SB 1020 — newborn screening; Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Last action — DP
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 56th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
111 added · 25 removedPlain-language change summary
The amended version of Senate Bill 1020 includes Duchenne muscular dystrophy as a new condition to be added to Arizona's newborn screening panel. The effective date for this addition has been changed: it will take effect either on October 1, 2026, or two years after it is recommended by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, rather than by the end of 2024. This change is significant because it allows for more time to prepare for the inclusion of this serious condition, which can help ensure that newborns are screened for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, enabling earlier diagnosis and treatment.
Fifty-sixthSenate LegislatureEngrossed Healthnewborn andscreening; Human Services Second Regular Session S.B.
1020Duchenne PROPOSEDmuscular dystrophy State of Arizona Senate Fifty-sixth Legislature Second Regular Session SENATE AMENDMENTSBILL TO1020 S.B.AN ACT AMENDING SECTION 36-694, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
1020RELATING (ReferenceTO toTHE printedNEWBORN bill)SCREENING PagePROGRAM. 2, line 1, strike "ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 31, 2024," After line 37, insert:
"Sec.(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - S.B.
1020 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
Section 1.
Section 36-694, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
36-694.
Report of blood tests;
newborn screening program;
committee;
fee;
definitions A.
When a birth or stillbirth is reported, the attending physician or other person required to report the birth shall state on the certificate whether a blood test for syphilis was made on a specimen of blood taken from the woman who bore the child or from the umbilical cord at delivery, as required by section 36-693, and the approximate date when the specimen was taken.
B.
When a birth is reported, the attending physician or person who is required to report the birth shall order or cause to be ordered tests for certain congenital disorders, including hearing disorders.
The results of tests for these disorders must be reported to the department of health services.
The department of health services shall specify in rule the disorders, the process for collecting and submitting specimens and the reporting requirements for test results.
C.
When a hearing test is performed on a newborn, the initial hearing test results and any subsequent hearing test results must be reported to the department of health services as prescribed by department rules.
D.
The director of the department of health services shall establish a newborn screening program within the department to ensure that the testing for congenital disorders and the reporting of hearing test results required by this section are conducted in an effective and efficient manner.
The newborn screening program shall include all congenital disorders that are included on the recommended uniform screening panel adopted by the secretary of the United States department of health and human services for both core and secondary conditions.
Beginning January 1, 2022, CONGENITAL disorders that are added to the core and secondary conditions list of the recommended uniform screening panel shall be added to this state's newborn screening panel within two years after their addition to the recommended uniform screening panel.
The newborn screening program shall include an education program for the general public, the medical community, parents and professional groups.
The director shall designate the state laboratory as the only testing facility for the program, except that the director may designate other laboratory testing facilities for conditions or tests added to the newborn screening program on or after July 24, 2014.
If the director designates another laboratory testing facility for any condition or test, the director shall require the facility to follow all of the privacy and sample destruction time frames that are required of the state laboratory.
- 1 - S.B.
1020 E.
IN ADDITION TO THE CONGENITAL DISORDERS ADDED TO THIS STATE'S NEWBORN SCREENING PANEL PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION D OF THIS SECTION, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ADD DUCHENNE MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY TO THIS STATE'S NEWBORN SCREENING PANEL.
E.
F.
The newborn screening program shall establish and maintain a central database of newborns and infants who are tested for hearing loss and congenital disorders that includes information required in rule.
Test results are confidential subject to the disclosure provisions of sections 12-2801 and 12-2802.
F.
G.
If tests conducted pursuant to this section indicate that a newborn or infant may have a hearing loss or a congenital disorder, the screening program shall provide follow-up services to encourage the child's family to access evaluation services, specialty care and early intervention services.
G.
H.
The director shall establish a committee to provide recommendations and advice to the department on at least an annual basis regarding newborn screening best practices and emerging trends.
Show all 64 changed lines (24 more)
H.
I.
The director may establish by rule a fee that the department may collect for operating the newborn screening program, including contracting for the testing pursuant to this section.
The director shall present any change to the fee for the newborn screening program to the joint legislative budget committee for review.
I.
J.
Not later than sixty days after the department adjusts the newborn screening program fee established pursuant to subsection H I of this section:
1.
Each health insurer that is subject to title 20 shall update its hospital rates that include newborn screening to reflect the increase.
For the Arizona health care cost containment system and contractors acting pursuant to chapter 29, article 1 of this title that are not subject to title 20, the Arizona health care cost containment system shall update its hospital rates that include newborn screening to reflect the increase.
J.
K.
For the purposes of this section:
1.
"Infant" means a child who is twenty-nine days of age to two years of age.
2.
"Newborn" means a child who is not more than twenty-eight days of age.
Sec.
2.
TheTwo years from the date Duchenne muscular dystrophy is added to the recommended uniform screening panel adopted by the secretary of the United States department of health and human services.
B.- 2 - S.B.
The1020 directorB. of the department of health services shall notify the director of the Arizona legislative council in writing within ten days after the date that Duchenne muscular dystrophy is added to the recommended uniform screening panel adopted by the secretary of the United States department of health and human services." Amend title to conform THOMAS "T.J." SHOPE 1020SHOPE.docx 01/26/2024 6:27 PM C:
MHThe director of the department of health services shall notify the director of the Arizona legislative council in writing within ten days after the date that Duchenne muscular dystrophy is added to the recommended uniform screening panel adopted by the secretary of the United States department of health and human services.
- 3 -
Show all 64 changed rows (24 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version Current pdf
- SENATE - Health and Human Services View text pdf
- Amended SENATE - Shope flr amend (ref HHS) adopted pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
DP
-
DP
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DP
-
DPA
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
-
Prefiled.
Sponsors
- Thomas "T.J." Shope · Primary
- Christine Marsh · Cosponsor
- David L. Cook · Cosponsor
- Jennifer Pawlik · Cosponsor
- Laura Terech · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 88 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican
Co-sponsors (4)
Not signed on (88)
88 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 88 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 13% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anna Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Anthony Kern | — | Nay |
| Christine Marsh | — | Yea |
| Juan Mendez | — | Yea |
| Justine Wadsack | — | Yea |
| Ken Bennett | — | Yea |
| Sine Kerr | — | Yea |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Yea |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Yea |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Yea |
| Eva Burch | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Yea |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Yea |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Yea |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Yea |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Nay |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Nay |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Nay |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1020?
- SB 1020 is sponsored by Thomas "T.J." Shope (Republican), Christine Marsh, David L. Cook, Jennifer Pawlik, and Laura Terech.
- What is the current status of SB 1020?
- This bill died with 56th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1020?
- Track SB 1020 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1020
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1020
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →