HB 2308 — occupational licenses; criminal offense; prohibition
Last action — Signed by Governor
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 17, 2024. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Katie Hobbs (Democratic) on April 08, 2024.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
12 sponsors
1 primary, 11 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (7 R · 4 D) — cross-party backing.
-
Mixed recorded votes
3 passed, 3 failed in recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
182 added · 304 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of HB 2308 makes changes to how individuals with criminal records can apply for professional licenses in Arizona. Previously, the bill included a section about petitioning to change agency rules, but now it focuses specifically on allowing those with criminal histories to petition agencies for a review of their eligibility for occupational licenses or permits. This matters because it aims to make the licensing process more accessible for people looking to avoid barriers to employment due to their past, potentially helping them reintegrate into the workforce more effectively.
HouseSenate Engrossed House Bill occupational licenses;
prohibition State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-sixth Legislature Second Regular Session CHAPTER 91 HOUSE BILL 2308 AN ACT AMENDING SECTIONSSECTION 41-1033 AND 41-1093.04, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
Section 41-1033, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
41-1033.
Petition for a rule or review of an agency practice, substantive policy statement, final rule, unduly burdensome licensing requirement or license or certificate denial, suspension or revocation;
notice;
definitions A.
Any person may petition an agency to do either of the following:
1.
Make, amend or repeal a final rule.
2.
Review an existing agency practice or substantive policy statement that the petitioner alleges to constitute a rule.
B.
An agency shall prescribe the form of the petition and the procedures for the petition's submission, consideration and disposition.
The person shall state on the petition the rulemaking to review or the agency practice or substantive policy statement to consider revising, repealing or making into a rule.
C.
Not later than sixty days after submission of the petition, the agency shall either:
1.
Reject the petition and state its reasons in writing for rejection to the petitioner.
2.
Initiate rulemaking proceedings in accordance with this chapter.
3.
If otherwise lawful, make a rule.
D.
The agency's response to the petition is open to public inspection.
E.
If an agency rejects a petition pursuant to subsection C of this section, the petitioner has thirty days to appeal to the council to review whether the existing agency practice or substantive policy statement constitutes a rule.
The petitioner's appeal may not be more than five double-spaced pages.
F.
A person may petition the council to request a review of a final rule based on the person's belief that the final rule does not meet the requirements prescribed in section 41-1030.
A petition submitted under this subsection may not be more than five double-spaced pages.
G.
A person may petition the council to request a review of an existing agency practice, substantive policy statement, final rule or regulatory licensing requirement that the petitioner alleges is not specifically authorized by statute, exceeds the agency's statutory authority, is unduly burdensome or is not demonstrated to be necessary to specifically fulfill a public health, safety or welfare concern.
On receipt of a properly submitted petition pursuant to this section, the council shall review the existing agency practice, substantive policy statement, final rule or regulatory licensing requirement as prescribed by this section.
A petition submitted under this subsection may not be more than five double-spaced pages.
This subsection does not apply to an - 1 - H.B.
2308 individual or institution that is subject to title 36, chapter 4, article 10 or chapter 20.
H.
A PERSON MAY PETITION THE COUNCIL TO REQUEST A REVIEW OF AN OCCUPATIONAL OR PROFESSIONAL LICENSING BOARD'S OR HEALTH PROFESSION REGULATORY BOARD'S DENIAL, SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF A LICENSE, REGISTRATION OR CERTIFICATE FOR A PRIOR CRIMINAL OFFENSE PURSUANT TO SECTION 41-1093.08.
ON RECEIPT OF A PROPERLY SUBMITTED PETITION PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION, THE COUNCIL SHALL REVIEW THE DENIAL, SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION AND INDEPENDENTLY DETERMINE WHETHER THE OFFENSE IS SUBSTANTIALLY RELATED TO THE APPLICANT'S, LICENSEE'S, REGISTRANT'S OR CERTIFICATE HOLDER'S OCCUPATION OR IF APPROVING OR NOT IMPOSING A DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST THE LICENSE, REGISTRATION OR CERTIFICATE WOULD POSE A REASONABLE THREAT TO PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY.
Show all 118 changed lines (78 more)
A PETITION SUBMITTED UNDER THIS SUBSECTION MAY NOT BE MORE THAN FIVE DOUBLE-SPACED PAGES.
H.
I.
If the council receives information that alleges an existing agency practice or substantive policy statement may constitute a rule, that a final rule does not meet the requirements prescribed in section 41-1030 or that an existing agency practice, substantive policy statement, final rule or regulatory licensing requirement exceeds the agency's statutory authority, is not specifically authorized by statute or does not meet the guidelines prescribed in subsection G of this section, or if the council receives an appeal under subsection E of this section, and at least three council members request of the chairperson that the matter be heard in a public meeting:
1.
Within ninety days after receiving the third council member's request, the council shall determine whether any of the following applies:
(a) The agency practice or substantive policy statement constitutes a rule.
(b) The final rule meets the requirements prescribed in section 41-1030.
(c) An existing agency practice, substantive policy statement, final rule or regulatory licensing requirement exceeds the agency's statutory authority, is not specifically authorized by statute or meets DOES NOT MEET the guidelines prescribed in subsection G of this section.
2.
Within ten days after receiving the third council member's request, the council shall notify the agency that the matter has been or will be placed on the council's agenda for consideration on the merits.
3.
Not later than thirty days after receiving notice from the council, the agency shall submit a statement of not more than five double-spaced pages to the council that addresses whether any of the following applies:
(a) The existing agency practice or substantive policy statement constitutes a rule.
- 2 - H.B.
2308 (b) The final rule meets the requirements prescribed in section 41-1030.
(c) An existing agency practice, substantive policy statement, final rule or regulatory licensing requirement exceeds the agency's statutory authority, is not specifically authorized by statute or meets the guidelines prescribed in subsection G of this section.
I.
J.
At the hearing, the council shall allocate the petitioner and the agency an equal amount of time for oral comments, not including any time spent answering questions raised by council members.
The council may also allocate time for members of the public who have an interest in the issue to provide oral comments.
J.
K.
For the purposes of subsection H I of this section, the council meeting shall not be scheduled until the expiration of the agency response period prescribed in subsection H I, paragraph 3 of this section.
K.
L.
An agency practice, substantive policy statement, final rule or regulatory licensing requirement considered by the council pursuant to this section shall remain in effect while under consideration of the council.
If the council determines that the agency practice, substantive policy statement or regulatory licensing requirement exceeds the agency's statutory authority, is not authorized by statute or constitutes a rule or that the final rule does not meet the requirements prescribed in section 41-1030, the practice, policy statement, rule or regulatory licensing requirement shall be void.
If the council determines that the existing agency practice, substantive policy statement, final rule or regulatory licensing requirement is unduly burdensome or is not demonstrated to be necessary to specifically fulfill a public health, safety or welfare concern, the council shall modify, revise or declare void any such existing agency practice, substantive policy statement, final rule or regulatory licensing requirement.
If an agency decides to further pursue a practice, substantive policy statement or regulatory licensing requirement that has been declared void or has been modified or revised by the council, the agency may do so only pursuant to a new rulemaking.
L.
M.
A council decision pursuant to this section shall be made by a majority of the council members who are present and voting on the issue.
Notwithstanding any other law, the council may not base any decision concerning an agency's compliance with the requirements of section 41-1030 in issuing a final rule or substantive policy statement on whether any party or person commented on the rulemaking or substantive policy statement.
M.
N.
A decision by the council pursuant to this section is not subject to judicial review, except that, in addition to the procedure prescribed in this section or in lieu of the procedure prescribed in this section, a person may seek declaratory relief pursuant to section 41-1034.
- 3 - H.B.
2308 N.
O.
Each agency and the secretary of state shall post prominently on their websites notice of an individual's right to petition the council for review pursuant to this section.
P.
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION:
1.
"REASONABLE THREAT" HAS THE SAME MEANING PRESCRIBED IN SECTION 41-1093.08.
2.
"SUBSTANTIALLY RELATED" HAS THE SAME MEANING PRESCRIBED IN SECTION 41-1093.08.
Sec.
2.
-2. 4 - H.B.
2308 2.
(b) A dangerous offense as defined in section 13-105, a serious offense as defined in section 13-706, a dangerous crime against children as- defined1 in- sectionH.B. 13-705 or an offense included in title 13, chapter 14 or 35.1, and the conviction has not been set aside.
2308 as defined in section 13-705 or an offense included in title 13, chapter 14 or 35.1, and the conviction has not been set aside.
-1. 5 - H.B.
2308 1.
2.- 2 - H.B.
2308 2.
-Sec. 6 - H.B.
23082. Sec.
3.
review;
procedures;
notice;
1.- 3 - H.B.
2308 1.
IN ADDITION TO OTHER AVAILABLE REMEDIES, AN APPLICANT, LICENSEE, REGISTRANT OR CERTIFICATE HOLDER MAY PETITION THE GOVERNOR'SOFFICE REGULATORYOF REVIEWADMINISTRATIVE COUNCILHEARINGS PURSUANT TO SECTION 41-1033, SUBSECTION H TO REQUEST A REVIEW OF A DENIAL, SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF A LICENSE, REGISTRATION OR CERTIFICATE.CERTIFICATE FOR A PRIOR CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
A PETITION SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION MAY NOT BE MORE THAN FIVE DOUBLE-SPACED PAGES.
REVIEW HEARINGS SHALL BE CONFIDENTIAL AND CONDUCTED IN AN INFORMAL MANNER.
ARTICLE 10 OF THIS CHAPTER DOES NOT APPLY TO REVIEWS REQUESTED PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION.
THISON SECTIONRECEIPT DOESOF NOTA IMPACTPROPERLY ASUBMITTED PERSON'SPETITION RIGHTPURSUANT TO PETITIONSUBSECTION ANB AGENCYOF FORTHIS ASECTION, CRIMINALTHE RECORDOFFICE REVIEWOF PURSUANTADMINISTRATIVE TOHEARINGS SECTIONSHALL 41-1093.04REVIEW ORTHE ANDENIAL, AGENCY'SSUSPENSION REQUIREMENTOR TOREVOCATION AND DETERMINE WHETHER THE PERSON'SOFFENSE CRIMINALIS RECORDSUBSTANTIALLY DISQUALIFIESRELATED TO THE PERSONAPPLICANT'S, FROMLICENSEE'S, OBTAININGREGISTRANT'S OR CERTIFICATE HOLDER'S OCCUPATION OR IF APPROVING OR NOT IMPOSING A DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST THE LICENSE, PERMIT,REGISTRATION OR CERTIFICATE ORWOULD OTHERPOSE STATEA RECOGNITION.REASONABLE THREAT TO PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY.
QUESTIONS FROM THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS SHALL BE LIMITED TO ONLY MATTERS SPECIFIED IN THE PETITION.
EACH OCCUPATIONAL OR PROFESSIONAL LICENSING BOARD OR HEALTH PROFESSION REGULATORY BOARD SHALL POST PROMINENTLY ON THE BOARD'S WEBSITE AND ON EACH LICENSE, REGISTRATION OR CERTIFICATE DENIAL A NOTICE OF AN INDIVIDUAL'S RIGHT TO PETITION THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR REVIEW PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION.
E.
THIS SECTION DOES NOT IMPACT A PERSON'S RIGHT TO PETITION AN AGENCY FOR A CRIMINAL RECORD REVIEW PURSUANT TO SECTION 41-1093.04 OR AN AGENCY'S REQUIREMENT TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE PERSON'S CRIMINAL RECORD DISQUALIFIES THE PERSON FROM OBTAINING A LICENSE, PERMIT, CERTIFICATE OR OTHER STATE RECOGNITION.
F.
-APPROVED 7BY -THE GOVERNOR APRIL 8, 2024.
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE APRIL 8, 2024.
- 4 -
Show all 118 changed rows (78 more)
View plain text versions (6)
- Chaptered Chaptered Version Current pdf
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version pdf
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version pdf
- HOUSE - Regulatory Affairs View text pdf
- SENATE - Finance and Commerce View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
Signed by Governor
-
Transmit to Governor
-
PASSED
-
PASSED
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DPA
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
-
Transmit to Senate
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DPA
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
Sponsors
- Sally Ann Gonzales · Cosponsor
- Shawnna Bolick · Cosponsor
- Analise Ortiz · Cosponsor
- Lydia Hernandez · Cosponsor
- Laurin Hendrix · Cosponsor
- John Gillette · Cosponsor
- Neal Carter · Cosponsor
- Michael Carbone · Cosponsor
- Selina Bliss · Cosponsor
- Travis W. Grantham · Primary
- Alma Hernandez · Cosponsor
- Sr. David Marshall · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 11 co-sponsors · 81 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (11)
- Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat
- Shawnna Bolick Republican
- Analise Ortiz Democrat
- Lydia Hernandez Democrat
- Laurin Hendrix Republican
- John Gillette Republican
- Neal Carter Republican
- Michael Carbone Republican
- Selina Bliss Republican
- Alma Hernandez Democrat
- David Marshall, Sr. Republican
Not signed on (81)
81 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 81 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 16 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 22 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 53 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (60)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Jevin D Hodge | — | Not Voting |
| Austin Smith | — | Yea |
| Barbara Parker | — | Yea |
| Ben Toma | — | Yea |
| Charles W Lucking | — | Yea |
| Cory McGarr | — | Yea |
| David L. Cook | — | Yea |
| Jacqueline Parker | — | Yea |
| Jennifer Pawlik | — | Yea |
| Judy Schwiebert | — | Yea |
| Justin Heap | — | Yea |
| Keith Seaman | — | Yea |
| Laura Terech | — | Yea |
| Marcelino Quiñonez | — | Yea |
| Melody Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Travis W. Grantham | — | Yea |
| Alma Hernandez | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Analise Ortiz | Democrat | Yea |
| Betty J Villegas | Democrat | Yea |
| Cesar Aguilar | Democrat | Yea |
| Christopher Mathis | Democrat | Yea |
| Consuelo Hernandez | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Elda Luna-Nájera | Democrat | Yea |
| Lorena Austin | Democrat | Yea |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Lydia Hernandez | Democrat | Yea |
| Mae Peshlakai | Democrat | Yea |
| Mariana Sandoval | Democrat | Yea |
| Myron Tsosie | Democrat | Yea |
| Nancy Gutierrez | Democrat | Yea |
| Oscar De Los Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Patty Contreras | Democrat | Yea |
| Quantá Crews | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Sarah Liguori | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Seth Blattman | Democrat | Yea |
| Stacey Travers | Democrat | Yea |
| Stephanie Stahl Hamilton | Democrat | Yea |
| Alexander Kolodin | Republican | Yea |
| Beverly Pingerelli | Republican | Yea |
| David Livingston | Republican | Not Voting |
| David Marshall, Sr. | Republican | Yea |
| Gail Griffin | Republican | Yea |
| John Gillette | Republican | Yea |
| Joseph Chaplik | Republican | Yea |
| Julie Willoughby | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Wilmeth | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Payne | Republican | Yea |
| Laurin Hendrix | Republican | Yea |
| Leo Biasiucci | Republican | Yea |
| Lupe Diaz | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Gress | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Carbone | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Peña | Republican | Yea |
| Neal Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Quang H Nguyen | Republican | Yea |
| Rachel Keshel | Republican | Yea |
| Selina Bliss | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Montenegro | Republican | Yea |
| Teresa Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy "Tim" Dunn | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 28 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anna Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Anthony Kern | — | Yea |
| Christine Marsh | — | Yea |
| Juan Mendez | — | Not Voting |
| Justine Wadsack | — | Yea |
| Ken Bennett | — | Yea |
| Sine Kerr | — | Yea |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Yea |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Yea |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Yea |
| Eva Burch | Democrat | Yea |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Yea |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Yea |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Yea |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Yea |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Yea |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 14 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 22 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 52 | 6 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 87% | 10% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (60)
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2308?
- HB 2308 is sponsored by Sally Ann Gonzales (Democrat), Shawnna Bolick (Republican), Analise Ortiz (Democrat), Lydia Hernandez (Democrat), Laurin Hendrix (Republican), John Gillette (Republican), Neal Carter (Republican), Michael Carbone (Republican), Selina Bliss (Republican), Travis W. Grantham, Alma Hernandez (Democrat), and David Marshall, Sr. (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 2308?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 17, 2024. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 2308?
- Track HB 2308 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2308
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2308
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →