county recorders; recorded instruments
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 2167 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 2167.
You're tracking HB 2167
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 2167 — county recorders; recorded instruments
Last action — House Second Reading
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 56th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced Version Current pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill amends recording requirements for county recorders in Arizona, particularly regarding the recording of social security numbers and the acceptance of digitized images.
-
Section 11-461
The recorder shall→ The recorder shall MAYChanges the obligation of the recorder to a potential action regarding the recording of instruments.
-
Section 11-461
provided IF the instruments meet the requirements of section 11-468, 11-480, 33-421 OR 47-9528, AS APPLICABLE.→ provided IF the instruments meet the requirements of section 11-468, 11-480, 33-421 OR 47-9528, AS APPLICABLE.No change to the substance but aligns the text format with other parts of the section.
-
Section 11-461
On or before January 1, 2009, The recorder in a county with a population of more than eight hundred thousand persons, shall redact references to complete nine digit social security numbers that are available on the recorder's website.→ On or before January 1, 2009, The recorder in a county with a population of more than eight hundred thousand persons, shall redact references to complete nine digit social security numbers that are available on the recorder's website.No substantive change but updates text for clarity.
-
Section 11-461
The recorder in a county with a population of less than eight hundred thousand persons shall redact references to complete nine digit social security numbers on instruments that are available on the recorder's website at the request of the holder of the social security number if the holder identifies the recorded instrument.→ The recorder in a county with a population of less than eight hundred thousand persons shall redact references to complete nine digit social security numbers on instruments that are available on the recorder's website at the request of the holder of the social security number if the holder identifies the recorded instrument.No substantive change but updates text for clarity.
-
Section 11-461
Notwithstanding the limitations of section 11-475.01, county recorders may use monies in the document storage and retrieval conversion and maintenance fund to accomplish the requirements of subsections G and H of this section.→ Notwithstanding the limitations of section 11-475.01, county recorders may use monies in the document storage and retrieval conversion and maintenance fund to accomplish the requirements of subsections G and H of this section.No substantive change but updates text for clarity.
Action History
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Prefiled.
Sponsors
- Timothy "Tim" Dunn · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2167?
- HB 2167 is sponsored by Timothy "Tim" Dunn (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 2167?
- This bill died with 56th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 2167?
- Track HB 2167 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2167
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2167
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →