SB 1129 — transient occupants; property; removal
Last action — Vetoed by Governor
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 56th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Vetoed by Governor Katie Hobbs (Democratic) on April 23, 2024.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
40 added · 157 removedPlain-language change summary
In the latest version of Senate Bill 1129, the title has been changed to remove the reference to "introduced by" along with the names of the senators and representative associated with the bill. This means the focus is now more on the content of the bill itself rather than the people proposing it. This change helps to clarify that the bill is about the removal of transient occupants from properties without emphasizing the individual legislators, which can make the legislative process feel more approachable for the public.
House Engrossed Senate BillEngrossed transient occupants;
removal (now:State of Arizona Senate Fifty-sixth Legislature Second Regular Session SENATE BILL 1129 AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 12, CHAPTER 8, ARTICLE 4, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 12-1173.02;
unlawful occupants;
property;
removal) State of Arizona Senate Fifty-sixth Legislature Second Regular Session SENATE BILL 1129 AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 12, CHAPTER 8, ARTICLE 4, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 12-1173.02;
LimitedRemedy alternative remedy for removalunlawful ofpossession unlawfulby transient occupant;
exception;
A PROPERTYTRANSIENT OWNEROCCUPANT OROF THEA PROPERTYRESIDENTIAL OWNER'SDWELLING AUTHORIZEDIS AGENTAN MAYUNLAWFUL REQUESTOCCUPANT FROMOF LAW ENFORCEMENT THE IMMEDIATEPROPERTY REMOVALAFTER OFRECEIVING A PERSONWRITTEN WHODIRECTION ISTO UNLAWFULLYLEAVE OCCUPYINGTHE APREMISES RESIDENTIALFROM DWELLINGTHE ASPERSON PRESCRIBEDWHO INIS SUBSECTIONENTITLED BTO POSSESSION OF THISTHE SECTION.PROPERTY.
AIF PERSONTHE UNLAWFULLYTRANSIENT OCCUPIESOCCUPANT FAILS TO LEAVE THE PREMISES AFTER RECEIVING WRITTEN DIRECTION, THE TRANSIENT OCCUPANT IS SUBJECT TO REMOVAL BY A RESIDENTIALLAW DWELLINGENFORCEMENT IFOFFICER ALLAS PRESCRIBED BY SUBSECTION B OF THETHIS FOLLOWINGSECTION CONDITIONSOR AREBY MET:AN ORDER OF A COURT IN A FORCIBLE DETAINER ACTION PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE.
1.
THE PERSON WHO IS REQUESTING THE REMOVAL OF THE OCCUPANT IS THE PROPERTY OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE PROPERTY OWNER.
2.
THE REAL PROPERTY THAT IS BEING OCCUPIED INCLUDES A RESIDENTIAL DWELLING.
3.
THE OCCUPANT HAS UNLAWFULLY ENTERED AND REMAINS OR CONTINUES TO RESIDE ON THE PROPERTY OWNER'S REAL PROPERTY.
4.
THE PROPERTY OWNER HAS DIRECTED THE OCCUPANT THROUGH DIRECT VERBAL COMMUNICATION OR WRITTEN NOTICE TO LEAVE THE REAL PROPERTY.
WRITTEN NOTICE MAY BE POSTED ON THE DOOR OF THE DWELLING UNIT OR ANY OTHER CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE PROPERTY.
5.
THE OCCUPANT IS NOT A CURRENT OR FORMER TENANT PURSUANT TO A WRITTEN OR VERBAL RENTAL AGREEMENT THAT WAS AUTHORIZED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER.
6.
THE OCCUPANT IS NOT AN IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBER OF THE PROPERTY OWNER.
7.
THE OCCUPANT HAS NOT HAD A PRIOR VERBAL OR WRITTEN AGREEMENT TO COHABITATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER IN THE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING.
8.
THERE IS NO PENDING LITIGATION THAT IS RELATED TO THE REAL PROPERTY BETWEEN THE PROPERTY OWNER AND THE PERSON WHO IS SOUGHT TO BE REMOVED.
TO REQUEST THE IMMEDIATE REMOVAL OF A PERSON WHO UNLAWFULLYIS OCCUPIESENTITLED ATO RESIDENTIALPOSSESSION DWELLINGOF AS PRESCRIBED BY THIS SECTION, THE PROPERTY OWNERTHAT ORIS THEOCCUPIED PROPERTYBY OWNER'SA AUTHORIZEDTRANSIENT AGENTOCCUPANT MUSTMAY SUBMIT TOA LAWSWORN ENFORCEMENTAFFIDAVIT TO A SWORNLAW AFFIDAVITENFORCEMENT INOFFICER SUBSTANTIALLYTHAT STATES THE FOLLOWINGFOLLOWING: FORM:
SWORN AFFIDAVIT I, (THE OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT _____________), DECLARE UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT:
(INITIAL EACH ITEM BELOW):
(_____)THE ITRANSIENT AMOCCUPANT THEHAS OWNERBEEN OFDIRECTED TO LEAVE THE REALPREMISES PROPERTYBY ORA THEWRITTEN AUTHORIZEDDEMAND AGENTPROVIDED OFTO THE OWNERTRANSIENT OFOCCUPANT THEON REAL(DATE). PROPERTY.
(_____) THE REALTRANSIENT PROPERTYOCCUPANT INCLUDESUNLAWFULLY ACONTINUES RESIDENTIALTO DWELLING.OCCUPY THE PREMISES.
-3. 1 - S.B.
1129THE 3.TRANSIENT OCCUPANT:
(______)(a) THEDOES OCCUPANTNOT HASPAY UNLAWFULLYRENT ENTEREDFOR AND REMAINS OR CONTINUES TO RESIDE UNLAWFULLY ON THE REALPREMISES. PROPERTY.
4.(b) DOES NOT HAVE AN OWNERSHIP INTEREST, FINANCIAL INTEREST OR LEASE INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY.
(_____)(c) IDID NOT HAVE DIRECTEDANY THEPRIOR OCCUPANTRIGHT THROUGH DIRECT VERBAL COMMUNICATION OR WRITTEN NOTICE, OR BOTH, TO LEAVEOCCUPY THE REALPROPERTY. PROPERTY, BUT THE OCCUPANT HAS NOT DONE SO.
5.C.
(_____)ON RECEIPT OF THE OCCUPANTSWORN ISAFFIDAVIT NOTTHAT ASTATES CURRENTTHE ORFACTORS FORMERPRESCRIBED TENANTBY PURSUANTSUBSECTION TOB AOF WRITTENTHIS ORSECTION, VERBALTHE RENTALLAW AGREEMENTENFORCEMENT THATOFFICER ISMAY AUTHORIZEDDIRECT BYTHE TRANSIENT OCCUPANT TO SURRENDER POSSESSION OF THE PROPERTYRESIDENTIAL OWNER.PROPERTY.
6.
(_____) THE OCCUPANT IS NOT AN IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBER OF THE PROPERTY OWNER.
Show all 88 changed lines (48 more)
7.
(______) THE OCCUPANT HAS NOT HAD A PRIOR VERBAL OR WRITTEN AGREEMENT TO COHABITATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER IN THE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING.
8.
(______) THERE IS NO PENDING LITIGATION THAT IS RELATED TO THE REAL PROPERTY BETWEEN THE PROPERTY OWNER AND THE PERSON WHO IS SOUGHT TO BE REMOVED.
9.
(______) I UNDERSTAND THAT AN OCCUPANT WHO IS REMOVED FROM THE REAL PROPERTY PURSUANT TO THIS PROCEDURE MAY BRING A CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST ME FOR ANY FALSE STATEMENTS MADE IN THIS AFFIDAVIT, OR FOR WRONGFULLY USING THIS PROCEDURE, AND THAT AS A RESULT OF THAT ACTION I MAY BE HELD LIABLE FOR ACTUAL DAMAGES, PENALTIES, COSTS AND REASONABLE ATTORNEY FEES.
10.
(______) I AM REQUESTING LAW ENFORCEMENT TO IMMEDIATELY REMOVE THE UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPANT FROM THE REAL PROPERTY.
11.
(______) A COPY OF MY VALID GOVERNMENT-ISSUED IDENTIFICATION IS ATTACHED, OR I AM THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE PROPERTY OWNER AND DOCUMENTS EVIDENCING MY AUTHORITY TO ACT ON THE PROPERTY OWNER'S BEHALF ARE ATTACHED.
I HAVE READ EVERY STATEMENT MADE IN THIS AFFIDAVIT AND EACH STATEMENT IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
I UNDERSTAND THAT THE STATEMENTS MADE IN THIS AFFIDAVIT ARE BEING MADE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, PUNISHABLE AS PROVIDED BY ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES SECTION 13-2702.
___________________________________________________ (SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT OF PROPERTY OWNER) ________________________ (DATE) C.
ON RECEIPT OF THE SWORN AFFIDAVIT THAT STATES THE FACTORS PRESCRIBED BY SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION, LAW ENFORCEMENT SHALL VERIFY THAT THE PERSON SUBMITTING THE SWORN AFFIDAVIT IS THE RECORD OWNER OF THE REAL PROPERTY OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE PROPERTY OWNER AND APPEARS - 2 - S.B.
1129 OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO RELIEF UNDER THIS SECTION.
IF VERIFIED, LAW ENFORCEMENT SHALL WITHOUT DELAY DIRECT THE UNLAWFUL OCCUPANT TO SURRENDER POSSESSION OF THE REAL PROPERTY.
LAW ENFORCEMENT SHALL SERVE A NOTICE TO IMMEDIATELY VACATE ON ALL OF THE UNLAWFUL OCCUPANTS AND SHALL PUT THE OWNER IN POSSESSION OF THE REAL PROPERTY.
SERVICE MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED BY HAND DELIVERY OF THE NOTICE TO THE OCCUPANT OR BY POSTING THE NOTICE ON THE FRONT DOOR OR ENTRANCE OF THE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING.
LAW ENFORCEMENT SHALL ALSO ATTEMPT TO VERIFY THE IDENTITIES OF ALL PERSONS WHO ARE OCCUPYING THE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING AND NOTE THE IDENTITIES ON THE RETURN OF SERVICE.
AFTERA LAWPERSON ENFORCEMENTWHO SERVESFAILS THEOR NOTICEREFUSES TO IMMEDIATELYSURRENDER VACATE,POSSESSION THE PROPERTY OWNER OR AN AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE PROPERTY OWNERAS MAYDIRECTED REQUESTBY THATA LAW ENFORCEMENT STANDOFFICER BYPURSUANT TO KEEPTHIS THESECTION PEACEIS WHILECOMMITTING THETRESPASS. PROPERTY OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE PROPERTY OWNER CHANGES THE LOCKS AND REMOVES THE PERSONAL PROPERTY OF THE UNLAWFUL OCCUPANT FROM THE PREMISES TO OR NEAR THE PROPERTY LINE.
WHEN SUCH A REQUEST IS MADE, LAW ENFORCEMENT MAY CHARGE A REASONABLE HOURLY RATE AND THE PERSON REQUESTING LAW ENFORCEMENT TO STAND BY AND KEEP THE PEACE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING THE REASONABLE HOURLY RATE SET BY LAW ENFORCEMENT.
LAW ENFORCEMENT IS NOT LIABLE TO THE OCCUPANT OR ANY OTHER PARTY FOR LOSS, DESTRUCTION OR DAMAGE OF PROPERTY.
THE PROPERTY OWNER OR AN AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE PROPERTY OWNER IS NOT LIABLE TO AN OCCUPANT OR ANY OTHER PARTY FOR THE LOSS, DESTRUCTION OR DAMAGE TO THE PERSONAL PROPERTY ON THE PREMISES UNLESS THE REMOVAL WAS WRONGFUL PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION G OF THIS SECTION.
THEA OWNERPERSON OFWHO THEIS PROPERTYWRONGFULLY ORREMOVED THEFROM PROPERTYA OWNER'SPREMISES AUTHORIZED AGENT MAY PRESUMEFILE THATAN THEACTION UNLAWFULAND OCCUPANTRECOVER HASDAMAGES ABANDONEDFOR PERSONALFORCIBLE BELONGINGSENTRY THATAND REMAINDETAINER ATAGAINST THE RESIDENTIALPERSON DWELLINGWHO AFTERCLAIMS THE UNLAWFULRIGHT OCCUPANTTO SURRENDERSPOSSESSION OCCUPANCY OF THE RESIDENTIALPROPERTY. DWELLING OR IS REMOVED FROM THE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING.
ANFOR OCCUPANTTHE WHOPURPOSES FAILS OR REFUSES TO SURRENDER POSSESSION OF THE REAL PROPERTY AS DIRECTED BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER PURSUANT TO THIS SECTIONSECTION, IS"TRANSIENT COMMITTINGOCCUPANT": TRESPASS.
G.
A PERSON WHO IS WRONGFULLY REMOVED FROM A PREMISES MAY FILE AN ACTION AGAINST THE PERSON WHO CLAIMS THE RIGHT TO POSSESSION OF THE REAL PROPERTY AND MAY BE RESTORED TO POSSESSION OF THE REAL PROPERTY AND RECOVER ACTUAL COSTS AND DAMAGES INCURRED, STATUTORY DAMAGES EQUAL TO THREE TIMES THE FAIR MARKET RENT OF THE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING, COURT COSTS AND REASONABLE ATTORNEY FEES.
THE COURT SHALL ADVANCE THE CAUSE ON THE CALENDAR.
A PERSON WHO IS WRONGFULLY REMOVED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION DOES NOT HAVE A CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER OR THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY THAT EMPLOYS THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER ABSENT A SHOWING OF BAD FAITH BY THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER.
H.
THIS SECTION DOES NOT LIMIT THE RIGHTS OF A PROPERTY OWNER OR LIMIT THE AUTHORITY OF A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER TO ARREST AN UNLAWFUL OCCUPANT FOR TRESPASSING, VANDALISM, THEFT OR OTHER CRIMES.
- 3 - S.B.
1129 I.
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION:
"LAW ENFORCEMENT" OR "LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER" MEANS THE SHERIFF OR A DEPUTYPERSON SHERIFFWHO OFOCCUPIES THEA COUNTYRESIDENTIAL IN WHICH THE REAL PROPERTY ISAND LOCATEDWHO ORMEETS AALL CITYOF ORTHE TOWNFOLLOWING LAWREQUIREMENTS: ENFORCEMENT OFFICER.
(a) DOES NOT PAY RENT FOR THE PREMISES.
(b) DOES NOT HAVE AN OWNERSHIP INTEREST, FINANCIAL INTEREST OR LEASE INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY.
(c) DID NOT HAVE ANY PRIOR RIGHT TO OCCUPY THE PROPERTY.
"OCCUPANT" OR "UNLAWFUL OCCUPANT" DOES NOT INCLUDE A TENANT UNDER TITLE 33, CHAPTER 10.
Sec.- 1 -
2.
Legislative intent The right to exclude others from entering and the right to direct others to immediately vacate residential real property are the most important real property rights.
Existing laws in this state fail to adequately protect the rights of property owners amidst the rampant increase of unauthorized persons occupying residential real property and fails to adequately discourage theft and vandalism.
The legislature intends to quickly restore possession of residential real property to the lawful owner of the property when the property is being unlawfully occupied and to thereby preserve property rights while limiting the opportunity for criminal activity.
(ENACTED WITHOUT THE EMERGENCY) Sec.
3.
Emergency This act is an emergency measure that is necessary to preserve the public peace, health or safety and is operative immediately as provided by law.
- 4 -
Show all 88 changed rows (48 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version pdf
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version Current pdf
- Amended HOUSE - Floor Amend to Bill - Biasiucci - passed pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
Vetoed by Governor
-
Transmit to Governor
-
PASSED
-
PASSED
-
Transmit to Senate
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
House Placed on Consent Calendar
-
DP
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DP
-
DP
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
Sponsors
- John Gillette · Cosponsor
- Thomas "T.J." Shope · Cosponsor
- John Kavanagh · Cosponsor
- David C. Farnsworth · Cosponsor
- Wendy Rogers · Primary
- Anthony Kern · Cosponsor
- Justine Wadsack · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 6 co-sponsors · 86 not signed on · 33 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Wendy Rogers Republican
Co-sponsors (6)
- John Gillette Republican
- Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican
- John Kavanagh Republican
- David C. Farnsworth Republican
- Anthony Kern
- Justine Wadsack
Not signed on (86)
86 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 86 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 47% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anna Hernandez | — | Nay |
| Anthony Kern | — | Yea |
| Christine Marsh | — | Nay |
| Juan Mendez | — | Nay |
| Justine Wadsack | — | Yea |
| Ken Bennett | — | Yea |
| Sine Kerr | — | Yea |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Nay |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Nay |
| Eva Burch | Democrat | Nay |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Nay |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Nay |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Nay |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Nay |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Yea |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 3 | 16 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 19 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 32% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (60)
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 2 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| Total | 18 | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 27% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anna Hernandez | — | Nay |
| Anthony Kern | — | Yea |
| Christine Marsh | — | Nay |
| Juan Mendez | — | Nay |
| Justine Wadsack | — | Yea |
| Ken Bennett | — | Yea |
| Sine Kerr | — | Yea |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Nay |
| Eva Burch | Democrat | Yea |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Nay |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Yea |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1129?
- SB 1129 is sponsored by John Gillette (Republican), Thomas "T.J." Shope (Republican), John Kavanagh (Republican), David C. Farnsworth (Republican), Wendy Rogers (Republican), Anthony Kern, and Justine Wadsack.
- What is the current status of SB 1129?
- This bill died with 56th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1129?
- Track SB 1129 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1129
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1129
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →