technical correction; tax judges; qualifications
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1001 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1001.
You're tracking SB 1001
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1001 — technical correction; tax judges; qualifications
Last action — Signed by Governor
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced November 15, 2021. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Mixed recorded votes
3 passed, 2 failed in recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
31 added · 25 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to SB 1001 clarify that threats must be based on a plausible claim of right to any property or services obtained or sought. This is crucial because it establishes a clearer standard for what constitutes unlawful threats or extortion, potentially reducing wrongful accusations. Additionally, these changes define the circumstances under which a person can defend against such allegations, emphasizing the importance of reasonable belief in their actions. Overall, these adjustments aim to better protect individuals from extortion while ensuring that legitimate claims are not improperly hindered.
SenateHouse Engrossed Senate Bill technical correction;
messages) State of Arizona Senate Fifty-fifth Legislature Second Regular Session CHAPTER 254 SENATE BILL 1001 AN ACT AMENDING SECTION 13-1804, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
Expose a secret or an asserted fact IN A SOCIAL MEDIA MESSAGE AS DEFINED IN SECTION 16-901 OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER, whether true or false, tending to subject anyone to hatred, contempt or ridicule or to impair the person's credit or business.business UNLESS THE THREAT IS BASED ON A PLAUSIBLE CLAIM OF RIGHT TO THE PROPERTY OR SERVICES OBTAINED OR SOUGHT TO BE OBTAINED.
- 1 - S.B.
1001 APPROVED BY THE GOVERNOR MAY 27, 2022.
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE MAY 27, 2022.
- 2 -
View plain text versions (6)
- Chaptered Chaptered Version Current pdf
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version pdf
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version pdf
- SENATE - Appropriations - Strike Everything View text pdf
- Amended HOUSE - Floor Amend to Bill - Blackman - passed pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill clarifies the definition of theft by extortion and modifies the classification of the offense.
-
Section 13-1804
EXPOSE A SECRET OR AN ASSERTED FACT IN A SOCIAL MEDIA MESSAGE AS DEFINED IN SECTION 16-901 OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER, whether true or false,→ EXPOSE A SECRET OR AN ASSERTED FACT IN A SOCIAL MEDIA MESSAGE AS DEFINED IN SECTION 16-901 OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER, whether true or false,The text regarding exposure of secrets has been clarified but remains the same.
-
Section 13-1804
THEFT BY EXTORTION UNDER SUBSECTION A, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THIS SECTION IS A CLASS 2 FELONY.→ THEFT BY EXTORTION UNDER SUBSECTION A, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THIS SECTION IS A CLASS 2 FELONY.The classification for theft by extortion has been specified for paragraph 1 but remains unchanged.
Action History
-
Signed by Governor
-
Transmit to Governor
-
PASSED
-
PASSED
-
Transmit to Senate
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
House Placed on Consent Calendar
-
DP
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DPA/SE
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
-
Prefiled.
Sponsors
- Venden "Vince" Leach · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 29 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Venden "Vince" Leach Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 21 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 31 | 27 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 52% | 45% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (60)
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 26 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 87% | 7% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Christine Marsh | — | Yea |
| Juan Mendez | — | Not Voting |
| Karen Fann | — | Yea |
| Kelly Townsend | — | Yea |
| Lisa Otondo | — | Yea |
| Martin Quezada | — | Nay |
| Michelle B. Ugenti-Rita | — | Yea |
| Nancy Barto | — | Yea |
| Paul Boyer | — | Yea |
| Raquel Terán | — | Nay |
| Rebecca Rios | — | Yea |
| Rick Gray | — | Yea |
| Rosanna Gabaldon | — | Yea |
| Sean Bowie | — | Yea |
| Sine Kerr | — | Yea |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Tyler Pace | — | Yea |
| Victoria Steele | — | Not Voting |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Yea |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Yea |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Stephanie Stahl Hamilton | Democrat | Yea |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| David Livingston | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1001?
- SB 1001 is sponsored by Venden "Vince" Leach (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1001?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced November 15, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 1001?
- Track SB 1001 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1001
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1001
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →