Arizona 56th Legislature - Second Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 1 R cosponsors

SB 1020 — newborn screening; Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Last action — DP

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 56th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

111 added · 25 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amended version of Senate Bill 1020 includes Duchenne muscular dystrophy as a new condition to be added to Arizona's newborn screening panel. The effective date for this addition has been changed: it will take effect either on October 1, 2026, or two years after it is recommended by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, rather than by the end of 2024. This change is significant because it allows for more time to prepare for the inclusion of this serious condition, which can help ensure that newborns are screened for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, enabling earlier diagnosis and treatment.

→
Previous
Latest
Fifty-sixth Legislature Health and Human Services Second Regular Session S.B.
Senate Engrossed newborn screening;
1020 PROPOSED SENATE AMENDMENTS TO S.B.
Duchenne muscular dystrophy State of Arizona Senate Fifty-sixth Legislature Second Regular Session SENATE BILL 1020 AN ACT AMENDING SECTION 36-694, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
1020 (Reference to printed bill) Page 2, line 1, strike "ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 31, 2024," After line 37, insert:
RELATING TO THE NEWBORN SCREENING PROGRAM.
"Sec.
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - S.B.
1020 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
Section 1.
Section 36-694, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
36-694.
Report of blood tests;
newborn screening program;
committee;
fee;
definitions A.
When a birth or stillbirth is reported, the attending physician or other person required to report the birth shall state on the certificate whether a blood test for syphilis was made on a specimen of blood taken from the woman who bore the child or from the umbilical cord at delivery, as required by section 36-693, and the approximate date when the specimen was taken.
B.
When a birth is reported, the attending physician or person who is required to report the birth shall order or cause to be ordered tests for certain congenital disorders, including hearing disorders.
The results of tests for these disorders must be reported to the department of health services.
The department of health services shall specify in rule the disorders, the process for collecting and submitting specimens and the reporting requirements for test results.
C.
When a hearing test is performed on a newborn, the initial hearing test results and any subsequent hearing test results must be reported to the department of health services as prescribed by department rules.
D.
The director of the department of health services shall establish a newborn screening program within the department to ensure that the testing for congenital disorders and the reporting of hearing test results required by this section are conducted in an effective and efficient manner.
The newborn screening program shall include all congenital disorders that are included on the recommended uniform screening panel adopted by the secretary of the United States department of health and human services for both core and secondary conditions.
Beginning January 1, 2022, CONGENITAL disorders that are added to the core and secondary conditions list of the recommended uniform screening panel shall be added to this state's newborn screening panel within two years after their addition to the recommended uniform screening panel.
The newborn screening program shall include an education program for the general public, the medical community, parents and professional groups.
The director shall designate the state laboratory as the only testing facility for the program, except that the director may designate other laboratory testing facilities for conditions or tests added to the newborn screening program on or after July 24, 2014.
If the director designates another laboratory testing facility for any condition or test, the director shall require the facility to follow all of the privacy and sample destruction time frames that are required of the state laboratory.
- 1 - S.B.
1020 E.
IN ADDITION TO THE CONGENITAL DISORDERS ADDED TO THIS STATE'S NEWBORN SCREENING PANEL PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION D OF THIS SECTION, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ADD DUCHENNE MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY TO THIS STATE'S NEWBORN SCREENING PANEL.
E.
F.
The newborn screening program shall establish and maintain a central database of newborns and infants who are tested for hearing loss and congenital disorders that includes information required in rule.
Test results are confidential subject to the disclosure provisions of sections 12-2801 and 12-2802.
F.
G.
If tests conducted pursuant to this section indicate that a newborn or infant may have a hearing loss or a congenital disorder, the screening program shall provide follow-up services to encourage the child's family to access evaluation services, specialty care and early intervention services.
G.
H.
The director shall establish a committee to provide recommendations and advice to the department on at least an annual basis regarding newborn screening best practices and emerging trends.
Show all 64 changed rows (24 more)
Previous
Latest
H.
I.
The director may establish by rule a fee that the department may collect for operating the newborn screening program, including contracting for the testing pursuant to this section.
The director shall present any change to the fee for the newborn screening program to the joint legislative budget committee for review.
I.
J.
Not later than sixty days after the department adjusts the newborn screening program fee established pursuant to subsection H I of this section:
1.
Each health insurer that is subject to title 20 shall update its hospital rates that include newborn screening to reflect the increase.
For the Arizona health care cost containment system and contractors acting pursuant to chapter 29, article 1 of this title that are not subject to title 20, the Arizona health care cost containment system shall update its hospital rates that include newborn screening to reflect the increase.
J.
K.
For the purposes of this section:
1.
"Infant" means a child who is twenty-nine days of age to two years of age.
2.
"Newborn" means a child who is not more than twenty-eight days of age.
Sec.
2.
The date Duchenne muscular dystrophy is added to the recommended uniform screening panel adopted by the secretary of the United States department of health and human services.
Two years from the date Duchenne muscular dystrophy is added to the recommended uniform screening panel adopted by the secretary of the United States department of health and human services.
B.
- 2 - S.B.
The director of the department of health services shall notify the director of the Arizona legislative council in writing within ten days after the date that Duchenne muscular dystrophy is added to the recommended uniform screening panel adopted by the secretary of the United States department of health and human services." Amend title to conform THOMAS "T.J." SHOPE 1020SHOPE.docx 01/26/2024 6:27 PM C:
1020 B.
MH
The director of the department of health services shall notify the director of the Arizona legislative council in writing within ten days after the date that Duchenne muscular dystrophy is added to the recommended uniform screening panel adopted by the secretary of the United States department of health and human services.
- 3 -
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. DP

  2. DP

  3. House Second Reading

  4. House First Reading.

  5. Transmit to House

  6. PASSED

  7. DPA

  8. DP

  9. DPA

  10. Senate Second Reading

  11. Senate First Reading

  12. Prefiled.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 88 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Not signed on (88)

88 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 88 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed

Passed 24 Yea · 4 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 9002
Unaffiliated 7100
Republican 8300
Total 24402
% of votes cast 80%13%0%7%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Anna Hernandez — Yea
Anthony Kern — Nay
Christine Marsh — Yea
Juan Mendez — Yea
Justine Wadsack — Yea
Ken Bennett — Yea
Sine Kerr — Yea
Sonny Borrelli — Yea
Brian Fernandez Democrat Yea
Catherine Miranda Democrat Yea
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Yea
Eva Burch Democrat Not Voting
Eva Diaz Democrat Not Voting
Flavio Bravo Democrat Yea
Lela Alston Democrat Yea
Priya Sundareshan Democrat Yea
Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat Yea
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Yea
Theresa Hatathlie Democrat Yea
David C. Farnsworth Republican Nay
David Gowan Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Yea
Jake Hoffman Republican Nay
Janae Shamp Republican Yea
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Nay
Wendy Rogers Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 1020?
SB 1020 is sponsored by Thomas "T.J." Shope (Republican), Christine Marsh, David L. Cook, Jennifer Pawlik, and Laura Terech.
What is the current status of SB 1020?
This bill died with 56th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1020?
Track SB 1020 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1020

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1020

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →