HB 2144 — health insurance coverage; biomarker testing
Last action — Signed by Governor
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 18, 2022. Enacted.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Mixed recorded votes
3 passed, 2 failed in recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
271 added · 236 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated bill now provides a clearer definition of "clinical utility," specifying that test results should inform treatment strategies and patient outcomes, even if some information isn't immediately actionable. It also retains definitions for "consensus statements" and "nationally recognized clinical practice guidelines," ensuring they are based on evidence and developed transparently. These changes are important because they emphasize the role of comprehensive and evidence-based testing in improving patient care, ensuring that health care organizations focus on tests that actually benefit patients' health decisions.
HouseSenate Engrossed House Bill health insurance coverage;
biomarker testing State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-fifth Legislature Second Regular Session CHAPTER 219 HOUSE BILL 2144 AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 20, CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 3, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 20-841.13;
A SUBSCRIPTION CONTRACT SHALL COVER BIOMARKER TESTING FOR THE PURPOSES OF DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT, APPROPRIATE MANAGEMENT OR ONGOING MONITORING OF A SUBSCRIBER'S DISEASE OR CONDITION TO GUIDE TREATMENT DECISIONS WHEN THE TEST ISPROVIDES SUPPORTEDCLINICAL UTILITY AS DEMONSTRATED BY MEDICAL AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE, INCLUDING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
"CLINICAL UTILITY" MEANS THE TEST RESULT PROVIDES INFORMATION THAT IS USED IN THE FORMULATION OF A TREATMENT OR MONITORING STRATEGY THAT INFORMS A PATIENT’S OUTCOME AND IMPACTS THE CLINICAL DECISION.
THE MOST APPROPRIATE TEST MAY INCLUDE BOTH INFORMATION THAT IS ACTIONABLE AND SOME INFORMATION THAT CANNOT BE IMMEDIATELY USED IN THE FORMULATION OF A CLINICAL DECISION.
4.
4.5.
AN EVIDENCE OF COVERAGE SHALL COVER BIOMARKER TESTING FOR THE PURPOSES OF DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT, APPROPRIATE MANAGEMENT OR ONGOING MONITORING OF AN ENROLLEE'S DISEASE OR CONDITION TO GUIDE TREATMENT DECISIONS WHEN THE TEST ISPROVIDES SUPPORTEDCLINICAL UTILITY AS DEMONSTRATED BY MEDICAL AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE, INCLUDING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
D.- 2 - H.B.
2144 D.
THE PROCESS SHALL BE READILY ACCESSIBLE ON THE HEALTH CARE SERVICES ORGANIZATION'S WEBSITE.
-E. 2 - H.B.
2144 E.
"CLINICAL UTILITY" MEANS THE TEST RESULT PROVIDES INFORMATION THAT IS USED IN THE FORMULATION OF A TREATMENT OR MONITORING STRATEGY THAT INFORMS A PATIENT’S OUTCOME AND IMPACTS THE CLINICAL DECISION.
THE MOST APPROPRIATE TEST MAY INCLUDE BOTH INFORMATION THAT IS ACTIONABLE AND SOME INFORMATION THAT CANNOT BE IMMEDIATELY USED IN THE FORMULATION OF A CLINICAL DECISION.
4.
4.5.
Sec.- 3 - H.B.
2144 Sec.
A POLICY SHALL COVER BIOMARKER TESTING FOR THE PURPOSES OF DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT, APPROPRIATE MANAGEMENT OR ONGOING MONITORING OF AN INSURED'S DISEASE OR CONDITION TO GUIDE TREATMENT DECISIONS WHEN THE TEST ISPROVIDES SUPPORTEDCLINICAL UTILITY AS DEMONSTRATED BY MEDICAL AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE, INCLUDING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
-3. 3 - H.B.
2144 3.
"CLINICAL UTILITY" MEANS THE TEST RESULT PROVIDES INFORMATION THAT IS USED IN THE FORMULATION OF A TREATMENT OR MONITORING STRATEGY THAT INFORMS A PATIENT’S OUTCOME AND IMPACTS THE CLINICAL DECISION.
THE MOST APPROPRIATE TEST MAY INCLUDE BOTH INFORMATION THAT IS ACTIONABLE AND SOME - 4 - H.B.
2144 INFORMATION THAT CANNOT BE IMMEDIATELY USED IN THE FORMULATION OF A CLINICAL DECISION.
4.
4.5.
-B. 4 - H.B.
2144A B.POLICY SHALL COVER BIOMARKER TESTING FOR THE PURPOSES OF DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT, APPROPRIATE MANAGEMENT OR ONGOING MONITORING OF AN INSURED'S DISEASE OR CONDITION TO GUIDE TREATMENT DECISIONS WHEN THE TEST PROVIDES CLINICAL UTILITY AS DEMONSTRATED BY MEDICAL AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE, INCLUDING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
A POLICY SHALL COVER BIOMARKER TESTING FOR THE PURPOSES OF DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT, APPROPRIATE MANAGEMENT OR ONGOING MONITORING OF A SUBSCRIBER'S DISEASE OR CONDITION TO GUIDE TREATMENT DECISIONS WHEN THE TEST IS SUPPORTED BY MEDICAL AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE, INCLUDING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
THE SUBSCRIBERINSURED AND PRESCRIBING PRACTITIONER MUST HAVE ACCESS TO A CLEAR, READILY ACCESSIBLE AND CONVENIENT PROCESS TO REQUEST AN EXCEPTION TO A COVERAGE POLICY OF A GROUP OR BLANKET DISABILITY INSURER.
THIS SUBSECTION DOES NOT REQUIRE A SEPARATE PROCESS IF THE- GROUP5 OR- BLANKETH.B. DISABILITY INSURER'S EXISTING PROCESS COMPLIES WITH THIS SUBSECTION.
2144 THE GROUP OR BLANKET DISABILITY INSURER'S EXISTING PROCESS COMPLIES WITH THIS SUBSECTION.
"CLINICAL UTILITY" MEANS THE TEST RESULT PROVIDES INFORMATION THAT IS USED IN THE FORMULATION OF A TREATMENT OR MONITORING STRATEGY THAT INFORMS A PATIENT’S OUTCOME AND IMPACTS THE CLINICAL DECISION.
THE MOST APPROPRIATE TEST MAY INCLUDE BOTH INFORMATION THAT IS ACTIONABLE AND SOME INFORMATION THAT CANNOT BE IMMEDIATELY USED IN THE FORMULATION OF A CLINICAL DECISION.
4.
4.5.
-(a) 5ARE -DEVELOPED H.B.BY INDEPENDENT ORGANIZATIONS OR MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES USING A TRANSPARENT METHODOLOGY AND REPORTING STRUCTURE AND A CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY.
2144 (a) ARE DEVELOPED BY INDEPENDENT ORGANIZATIONS OR MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES USING A TRANSPARENT METHODOLOGY AND REPORTING STRUCTURE AND A CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY.
THE ADMINISTRATION AND ITS CONTRACTORS SHALL PROVIDE BIOMARKER TESTING FOR THE PURPOSES OF DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT, APPROPRIATE MANAGEMENT OR ONGOING MONITORING OF A MEMBER'S DISEASE OR CONDITION TO GUIDE TREATMENT DECISIONS WHEN THE TEST ISPROVIDES SUPPORTEDCLINICAL UTILITY AS DEMONSTRATED BY MEDICAL AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE, INCLUDING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
Show all 56 changed lines (16 more)
1.- 6 - H.B.
2144 1.
THIS SUBSECTION DOES NOT REQUIRE A SEPARATE PROCESS IF THE ADMINISTRATION'S AND ITS CONTRACTOR'S EXISTING PROCESS COMPLIES WITH THIS SUBSECTION.
-3. 6 - H.B.
2144"CLINICAL 3.UTILITY" MEANS THE TEST RESULT PROVIDES INFORMATION THAT IS USED IN THE FORMULATION OF A TREATMENT OR MONITORING STRATEGY THAT INFORMS A PATIENT’S OUTCOME AND IMPACTS THE CLINICAL DECISION.
THE MOST APPROPRIATE TEST MAY INCLUDE BOTH INFORMATION THAT IS ACTIONABLE AND SOME INFORMATION THAT CANNOT BE IMMEDIATELY USED IN THE FORMULATION OF A CLINICAL DECISION.
4.
(a) ARE DEVELOPED BY AN INDEPENDENT, MULTIDISCIPLINARY PANEL OF EXPERTS USING A TRANSPARENT METHODOLOGY AND REPORTING STRUCTURE ANDTHAT WITHINCLUDES A CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY.
(c) ARE BASED ON THE BEST AVAILABLE EVIDENCE FOR THE PURPOSE OF OPTIMIZING THE OUTCOMES OF CLINICAL CARE.CARE OUTCOMES.
4.5.
(a)- ARE7 DEVELOPED- BYH.B. INDEPENDENT ORGANIZATIONS OR MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES USING A TRANSPARENT METHODOLOGY AND REPORTING STRUCTURE AND WITH A CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY.
(b)2144 ESTABLISH(a) STANDARDS OF CARE THAT ARE INFORMEDDEVELOPED BY AINDEPENDENT SYSTEMATICORGANIZATIONS REVIEWOR OFMEDICAL EVIDENCEPROFESSIONAL ANDSOCIETIES ANUSING ASSESSMENTA OFTRANSPARENT THEMETHODOLOGY BENEFITS AND COSTSREPORTING OFSTRUCTURE ALTERNATIVE CARE OPTIONS AND INCLUDEA RECOMMENDATIONSCONFLICT INTENDEDOF TOINTEREST OPTIMIZEPOLICY. PATIENT CARE.
-(b) 7ESTABLISH -STANDARDS OF CARE THAT ARE INFORMED BY A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EVIDENCE AND AN ASSESSMENT OF THE BENEFITS AND COSTS OF ALTERNATIVE CARE OPTIONS THAT INCLUDES RECOMMENDATIONS INTENDED TO OPTIMIZE PATIENT CARE.
APPROVED BY THE GOVERNOR MAY 6, 2022.
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE MAY 6, 2022.
- 8 -
Show all 56 changed rows (16 more)
View plain text versions (8)
- Chaptered Chaptered Version Current pdf
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version pdf
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version pdf
- HOUSE - 2144FloorCOBB3_Merged.pdf View text pdf
- HOUSE - 2144HEALTH HUMAN SERVICES.PDF View text pdf
- HOUSE - Health & Human Services View text pdf
- SENATE - Finance View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
Signed by Governor
-
Transmit to Governor
-
PASSED
-
PASSED
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DPA
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
-
Transmit to Senate
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DPA
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
Sponsors
- Regina E. Cobb · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 14 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 52 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 87% | 7% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (60)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 25 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 7% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Christine Marsh | — | Yea |
| Juan Mendez | — | Not Voting |
| Karen Fann | — | Yea |
| Kelly Townsend | — | Nay |
| Lisa Otondo | — | Yea |
| Martin Quezada | — | Yea |
| Michelle B. Ugenti-Rita | — | Yea |
| Nancy Barto | — | Yea |
| Paul Boyer | — | Yea |
| Raquel Terán | — | Yea |
| Rebecca Rios | — | Yea |
| Rick Gray | — | Yea |
| Rosanna Gabaldon | — | Yea |
| Sean Bowie | — | Yea |
| Sine Kerr | — | Yea |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Tyler Pace | — | Yea |
| Victoria Steele | — | Yea |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Yea |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Stephanie Stahl Hamilton | Democrat | Yea |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| David Livingston | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Nay |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 59 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (60)
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2144?
- HB 2144 is sponsored by Regina E. Cobb.
- What is the current status of HB 2144?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 18, 2022. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 2144?
- Track HB 2144 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2144
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2144
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →