Arizona 56th Legislature - Second Regular Session Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 6 R · 2 D cosponsors

HB 2297 — adaptive reuse; commercial buildings; zoning

Last action — Signed by Governor

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 16, 2024. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Katie Hobbs (Democratic) on April 10, 2024.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 82% · high confidence

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 9 sponsors

    1 primary, 8 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (6 R · 2 D) — cross-party backing.

  • Mixed recorded votes

    3 passed, 3 failed in recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

141 added · 112 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendment to Bill HB 2297 modifies the requirements for municipalities with populations over 150,000 regarding multifamily residential development in existing commercial buildings. Now, these municipalities can allow up to 10% of commercial buildings to be converted to multifamily housing without requiring lengthy public hearings or complicated permits. This change aims to streamline the process, encouraging more adaptable use of existing structures and potentially addressing housing shortages more efficiently.

→
Previous
Latest
House Engrossed adaptive reuse;
Senate Engrossed House Bill adaptive reuse;
commercial buildings) State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-sixth Legislature Second Regular Session HOUSE BILL 2297 AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 9, CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 6.1, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 9-462.10;
commercial buildings) (now:
RELATING TO PLANNING AND ZONING.
commercial buildings;
adaptive reuse) State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-sixth Legislature Second Regular Session CHAPTER 141 HOUSE BILL 2297 AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 9, CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 6.1, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 9-462.10;
RELATING TO MUNICIPAL ZONING.
multifamily development;
objective standards;
ON OR BEFORE JANUARY 1, 2025, THE GOVERNING BODY OF A MUNICIPALITY WITH A POPULATION OF ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND OR MORE PERSONS SHALL ALLOW MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OR ADAPTIVE REUSE DEVELOPMENT OF ANY COMMERCIAL, OFFICE OR MIXED USE BUILDINGS WITHOUT REQUIRING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, PLANNING UNIT DEVELOPMENT, REZONING APPLICATION OR OTHER DISCRETIONARY MUNICIPAL REVIEW.
ON OR BEFORE JANUARY 1, 2025, THE GOVERNING BODY OF A MUNICIPALITY WITH A POPULATION OF ONE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND OR MORE PERSONS SHALL ESTABLISH OBJECTIVE STANDARDS TO ALLOW MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OR ADAPTIVE REUSE ON NOT MORE THAN TEN PERCENT OF THE TOTAL EXISTING COMMERCIAL, OFFICE OR MIXED USE BUILDINGS WITHIN THE MUNICIPALITY WITHOUT REQUIRING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OR REZONING APPLICATION OR ANY OTHER APPLICATION THAT WOULD REQUIRE A PUBLIC HEARING.
THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE MUNICIPALITY MAY MODIFY THE PERCENTAGE OF EXISTING COMMERCIAL, OFFICE OR MIXED USE BUILDINGS WITHIN THE MUNICIPALITY AVAILABLE FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OR ADAPTIVE REUSE EVERY TEN YEARS.
A DEVELOPMENT THAT IS DEVELOPED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION IS SUBJECT TO SITE PLAN REVIEW AND APPROVAL.
A MUNICIPALITY MAY DESIGNATE COMMERCIAL OR EMPLOYMENT HUBS AND OTHER ESSENTIAL COMMERCIAL OR EMPLOYMENT USE AREAS WHERE EXISTING COMMERCIAL, OFFICE, EMPLOYMENT OR MIXED USE BUILDINGS ARE EXCLUDED FROM THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION.
THE SITE PLAN REVIEW AND APPROVAL SHALL INCLUDE APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN BY ANY UTILITY PROVIDER IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
THE DESIGNATIONS MADE PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION MAY NOT EXCEED TEN PERCENT OF THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL, OFFICE, EMPLOYMENT OR MIXED USE BUILDINGS WITHIN THE MUNICIPALITY.
A MUNICIPALITY MAY MODIFY THE COMMERCIAL OR EMPLOYMENT HUBS THAT ARE EXCLUDED FROM THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION ONCE EVERY TEN YEARS.
TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR REDEVELOPMENT AS A MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OR ADAPTIVE REUSE, A BUILDING MUST HAVE ACCESS TO PUBLIC SEWER AND WATER SERVICE FOR THE ENTIRE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING AND FIRE CODES.
FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OR ADAPTIVE REUSE, THE OBJECTIVE STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY A MUNICIPALITY SHALL REQUIRE BUT MAY NOT REQUIRE MORE THAN THE FOLLOWING:
D.
1.
THE RESIDENTIAL DENSITY SHALL BE THE MAXIMUM RESIDENTIAL DENSITY ALLOWED UNDER THE ZONING ORDINANCE.
A MUNICIPAL SITE PLAN REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCESS REQUIREMENT, INCLUDING SITE PLAN REVIEW BY ANY UTILITY PROVIDER IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
2.
ADEQUATE PUBLIC SEWER AND WATER SERVICE FOR THE ENTIRE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
3.
COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING AND FIRE CODES.
4.
THAT THE EXISTING BUILDINGS ARE ECONOMICALLY OR FUNCTIONALLY OBSOLETE.
5.
THAT THE EXISTING BUILDINGS ARE LOCATED ON A PARCEL OR PARCELS THAT ARE AT LEAST ONE ACRE IN SIZE BUT NOT MORE THAN TWENTY ACRES IN SIZE.
6.
A SET ASIDE OF TEN PERCENT OF THE TOTAL DWELLING UNITS FOR EITHER MODERATE-INCOME HOUSING OR LOW-INCOME HOUSING OR ANY COMBINATION OF THE TWO FOR AT LEAST TWENTY YEARS AFTER THE INITIAL OCCUPATION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
THE DEVELOPER MAY SET ASIDE MORE THAN TEN PERCENT AT THE DEVELOPER'S SOLE DISCRETION.
- 1 - H.B.
2297 D.
THE OBJECTIVE STANDARDS MAY NOT CONTAIN PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS THAT EXCEED THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS THAT APPLY TO MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS OR ADAPTIVE REUSE BUILDINGS UNDER THE EXISTING ZONING CODE UNLESS THE PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OR ADAPTIVE REUSE ALSO QUALIFIES AS A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT.
THE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OR ADAPTIVE REUSE DEVELOPMENT MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE ENFORCEMENT OF ANY REGULATION THAT EXCEEDS EXISTING ZONING ORDINANCE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OR ADAPTIVE REUSE.
A MUNICIPALITY MAY NOT WITHHOLD A DEMOLITION PERMIT IF A MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION.
FOR ADAPTIVE REUSE, THE EXISTING SETBACKS MAY REMAIN.
FOR A MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, ALL OF THE FOLLOWING APPLY:
IF THE EXISTING ZONING ORDINANCE SETBACK REQUIREMENT IS LESS THAN WHAT IS ALLOWED FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OR ADAPTIVE REUSE, THE PROPERTY SHALL BE CONSIDERED NONCONFORMING UNLESS EXISTING EASEMENTS, INCLUDING PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS, ARE WITHIN EXISTING SETBACK AREAS.
1.
THE DEMOLITION OF ALL OR A PORTION OF THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL, OFFICE OR MIXED USE BUILDINGS SHALL BE ALLOWED.
2.
SETBACK REQUIREMENTS MAY NOT EXCEED WHAT IS REQUIRED IN THE EXISTING ZONING CODE FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS.
3.
NOTWITHSTANDING SECTION 9-462.01, SUBSECTION C, THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT AND DENSITY SHALL BE EQUAL TO THE HIGHEST ALLOWABLE MULTIFAMILY HEIGHT AND DENSITY FOR A MULTIFAMILY ZONING DISTRICT IN THE MUNICIPALITY WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE BUILDING TO BE REDEVELOPED.
IF THERE IS NO MULTIFAMILY ZONING DISTRICT IN THE MUNICIPALITY WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE BUILDING TO BE REDEVELOPED, THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT AND DENSITY SHALL BE EQUIVALENT TO THE NEXT CLOSEST MULTIFAMILY ZONING DISTRICT.
4.
THE ALLOWABLE HEIGHT MAY NOT EXCEED FIVE STORIES AND A MUNICIPALITY MAY LIMIT THE HEIGHT TO TWO STORIES IN THE AREAS OF A SITE WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEET OF SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES.
Show all 93 changed rows (53 more)
Previous
Latest
MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT THAT IS CONSTRUCTED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION DOES NOT QUALIFY AS BEING WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE BUILDING BEING REDEVELOPED OR THE NEXT CLOSEST MULTIFAMILY BUILDING.
THE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MAY ALLOW FOR THE DEMOLITION OF ALL OR A PORTION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING OR BUILDINGS.
A MUNICIPALITY MAY NOT WITHHOLD A DEMOLITION PERMIT IF AN ADAPTIVE REUSE PROJECT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION.
G.
FOR ADAPTIVE REUSE, ALL OF THE FOLLOWING APPLY:
FOR ADAPTIVE REUSE, IF THE HEIGHT OF THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL OFFICE OR MIXED USE BUILDING EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE, THE HEIGHT MAY REMAIN AND THE MAXIMUM DENSITY MAY BE EXCEEDED AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED NONCONFORMING.
ANY ROOFTOP CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE HEIGHT EXEMPTION.
H.
THE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OR ADAPTIVE REUSE DEVELOPMENT OF ANY COMMERCIAL OFFICE OR MIXED USE BUILDING SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM SET ASIDE OF AT LEAST TEN PERCENT DESIGNATED FOR EITHER MODERATE-INCOME HOUSING OR LOW-INCOME HOUSING OR ANY COMBINATION OF BOTH MODERATE-INCOME HOUSING AND LOW-INCOME HOUSING.
I.
THE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OR ADAPTIVE REUSE DEVELOPMENT MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO ENFORCEMENT OF ANY REGULATION THAT - 1 - H.B.
2297 EXCEEDS EXISTING PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS BEYOND WHAT IS REQUIRED IN THE EXISTING ZONING ORDINANCE FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OR ADAPTIVE REUSE DEVELOPMENT.
J.
THIS SECTION DOES NOT APPLY TO ANY LAND IN AN AREA THAT IS DESIGNATED AS A DISTRICT OF HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE PURSUANT TO SECTION 9-462.01, SUBSECTION A, PARAGRAPH 10, IN AN AREA THAT IS DESIGNATED AS HISTORIC ON THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES, IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF A MUNICIPAL, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION COMMERCIALLY LICENSED, GENERAL AVIATION OR MILITARY AIRPORT OR ANCILLARY MILITARY FACILITY AS DEFINED IN SECTION 28-8461 OR IN A MUNICIPALITY THAT IS LOCATED ON TRIBAL LAND.
K.
A MUNICIPALITY MAY DESIGNATE COMMERCIAL HUBS AND OTHER ESSENTIAL COMMERCIAL USE AREAS WHERE COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND MIXED USE BUILDINGS ARE EXCLUDED FROM MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OR ADAPTIVE REUSE REDEVELOPMENT.
THE DESIGNATIONS MAY NOT EXCEED TEN PERCENT OF THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL, OFFICE OR MIXED USE BUILDINGS WITHIN EACH MUNICIPALITY.
L.
MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS OR ADAPTIVE REUSE DEVELOPMENTS SHALL BE ALLOWED ON AT LEAST TEN PERCENT OF THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL, OFFICE OR MIXED USE BUILDINGS WITHIN EACH MUNICIPALITY THAT MEET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS:
THE COMMERCIAL, OFFICE OR MIXED USE BUILDINGS ARE ECONOMICALLY OR FUNCTIONALLY OBSOLETE OR IN A STATE OF DISREPAIR OR HAVE AT LEAST A FIFTY PERCENT VACANCY OF THE TOTAL LEASABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE, OR THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE OF THE BUILDINGS IS IN CONVERSION TO A MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OR ADAPTIVE REUSE AT THE TIME OF SITE PLAN APPLICATION.
THE DEMOLITION OF A PORTION OF THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL, OFFICE OR MIXED USE BUILDING OR BUILDINGS SHALL BE ALLOWED.
THE COMMERCIAL, OFFICE OR MIXED USE BUILDINGS ARE ON A PARCEL OR PARCELS THAT ARE AT LEAST ONE ACRE BUT NOT MORE THAN THIRTY ACRES.
THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROPOSED USE SHALL APPLY.
IF THE MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENT THAT APPLIES TO THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL, OFFICE OR MIXED USE BUILDING IS LESS THAN THE MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENT THAT APPLIES TO THE PROPOSED USE, THE EXISTING BUILDING SHALL BE CONSIDERED NONCONFORMING FOR SETBACK PURPOSES UNLESS EASEMENTS, INCLUDING PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS, ARE LOCATED WITHIN SETBACK AREAS.
THE PROPERTY VALUE A YEAR AFTER A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL BE ISSUED IS ESTIMATED TO BE AT LEAST FIFTEEN PERCENT HIGHER THAN THE PROPERTY VALUE AT THE TIME OF SITE PLAN APPLICATION.
IF THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT THAT APPLIES TO THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL, OFFICE OR MIXED USE BUILDING EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT FOR THE PROPOSED USE, THE EXISTING HEIGHT MAY REMAIN AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED NONCONFORMING FOR HEIGHT PURPOSES AND THE EXISTING BUILDING MAY BE EXPANDED TO THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DENSITY FOR THE PROPOSED USE.
M.
ANY ROOFTOP APPURTENANCES SHALL BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE HEIGHT EXEMPTION.
- 2 - H.B.
2297 G.
THIS SECTION DOES NOT APPLY TO ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
1.
LAND IN AN AREA THAT IS DESIGNATED AS A DISTRICT OF HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE PURSUANT TO SECTION 9-462.01, SUBSECTION A, PARAGRAPH 10.
2.
LAND IN AN AREA THAT IS DESIGNATED HISTORIC BY A LOCAL GOVERNMENT.
3.
LAND IN AN AREA THAT IS DESIGNATED AS HISTORIC ON THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES.
4.
LAND IN THE TERRITORY IN THE VICINITY OF A MILITARY AIRPORT OR ANCILLARY MILITARY FACILITY AS DEFINED IN SECTION 28-8461.
5.
LAND IN THE TERRITORY IN THE VICINITY OF A FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION COMMERCIALLY LICENSED AIRPORT OR A GENERAL AVIATION OR PUBLIC AIRPORT AS DEFINED IN SECTION 28-8486.
6.
LAND IN A MUNICIPALITY THAT IS LOCATED ON TRIBAL LAND.
H.
"ADAPTIVE REUSE" MEANS CONVERTING AN EXISTING STRUCTURE FROM THE USE FOR WHICH IT WAS CONSTRUCTED TO A NEW USE BY MAINTAINING SOME OR ALL OF THE ELEMENTS OF THE STRUCTURE.
"ADAPTIVE REUSE" MEANS CONVERTING AN EXISTING BUILDING FROM THE USE FOR WHICH IT WAS CONSTRUCTED TO A NEW USE BY MAINTAINING SOME OR ALL OF THE ELEMENTS OF THE BUILDING.
"ECONOMICALLY OR FUNCTIONALLY OBSOLETE" MEANS THE COMMERCIAL, OFFICE OR MIXED USE BUILDING IS IN A STATE OF DISREPAIR OR HAS A FIFTY PERCENT VACANCY IN THE TOTAL LEASABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE.
4.
- 2 - H.B.
2297 4.
"MAXIMUM RESIDENTIAL DENSITY" MEANS A RESIDENTIAL DENSITY DEVELOPMENT THAT IS EQUAL TO THE MAXIMUM RESIDENTIAL DENSITY ALLOWED UNDER THE LOCAL GENERAL PLAN OR MUNICIPAL ZONING ORDINANCES.
"MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT" MEANS A BUILDING OR BUILDINGS THAT ARE DESIGNED AND USED FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES AND THAT CONTAIN MORE THAN ONE APARTMENT OR DWELLING UNIT FOR SALE OR FOR RENT.
"MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT" MEANS A BUILDING OR BUILDINGS THAT ARE DESIGNED AND USED FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES AND THAT CONTAIN MORE THAN ONE APARTMENT OR DWELLING UNIT FOR SALE OR FOR RENT BUT THAT ARE NOT ADAPTIVE REUSE.
8.
- 3 - H.B.
"ROOFTOP CONSTRUCTION":
2297 8.
(a) MEANS ROOFTOP STRUCTURES THAT PRINCIPALLY HOUSE AIR CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT, SOLAR PANELS AND OTHER ENERGY PRODUCTION FACILITIES.
"ROOFTOP APPURTENANCES":
(a) MEANS ROOFTOP STRUCTURES THAT PRINCIPALLY HOUSE AIR CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT, SOLAR PANELS, UTILITIES, ELEVATORS, OTHER ENERGY PRODUCTION FACILITIES AND OTHER NONHABITABLE STRUCTURES.
(c) DOES NOT INCLUDE DECORATIVE FEATURES, SPIRES, BELL TOWERS, DOMES, CUPOLAS, PEDIMENTS, OBELISKS OR MONUMENTS.
(c) DOES NOT INCLUDE ENCLOSED AREAS, SPIRES, BELL TOWERS, DOMES, CUPOLAS, PEDIMENTS, OBELISKS OR MONUMENTS.
- 3 -
APPROVED BY THE GOVERNOR APRIL 10, 2024.
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE APRIL 10, 2024.
- 4 -
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (8)

Action History

  1. Signed by Governor

  2. Transmit to Governor

  3. PASSED

  4. PASSED

  5. Transmit to House

  6. PASSED

  7. DPA

  8. DPA/SE

  9. Senate Second Reading

  10. Senate First Reading

  11. Transmit to Senate

  12. PASSED

  13. DPA

  14. DPA/SE

  15. House Second Reading

  16. House First Reading.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 84 not signed on · 26 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (8)

Not signed on (84)

84 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 84 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed

Passed 24 Yea · 3 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 10100
Unaffiliated 5201
Democrat 9002
Total 24303
% of votes cast 80%10%0%10%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Anna Hernandez — Yea
Anthony Kern — Nay
Christine Marsh — Yea
Juan Mendez — Not Voting
Justine Wadsack — Nay
Ken Bennett — Yea
Sine Kerr — Yea
Sonny Borrelli — Yea
Brian Fernandez Democrat Yea
Catherine Miranda Democrat Yea
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Yea
Eva Burch Democrat Yea
Eva Diaz Democrat Not Voting
Flavio Bravo Democrat Yea
Lela Alston Democrat Yea
Priya Sundareshan Democrat Yea
Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat Yea
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Yea
Theresa Hatathlie Democrat Not Voting
David C. Farnsworth Republican Yea
David Gowan Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Yea
Jake Hoffman Republican Nay
Janae Shamp Republican Yea
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Yea
Wendy Rogers Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed

Passed 36 Yea · 23 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 16400
Republican 101300
Unaffiliated 10601
Total 362301
% of votes cast 60%38%0%2%
How each member voted (60)
Member Party Vote
Jevin D Hodge — Yea
Austin Smith — Nay
Barbara Parker — Nay
Ben Toma — Yea
Charles W Lucking — Yea
Cory McGarr — Nay
David L. Cook — Nay
Jacqueline Parker — Nay
Jennifer Pawlik — Yea
Judy Schwiebert — Yea
Justin Heap — Nay
Keith Seaman — Yea
Laura Terech — Yea
Leezah Elsa Sun — Not Voting
Marcelino Quiñonez — Yea
Melody Hernandez — Yea
Travis W. Grantham — Yea
Alma Hernandez Democrat Yea
Analise Ortiz Democrat Yea
Betty J Villegas Democrat Nay
Cesar Aguilar Democrat Yea
Christopher Mathis Democrat Nay
Consuelo Hernandez Democrat Yea
Lorena Austin Democrat Yea
Lupe Contreras Democrat Yea
Lydia Hernandez Democrat Yea
Mae Peshlakai Democrat Yea
Mariana Sandoval Democrat Yea
Myron Tsosie Democrat Yea
Nancy Gutierrez Democrat Yea
Oscar De Los Santos Democrat Yea
Patty Contreras Democrat Nay
Quantá Crews Democrat Yea
Sarah Liguori Democrat Yea
Seth Blattman Democrat Yea
Stacey Travers Democrat Yea
Stephanie Stahl Hamilton Democrat Nay
Alexander Kolodin Republican Nay
Beverly Pingerelli Republican Nay
David Livingston Republican Yea
David Marshall, Sr. Republican Nay
Gail Griffin Republican Nay
John Gillette Republican Yea
Joseph Chaplik Republican Nay
Julie Willoughby Republican Nay
Justin Wilmeth Republican Yea
Kevin Payne Republican Yea
Laurin Hendrix Republican Nay
Leo Biasiucci Republican Yea
Lupe Diaz Republican Nay
Matt Gress Republican Nay
Michael Carbone Republican Yea
Michele Peña Republican Yea
Neal Carter Republican Nay
Quang H Nguyen Republican Yea
Rachel Keshel Republican Nay
Selina Bliss Republican Yea
Steve Montenegro Republican Nay
Teresa Martinez Republican Nay
Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

housing environment transportation
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 2297?
HB 2297 is sponsored by Stacey Travers (Democrat), Michele Peña (Republican), Analise Ortiz (Democrat), Quang H Nguyen (Republican), John Gillette (Republican), Michael Carbone (Republican), Selina Bliss (Republican), Leo Biasiucci (Republican), and Marcelino Quiñonez.
What is the current status of HB 2297?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 16, 2024. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 2297?
Track HB 2297 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 2297

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of HB 2297

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →