Arizona Fifty-fifth Legislature - Second Regular Session Status: Enacted

HB 2144 — health insurance coverage; biomarker testing

Last action — Signed by Governor

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 18, 2022. Enacted.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 54% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Mixed recorded votes

    3 passed, 2 failed in recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

271 added · 236 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated bill now provides a clearer definition of "clinical utility," specifying that test results should inform treatment strategies and patient outcomes, even if some information isn't immediately actionable. It also retains definitions for "consensus statements" and "nationally recognized clinical practice guidelines," ensuring they are based on evidence and developed transparently. These changes are important because they emphasize the role of comprehensive and evidence-based testing in improving patient care, ensuring that health care organizations focus on tests that actually benefit patients' health decisions.

→
Previous
Latest
House Engrossed health insurance coverage;
Senate Engrossed House Bill health insurance coverage;
biomarker testing State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-fifth Legislature Second Regular Session HOUSE BILL 2144 AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 20, CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 3, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 20-841.13;
biomarker testing State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-fifth Legislature Second Regular Session CHAPTER 219 HOUSE BILL 2144 AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 20, CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 3, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 20-841.13;
A SUBSCRIPTION CONTRACT SHALL COVER BIOMARKER TESTING FOR THE PURPOSES OF DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT, APPROPRIATE MANAGEMENT OR ONGOING MONITORING OF A SUBSCRIBER'S DISEASE OR CONDITION TO GUIDE TREATMENT DECISIONS WHEN THE TEST IS SUPPORTED BY MEDICAL AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE, INCLUDING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
A SUBSCRIPTION CONTRACT SHALL COVER BIOMARKER TESTING FOR THE PURPOSES OF DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT, APPROPRIATE MANAGEMENT OR ONGOING MONITORING OF A SUBSCRIBER'S DISEASE OR CONDITION TO GUIDE TREATMENT DECISIONS WHEN THE TEST PROVIDES CLINICAL UTILITY AS DEMONSTRATED BY MEDICAL AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE, INCLUDING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
"CLINICAL UTILITY" MEANS THE TEST RESULT PROVIDES INFORMATION THAT IS USED IN THE FORMULATION OF A TREATMENT OR MONITORING STRATEGY THAT INFORMS A PATIENT’S OUTCOME AND IMPACTS THE CLINICAL DECISION.
THE MOST APPROPRIATE TEST MAY INCLUDE BOTH INFORMATION THAT IS ACTIONABLE AND SOME INFORMATION THAT CANNOT BE IMMEDIATELY USED IN THE FORMULATION OF A CLINICAL DECISION.
4.
4.
5.
AN EVIDENCE OF COVERAGE SHALL COVER BIOMARKER TESTING FOR THE PURPOSES OF DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT, APPROPRIATE MANAGEMENT OR ONGOING MONITORING OF AN ENROLLEE'S DISEASE OR CONDITION TO GUIDE TREATMENT DECISIONS WHEN THE TEST IS SUPPORTED BY MEDICAL AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE, INCLUDING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
AN EVIDENCE OF COVERAGE SHALL COVER BIOMARKER TESTING FOR THE PURPOSES OF DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT, APPROPRIATE MANAGEMENT OR ONGOING MONITORING OF AN ENROLLEE'S DISEASE OR CONDITION TO GUIDE TREATMENT DECISIONS WHEN THE TEST PROVIDES CLINICAL UTILITY AS DEMONSTRATED BY MEDICAL AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE, INCLUDING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
D.
- 2 - H.B.
2144 D.
THE PROCESS SHALL BE READILY ACCESSIBLE ON HEALTH CARE SERVICES ORGANIZATION'S WEBSITE.
THE PROCESS SHALL BE READILY ACCESSIBLE ON THE HEALTH CARE SERVICES ORGANIZATION'S WEBSITE.
- 2 - H.B.
E.
2144 E.
"CLINICAL UTILITY" MEANS THE TEST RESULT PROVIDES INFORMATION THAT IS USED IN THE FORMULATION OF A TREATMENT OR MONITORING STRATEGY THAT INFORMS A PATIENT’S OUTCOME AND IMPACTS THE CLINICAL DECISION.
THE MOST APPROPRIATE TEST MAY INCLUDE BOTH INFORMATION THAT IS ACTIONABLE AND SOME INFORMATION THAT CANNOT BE IMMEDIATELY USED IN THE FORMULATION OF A CLINICAL DECISION.
4.
4.
5.
Sec.
- 3 - H.B.
2144 Sec.
A POLICY SHALL COVER BIOMARKER TESTING FOR THE PURPOSES OF DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT, APPROPRIATE MANAGEMENT OR ONGOING MONITORING OF AN INSURED'S DISEASE OR CONDITION TO GUIDE TREATMENT DECISIONS WHEN THE TEST IS SUPPORTED BY MEDICAL AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE, INCLUDING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
A POLICY SHALL COVER BIOMARKER TESTING FOR THE PURPOSES OF DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT, APPROPRIATE MANAGEMENT OR ONGOING MONITORING OF AN INSURED'S DISEASE OR CONDITION TO GUIDE TREATMENT DECISIONS WHEN THE TEST PROVIDES CLINICAL UTILITY AS DEMONSTRATED BY MEDICAL AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE, INCLUDING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
- 3 - H.B.
3.
2144 3.
"CLINICAL UTILITY" MEANS THE TEST RESULT PROVIDES INFORMATION THAT IS USED IN THE FORMULATION OF A TREATMENT OR MONITORING STRATEGY THAT INFORMS A PATIENT’S OUTCOME AND IMPACTS THE CLINICAL DECISION.
THE MOST APPROPRIATE TEST MAY INCLUDE BOTH INFORMATION THAT IS ACTIONABLE AND SOME - 4 - H.B.
2144 INFORMATION THAT CANNOT BE IMMEDIATELY USED IN THE FORMULATION OF A CLINICAL DECISION.
4.
4.
5.
- 4 - H.B.
B.
2144 B.
A POLICY SHALL COVER BIOMARKER TESTING FOR THE PURPOSES OF DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT, APPROPRIATE MANAGEMENT OR ONGOING MONITORING OF AN INSURED'S DISEASE OR CONDITION TO GUIDE TREATMENT DECISIONS WHEN THE TEST PROVIDES CLINICAL UTILITY AS DEMONSTRATED BY MEDICAL AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE, INCLUDING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
A POLICY SHALL COVER BIOMARKER TESTING FOR THE PURPOSES OF DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT, APPROPRIATE MANAGEMENT OR ONGOING MONITORING OF A SUBSCRIBER'S DISEASE OR CONDITION TO GUIDE TREATMENT DECISIONS WHEN THE TEST IS SUPPORTED BY MEDICAL AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE, INCLUDING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
THE SUBSCRIBER AND PRESCRIBING PRACTITIONER MUST HAVE ACCESS TO A CLEAR, READILY ACCESSIBLE AND CONVENIENT PROCESS TO REQUEST AN EXCEPTION TO A COVERAGE POLICY OF A GROUP OR BLANKET DISABILITY INSURER.
THE INSURED AND PRESCRIBING PRACTITIONER MUST HAVE ACCESS TO A CLEAR, READILY ACCESSIBLE AND CONVENIENT PROCESS TO REQUEST AN EXCEPTION TO A COVERAGE POLICY OF A GROUP OR BLANKET DISABILITY INSURER.
THIS SUBSECTION DOES NOT REQUIRE A SEPARATE PROCESS IF THE GROUP OR BLANKET DISABILITY INSURER'S EXISTING PROCESS COMPLIES WITH THIS SUBSECTION.
THIS SUBSECTION DOES NOT REQUIRE A SEPARATE PROCESS IF - 5 - H.B.
2144 THE GROUP OR BLANKET DISABILITY INSURER'S EXISTING PROCESS COMPLIES WITH THIS SUBSECTION.
"CLINICAL UTILITY" MEANS THE TEST RESULT PROVIDES INFORMATION THAT IS USED IN THE FORMULATION OF A TREATMENT OR MONITORING STRATEGY THAT INFORMS A PATIENT’S OUTCOME AND IMPACTS THE CLINICAL DECISION.
THE MOST APPROPRIATE TEST MAY INCLUDE BOTH INFORMATION THAT IS ACTIONABLE AND SOME INFORMATION THAT CANNOT BE IMMEDIATELY USED IN THE FORMULATION OF A CLINICAL DECISION.
4.
4.
5.
- 5 - H.B.
(a) ARE DEVELOPED BY INDEPENDENT ORGANIZATIONS OR MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES USING A TRANSPARENT METHODOLOGY AND REPORTING STRUCTURE AND A CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY.
2144 (a) ARE DEVELOPED BY INDEPENDENT ORGANIZATIONS OR MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES USING A TRANSPARENT METHODOLOGY AND REPORTING STRUCTURE AND A CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY.
THE ADMINISTRATION AND ITS CONTRACTORS SHALL PROVIDE BIOMARKER TESTING FOR THE PURPOSES OF DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT, APPROPRIATE MANAGEMENT OR ONGOING MONITORING OF A MEMBER'S DISEASE OR CONDITION TO GUIDE TREATMENT DECISIONS WHEN THE TEST IS SUPPORTED BY MEDICAL AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE, INCLUDING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
THE ADMINISTRATION AND ITS CONTRACTORS SHALL PROVIDE BIOMARKER TESTING FOR THE PURPOSES OF DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT, APPROPRIATE MANAGEMENT OR ONGOING MONITORING OF A MEMBER'S DISEASE OR CONDITION TO GUIDE TREATMENT DECISIONS WHEN THE TEST PROVIDES CLINICAL UTILITY AS DEMONSTRATED BY MEDICAL AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE, INCLUDING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
Show all 56 changed rows (16 more)
Previous
Latest
1.
- 6 - H.B.
2144 1.
THIS SUBSECTION DOES NOT REQUIRE A SEPARATE PROCESS IF THE ADMINISTRATION'S AND CONTRACTOR'S EXISTING PROCESS COMPLIES WITH THIS SUBSECTION.
THIS SUBSECTION DOES NOT REQUIRE A SEPARATE PROCESS IF THE ADMINISTRATION'S AND ITS CONTRACTOR'S EXISTING PROCESS COMPLIES WITH THIS SUBSECTION.
- 6 - H.B.
3.
2144 3.
"CLINICAL UTILITY" MEANS THE TEST RESULT PROVIDES INFORMATION THAT IS USED IN THE FORMULATION OF A TREATMENT OR MONITORING STRATEGY THAT INFORMS A PATIENT’S OUTCOME AND IMPACTS THE CLINICAL DECISION.
THE MOST APPROPRIATE TEST MAY INCLUDE BOTH INFORMATION THAT IS ACTIONABLE AND SOME INFORMATION THAT CANNOT BE IMMEDIATELY USED IN THE FORMULATION OF A CLINICAL DECISION.
4.
(a) ARE DEVELOPED BY AN INDEPENDENT, MULTIDISCIPLINARY PANEL OF EXPERTS USING A TRANSPARENT METHODOLOGY AND REPORTING STRUCTURE AND WITH A CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY.
(a) ARE DEVELOPED BY AN INDEPENDENT, MULTIDISCIPLINARY PANEL OF EXPERTS USING A TRANSPARENT METHODOLOGY AND REPORTING STRUCTURE THAT INCLUDES A CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY.
(c) ARE BASED ON THE BEST AVAILABLE EVIDENCE FOR THE PURPOSE OF OPTIMIZING THE OUTCOMES OF CLINICAL CARE.
(c) ARE BASED ON THE BEST AVAILABLE EVIDENCE FOR THE PURPOSE OF OPTIMIZING CLINICAL CARE OUTCOMES.
4.
5.
(a) ARE DEVELOPED BY INDEPENDENT ORGANIZATIONS OR MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES USING A TRANSPARENT METHODOLOGY AND REPORTING STRUCTURE AND WITH A CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY.
- 7 - H.B.
(b) ESTABLISH STANDARDS OF CARE THAT ARE INFORMED BY A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EVIDENCE AND AN ASSESSMENT OF THE BENEFITS AND COSTS OF ALTERNATIVE CARE OPTIONS AND INCLUDE RECOMMENDATIONS INTENDED TO OPTIMIZE PATIENT CARE.
2144 (a) ARE DEVELOPED BY INDEPENDENT ORGANIZATIONS OR MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES USING A TRANSPARENT METHODOLOGY AND REPORTING STRUCTURE AND A CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY.
- 7 -
(b) ESTABLISH STANDARDS OF CARE THAT ARE INFORMED BY A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EVIDENCE AND AN ASSESSMENT OF THE BENEFITS AND COSTS OF ALTERNATIVE CARE OPTIONS THAT INCLUDES RECOMMENDATIONS INTENDED TO OPTIMIZE PATIENT CARE.
APPROVED BY THE GOVERNOR MAY 6, 2022.
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE MAY 6, 2022.
- 8 -
View plain text versions (8)

Action History

  1. Signed by Governor

  2. Transmit to Governor

  3. PASSED

  4. PASSED

  5. Transmit to House

  6. PASSED

  7. DPA

  8. DPA

  9. Senate Second Reading

  10. Senate First Reading

  11. Transmit to Senate

  12. PASSED

  13. DPA

  14. DPA

  15. House Second Reading

  16. House First Reading.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 6 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (92)

92 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 92 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed

Passed 52 Yea · 4 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 32302
Republican 14102
Democrat 6000
Total 52404
% of votes cast 87%7%0%7%
How each member voted (60)
Member Party Vote
Amish Shah — Yea
Andrea Dalessandro — Yea
Andres Cano — Yea
Athena Salman — Not Voting
Ben Toma — Yea
Brenda Barton — Yea
Christian Solorio — Yea
César Chávez — Yea
Daniel Hernandez — Yea
David L. Cook — Yea
Diego Espinoza — Yea
Domingo DeGrazia — Yea
Jacqueline Parker — Nay
Jasmine Blackwater-Nygren — Yea
Jennifer Jermaine — Yea
Jennifer Longdon — Yea
Jennifer Pawlik — Yea
Joanne Osborne — Yea
Joel John — Yea
John Fillmore — Yea
Judy Burges — Nay
Judy Schwiebert — Yea
Kelli Butler — Yea
Lorenzo Sierra — Yea
Marcelino Quiñonez — Yea
Melody Hernandez — Yea
Michelle Udall — Yea
Morgan Abraham — Nay
Pamela Powers Hannley — Yea
Regina E. Cobb — Yea
Reginald Bolding — Yea
Richard C. Andrade — Yea
Robert Meza — Yea
Russell Bowers — Yea
Steve Kaiser — Yea
Travis W. Grantham — Not Voting
Walter Blackman — Yea
Alma Hernandez Democrat Yea
Brian Fernandez Democrat Yea
Christopher Mathis Democrat Yea
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Yea
Myron Tsosie Democrat Yea
Sarah Liguori Democrat Yea
Beverly Pingerelli Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
Gail Griffin Republican Yea
Jake Hoffman Republican Not Voting
Jeff Weninger Republican Yea
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Joseph Chaplik Republican Nay
Justin Wilmeth Republican Yea
Kevin Payne Republican Yea
Leo Biasiucci Republican Yea
Lupe Diaz Republican Not Voting
Mark Finchem Republican Yea
Neal Carter Republican Yea
Quang H Nguyen Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Teresa Martinez Republican Yea
Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed

Passed 25 Yea · 2 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 3002
Unaffiliated 16101
Republican 6100
Total 25203
% of votes cast 83%7%0%10%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Christine Marsh — Yea
Juan Mendez — Not Voting
Karen Fann — Yea
Kelly Townsend — Nay
Lisa Otondo — Yea
Martin Quezada — Yea
Michelle B. Ugenti-Rita — Yea
Nancy Barto — Yea
Paul Boyer — Yea
Raquel Terán — Yea
Rebecca Rios — Yea
Rick Gray — Yea
Rosanna Gabaldon — Yea
Sean Bowie — Yea
Sine Kerr — Yea
Sonny Borrelli — Yea
Tyler Pace — Yea
Victoria Steele — Yea
Lela Alston Democrat Yea
Lupe Contreras Democrat Not Voting
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Not Voting
Stephanie Stahl Hamilton Democrat Yea
Theresa Hatathlie Democrat Yea
David Gowan Republican Yea
David Livingston Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Venden "Vince" Leach Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Nay
Wendy Rogers Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed

Passed 59 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 36001
Republican 17000
Democrat 6000
Total 59001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (60)
Member Party Vote
Amish Shah — Yea
Andrea Dalessandro — Yea
Andres Cano — Yea
Athena Salman — Not Voting
Ben Toma — Yea
Brenda Barton — Yea
Christian Solorio — Yea
César Chávez — Yea
Daniel Hernandez — Yea
David L. Cook — Yea
Diego Espinoza — Yea
Domingo DeGrazia — Yea
Jacqueline Parker — Yea
Jasmine Blackwater-Nygren — Yea
Jennifer Jermaine — Yea
Jennifer Longdon — Yea
Jennifer Pawlik — Yea
Joanne Osborne — Yea
Joel John — Yea
John Fillmore — Yea
Judy Burges — Yea
Judy Schwiebert — Yea
Kelli Butler — Yea
Lorenzo Sierra — Yea
Marcelino Quiñonez — Yea
Melody Hernandez — Yea
Michelle Udall — Yea
Morgan Abraham — Yea
Pamela Powers Hannley — Yea
Regina E. Cobb — Yea
Reginald Bolding — Yea
Richard C. Andrade — Yea
Robert Meza — Yea
Russell Bowers — Yea
Steve Kaiser — Yea
Travis W. Grantham — Yea
Walter Blackman — Yea
Alma Hernandez Democrat Yea
Brian Fernandez Democrat Yea
Christopher Mathis Democrat Yea
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Yea
Myron Tsosie Democrat Yea
Sarah Liguori Democrat Yea
Beverly Pingerelli Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
Gail Griffin Republican Yea
Jake Hoffman Republican Yea
Jeff Weninger Republican Yea
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Joseph Chaplik Republican Yea
Justin Wilmeth Republican Yea
Kevin Payne Republican Yea
Leo Biasiucci Republican Yea
Lupe Diaz Republican Yea
Mark Finchem Republican Yea
Neal Carter Republican Yea
Quang H Nguyen Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Teresa Martinez Republican Yea
Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 2144?
HB 2144 is sponsored by Regina E. Cobb.
What is the current status of HB 2144?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 18, 2022. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 2144?
Track HB 2144 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 2144

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 2144

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →