Arizona 56th Legislature - Second Regular Session Status: To Executive

HB 2125 — annexation; notice; approval

Last action — Vetoed by Governor

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 56th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

Vetoed by Governor Katie Hobbs (Democratic) on April 09, 2024.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

263 added · 29 removed

Plain-language change summary

The changes to House Bill 2125 primarily adjust the requirements for petitions seeking to annex land to a city or town. Specifically, the percentage of property owners needed to sign the petition has been increased from 50% to 60% for areas located in counties with populations over four million, while a 50% threshold remains for others. This adjustment is significant as it raises the barrier for annexation in densely populated counties, potentially making it more challenging for cities to expand their boundaries, which could impact local governance, funding, and development.

→
Previous
Latest
Fifty-sixth Legislature Government Second Regular Session H.B.
House Engrossed annexation;
2125 PROPOSED HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO H.B.
notice;
2125 (Reference to printed bill) Page 2, line 20, strike "petition in writing" insert "WRITTEN PETITION THAT MEETS THE MINIMUM SIGNATURE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SUBSECTION MUST BE FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER.
approval State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-sixth Legislature Second Regular Session HOUSE BILL 2125 AN ACT AMENDING SECTION 9-471, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
IF THE PETITION SEEKS TO EXTEND AND INCREASE THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF A CITY OR TOWN THAT IS LOCATED ENTIRELY WITHIN A COUNTY WITH A POPULATION OF MORE THAN FOUR MILLION PERSONS AND IS NOT LOCATED IN MORE THAN ONE COUNTY, THE PETITION SHALL BE" Line 24, strike ", may be" Line 25, strike "circulated and filed in the office of the county recorder";
RELATING TO ANNEXATION.
after the period insert "IF THE PETITION SEEKS TO EXTEND AND INCREASE THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF A CITY OR TOWN THAT IS NOT LOCATED ENTIRELY WITHIN A COUNTY WITH A POPULATION OF MORE THAN FOUR MILLION PERSONS, THE PETITION SHALL BE SIGNED BY THE OWNERS OF FIFTY PERCENT OR MORE IN VALUE OF THE REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY AND MORE THAN FIFTY PERCENT OF THE PERSONS OWNING REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY THAT WOULD BE SUBJECT TO TAXATION BY THE CITY OR TOWN IN THE EVENT OF ANNEXATION, AS SHOWN BY THE LAST ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPERTY." Page 6, line 2, strike "SIXTY PERCENT or more" insert "PERCENTAGE" Line 3, strike "more than;
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - H.B.
strike "SIXTY PERCENT" insert "THE PERCENTAGE" Amend title to conform TIMOTHY M.
2125 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
DUNN 2125DUNN.docx 01/30/2024 09:56 AM H:
Section 1.
SJ/ls
Section 9-471, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
9-471.
Annexation of territory;
procedures;
notice;
petitions;
access to information;
pre-annexation agreements;
restrictions A.
The following procedures are required to extend and increase the corporate limits of a city or town by annexation:
1.
A city or town shall file in the office of the county recorder of the county in which the annexation is proposed a blank petition required by paragraph 4 of this subsection setting forth a description and an accurate map of all the exterior boundaries of the territory contiguous to the city or town proposed to be annexed, except that a city or town shall not file an annexation petition that includes any territory for which an unsuccessful annexation was attempted by the same city or town until at least forty-five days after completion of the unsuccessful attempt.
A property owner may waive the forty-five-day waiting period for the owner's property that was part of the original unsuccessful annexation.
Notice and a copy of the filing shall be given to the clerk of the board of supervisors and to the county assessor.
The accurate map shall include all county rights-of-way and roadways that are within or contiguous to the exterior boundaries of the area of the proposed annexation.
If state land, other than state land used as state rights-of-way or land held by the state by tax deed, is included in the territory, written approval of the state land commissioner and the selection board established by section 37-202 shall also be filed.
The description shall identify the entity, if any, that will be responsible for maintaining the existing rights-of-way and roadways that are within or contiguous to the exterior boundaries of the area of the proposed annexation.
For the purposes of this paragraph, "unsuccessful annexation" means an annexation attempt that was withdrawn or that was not completed pursuant to this section.
2.
Signatures on petitions filed for annexation shall not be obtained for a waiting period of thirty days after filing the blank petition.
3.
After filing the blank petition pursuant to paragraph 1 of this subsection, the governing body of the city or town shall hold a public hearing within the last ten days of the thirty-day waiting period to discuss the annexation proposal.
The public hearing shall be held in accordance with title 38, chapter 3, article 3.1, except that, notwithstanding section 38-431.02, subsections C and D, the following notices of the public hearing to discuss the annexation proposal shall be given at least six days before the hearing:
- 1 - H.B.
2125 (a) Publication at least once in a newspaper of general circulation, which is published or circulated in the city or town and the territory proposed to be annexed, at least fifteen days before the end of the waiting period.
(b) Posting in at least three conspicuous public places in the territory proposed to be annexed.
(c) Notice by first class CERTIFIED mail sent to the chairperson of the board of supervisors of the county in which the territory proposed to be annexed is located.
THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OR TOWN SHALL BEAR THE COST OF THE CERTIFIED MAIL.
(d) Notice by first class mail with an accurate map of the territory proposed to be annexed sent to each owner of the real and personal property as shown on the statement furnished pursuant to subsection G of this section that would be subject to taxation by the city or town in the event of annexation in the territory proposed to be annexed.
For the purposes of this subdivision, "real and personal property" includes mobile, modular and manufactured homes and trailers only if the owner also owns the underlying real property.
4.
Within one year after the last day of the thirty-day waiting period, a petition in writing WRITTEN PETITION THAT MEETS THE MINIMUM SIGNATURE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SUBSECTION MUST BE FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER.
IF THE PETITION SEEKS TO EXTEND AND INCREASE THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF A CITY OR TOWN THAT IS LOCATED ENTIRELY WITHIN A COUNTY WITH A POPULATION OF MORE THAN FOUR MILLION PERSONS AND IS NOT LOCATED IN MORE THAN ONE COUNTY, THE PETITION SHALL BE signed by the owners of one-half SIXTY PERCENT or more in value of the real and personal property and more than one-half SIXTY PERCENT of the persons owning real and personal property that would be subject to taxation by the city or town in the event of annexation, as shown by the last assessment of the property, may be circulated and filed in the office of the county recorder.
Show all 126 changed rows (86 more)
Previous
Latest
IF THE PETITION SEEKS TO EXTEND AND INCREASE THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF A CITY OR TOWN THAT IS NOT LOCATED ENTIRELY WITHIN A COUNTY WITH A POPULATION OF MORE THAN FOUR MILLION PERSONS, THE PETITION SHALL BE SIGNED BY THE OWNERS OF FIFTY PERCENT OR MORE IN VALUE OF THE REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY AND MORE THAN FIFTY PERCENT OF THE PERSONS OWNING REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY THAT WOULD BE SUBJECT TO TAXATION BY THE CITY OR TOWN IN THE EVENT OF ANNEXATION, AS SHOWN BY THE LAST ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPERTY.
For the purposes of this paragraph, "real and personal property" includes mobile, modular and manufactured homes and trailers only if the owner also owns the underlying real property.
5.
Alterations increasing or reducing the territory sought to be annexed shall not be made after a petition has been signed by a property owner.
6.
The petitioner shall determine and submit a sworn affidavit verifying that no part of the territory for which the filing is made is - 2 - H.B.
2125 already subject to an earlier filing for annexation.
The county recorder shall not accept a filing for annexation without the sworn affidavit.
B.
All information contained in the filings, the notices, the petition, the tax and property rolls and other matters regarding a proposed or final annexation shall be made available by the appropriate official for public inspection during regular office hours.
C.
Any city or town, the attorney general, the county attorney or any other interested party within the territory to be annexed may on verified petition move to question the validity of the annexation for failure to comply with this section.
The petition shall set forth the manner in which it is alleged the annexation procedure was not in compliance with this section and shall be filed within thirty days after adoption of the ordinance annexing the territory by the governing body of the city or town and not otherwise.
The burden of proof shall be on the petitioner to prove the material allegations of the verified petition.
An action shall not be brought to question the validity of an annexation ordinance unless brought within the time and for the reasons provided in this subsection.
All hearings provided by this section and all appeals therefrom shall be preferred and heard and determined in preference to all other civil matters, except election actions.
If more than one petition questioning the validity of an annexation ordinance is filed, all such petitions shall be consolidated for hearing.
If two or more cities or towns show the court that they have demonstrated an active interest in annexing any or all of the area proposed for annexation, the court shall consider any oral or written agreements or understandings between or among the cities and towns in making its determination pursuant to this subsection.
D.
The annexation shall become final after the expiration of thirty days after the adoption of the ordinance annexing the territory by the city or town governing body, provided the annexation ordinance has been finally adopted in accordance with procedures established by statute, charter provisions or local ordinances, whichever is applicable, subject to the review of the court to determine the validity of the annexation ordinance if petitions in objection have been filed.
After adoption of the annexation ordinance, the clerk of the city or town shall provide a copy of the adopted annexation ordinance to the clerk of the board of supervisors of each county that has jurisdiction over the annexed area within sixty days after the annexation becomes final.
E.
For the purpose of determining the sufficiency of the percentage of the value of property under this section, the values of property shall be determined as follows:
1.
In the case of property assessed by the county assessor, values shall be the same as shown by the last assessment of the property.
- 3 - H.B.
2125 2.
In the case of property valued by the department of revenue, values shall be appraised by the department in the manner provided by law for municipal assessment purposes.
F.
For the purpose of determining the sufficiency of the percentage of persons owning property under this section, the number of persons owning property shall be determined as follows:
1.
In the case of property assessed by the county assessor, the number of persons owning property shall be as shown on the last assessment of the property.
2.
In the case of property valued by the department of revenue, the number of persons owning property shall be as shown on the last valuation of the property.
3.
If an undivided parcel of property is owned by multiple owners, those owners are deemed one owner for the purposes of this section.
4.
If a person owns multiple parcels of property, that owner is deemed one owner for the purposes of this section.
G.
The county assessor and the department of revenue, respectively, shall furnish to the city or town proposing an annexation, within thirty days after a request, a statement in writing showing the owner, the address of each owner and the appraisal and assessment of all such property.
H.
Territory is not contiguous for the purposes of subsection A, paragraph 1 of this section unless:
1.
It adjoins the exterior boundary of the annexing city or town for at least three hundred feet.
2.
It is, at all points, at least two hundred feet in width, excluding rights-of-way and roadways.
3.
The distance from the existing boundary of the annexing city or town where it adjoins the annexed territory to the furthest point of the annexed territory from that boundary is not more than twice the maximum width of the annexed territory.
I.
A city or town shall not annex territory if, as a result of that annexation, unincorporated territory is completely surrounded by the annexing city or town or a combination of the annexing city or town and other cities or towns.
J.
Notwithstanding any provisions of this article to the contrary, any town incorporated before 1950 that had a population of less than two thousand persons by the 1970 census and that is bordered on at least three sides by Indian lands may annex by ordinance territory owned by the state within the same county for a new townsite that is not contiguous to the existing boundaries of the town.
K.
Subsections H and I of this section do not apply to territory that at the time of the annexation was already completely surrounded by the same city or town or a combination of cities and towns.
- 4 - H.B.
2125 L.
Subsection I of this section does not apply to annexations that were approved by the selection board established in section 37-202 before August 25, 2020.
M.
A city or town annexing an area shall adopt zoning classifications that permit densities and uses not greater than those permitted by the county immediately before annexation.
Subsequent changes in zoning of the annexed territory shall be made according to existing procedures established by the city or town for the rezoning of land.
N.
The annexation of territory within six miles of territory included in a pending incorporation petition filed with the county recorder pursuant to section 9-101.01, subsection D shall not cause an urbanized area to exist pursuant to section 9-101.01 that did not exist before the annexation.
O.
As an alternative to the procedures established in this section, a county right-of-way or roadway may be transferred to an adjacent city or town by mutual consent of the governing bodies of the county and city or town if the property transferred is adjacent to the receiving city or town and if the city or town and county each approve the proposed transfer as a published agenda item at a regular public meeting of their governing bodies.
A transfer of property made pursuant to this subsection shall be treated by the receiving city or town as if the transferred property was newly annexed territory.
P.
On or before the date the governing body adopts the ordinance annexing territory, the governing body shall have approved a plan, policy or procedure to provide the annexed territory with appropriate levels of infrastructure and services to serve anticipated new development within ten years after the date the annexation becomes final pursuant to subsection D of this section.
Q.
If a property owner prevails in any action to challenge the annexation of the property owner's property, the court shall allow the property owner reasonable attorney fees and costs relating to the action from the annexing municipality.
R.
A city or town may annex territory that is a county-owned park or a park operated on public lands by a county as part of a management agreement if otherwise agreed to by the board of supervisors.
If the board of supervisors does not agree to the annexation, the county-owned park or park operated on public lands by a county as part of a management agreement shall be excluded from the annexation area, notwithstanding subsections H and I of this section.
A county-owned park or park operated on public lands by a county as part of a management agreement that is excluded from the annexation area pursuant to this subsection may subsequently be annexed with the permission of the board of supervisors notwithstanding any other provision of this section.
For the purposes of this subsection, "public lands":
1.
Has the same meaning prescribed in section 37-901.
- 5 - H.B.
2125 2.
Does not include lands owned by a flood control district.
S.
Notwithstanding subsection H of this section, territory is considered contiguous for the purposes of subsection A, paragraph 1 of this section if all of the real property in the territory is owned by one person, the city or town and the owner of the real property agree to the annexation and the territory adjoins the exterior boundary of the annexing city or town for at least three hundred feet.
T.
A city, town or developer may enter into a pre-annexation agreement with a property owner in which the property owner agrees to future annexation of an area that includes the property owner's property.
A property owner who has entered into a pre-annexation agreement is not required to sign the petition pursuant to subsection A, paragraph 4 of this section.
Whether or not the property owner signs the petition, the property and property owner are included for purposes of calculating the one-half or more PERCENTAGE in value of the real and personal property and more than one-half THE PERCENTAGE of the persons owning real and personal property that would be subject to taxation by the city or town in the event of the annexation, as required pursuant to subsection A, paragraph 4 of this section.
- 6 -
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Vetoed by Governor

  2. Transmit to Governor

  3. Transmit to House

  4. PASSED

  5. PASSED

  6. FAILED

  7. DP

  8. DP

  9. Senate Second Reading

  10. Senate First Reading

  11. Transmit to Senate

  12. PASSED

  13. DPA

  14. DPA

  15. House Second Reading

  16. House First Reading.

  17. Prefiled.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 42 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (92)

92 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 92 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed

Passed 16 Yea · 14 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 01100
Unaffiliated 5300
Republican 11000
Total 161400
% of votes cast 53%47%0%0%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Anna Hernandez — Nay
Anthony Kern — Yea
Christine Marsh — Nay
Juan Mendez — Nay
Justine Wadsack — Yea
Ken Bennett — Yea
Sine Kerr — Yea
Sonny Borrelli — Yea
Brian Fernandez Democrat Nay
Catherine Miranda Democrat Nay
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Nay
Eva Burch Democrat Nay
Eva Diaz Democrat Nay
Flavio Bravo Democrat Nay
Lela Alston Democrat Nay
Priya Sundareshan Democrat Nay
Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat Nay
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Nay
Theresa Hatathlie Democrat Nay
David C. Farnsworth Republican Yea
David Gowan Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Yea
Jake Hoffman Republican Yea
Janae Shamp Republican Yea
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Yea
Wendy Rogers Republican Yea

Official roll call →

failed to pass

Passed 15 Yea · 14 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 11000
Democrat 01100
Unaffiliated 4301
Total 151401
% of votes cast 50%47%0%3%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Anna Hernandez — Nay
Anthony Kern — Yea
Christine Marsh — Nay
Juan Mendez — Not Voting
Justine Wadsack — Yea
Ken Bennett — Nay
Sine Kerr — Yea
Sonny Borrelli — Yea
Brian Fernandez Democrat Nay
Catherine Miranda Democrat Nay
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Nay
Eva Burch Democrat Nay
Eva Diaz Democrat Nay
Flavio Bravo Democrat Nay
Lela Alston Democrat Nay
Priya Sundareshan Democrat Nay
Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat Nay
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Nay
Theresa Hatathlie Democrat Nay
David C. Farnsworth Republican Yea
David Gowan Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Yea
Jake Hoffman Republican Yea
Janae Shamp Republican Yea
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Yea
Wendy Rogers Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed

Passed 31 Yea · 28 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 02000
Republican 23000
Unaffiliated 8801
Total 312801
% of votes cast 52%47%0%2%
How each member voted (60)
Member Party Vote
Jevin D Hodge — Nay
Austin Smith — Yea
Barbara Parker — Yea
Ben Toma — Yea
Charles W Lucking — Nay
Cory McGarr — Yea
David L. Cook — Yea
Jacqueline Parker — Yea
Jennifer Pawlik — Nay
Judy Schwiebert — Nay
Justin Heap — Yea
Keith Seaman — Nay
Laura Terech — Nay
Leezah Elsa Sun — Not Voting
Marcelino Quiñonez — Nay
Melody Hernandez — Nay
Travis W. Grantham — Yea
Alma Hernandez Democrat Nay
Analise Ortiz Democrat Nay
Betty J Villegas Democrat Nay
Cesar Aguilar Democrat Nay
Christopher Mathis Democrat Nay
Consuelo Hernandez Democrat Nay
Lorena Austin Democrat Nay
Lupe Contreras Democrat Nay
Lydia Hernandez Democrat Nay
Mae Peshlakai Democrat Nay
Mariana Sandoval Democrat Nay
Myron Tsosie Democrat Nay
Nancy Gutierrez Democrat Nay
Oscar De Los Santos Democrat Nay
Patty Contreras Democrat Nay
Quantá Crews Democrat Nay
Sarah Liguori Democrat Nay
Seth Blattman Democrat Nay
Stacey Travers Democrat Nay
Stephanie Stahl Hamilton Democrat Nay
Alexander Kolodin Republican Yea
Beverly Pingerelli Republican Yea
David Livingston Republican Yea
David Marshall, Sr. Republican Yea
Gail Griffin Republican Yea
John Gillette Republican Yea
Joseph Chaplik Republican Yea
Julie Willoughby Republican Yea
Justin Wilmeth Republican Yea
Kevin Payne Republican Yea
Laurin Hendrix Republican Yea
Leo Biasiucci Republican Yea
Lupe Diaz Republican Yea
Matt Gress Republican Yea
Michael Carbone Republican Yea
Michele Peña Republican Yea
Neal Carter Republican Yea
Quang H Nguyen Republican Yea
Rachel Keshel Republican Yea
Selina Bliss Republican Yea
Steve Montenegro Republican Yea
Teresa Martinez Republican Yea
Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 2125?
HB 2125 is sponsored by Austin Smith.
What is the current status of HB 2125?
This bill died with 56th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 2125?
Track HB 2125 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 2125

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 2125

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →