Arizona 56th Legislature - First Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 1 R cosponsors

SB 1375 — technical correction; driver license fees

Last action — DP

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 56th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

219 added · 215 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment to Bill SB 1375 clarifies the section related to tax exemptions for certain retirement incomes, specifically focusing on the income from uniformed services. It replaces previous references and consolidates the language for clarity. This change is important because it aims to simplify the tax code, making it easier for individuals in uniformed services to understand their tax obligations and potentially ensuring they receive the benefits they are entitled to.

→
Previous
Latest
Fifty-sixth Legislature Military Affairs, Public Safety and Border Security First Regular Session S.B.
Senate Engrossed technical correction;
1375 PROPOSED SENATE AMENDMENTS TO S.B.
driver license fees (now:
1375 (Reference to printed bill) Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert:
gross income subtractions;
"Section 1.
uniformed services) State of Arizona Senate Fifty-sixth Legislature First Regular Session SENATE BILL 1375 AN ACT AMENDING SECTION 43-1022, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
RELATING TO TAXATION OF INCOME.
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - S.B.
1375 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
Section 1.
Senate Amendments to S.B.
4.
1375 4.
The amount of exploration expenses that is determined pursuant to section 617 of the internal revenue code, that has been deferred in a taxable year ending before January 1, 1990 and for which a subtraction has not previously been made.
The amount of exploration expenses that is determined pursuant to section 617 of the internal revenue code, that has been deferred in a taxable year ending before January 1, 1990 and for which a subtraction has - 1 - S.B.
1375 not previously been made.
To the extent not already excluded from Arizona gross income under the internal revenue code, compensation received for active service as a member of the reserves, the national guard or the armed forces UNIFORMED SERVICES of the United States, including compensation for service -2- Senate Amendments to S.B.
To the extent not already excluded from Arizona gross income under the internal revenue code, compensation received for active service as a member of the reserves, the national guard or the armed forces UNIFORMED SERVICES of the United States, including compensation for service in a combat zone as determined under section 112 of the internal revenue code.
1375 in a combat zone as determined under section 112 of the internal revenue code.
-3- Senate Amendments to S.B.
- 2 - S.B.
With respect to property that is sold or otherwise disposed of during the taxable year by a taxpayer that complied with section 43-1021, paragraph 11 with respect to that property, the amount of depreciation that has been allowed pursuant to section 167(a) of the internal revenue code to -4- Senate Amendments to S.B.
With respect to property that is sold or otherwise disposed of during the taxable year by a taxpayer that complied with section 43-1021, paragraph 11 with respect to that property, the amount of depreciation that has been allowed pursuant to section 167(a) of the internal revenue code to the extent that the amount has not already reduced Arizona taxable income in the current or prior taxable years.
1375 the extent that the amount has not already reduced Arizona taxable income in the current or prior taxable years.
In the case of a husband and wife who file separate returns, the subtraction may be taken by either taxpayer or may be divided between them, but the total subtractions allowed both husband and wife may not exceed $4,000 per beneficiary.
In the case of a husband and wife who file separate returns, the subtraction may be taken by either taxpayer or may be divided between - 3 - S.B.
1375 them, but the total subtractions allowed both husband and wife may not exceed $4,000 per beneficiary.
-5- Senate Amendments to S.B.
22.
1375 22.
For taxable years beginning from and after December 31, 2017, the amount of any net capital gain included in Arizona gross income for the taxable year that is derived from the exchange of one kind of legal tender for another kind of legal tender.
For taxable years beginning from and after December 31, 2017, the amount of any net capital gain included in Arizona gross income for the taxable year that is derived from the exchange of one kind of legal - 4 - S.B.
1375 tender for another kind of legal tender.
-6- Senate Amendments to S.B.
26.
1375 26.
This paragraph may not be interpreted as providing a subtraction for any appreciation in value that occurs from holding the -7- Senate Amendments to S.B.
This paragraph may not be interpreted as providing a subtraction for any appreciation in value that occurs from holding the virtual currency after the initial receipt of the airdrop.
1375 virtual currency after the initial receipt of the airdrop.
(c) "Virtual currency" has the same meaning prescribed in section 43-1028.
- 5 - S.B.
1375 (c) "Virtual currency" has the same meaning prescribed in section 43-1028.
Effective date This act is effective to taxable years beginning from and after December 31, 2023." Amend title to conform DAVID GOWAN 1375GOWAN.docx 02/08/2023 03:08 PM C:
Effective date This act is effective to taxable years beginning from and after December 31, 2023.
CT -8-
- 6 -
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. DP

  2. W/D

  3. House Second Reading

  4. House First Reading.

  5. Transmit to House

  6. PASSED

  7. DPA

  8. DPA/SE

  9. Senate Second Reading

  10. Senate First Reading

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 11 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (92)

92 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 92 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed

Passed 18 Yea · 11 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 6301
Unaffiliated 6400
Republican 6400
Total 181101
% of votes cast 60%37%0%3%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Anna Hernandez — Nay
Anthony Kern — Yea
Christine Marsh — Yea
Juan Mendez — Nay
Justine Wadsack — Nay
Ken Bennett — Yea
Raquel Terán — Nay
Sine Kerr — Yea
Sonny Borrelli — Yea
Steve Kaiser — Yea
Brian Fernandez Democrat Yea
Catherine Miranda Democrat Yea
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Nay
Eva Burch Democrat Yea
Eva Diaz Democrat Nay
Lela Alston Democrat Yea
Priya Sundareshan Democrat Yea
Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat Yea
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Nay
Theresa Hatathlie Democrat Not Voting
David C. Farnsworth Republican Nay
David Gowan Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Nay
Jake Hoffman Republican Nay
Janae Shamp Republican Yea
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Nay
Wendy Rogers Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 1375?
SB 1375 is sponsored by David Gowan (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 1375?
This bill died with 56th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1375?
Track SB 1375 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1375

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1375

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →