Arizona 56th Legislature - Second Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 2 R cosponsors

SB 1052 — all-terrain vehicles; definition

Last action — FAILED

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 56th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 47 removed

Plain-language change summary

SB 1052 has undergone some changes, primarily in the way it presents the definition of all-terrain vehicles. The title section has been removed, and the bill’s introduction now focuses directly on the legislative content rather than who introduced it. These changes help streamline the bill, making it clearer and more straightforward for readers to understand its purpose. This matters because it enhances readability and can make it easier for lawmakers and the public to engage with the topic.

→
Previous
Latest
House Engrossed Senate Bill all-terrain vehicles;
Senate Engrossed all-terrain vehicles;
Sec.
- 15 -
4.
Legislative intent The legislature intends that:
1.
After the effective date of this act the Arizona state parks board continues to use the increased user fees described in section 5 of this act for the purposes described in section 5, subsection A of this act.
2.
The increase in the user fees described in section 5 of this act shall be used to protect private property rights and personal property that is located on real property from any damage that is caused by an operator's unintentional or intentional misuse of an all-terrain vehicle.
Any additional increase in the user fees beyond the increase described in section 5 of this act shall be used as prescribed in section 28-1177, Arizona Revised Statutes, as amended by this act.
3.
The user fees described in section 5 of this act place the responsibility on the all-terrain vehicle community to fund increased law enforcement resources to enable law enforcement to better identify and fine persons who violate the laws and to provide additional resources to the off-highway vehicle recreation fund established by section 28-1176, Arizona Revised Statutes, to mitigate any private property damage that is caused by all-terrain vehicle operators.
- 15 - S.B.
1052 Sec.
5.
Conditional enactment;
notice;
definition A.
This act does not become effective unless on or before September 1, 2027 the department of transportation increases the user fees for a resident off-highway vehicle user indicia and a nonresident off-highway vehicle user indicia that are issued pursuant to section 28-1177, Arizona Revised Statutes, as amended by this act, and the Arizona state parks board uses the monies that are from the increased user fees and that are deposited in the off-highway vehicle recreation fund established by section 28-1176, Arizona Revised Statutes, sufficient to do both of the following:
1.
Mitigate damages to land, including private property, that result from all-terrain vehicles and allow private individuals to directly receive monies from the off-highway vehicle recreation fund for monies to use for remediation.
2.
Fund a county sheriff law enforcement program relating to the all-terrain vehicle laws in this state to enable a county sheriff to enforce the all-terrain vehicle laws in this state.
B.
The department of transportation and the Arizona state parks board shall notify the director of the Arizona legislative council in writing on or before October 1, 2027 either:
1.
Of the date on which the condition was met.
2.
That the condition was not met.
C.
For the purposes of this section, "all-terrain vehicle" has the same meaning prescribed in section 28-101, Arizona Revised Statutes, as amended by this act.
- 16 -
View plain text versions (5)

Action History

  1. FAILED

  2. DPA

  3. PASSED

  4. DPA

  5. DPA

  6. House Second Reading

  7. House First Reading.

  8. Transmit to House

  9. PASSED

  10. DP

  11. DP

  12. Senate Second Reading

  13. Senate First Reading

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 90 not signed on · 46 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (2)

Not signed on (90)

90 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 90 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

failed to pass

Failed 19 Yea · 39 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 41800
Republican 101102
Unaffiliated 51000
Total 193902
% of votes cast 32%65%0%3%
How each member voted (60)
Member Party Vote
Austin Smith — Nay
Barbara Parker — Nay
Ben Toma — Yea
Charles W Lucking — Nay
Cory McGarr — Nay
David L. Cook — Nay
Deborah Nardozzi — Nay
Jacqueline Parker — Nay
Jennifer Pawlik — Nay
Judy Schwiebert — Yea
Justin Heap — Nay
Keith Seaman — Yea
Laura Terech — Yea
Melody Hernandez — Nay
Travis W. Grantham — Yea
Alma Hernandez Democrat Yea
Analise Ortiz Democrat Nay
Betty J Villegas Democrat Nay
Cesar Aguilar Democrat Nay
Christopher Mathis Democrat Nay
Consuelo Hernandez Democrat Yea
Elda Luna-Nájera Democrat Nay
Junelle Cavero Democrat Nay
Lorena Austin Democrat Nay
Lupe Contreras Democrat Nay
Lydia Hernandez Democrat Yea
Mae Peshlakai Democrat Nay
Mariana Sandoval Democrat Nay
Myron Tsosie Democrat Yea
Nancy Gutierrez Democrat Nay
Oscar De Los Santos Democrat Nay
Patty Contreras Democrat Nay
Quantá Crews Democrat Nay
Sarah Liguori Democrat Nay
Seth Blattman Democrat Nay
Stacey Travers Democrat Nay
Stephanie Stahl Hamilton Democrat Nay
Alexander Kolodin Republican Nay
Beverly Pingerelli Republican Nay
David Livingston Republican Yea
David Marshall, Sr. Republican Nay
Gail Griffin Republican Yea
John Gillette Republican Yea
Joseph Chaplik Republican Nay
Julie Willoughby Republican Not Voting
Justin Wilmeth Republican Yea
Kevin Payne Republican Nay
Laurin Hendrix Republican Nay
Leo Biasiucci Republican Nay
Lupe Diaz Republican Yea
Matt Gress Republican Not Voting
Michael Carbone Republican Yea
Michele Peña Republican Yea
Neal Carter Republican Nay
Quang H Nguyen Republican Yea
Rachel Keshel Republican Nay
Selina Bliss Republican Yea
Steve Montenegro Republican Nay
Teresa Martinez Republican Nay
Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed

Passed 20 Yea · 8 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5300
Republican 10100
Democrat 5402
Total 20802
% of votes cast 67%27%0%7%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Anna Hernandez — Nay
Anthony Kern — Yea
Christine Marsh — Nay
Juan Mendez — Nay
Justine Wadsack — Yea
Ken Bennett — Yea
Sine Kerr — Yea
Sonny Borrelli — Yea
Brian Fernandez Democrat Yea
Catherine Miranda Democrat Yea
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Nay
Eva Burch Democrat Yea
Eva Diaz Democrat Not Voting
Flavio Bravo Democrat Yea
Lela Alston Democrat Yea
Priya Sundareshan Democrat Nay
Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat Nay
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Not Voting
Theresa Hatathlie Democrat Nay
David C. Farnsworth Republican Yea
David Gowan Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Yea
Jake Hoffman Republican Yea
Janae Shamp Republican Yea
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Yea
Wendy Rogers Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 1052?
SB 1052 is sponsored by David C. Farnsworth (Republican), Frank Carroll (Republican), and David L. Cook.
What is the current status of SB 1052?
This bill died with 56th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1052?
Track SB 1052 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1052

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1052

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →