Arizona 56th Legislature - Second Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 1 R cosponsors

SB 1085 — pharmacists; independent testing; treatment

Last action — FAILED

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 56th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

91 added · 42 removed

Plain-language change summary

The revised version of SB 1085 allows pharmacists to treat patients who are at least six years old, instead of three, if they test positive for specified health conditions. Additionally, the updated bill now lists "a respiratory illness, condition, or disease" instead of specifically mentioning SARS-COV-2. These changes expand the scope of care that pharmacists can provide, which can lead to quicker treatment for patients and improve public health responses during illness outbreaks.

→
Previous
Latest
Bill Number:
Senate Engrossed pharmacists;
S.B.
independent testing;
1085 Shope Floor Amendment Reference to:
treatment State of Arizona Senate Fifty-sixth Legislature Second Regular Session SENATE BILL 1085 AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 32, CHAPTER 18, ARTICLE 3, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 32-1979.04;
printed bill Amendment drafted by:
RELATING TO THE ARIZONA STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY.
Michael Madden FLOOR AMENDMENT EXPLANATION 1.
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - S.B.
Increases, from three to six, the age of a person that a pharmacist may independently test and treat.
1085 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
Section 1.
Title 32, chapter 18, article 3, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding section 32-1979.04, to read:
32-1979.04.
Pharmacists;
independent testing;
treatment;
health conditions A.
PURSUANT TO A STATEWIDE WRITTEN PROTOCOL APPROVED BY THE ARIZONA STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY, IN CONSULTATION WITH THE ARIZONA MEDICAL BOARD, A PHARMACIST MAY INDEPENDENTLY ORDER, PERFORM AND INTERPRET TESTS AUTHORIZED BY THE UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION AND WAIVED UNDER THE CLINICAL LABORATORY IMPROVEMENT AMENDMENTS OF 1988.
A PHARMACIST MAY INDEPENDENTLY INITIATE THERAPY TO ELIGIBLE PERSONS WHO ARE AT LEAST SIX YEARS OF AGE AND WHO TEST POSITIVE FOR ANY OF THE FOLLOWING HEALTH CONDITIONS:
1.
INFLUENZA.
Removes the authority of a pharmacist to independently test for and treat COVID-19.
GROUP A STREPTOCOCCUS PHARYNGITIS.
Allows the criteria for treatment of an eligible person to be based on the Arizona State Board of Pharmacy's statewide written protocol.
A RESPIRATORY ILLNESS, CONDITION OR DISEASE.
Requires pharmacists to maintain the results of any testing or screening for a period of seven years.
A CONDITION RELATED TO AN EMERGING OR EXISTING PUBLIC HEALTH THREAT IDENTIFIED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES FOR WHICH A STATEWIDE STANDING ORDER, RULE OR EXECUTIVE ORDER IS ISSUED.
5.
B.
Limits the ability of a pharmacist to delegate the task of performing a test to only licensed, rather than trained, staff members.
A PHARMACIST WHO ORDERS, CONDUCTS TESTING OR TREATS HEALTH CONDITIONS PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION SHALL USE ANY TEST THAT MAY GUIDE CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING FOR WHICH A WAIVER HAS BEEN OBTAINED UNDER THE CLINICAL LABORATORY IMPROVEMENT AMENDMENTS OF 1988, OR THE FEDERAL RULES ADOPTED THEREUNDER, OR ANY SCREENING PROCEDURE THAT IS ESTABLISHED BY THE STATEWIDE WRITTEN PROTOCOL.
6.
C.
Removes the prohibition on health insurers denying reimbursement for any test, screening or treatment performed by a pharmacist that would have been covered if otherwise performed by a medical or osteopathic physician, nurse practitioner or physician assistant.
PHARMACISTS SHALL USE EVIDENCE-BASED CLINICAL GUIDELINES PUBLISHED BY THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION OR THE INFECTIOUS DISEASES SOCIETY OF AMERICA OR OTHER CLINICALLY RECOGNIZED RECOMMENDATIONS IN PROVIDING PATIENT TREATMENT PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION.
Amendment explanation prepared by Michael Madden 02/15/2024 Fifty-sixth Legislature Shope Second Regular Session S.B.
D.
1085 SHOPE FLOOR AMENDMENT SENATE AMENDMENTS TO S.B.
AN ELIGIBLE PERSON MUST MEET CRITERIA FOR TREATMENT BASED ON CURRENT CLINICAL GUIDELINES, IF AVAILABLE, THE STATEWIDE WRITTEN PROTOCOL OR EVIDENCE-BASED RESEARCH FINDINGS THAT SPECIFY THE FOLLOWING:
1085 (Reference to printed bill) Page 1, line 5, strike “;
1.
health insurance coverage;” Strike line 6 Line 12, strike "THREE" insert "SIX" Line 17, strike "SARS-COV-2 OR ANY OTHER" insert "A" Line 34, after the second comma, insert "THE STATEWIDE WRITTEN PROTOCOL" Page 2, line 12, after "INITIATED" insert "FOR A PERIOD OF SEVEN YEARS" Line 21, strike "ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL TASKS" insert "TASK" Line 23, strike "TRAINED" insert "LICENSED" Strike lines 27 through 34 Reletter to conform Strike lines 42 and 43 Amend title to conform THOMAS "T.J." SHOPE 1085SHOPE1014.docx 02/15/2024 10:14 AM S:
PATIENT INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA.
MM/slp - 1 -
2.
EXPLICIT MEDICAL REFERRAL CRITERIA.
E.
A PHARMACIST SHALL REFER A PATIENT TO THE PATIENT'S IDENTIFIED PRIMARY CARE PROVIDER, IF ONE IS IDENTIFIED, IF THE PATIENT EITHER:
1.
IS NOT ELIGIBLE FOR PATIENT TREATMENT PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION AND PRESENTS WITH DIFFERENTIAL SYMPTOMS.
2.
DOES NOT RESPOND TO THE INITIAL TREATMENT PROVIDED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION.
F.
A PHARMACIST WHO INITIATES A TREATMENT UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL:
1.
NOTIFY THE PATIENT'S IDENTIFIED PRIMARY CARE PROVIDER, IF ONE IS IDENTIFIED, WITHIN SEVENTY-TWO HOURS AFTER INITIATING THE TREATMENT.
Show all 59 changed rows (19 more)
Previous
Latest
THE NOTICE SHALL INCLUDE THE PATIENT'S NAME, THE TREATMENT INITIATED AND THE - 1 - S.B.
1085 DATE OF TREATMENT AND MAY BE SUBMITTED BY PHONE, FAX, MAIL OR EMAIL.
THE PHARMACIST SHALL MAKE A REASONABLE EFFORT TO IDENTIFY THE PATIENT'S PRIMARY CARE PROVIDER BY AT LEAST ONE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS:
(a) CHECKING PHARMACY RECORDS.
(b) REQUESTING THE INFORMATION FROM THE PATIENT OR, FOR A PATIENT UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE, THE PATIENT'S PARENT OR GUARDIAN.
2.
MAINTAIN A RECORD OF THE RESULTS OF ANY TESTING OR SCREENING FOR WHICH A TREATMENT IS INITIATED FOR A PERIOD OF SEVEN YEARS.
3.
NOTIFY THE PATIENT'S IDENTIFIED PRIMARY CARE PROVIDER, IF ONE IS IDENTIFIED, WITHIN FORTY-EIGHT HOURS AFTER THE OCCURRENCE OF ANY ADVERSE REACTION THAT IS REPORTED TO OR WITNESSED BY THE PHARMACIST AS A RESULT OF THE TREATMENT.
4.
PROVIDE INFORMATIONAL MATERIALS TO THE PATIENT REQUESTING TREATMENT OR, FOR A PATIENT UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE, TO THE PATIENT'S PARENT OR GUARDIAN ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF PEDIATRIC PREVENTIVE HEALTH CARE VISITS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS.
G.
A PHARMACIST MAY DELEGATE THE TASK OF PERFORMING A TEST WAIVED BY THE CLINICAL LABORATORY IMPROVEMENT AMENDMENTS OF 1988 TO A LICENSED MEMBER OF THE PHARMACY STAFF WHO IS UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF THE PHARMACIST.
A PHARMACIST MAY NOT DELEGATE ANY TASKS THAT INCLUDE CLINICAL JUDGMENT AND SHALL DELEGATE ONLY ANCILLARY DUTIES AS ALLOWED BY BOARD RULES.
H.
THIS SECTION DOES NOT ESTABLISH A CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST A PATIENT'S PRIMARY CARE PROVIDER FOR ANY ADVERSE REACTION, COMPLICATION OR NEGATIVE OUTCOME ARISING FROM THE TREATMENT INITIATED BY A PHARMACIST PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION IF THE TREATMENT IS INITIATED WITHOUT A PRESCRIPTION ORDER WRITTEN BY THE PATIENT'S PRIMARY CARE PROVIDER.
I.
A PHARMACIST MAY NOT INDEPENDENTLY ORDER A TEST OR SCREENING OR TREAT A MINOR WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE MINOR'S PARENT OR GUARDIAN.
- 2 -
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. FAILED

  2. PASSED

  3. FAILED

  4. DPA

  5. DP

  6. Senate Second Reading

  7. Senate First Reading

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 19 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (92)

92 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 92 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

failed to pass

Failed 15 Yea · 15 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 3800
Unaffiliated 3500
Republican 9200
Total 151500
% of votes cast 50%50%0%0%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Anna Hernandez — Nay
Anthony Kern — Nay
Christine Marsh — Nay
Juan Mendez — Nay
Justine Wadsack — Nay
Ken Bennett — Yea
Sine Kerr — Yea
Sonny Borrelli — Yea
Brian Fernandez Democrat Nay
Catherine Miranda Democrat Yea
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Nay
Eva Burch Democrat Yea
Eva Diaz Democrat Nay
Flavio Bravo Democrat Nay
Lela Alston Democrat Yea
Priya Sundareshan Democrat Nay
Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat Nay
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Nay
Theresa Hatathlie Democrat Nay
David C. Farnsworth Republican Yea
David Gowan Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Nay
Jake Hoffman Republican Nay
Janae Shamp Republican Yea
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Yea
Wendy Rogers Republican Yea

Official roll call →

failed to pass

Failed 10 Yea · 18 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 0902
Unaffiliated 3500
Republican 7400
Total 101802
% of votes cast 33%60%0%7%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Anna Hernandez — Nay
Anthony Kern — Nay
Christine Marsh — Nay
Juan Mendez — Nay
Justine Wadsack — Nay
Ken Bennett — Yea
Sine Kerr — Yea
Sonny Borrelli — Yea
Brian Fernandez Democrat Nay
Catherine Miranda Democrat Nay
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Nay
Eva Burch Democrat Not Voting
Eva Diaz Democrat Not Voting
Flavio Bravo Democrat Nay
Lela Alston Democrat Nay
Priya Sundareshan Democrat Nay
Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat Nay
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Nay
Theresa Hatathlie Democrat Nay
David C. Farnsworth Republican Nay
David Gowan Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Nay
Jake Hoffman Republican Nay
Janae Shamp Republican Yea
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Nay
Wendy Rogers Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 1085?
SB 1085 is sponsored by Thomas "T.J." Shope (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 1085?
This bill died with 56th Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1085?
Track SB 1085 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1085

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1085

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →