appropriation; Little Colorado River levee.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1321 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1321.
You're tracking SB 1321
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1321 — appropriation; Little Colorado River levee.
Last action — Transmit to Senate
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
Died in session
This bill died with 56th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
8 added · 62 removedPlain-language change summary
In the latest version of Senate Bill 1321, some text was added to clarify that it includes funding for the Little Colorado River levee. Previously, the reference title indicating this funding was removed. This change is important because it ensures that the bill explicitly designates the appropriation for the levee project, which could help secure necessary resources for flood protection and community safety.
House Engrossed Senate BillEngrossed appropriation;
(now:State of Arizona Senate Fifty-sixth Legislature First Regular Session SENATE BILL 1321 AN ACT APPROPRIATING MONIES TO THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.
backyard fowl;
regulation;
prohibition) State of Arizona Senate Fifty-sixth Legislature First Regular Session SENATE BILL 1321 AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 9, CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 6.1, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 9-462.10;
AMENDING TITLE 11, CHAPTER 6, ARTICLE 2, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 11-820.04;
RELATING TO FOWL.
TitleAppropriation; 9, chapter 4, article 6.1, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding section 9-462.10, to read:
9-462.10.department of transportation;
BackyardLittle fowlColorado regulation;River levee at Winslow The sum of $20,000,000 is appropriated from the state general fund in fiscal year 2023-2024 to the department of transportation to distribute to Navajo county to reconstruct the Little Colorado River levee at the city of Winslow.
prohibition;- 1 -
exceptions;
state preemption;
definition A.
A MUNICIPALITY MAY NOT ADOPT ANY LAW, ORDINANCE OR OTHER REGULATION THAT PROHIBITS A RESIDENT OF A SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENCE THAT IS ONE-HALF ACRE OR LESS IN SIZE FROM KEEPING FOWL IN THE BACKYARD OF THE PROPERTY.
A MUNICIPALITY MAY:
1.
RESTRICT THE NUMBER OF FOWL THAT A RESIDENT MAY KEEP IN THE BACKYARD OF THE PROPERTY TO NOT MORE THAN SIX.
2.
PROHIBIT A RESIDENT FROM KEEPING MALE FOWL, INCLUDING ROOSTERS.
3.
REQUIRE FOWL TO BE KEPT IN AN ENCLOSURE LOCATED IN THE REAR OR SIDE YARD OF THE PROPERTY AT LEAST FIFTEEN FEET FROM A NEIGHBORING PROPERTY AND RESTRICT THE SIZE OF THE ENCLOSURE TO A MAXIMUM OF TWO HUNDRED SQUARE FEET WITH A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF EIGHT FEET.
4.
REQUIRE THE ENCLOSURE TO BE MAINTAINED AND MANURE PICKED UP AND DISPOSED OF OR COMPOSTED AT LEAST TWICE WEEKLY.
5.
REQUIRE THAT COMPOSTED MANURE BE KEPT IN A WAY THAT PREVENTS MIGRATION OF INSECTS.
6.
REQUIRE WATER SOURCES WITH ADEQUATE OVERFLOW DRAINAGE.
7.
REQUIRE THAT FEED BE STORED IN INSECT-PROOF AND RODENT-PROOF CONTAINERS.
8.
PROHIBIT FOWL FROM RUNNING AT LARGE.
B.
THE PROPERTY RIGHTS OF PROPERTY OWNERS IN THIS STATE ARE OF STATEWIDE CONCERN.
THIS SECTION PREEMPTS ALL LOCAL LAWS, ORDINANCES AND CHARTER PROVISIONS TO THE CONTRARY.
C.
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "FOWL" MEANS A COCK OR HEN OF THE DOMESTIC CHICKEN.
Sec.
2.
Title 11, chapter 6, article 2, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding section 11-820.04, to read:
Show all 71 changed lines (31 more)
11-820.04.
Backyard fowl regulation;
prohibition;
exceptions;
state preemption;
definition A.
A COUNTY MAY NOT ADOPT ANY LAW, ORDINANCE OR OTHER REGULATION THAT PROHIBITS A RESIDENT OF A SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENCE THAT IS ONE-HALF ACRE OR LESS IN SIZE FROM KEEPING FOWL IN THE BACKYARD OF THE PROPERTY.
A COUNTY MAY:
1.
RESTRICT THE NUMBER OF FOWL THAT A RESIDENT MAY KEEP IN THE BACKYARD OF THE PROPERTY TO NOT MORE THAN SIX.
2.
PROHIBIT A RESIDENT FROM KEEPING MALE FOWL, INCLUDING ROOSTERS.
3.
REQUIRE FOWL TO BE KEPT IN AN ENCLOSURE LOCATED IN THE REAR OR SIDE YARD OF THE PROPERTY AT LEAST FIFTEEN FEET FROM A NEIGHBORING PROPERTY AND RESTRICT THE SIZE OF THE ENCLOSURE TO A MAXIMUM OF TWO HUNDRED SQUARE FEET WITH A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF EIGHT FEET.
- 1 - S.B.
1321 4.
REQUIRE THE ENCLOSURE TO BE MAINTAINED AND MANURE PICKED UP AND DISPOSED OF OR COMPOSTED AT LEAST TWICE WEEKLY.
5.
REQUIRE THAT COMPOSTED MANURE BE KEPT IN A WAY THAT PREVENTS MIGRATION OF INSECTS.
6.
REQUIRE WATER SOURCES WITH ADEQUATE OVERFLOW DRAINAGE.
7.
REQUIRE THAT FEED BE STORED IN INSECT-PROOF AND RODENT-PROOF CONTAINERS.
8.
PROHIBIT FOWL FROM RUNNING AT LARGE.
B.
THE PROPERTY RIGHTS OF PROPERTY OWNERS IN THIS STATE ARE OF STATEWIDE CONCERN.
THIS SECTION PREEMPTS ALL LOCAL LAWS AND ORDINANCES TO THE CONTRARY.
C.
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "FOWL" MEANS A COCK OR HEN OF THE DOMESTIC CHICKEN.
- 2 -
Show all 71 changed rows (31 more)
View plain text versions (5)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version pdf
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version Current pdf
- HOUSE - Appropriations - Strike Everything View text pdf
- HOUSE - Transportation & Infrastructure View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
Transmit to Senate
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DPA/SE
-
DPA
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DP
-
DP
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
Sponsors
- Myron Tsosie · Cosponsor
- Mae Peshlakai · Cosponsor
- Catherine Miranda · Cosponsor
- John Kavanagh · Cosponsor
- Sally Ann Gonzales · Cosponsor
- Rosanna Gabaldón · Cosponsor
- Brian Fernandez · Cosponsor
- Denise “Mitzi” Epstein · Cosponsor
- Eva Diaz · Cosponsor
- Lela Alston · Cosponsor
- Theresa Hatathlie · Primary
- Sonny Borrelli · Cosponsor
- Christine Marsh · Cosponsor
- Juan Mendez · Cosponsor
- Raquel Terán · Cosponsor
- David L. Cook · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 15 co-sponsors · 77 not signed on · 28 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Theresa Hatathlie Democrat
Co-sponsors (15)
- Myron Tsosie Democrat Voted No
- Mae Peshlakai Democrat Voted No
- Catherine Miranda Democrat
- John Kavanagh Republican
- Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat
- Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat
- Brian Fernandez Democrat
- Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat
- Eva Diaz Democrat
- Lela Alston Democrat
- Sonny Borrelli
- Christine Marsh
- Juan Mendez
- Raquel Terán
- David L. Cook
Not signed on (77)
77 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 77 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 16 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 31 | 27 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 52% | 45% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (60)
Per-member breakdown not published by this state.
Per-member breakdown not published by this state.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 26 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 87% | 10% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anna Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Anthony Kern | — | Yea |
| Christine Marsh | — | Yea |
| Juan Mendez | — | Yea |
| Justine Wadsack | — | Yea |
| Ken Bennett | — | Yea |
| Raquel Terán | — | Yea |
| Sine Kerr | — | Yea |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Steve Kaiser | — | Yea |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Yea |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Yea |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Yea |
| Eva Burch | Democrat | Yea |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Yea |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Yea |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Yea |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Nay |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Nay |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Nay |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1321?
- SB 1321 is sponsored by Myron Tsosie (Democrat), Mae Peshlakai (Democrat), Catherine Miranda (Democrat), John Kavanagh (Republican), Sally Ann Gonzales (Democrat), Rosanna Gabaldón (Democrat), Brian Fernandez (Democrat), Denise “Mitzi” Epstein (Democrat), Eva Diaz (Democrat), Lela Alston (Democrat), Theresa Hatathlie (Democrat), Sonny Borrelli, Christine Marsh, Juan Mendez, Raquel Terán, and David L. Cook.
- What is the current status of SB 1321?
- This bill died with 56th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1321?
- Track SB 1321 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1321
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1321
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →