforce the all-terrain vehicle laws in this state.
B.
The department of transportation and the Arizona state parks board shall notify the director of the Arizona legislative council in writing on or before October 1, 2027 either:
1.
Of the date on which the condition was met.
2.
That the condition was not met.
C.
For the purposes of this section, "all-terrain vehicle" has the same meaning prescribed in section 28-101, Arizona Revised Statutes, as amended by this act.
- 16 -
View plain text versions (5)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version pdf
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version Current pdf
- HOUSE - Transportation & Infrastructure View text pdf
- Amended HOUSE - Floor Amend to Engrossed Bill - Cook - passed pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
FAILED
-
DPA
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DPA
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DP
-
DP
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
Sponsors
- David C. Farnsworth · Cosponsor
- Frank Carroll · Primary
- David L. Cook · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 90 not signed on · 46 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Frank Carroll Republican
Co-sponsors (2)
- David C. Farnsworth Republican
- David L. Cook Voted No
Not signed on (90)
90 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 90 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 4 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 10 | 11 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 19 | 39 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 32% | 65% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (60)
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 5 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 20 | 8 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 27% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anna Hernandez | — | Nay |
| Anthony Kern | — | Yea |
| Christine Marsh | — | Nay |
| Juan Mendez | — | Nay |
| Justine Wadsack | — | Yea |
| Ken Bennett | — | Yea |
| Sine Kerr | — | Yea |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Yea |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Yea |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Nay |
| Eva Burch | Democrat | Yea |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Yea |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Yea |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Nay |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Nay |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Nay |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Yea |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Nay |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1052?
- SB 1052 is sponsored by David C. Farnsworth (Republican), Frank Carroll (Republican), and David L. Cook.
- What is the current status of SB 1052?
- This bill died with 56th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1052?
- Track SB 1052 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1052
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1052
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →