Arizona Fifty-fifth Legislature - Second Regular Session Status: Passed House 3 R cosponsors

HB 2592 — juror compensation; superior court; appropriation.

Last action — DPA

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with Fifty-fifth Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

82 added · 16 removed

Plain-language change summary

The revised version of House Bill 2592 changes the duration for which jurors can request compensation from more than five days to two days. This adjustment is important because it expands eligibility, allowing jurors who serve for a shorter period to receive financial assistance, which may help alleviate the burden of lost wages for many people summoned for jury duty. Additionally, the total amount appropriated from the state general fund has been reduced from $1,620,000 to $1,000,000, which will affect the available resources for compensating these jurors.

→
Previous
Latest
Fifty-fifth Legislature Judiciary Second Regular Session H.B.
House Engrossed juror compensation;
2592 PROPOSED HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO H.B.
superior court;
2592 (Reference to printed bill) Page 1, line 22, strike "for more than five days" insert "for more than five TWO days" Lines 30 and 31, strike "whose jury service lasts more than five days" insert "whose jury service lasts more than five TWO days" Page 2, line 19, strike "$1,620,000" insert "$1,000,000" Amend title to conform JACQUELINE PARKER 2592PARKER.docx 02/07/2022 03:53 PM C:
appropriation.
SP
State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-fifth Legislature Second Regular Session HOUSE BILL 2592 AN ACT AMENDING SECTION 21-222, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
APPROPRIATING MONIES;
RELATING TO JURORS.
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - H.B.
2592 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
Section 1.
Section 21-222, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
21-222.
Arizona lengthy trial and digital evidence fund A.
The Arizona lengthy trial and digital evidence fund is established consisting of monies received from the additional fees paid on all filings, appearances, responses and answers pursuant to section 12-115 AND MONIES APPROPRIATED BY THE LEGISLATURE.
The monies in the fund shall not be used for any purpose other than as prescribed in this section.
B.
The supreme court shall administer the fund and shall adopt rules for the administration of the fund.
Not more than three percent of the monies in the fund shall be used for the reasonable and necessary costs of administering the fund.
On or before the fifteenth day of each month, on receipt of a request for reimbursement the supreme court shall transmit monies from the fund to a jury commissioner for monies paid to a juror under this section, together with a fee of not less than the amount prescribed in section 12-284, subsection A, class E for each application for payment of replacement or supplemental earnings by a juror.
C.
Subject to the availability of monies, monies in the fund shall be used to:
1.
Pay full or partial earnings replacement or supplementation to jurors who serve as petit jurors for more than five TWO days IN THE SUPERIOR COURT and who receive less than full compensation.
The amount of replacement or supplemental earnings shall be at least $40 but not more than $300 per day per juror beginning on the first day of jury service.
2.
If monies are available in the fund after paying jurors pursuant to paragraph 1 of this subsection, pay for the management and storage of digital evidence and to facilitate the display of the evidence to the jury and court at a trial and related proceedings.
D.
A PERSON WHO SERVES AS A PETIT juror whose jury service lasts more than five TWO days IN THE SUPERIOR COURT may submit a request for payment from the fund.
The amount a juror receives from the fund is limited to the difference between the jury fee prescribed in section 21-221 and the actual amount of earnings a juror earns, not less than $40, up to the maximum level payable under subsection C, paragraph 1 of this section, minus any amount the juror actually received from the juror's employer during the same time period.
A juror who requests payment from the fund:
1.
Shall disclose on the form the juror's regular earnings, the amount the juror's employer will pay during the term of jury service starting on the first day and thereafter, the amount of replacement or supplemental earnings being requested and any other information that the jury commissioner deems necessary.
- 1 - H.B.
2592 2.
Before receiving payment from the fund, shall submit verification from the juror's employer, if any, regarding the earnings information that is provided under paragraph 1 of this subsection.
This verification may include the employee's most recent earnings statement or a similar document.
3.
In order to verify the weekly income if the juror is self-employed or receives compensation other than wages, shall provide a sworn affidavit attesting to the juror's approximate gross weekly income, together with any other information that the supreme court requires.
E.
Jurors who are unemployed and are not eligible for payment pursuant to subsection C, paragraph 1 and subsection D of this section are eligible to be paid $40 per day, even if they receive income in the form of spousal maintenance, pensions, retirement, unemployment compensation, disability benefits or other similar income.
Commissioners shall not deduct these other forms of income in calculating the amount these jurors are to be paid from the fund.
Show all 45 changed rows (5 more)
Previous
Latest
Sec.
2.
Appropriations;
Arizona lengthy trial and digital evidence fund The sum of $1,000,000 is appropriated from the state general fund in each of fiscal years 2022-2023, 2023-2024, 2024-2025 and 2025-2026 to the Arizona lengthy trial and digital evidence fund established by section 21-222, Arizona Revised Statutes, as amended by this act.
- 2 -
View plain text versions (5)

How this bill changes current law

5 changes Share ↗

AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.

The bill increases juror compensation and appropriates funds for the Arizona lengthy trial and digital evidence fund.

  • 21-222

    more than five days → more than five TWO days

    The threshold for when jurors can receive replacement earnings is lowered.

  • 21-222

    pursuant to subsection C, paragraph 1 → pursuant to subsection C, paragraph 1 and subsection D

    Unemployed jurors can now receive compensation even if they have other forms of income.

  • 21-222

    $40 → at least $40 but not more than $300

    Juror compensation is specified to range between $40 and $300 per day.

  • 21-222

    monies appropriated by the legislature. → AND MONIES APPROPRIATED BY THE LEGISLATURE.

    Clarifies that the fund will include both fees and appropriated monies.

  • Section 2

    The sum of $1,000,000 is appropriated from the state general fund in each of fiscal years 2022-2023, 2023-2024, 2024-2025 and 2025-2026 to the Arizona lengthy trial and digital evidence fund established by section 21-222, Arizona Revised Statutes, as amended by this act.

    Establishes a dedicated appropriation of $1 million per year to support juror compensation.

Action History

  1. DPA

  2. DP

  3. Senate Second Reading

  4. Senate First Reading

  5. Transmit to Senate

  6. PASSED

  7. DPA

  8. DP

  9. DPA

  10. House Second Reading

  11. House First Reading.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 88 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (4)

Not signed on (88)

88 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 88 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed

Passed 59 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 36001
Republican 17000
Democrat 6000
Total 59001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (60)
Member Party Vote
Amish Shah — Yea
Andrea Dalessandro — Yea
Andres Cano — Yea
Athena Salman — Not Voting
Ben Toma — Yea
Brenda Barton — Yea
Christian Solorio — Yea
César Chávez — Yea
Daniel Hernandez — Yea
David L. Cook — Yea
Diego Espinoza — Yea
Domingo DeGrazia — Yea
Jacqueline Parker — Yea
Jasmine Blackwater-Nygren — Yea
Jennifer Jermaine — Yea
Jennifer Longdon — Yea
Jennifer Pawlik — Yea
Joanne Osborne — Yea
Joel John — Yea
John Fillmore — Yea
Judy Burges — Yea
Judy Schwiebert — Yea
Kelli Butler — Yea
Lorenzo Sierra — Yea
Marcelino Quiñonez — Yea
Melody Hernandez — Yea
Michelle Udall — Yea
Morgan Abraham — Yea
Pamela Powers Hannley — Yea
Regina E. Cobb — Yea
Reginald Bolding — Yea
Richard C. Andrade — Yea
Robert Meza — Yea
Russell Bowers — Yea
Steve Kaiser — Yea
Travis W. Grantham — Yea
Walter Blackman — Yea
Alma Hernandez Democrat Yea
Brian Fernandez Democrat Yea
Christopher Mathis Democrat Yea
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Yea
Myron Tsosie Democrat Yea
Sarah Liguori Democrat Yea
Beverly Pingerelli Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
Gail Griffin Republican Yea
Jake Hoffman Republican Yea
Jeff Weninger Republican Yea
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Joseph Chaplik Republican Yea
Justin Wilmeth Republican Yea
Kevin Payne Republican Yea
Leo Biasiucci Republican Yea
Lupe Diaz Republican Yea
Mark Finchem Republican Yea
Neal Carter Republican Yea
Quang H Nguyen Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Teresa Martinez Republican Yea
Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 2592?
HB 2592 is sponsored by Lupe Diaz (Republican), Neal Carter (Republican), Walt Blackman (Republican), Diego Espinoza, and Jennifer Longdon.
What is the current status of HB 2592?
This bill died with Fifty-fifth Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 2592?
Track HB 2592 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 2592

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 2592

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →