HB 2209 — industrial commission of Arizona; continuation
Last action — Signed by Governor
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 30, 2024. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Katie Hobbs (Democratic) on June 18, 2024.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Mixed recorded votes
3 passed, 5 failed in recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
227 added · 177 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of HB 2209 makes several key changes regarding the Industrial Commission of Arizona. Notably, the requirement for penalties and fines for labor violations to be approved by a supermajority vote of the commissioners has been replaced with a standard vote by the commissioners. Additionally, sections that were previously included have been removed, streamlining the bill. These changes simplify the decision-making process for the commission, which may speed up how labor violations are addressed and potentially impact how effectively penalties are enforced.
HouseSenate Engrossed House Bill industrial commission of Arizona;
continuation State(now: of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-sixth Legislature Second Regular Session HOUSE BILL 2209 AN ACT AMENDING SECTIONS 23-108.03 AND 23-408, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
REPEALINGindustrial SECTIONcommission 41-3024.20,of ARIZONAArizona; REVISED STATUTES;
AMENDINGcontinuations) TITLEState 41,of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-sixth Legislature Second Regular Session CHAPTER 27,205 ARTICLEHOUSE 2,BILL ARIZONA2209 REVISEDAN STATUTES,ACT BYAMENDING ADDINGSECTIONS SECTION23-108.03 41-3027.09;AND 23-408, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
RELATINGREPEALING TOSECTIONS THE41-3024.17, INDUSTRIAL41-3024.18, COMMISSION41-3024.19 OFAND ARIZONA.41-3024.20, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
AMENDING TITLE 41, CHAPTER 27, ARTICLE 2, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTIONS 41-3028.15, 41-3032.17, 41-3032.18 AND 41-3032.19;
RELATING TO LABOR.
Performance of certain powers and duties;duties A.
definitionThe A.industrial commission OF ARIZONA shall be responsible for determining the policy of the commission.
The industrial commission shall be responsible for determining the policy of the commission.
STATE LABOR DEPARTMENT DETERMINATIONS, PENALTIES AND FINES FOR LABOR VIOLATIONS SHALL BE CONSIDERED, AUTHORIZED AND DETERMINED BY A SUPERMAJORITY VOTE OF THE COMMISSIONERS.
THE COMMISSIONERS SHALL CONSIDER WHETHER A VIOLATION CONTINUES AFTER THE EMPLOYER’SEMPLOYER'S COURSE OF CONDUCT HAS CEASED.
E.FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SUBSECTION, "LABOR DEPARTMENT" MEANS THE LABOR DEPARTMENT OF THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA.
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "SUPERMAJORITY" MEANS AN AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF TWO-THIRDS OF COMMISSIONERS PRESENT AND VOTING.
-B. 1 - H.B.
2209 B.
Witnesses- shall1 be- paidH.B. the same fees and mileage paid to witnesses in the courts of this state.
2209 Witnesses shall be paid the same fees and mileage paid to witnesses in the courts of this state.
THE DIRECTOR MAY NOT ALLOW ANY INDIVIDUAL TO ACCOMPANY ANA INSPECTORCOMPLIANCE SAFETY AND HEALTH OFFICER WHEN CONDUCTING INSPECTIONS FOR THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION UNLESS THE INDIVIDUAL IS ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
THE AUTHORIZED EMPLOYEE REPRESENTATIVE,REPRESENTATIVE. WHICH IS DEFINED TO BE THE AGENT OF A LABOR ORGANIZATION THAT HAS A COLLECTIVE BARGAINING RELATIONSHIP WITH THE EMPLOYER THAT REPRESENTS EMPLOYEES WHO ARE MEMBERS OF THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING UNIT.
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PARAGRAPH, "AUTHORIZED EMPLOYEE REPRESENTATIVE" MEANS AN AGENT OF A LABOR ORGANIZATION THAT HAS A COLLECTIVE BARGAINING RELATIONSHIP WITH THE EMPLOYER WHO REPRESENTS EMPLOYEES WHO ARE MEMBERS OF THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING UNIT.
OTHERWISEA THIRD PARTY WHO IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO BEACCOMPANY PRESENT,THE PROVIDEDCOMPLIANCE SAFETY AND HEALTH OFFICER TO ENSURE THAT THE EMPLOYERSTATE HASPLAN THEIS RIGHTAT TOLEAST REQUIREAS EFFECTIVE AS THE FOLLOWINGSTANDARDS CONDITIONS:OF THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT OF 1970 (P.L.
(a)91-596; THAT NO MORE THAN ONE SUCH INDIVIDUAL BE PRESENT.
84 STAT.
1590).
5.
OTHERWISE REQUIRED BY LAW TO BE PRESENT.
2209 (b)G. THAT THE INDIVIDUAL POSSESS AND USE PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT AND OTHER SAFETY EQUIPMENT APPLICABLE TO THE PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT TO BE INSPECTED.
(c)THE THATEMPLOYER MAY REQUIRE THE INDIVIDUALFOLLOWING HASCONDITIONS ALREADYFOR BEENA TRAINEDTHIRD ONPARTY ANYWHO ACCOMPANIES A COMPLIANCE SAFETY REQUIREMENTSAND APPLICABLEHEALTH TOOFFICER THEDURING PLACEAN OFINSPECTION EMPLOYMENTPURSUANT TO BESUBSECTION INSPECTED.F OF THIS SECTION:
(d)1. THAT THE INDIVIDUAL HAS WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE COVERAGE THAT NAMES THE EMPLOYER AS AN ADDITIONAL INSURED.
(e) THAT THENOT INDIVIDUALMORE EXECUTETHAN AONE CONTRACTINDIVIDUAL TOBE PROHIBITPRESENT THEUNLESS DISCLOSUREOTHERWISE OFREQUIRED ANYBY TRADELAW. SECRETS OR CONFIDENTIAL, PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF THE EMPLOYER THAT THE PERSON MAY ACQUIRE AS A RESULT OF THE INSPECTION.
2.
THAT THE INDIVIDUAL FOLLOW ALL WORKPLACE SAFETY RULES REGARDING PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT APPLICABLE TO ALL VISITORS FOR THE WORKPLACE.
3.
THAT THE INDIVIDUAL IS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE ANY SAFETY TRAININGS APPLICABLE TO ALL VISITORS OF THE WORKPLACE.
4.
THAT THE INDIVIDUAL SIGN A CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT WITH RESPECT TO THE USE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION THAT IS LEARNED DURING THE INSPECTION THAT HAS THE SAME TERMS AS REQUIRED FOR OTHER VISITORS.
5.
THAT NONEMPLOYEES, OTHER THAN THE COMPLIANCE SAFETY AND HEALTH OFFICER, ARE PROHIBITED FROM ENTERING AREAS THAT CONTAIN TRADE SECRETS.
THE COMPLIANCE SAFETY AND HEALTH OFFICER MAY CONSULT WITH A REASONABLE NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES WHO WORK IN THE IDENTIFIED TRADE SECRET AREA ON MATTERS OF SAFETY AND HEALTH, EVEN IF THOSE EMPLOYEES ARE NOT JOINING THE INSPECTION.
Show all 98 changed lines (58 more)
INFORMATION OBTAINED BY THE COMMISSION OR ITS REPRESENTATIVES DURING THE INSPECTION THAT CONTAINS OR THAT MAY REVEAL A TRADE SECRET IS SUBJECT TO SECTION 23-426.
G.H.
H.I.
I.J.
Before, during or after an inspection or investigation, communicate to an employer that the employer should not be represented by an attorney or that the employer may be treated more favorably by the division- or3 the- commissionH.B. if the employer is not represented by an attorney.
2209 division or the commission if the employer is not represented by an attorney.
-I. 3 - H.B.
2209K. I.
J.
K.L.
L.
The commission, or the commission's authorized representative, in addition to initiating an action under subsection I of this section, may file in the superior court in the county where the inspection was refused a verified complaint against an employer who violates subsection A of this section and request an injunction against continued refusal to permit an inspection.
THEThe JOINTcommission, LEGISLATIVEor AUDITthe COMMITTEEcommission's SHALLauthorized REVIEWrepresentative, ANYin ARIZONAaddition DIVISIONto OFinitiating OCCUPATIONALan SAFETYaction ANDunder HEALTHsubsection STATEI PLANK PROPOSALof ORthis PROPOSEDsection, ADOPTIONmay BYfile THEin INDUSTRIALthe COMMISSIONsuperior OFcourt ARIZONAin BEFOREthe THEcounty STATEwhere PLANthe PROPOSALinspection ORwas PROPOSEDrefused ADOPTIONa ISverified SUBMITTEDcomplaint TOagainst THEan UNITEDemployer STATESwho OCCUPATIONALviolates SAFETYsubsection ANDA HEALTHof ADMINISTRATION.this section and request an injunction against continued refusal to permit an inspection.
N.
AT LEAST THIRTY DAYS BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA SUBMITS THE STATE PLAN PROPOSAL OR PROPOSED ADOPTION TO THE UNITED STATES OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, THE COMMISSION SHALL SUBMIT THE STATE PLAN PROPOSAL OR PROPOSED ADOPTION TO THE JOINT LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE, WHICH MAY REVIEW AND RECOMMEND THAT THE COMMISSION AMEND THE STATE PLAN PROPOSAL OR PROPOSED ADOPTION.
Repeal SectionSections 41-3024.17, 41-3024.18, 41-3024.19 and 41-3024.20, Arizona Revised Statutes, isare repealed.
Sec.- 4 - H.B.
2209 Sec.
Title 41, chapter 27, article 2, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding sectionsections 41-3027.09,41-3028.15, 41-3032.17, 41-3032.18 and 41-3032.19, to read:
41-3027.09.41-3028.15.
termination July 1, 20272028 A.
THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA TERMINATES ON JULY 1, 2027.2028.
TITLE 23, CHAPTER 1 AND THIS SECTION ARE REPEALED ON JANUARY 1, 2028.2029.
41-3032.17.
Occupational safety and health advisory committee;
termination July 1, 2032 A.
THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE TERMINATES ON JULY 1, 2032.
B.
SECTION 23-409 AND THIS SECTION ARE REPEALED ON JANUARY 1, 2033.
41-3032.18.
Boiler advisory board;
termination July 1, 2032 A.
THE BOILER ADVISORY BOARD TERMINATES ON JULY 1, 2032.
B.
SECTION 23-486 AND THIS SECTION ARE REPEALED ON JANUARY 1, 2033.
41-3032.19.
Occupational safety and health review board;
termination July 1, 2032 A.
THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW BOARD TERMINATES ON JULY 1, 2032.
B.
SECTIONS 23-422 AND 23-423 AND THIS SECTION ARE REPEALED ON JANUARY 1, 2033.
Purpose of the industrial commission of Arizona Pursuant to section 41-2955, subsection B, Arizona Revised Statutes, the legislature continues the industrial commission of Arizona to promote the health, safety and welfare of employees.
-Sec. 4 - H.B.
2209 Sec.
LegislativePurpose IntentPursuant Itto issection the41-2955, intentsubsection ofB, theArizona legislatureRevised toStatutes, request the jointlegislature legislativecontinues auditthe committeeoccupational tosafety assignand thehealth sunset review ofcommittee the industrial commission of Arizona to theassist office of the auditorindustrial generalcommission toin conductdrafting astandards performanceand audit.rules.
Purpose Pursuant to section 41-2955, subsection B, Arizona Revised Statutes, the legislature continues the boiler advisory board to assist the division of occupational safety and health in drafting standards and rules for boilers and water heaters.
Sec.
8.
Purpose Pursuant to section 41-2955, subsection B, Arizona Revised Statutes, the legislature continues the occupational safety and health review board to hear administrative appeals regarding industrial commission of Arizona matters.
- 5 - H.B.
2209 Sec.
9.
Legislative intent It is the intent of the legislature to request the joint legislative audit committee to assign the sunset review of the industrial commission of Arizona to the office of the auditor general to conduct a performance audit.
Sec.
10.
-APPROVED 5BY -THE GOVERNOR JUNE 18, 2024.
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE JUNE 18, 2024.
- 6 -
Show all 98 changed rows (58 more)
View plain text versions (7)
- Chaptered Chaptered Version Current pdf
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version pdf
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version pdf
- HOUSE - 2209FloorGRESS_Merged.pdf View text pdf
- HOUSE - Commerce View text pdf
- Amended SENATE - Mesnard flr amend (ref Bill) adopted pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
Signed by Governor
-
Transmit to Governor
-
PASSED
-
PASSED
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DP
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
-
Transmit to Senate
-
PASSED
-
PASSED
-
FAILED
-
FAILED
-
DPA
-
DPA
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
Sponsors
- David Livingston · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 56 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- David Livingston Republican Voted No
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 16 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 47 | 10 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 17% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (60)
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 8 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 25 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 0% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anna Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Anthony Kern | — | Yea |
| Christine Marsh | — | Yea |
| Juan Mendez | — | Yea |
| Justine Wadsack | — | Yea |
| Ken Bennett | — | Yea |
| Sine Kerr | — | Yea |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Yea |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Yea |
| Eva Burch | Democrat | Yea |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Yea |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Yea |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Yea |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Yea |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Not Voting |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Not Voting |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Not Voting |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 22 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 9 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 28 | 30 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 47% | 50% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (60)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 8 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 31 | 28 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 52% | 47% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (60)
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 22 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 7 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 28 | 29 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 47% | 48% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (60)
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2209?
- HB 2209 is sponsored by David Livingston (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 2209?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 30, 2024. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 2209?
- Track HB 2209 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2209
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2209
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →