schools; corporal punishment; prohibition
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 2071 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 2071.
You're tracking HB 2071
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 2071 — schools; corporal punishment; prohibition
Last action — House Second Reading
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 56th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced Version Current pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill modifies existing laws to prohibit corporal punishment in schools and amend regulations surrounding the use of restraint and seclusion techniques on students.
-
15-105
A school may permit ALLOW the use of restraint or seclusion techniques on any pupil STUDENT if both of the following apply:→ A school may allow the use of restraint or seclusion techniques on any pupil if both of the following apply:The bill clarifies the language to use 'allow' consistently instead of 'permit.'
-
15-120.04
A TEACHER, PRINCIPAL OR OTHER PERSON EMPLOYED BY A SCHOOL DISTRICT OR CHARTER SCHOOL MAY NOT SUBJECT A STUDENT TO CORPORAL PUNISHMENT.
This introduces a prohibition on any form of corporal punishment in schools.
-
15-120.04
THE PROHIBITION ON CORPORAL PUNISHMENT DOES NOT PREVENT THE USE OF RESTRAINT OR SECLUSION TECHNIQUES THAT COMPLY WITH SECTION 15-105.
It clarifies that using restraint or seclusion techniques is still permitted under specific conditions.
-
15-120.04
1. MEANS INFLICTING, OR CAUSING THE INFLICTION OF, PHYSICAL PAIN ON A STUDENT AS A MEANS OF DISCIPLINE.
New definition of corporal punishment is established within the legal framework.
-
15-120.04
2. DOES NOT INCLUDE PHYSICAL PAIN, INJURY OR DISCOMFORT CAUSED BY USING INCIDENTAL, MINOR OR REASONABLE PHYSICAL CONTACT OR OTHER ACTIONS DESIGNED TO MAINTAIN ORDER, CONTROL AND SAFETY IN THE SCHOOL OR CLASSROOM SETTING.
This distinguishes acceptable minor physical contact from corporal punishment.
-
15-843
2. Procedures for using corporal punishment if allowed by the governing board.→ 2. Procedures for the reasonable use of physical force by certificated or classified personnel in self-defense, defense of others and defense of property.This removal eliminates the option for corporal punishment in disciplinary procedures.
Action History
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
Sponsors
- Myron Tsosie · Cosponsor
- Stacey Travers · Cosponsor
- Mariana Sandoval · Cosponsor
- Christopher Mathis · Cosponsor
- Nancy Gutierrez · Cosponsor
- Patty Contreras · Cosponsor
- Flavio Bravo · Cosponsor
- Seth Blattman · Cosponsor
- Lorena Austin · Cosponsor
- Stephanie Stahl Hamilton · Cosponsor
- Oscar De Los Santos · Cosponsor
- Laura Terech · Primary
- Andres Cano · Cosponsor
- Jennifer Pawlik · Cosponsor
- Judy Schwiebert · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 14 co-sponsors · 78 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (14)
- Myron Tsosie Democrat
- Stacey Travers Democrat
- Mariana Sandoval Democrat
- Christopher Mathis Democrat
- Nancy Gutierrez Democrat
- Patty Contreras Democrat
- Flavio Bravo Democrat
- Seth Blattman Democrat
- Lorena Austin Democrat
- Stephanie Stahl Hamilton Democrat
- Oscar De Los Santos Democrat
- Andres Cano
- Jennifer Pawlik
- Judy Schwiebert
Not signed on (78)
78 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 78 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2071?
- HB 2071 is sponsored by Myron Tsosie (Democrat), Stacey Travers (Democrat), Mariana Sandoval (Democrat), Christopher Mathis (Democrat), Nancy Gutierrez (Democrat), Patty Contreras (Democrat), Flavio Bravo (Democrat), Seth Blattman (Democrat), Lorena Austin (Democrat), Stephanie Stahl Hamilton (Democrat), Oscar De Los Santos (Democrat), Laura Terech, Andres Cano, Jennifer Pawlik, and Judy Schwiebert.
- What is the current status of HB 2071?
- This bill died with 56th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 2071?
- Track HB 2071 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2071
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2071
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →