HB 2721 — municipal zoning; middle housing
Last action — Signed by Governor
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 05, 2024. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Katie Hobbs (Democratic) on May 21, 2024.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
17 sponsors
1 primary, 16 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (8 R · 4 D) — cross-party backing.
-
Mixed recorded votes
4 passed, 5 failed in recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
109 added · 77 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised bill now specifies that municipalities with populations of 75,000 or more must allow duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, and townhomes as a permitted use in certain areas, specifically within one mile of their central business district and in at least 20% of new developments exceeding ten contiguous acres. Additionally, the terms "fiveplexes" and "fire sprinkler requirements" have been removed, which simplifies the housing options and regulatory burden. This change is important because it aims to encourage the development of middle housing and address housing shortages, particularly in urban areas, while preventing overly restrictive local regulations.
HouseSenate Engrossed House Bill municipal zoning;
middle housing State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-sixth Legislature Second Regular Session CHAPTER 197 HOUSE BILL 2721 AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 9, CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 6.1, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 9-462.10;
applicability;
ON OR BEFORE JANUARY 1, 2026, A MUNICIPALITY WITH A POPULATION OF SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND PERSONS OR MORE MUST AUTHORIZE BY ORDINANCE AND INCORPORATE INTO ITS DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, ZONING REGULATIONS AND OTHER OFFICIAL CONTROLS THE DEVELOPMENT OF DUPLEXES, TRIPLEXES, FOURPLEXES,FOURPLEXES FIVEPLEXES AND TOWNHOMES AS A PERMITTED USE ON ALLBOTH LOTSOF ZONEDTHE FORFOLLOWING: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE.
1.
ALL LOTS ZONED FOR SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE MUNICIPALITY'S CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT.
2.
AT LEAST TWENTY PERCENT OF ANY NEW DEVELOPMENT OF MORE THAN TEN CONTIGUOUS ACRES.
DISCOURAGE THE DEVELOPMENT OF MIDDLE HOUSING THROUGH UNREASONABLE COSTS, FEES, DELAYS OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS OR ACTIONS,ACTIONS WHICHTHAT INDIVIDUALLY OR CUMULATIVELY MAKE IMPRACTICABLE THE PERMITTING, SITING, OR CONSTRUCTION OF MIDDLE HOUSING.
RESTRICT MIDDLE HOUSING TYPES TO LESS THAN TWO FLOORSFLOORS. OR A FLOOR AREA RATIO OF LESS THAN ONE.
SETRESTRICT RESTRICTIONS, PERMITTING OR REVIEW PROCESSES FOR MIDDLE HOUSING THATTYPES ARETO MOREA RESTRICTIVEFLOOR THANAREA THOSERATIO FOROF SINGLE-FAMILYLESS DWELLINGSTHAN WITHINFIFTY THEPERCENT. SAME ZONE.
REQUIRESET OWNERRESTRICTIONS, OCCUPANCYPERMITTING OFOR ANYREVIEW STRUCTURESPROCESSES ONFOR MIDDLE HOUSING THAT ARE MORE RESTRICTIVE THAN THOSE FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS WITHIN THE LOT.SAME ZONE.
REQUIRE OWNER OCCUPANCY OF ANY STRUCTURES ON THE LOT.
6.
7.
REQUIRE MORE THAN ONE OFF-STREET PARKING SPACE PER UNIT.
THE MUNICIPALITY SHALL ALLOW THE PROPERTY OWNER TO DETERMINE THE LOCATION, NUMBER AND FORM OF OFF-STREET VEHICLE PARKING SPACES.
D.
E.D.
AREAS THAT ARE NOT SERVED BY MUNICIPAL WATER AND SEWER SERVICES.
F.6.
AREAS COVERED UNDER TITLE 48, CHAPTER 6, ARTICLE 4.
7.
ANY LAND WITHIN THE TERRITORY IN THE VICINITY OF A PUBLIC AIRPORT AS DEFINED IN SECTION 28-8486 OR TO THE EXTENT THIS SECTION WOULD - 1 - H.B.
2721 INTERFERE WITH THE PUBLIC AIRPORT'S ABILITY TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS, REGULATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES RELATED TO APPLYING FOR, RECEIVING OR SPENDING FEDERAL MONIES.
8.
ANY LAND WITHIN THE TERRITORY IN THE VICINITY OF A MILITARY AIRPORT AS DEFINED IN SECTION 28-8461.
E.
-F. 1 - H.B.
2721THIS G.SECTION DOES NOT CHANGE OR OTHERWISE IMPAIR THE TERMS OF ANY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT EXISTS ON THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SECTION.
G.
NOTWITHSTANDING SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION, A UTILITY PROVIDER IMPACTED BY A DEVELOPMENT BEING DEVELOPED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION SHALL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THE SITE PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT.
H.
"DUPLEX""BUILDING MEANSCODE": A PARCEL OR LOT WITH TWO DWELLING UNITS THAT ARE DESIGNED FOR RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY BY NOT MORE THAN TWO HOUSEHOLDS LIVING INDEPENDENTLY FROM EACH OTHER.
(a) MEANS A CONSTRUCTION CODE ADOPTED BY A MUNICIPALITY.
(b) INCLUDES A MODEL BUILDING CODE, COMMERCIAL CODE, PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL CODE, ELECTRIC CODE, ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE, FIRE CODE, PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE, NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION CODE, ANTI-BLIGHT CODE OR OTHER SIMILAR CODE.
"FIVEPLEX""CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT" MEANS AAN PARCELAREA OR LOTSERIES WITHOF FIVEAREAS DWELLINGDESIGNATED UNITSBY A MUNICIPALITY THAT ARE DESIGNEDPRIMARILY FORNONINDUSTRIAL RESIDENTIALAND OCCUPANCYTHAT BYATTRACT NOTCOMMUNITY MOREACTIVITY, THANINCLUDING FIVETHE HOUSEHOLDSENTIRE LIVINGGEOGRAPHIC INDEPENDENTLYAREA FROMTHAT EACHTHE OTHER.MUNICIPALITY HAS OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED AS ITS DOWNTOWN OR EQUIVALENT ON THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE SECTION.
"FLOOR"DUPLEX" AREAMEANS RATIO"TWO MEANSDWELLING THEUNITS RATIOON OFTHE ALLOWEDSAME SQUAREPARCEL FOOTAGEOR LOT IN AATTACHED, MIDDLEDETACHED HOUSINGOR PROJECTSEMI-DETACHED TOARRANGEMENTS THETHAT SQUAREARE FOOTAGEDESIGNED OFFOR THERESIDENTIAL PARCELOCCUPANCY ONBY WHICHNOT ITMORE ISTHAN BUILT.TWO HOUSEHOLDS LIVING INDEPENDENTLY FROM EACH OTHER.
"FOURPLEX""FLOOR MEANSAREA ARATIO" PARCELMEANS ORTHE LOTRATIO WITHOF FOURALLOWED DWELLINGSQUARE UNITSFOOTAGE THATIN AREA DESIGNEDMIDDLE FORHOUSING RESIDENTIALPROJECT OCCUPANCYTO BYTHE NOTSQUARE MOREFOOTAGE THANOF FOURTHE HOUSEHOLDSPARCEL LIVINGON INDEPENDENTLYWHICH FROMIT EACHIS OTHER.BUILT.
"FOURPLEX" MEANS FOUR DWELLING UNITS ON THE SAME PARCEL OR LOT IN ATTACHED, DETACHED OR SEMI-DETACHED ARRANGEMENTS THAT ARE DESIGNED FOR RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY BY NOT MORE THAN FOUR HOUSEHOLDS LIVING INDEPENDENTLY FROM EACH OTHER.
Show all 53 changed lines (13 more)
6.
6.- 2 - H.B.
2721 7.
(b) INCLUDES DUPLEXES, TRIPLEXES, FOURPLEXES,FOURPLEXES FIVEPLEXES AND TOWNHOUSES.
7.
"PERMITTED USE" MEANS THE ABILITY FOR A DEVELOPMENT TO BE APPROVED WITHOUT REQUIRING A PUBLIC HEARING, VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, SPECIAL PERMIT OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION, OTHER THAN A DISCRETIONARY ZONING ACTION TO DETERMINATION THAT A SITE PLAN CONFORMS WITH APPLICABLE ZONING REGULATIONS.
"TOWNHOUSES""PERMITTED USE" MEANS DWELLINGTHE UNITSABILITY THATFOR AREA CONSTRUCTEDDEVELOPMENT INTO ABE ROWAPPROVED OFWITHOUT TWOREQUIRING ORA MOREPUBLIC ATTACHEDHEARING, UNITSVARIANCE, INCONDITIONAL WHICHUSE EACHPERMIT, DWELLINGSPECIAL UNITPERMIT SHARESOR ATSPECIAL LEASTEXCEPTION, ONEOTHER COMMONTHAN WALLA WITHDISCRETIONARY ANZONING ADJACENTACTION UNITTO ANDDETERMINATION THAT AREA ACCESSEDSITE BYPLAN SEPARATECONFORMS OUTDOORWITH ENTRANCES.APPLICABLE ZONING REGULATIONS.
"TRIPLEX""TOWNHOUSES" MEANS DWELLING UNITS THAT ARE CONSTRUCTED IN A PARCELROW OF TWO OR LOTMORE WITHATTACHED THREEUNITS IN WHICH EACH DWELLING UNITSUNIT THATSHARES AREAT DESIGNEDLEAST FORONE RESIDENTIALCOMMON OCCUPANCYWALL BYWITH NOTAN MOREADJACENT THANUNIT THREEAND HOUSEHOLDSTHAT LIVINGARE INDEPENDENTLYACCESSED FROMBY EACHSEPARATE OTHER.OUTDOOR ENTRANCES.
-10. 2 -
"TRIPLEX" MEANS THREE DWELLING UNITS ON THE SAME PARCEL OR LOT IN ATTACHED, DETACHED OR SEMI-DETACHED ARRANGEMENTS THAT ARE DESIGNED FOR RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY BY NOT MORE THAN THREE HOUSEHOLDS LIVING INDEPENDENTLY FROM EACH OTHER.
APPROVED BY THE GOVERNOR MAY 21, 2024.
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE MAY 21, 2024.
- 3 -
Show all 53 changed rows (13 more)
View plain text versions (5)
- Chaptered Chaptered Version Current pdf
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version pdf
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version pdf
- SENATE - Finance and Commerce View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Signed by Governor
-
Transmit to Governor
-
PASSED
-
PASSED
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DPA
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
-
Transmit to Senate
-
PASSED
-
PASSED
-
FAILED
-
DP
-
House Placed on Consent Calendar
-
DP
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
Sponsors
- Janae Shamp · Cosponsor
- Warren Petersen · Cosponsor
- Brian Fernandez · Cosponsor
- David C. Farnsworth · Cosponsor
- Justin Wilmeth · Cosponsor
- Michele Peña · Cosponsor
- Analise Ortiz · Cosponsor
- David Livingston · Cosponsor
- Consuelo Hernandez · Cosponsor
- Leo Biasiucci · Cosponsor
- Cesar Aguilar · Cosponsor
- Michael Carbone · Primary
- David L. Cook · Cosponsor
- Travis W. Grantham · Cosponsor
- Austin Smith · Cosponsor
- Sonny Borrelli · Cosponsor
- Anna Hernandez · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 16 co-sponsors · 76 not signed on · 37 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Michael Carbone Republican Voted No
Co-sponsors (16)
- Janae Shamp Republican
- Warren Petersen Republican
- Brian Fernandez Democrat
- David C. Farnsworth Republican
- Justin Wilmeth Republican
- Michele Peña Republican
- Analise Ortiz Democrat
- David Livingston Republican
- Consuelo Hernandez Democrat
- Leo Biasiucci Republican
- Cesar Aguilar Democrat
- David L. Cook
- Travis W. Grantham Voted No
- Austin Smith
- Sonny Borrelli
- Anna Hernandez
Not signed on (76)
76 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 76 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 21 | 7 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 23% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anna Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Anthony Kern | — | Nay |
| Christine Marsh | — | Nay |
| Juan Mendez | — | Yea |
| Justine Wadsack | — | Nay |
| Ken Bennett | — | Nay |
| Sine Kerr | — | Yea |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Yea |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Yea |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Yea |
| Eva Burch | Democrat | Yea |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Yea |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Yea |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Yea |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Yea |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Not Voting |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Nay |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Nay |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Not Voting |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 13 | 5 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 15 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 36 | 18 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 30% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (60)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 12 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 10 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 28 | 32 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 47% | 53% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (60)
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2721?
- HB 2721 is sponsored by Janae Shamp (Republican), Warren Petersen (Republican), Brian Fernandez (Democrat), David C. Farnsworth (Republican), Justin Wilmeth (Republican), Michele Peña (Republican), Analise Ortiz (Democrat), David Livingston (Republican), Consuelo Hernandez (Democrat), Leo Biasiucci (Republican), Cesar Aguilar (Democrat), Michael Carbone (Republican), David L. Cook, Travis W. Grantham, Austin Smith, Sonny Borrelli, and Anna Hernandez.
- What is the current status of HB 2721?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 05, 2024. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 2721?
- Track HB 2721 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2721
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2721
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →