SB 1514 — health care institutions; visitation
Last action — DPA
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with Fifty-fifth Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
87 added · 40 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to SB 1514 clarify hospital visitation policies by specifying that hospitals must provide clear notice to patients or their representatives about these policies. Additionally, the bill now emphasizes that the visitation policy should include details on how family members can be included in the process. This change matters because it aims to enhance transparency and ensure that patients and their families are informed about their rights and options for visitation, especially during critical times.
Fifty-fifthSenate LegislatureEngrossed Judiciaryhealth Secondcare Regularinstitutions; Session S.B.
1514visitation PROPOSED(now: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO S.B.
1514hospitals; (Reference to Senate engrossed bill) Page 1, line 6, before "Visitation" insert "Hospitals;" Line 18, strike "MEMBERS";
aftervisitation; "FAMILY" insert "MEMBERS" Line 26, strike "IS" insert "AS" Line 29, strike "MAY NOT BE" insert "IS NOT" Page 2, line 4, strike "A" insert "THE" Line 13, strike "HEAR CLAIMS" insert "SET A HEARING" Line 14, after "SECTION" insert "TO OCCUR" Line 15, strike ", AND ENTER JUDGMENT WITHIN THAT TIME";
afterpolicy) theState periodof insertArizona "THESenate HEARINGFifty-fifth MAYLegislature BESecond HELDRegular TELEPHONICALLY.Session SENATE BILL 1514 AN ACT REPEALING SECTION 36-407.01, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
IF,AMENDING ONTITLE COMPLETION36, OFCHAPTER THE4, HEARING,ARTICLE THE1, COURTARIZONA HASREVISED SUFFICIENTSTATUTES, INFORMATIONBY TOADDING MAKE A DECISIONNEW ASSECTION TO36-407.01; WHETHER PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF SHOULD BE GRANTED, THE COURT SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT.
IFRELATING THE COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT INFORMATION TO MAKEHOSPITALS. A DETERMINATION AT THE INITIAL HEARING, THE COURT SHALL SET AN EVIDENTIARY PROCEEDING AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION THE COURT'S CALENDAR, THE AVAILABILITY OF THE PARTIES AND THE EVIDENCE AND THE URGENCY OF THE PETITIONER'S REQUEST.
PRELIMINARY(TEXT INJUNCTIVEOF RELIEFBILL SHALLBEGINS BEON GRANTEDNEXT IFPAGE) THE- PETITIONERi ESTABLISHES- THE CRITERIA FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF UNDER THE LAWS OF THIS STATE." House Amendments to S.B.
1514 PageBe 2,it afterenacted lineby 24,the insert:Legislature of the State of Arizona:
"Sec.Section 1.
3.Repeal Section 36-407.01, Arizona Revised Statutes, is repealed.
LegislativeSec. intent The legislature intends that the court resolve the cases arising out of claims filed pursuant to section 36-407.01, subsection F, Arizona Revised Statutes, as added by this act, as quickly as possible." Amend title to conform JACQUELINE PARKER 1514BLANK 03/18/2022 05:23 PM C:
MH2. 1514PARKER 03/22/2022 10:15 AM H:
LC/lsTitle -2-36, chapter 4, article 1, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new section 36-407.01, to read:
36-407.01.
Visitation policies;
notice;
communication devices;
court petition;
definitions A.
A HOSPITAL SHALL PROVIDE NOTICE OF ITS VISITATION POLICY TO EACH PATIENT OR THE PATIENT'S REPRESENTATIVE.
THE POLICY MUST ALLOW BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING:
1.
FOR THE PATIENT TO BE ACCOMPANIED BY AT LEAST TWO VISITORS OF THE PATIENT'S CHOOSING.
IF A PATIENT IS STAYING IN A ROOM WITH ANOTHER PATIENT, THE HOSPITAL MAY LIMIT EACH PATIENT TO ONE VISITOR AT A TIME.
THE PATIENT MUST BE FREE TO CHANGE THE IDENTITY OF THESE VISITORS AS OFTEN AS THE PATIENT WISHES.
2.
IF A SERIOUS POSSIBILITY EXISTS THAT THE PATIENT WILL LOSE CONSCIOUSNESS OR DIE WITHIN TWENTY-FOUR HOURS OR IF THE PATIENT HAS LOST CONSCIOUSNESS, FOR ALL MEMBERS OF THE PATIENT'S IMMEDIATE FAMILY AND A CLERGY MEMBER OF THE PATIENT'S CHOOSING TO VISIT THE PATIENT IMMEDIATELY AND ON DEMAND UNLESS THE PATIENT HAS EXPRESSED A CONTRARY PREFERENCE.
B.
A HOSPITAL'S VISITATION POLICY MAY:
1.
NOT PLACE TIME RESTRICTIONS ON PATIENT VISITATION.
2.
EXCLUDE VISITORS FROM THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, FROM AREAS WHERE SURGERIES OR PROCEDURES ARE PERFORMED OR PATIENTS ARE RECOVERING FROM A SURGERY OR PROCEDURE AND FROM ANY AREA THE HOSPITAL DESIGNATES IN THE POLICY IS NOT APPROPRIATE FOR VISITORS.
C.
HOSPITAL STAFF MAY ASK A PATIENT'S VISITOR TO LEAVE AT THE REQUEST OF THE PATIENT, FOR CONFIDENTIALITY OR PRIVACY PURPOSES OR BECAUSE OF THE VISITOR'S CONDUCT.
DURING TIMES WHEN A VISITOR MAY NOT BE ALLOWED TO BE WITH A PATIENT, THE HOSPITAL SHALL PROVIDE A WAITING AREA FOR THE VISITOR AND THE PATIENT'S HEALTH CARE PROVIDER SHALL COMMUNICATE REGULARLY WITH THE VISITOR ABOUT THE PATIENT'S HEALTH CONDITION AND CARE.
D.
A HOSPITAL SHALL ALLOW PATIENTS TO COMMUNICATE PROMPTLY AND ON DEMAND WITH ANY PERSON OF THEIR CHOICE.
EACH HOSPITAL SHALL HAVE A POLICY ADDRESSING THE USE OF COMMUNICATION DEVICES, INCLUDING CELL PHONES, SMARTPHONES AND PERSONAL COMPUTERS.
Show all 64 changed lines (24 more)
THE POLICY SHALL ADDRESS AREAS OF THE HOSPITAL WHERE AND INSTANCES WHEN COMMUNICATION DEVICES MAY BE RESTRICTED, TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION PATIENT CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVACY.
A HOSPITAL MAY NOT, CONSISTENT WITH THE HOSPITAL'S POLICY:
1.
PROHIBIT PATIENTS FROM HAVING COMMUNICATION DEVICES WITH THEM SUCH AS CELL PHONES, SMARTPHONES AND PERSONAL COMPUTERS.
2.
PROHIBIT PATIENTS FROM HAVING SUCH COMMUNICATION DEVICES BROUGHT TO THEM PROMPTLY ON DEMAND OR FAIL TO PROVIDE MEANS BY WHICH SUCH A REQUEST MAY BE EXPEDITIOUSLY MADE BY THE PATIENT.
- 1 - S.B.
1514 E.
A HOSPITAL SHALL NOTIFY A PATIENT OF THE PATIENT'S RIGHT TO VISITATION AND THE PATIENT'S RIGHT TO PETITION A COURT IF THE RIGHT TO VISITATION IS NOT HONORED.
IF A PATIENT'S RIGHT TO VISITATION IS NOT HONORED, THE PATIENT OR A PATIENT'S IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBER MAY REQUEST TO MEET WITH A PERSON THE HOSPITAL HAS DESIGNATED TO RESOLVE VISITATION DENIALS OR DISPUTES WITHIN ONE BUSINESS DAY TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE.
A MEETING REQUESTED WITH HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATION PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION SHALL PREFERABLY BE IN PERSON BUT MAY OCCUR USING AUDIO OR VIDEO CAPABILITIES.
IF A MEETING DOES NOT OCCUR AND THE VISITATION ISSUE IS NOT RESOLVED, THE PATIENT OR THE PATIENT'S IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBER MAY PETITION THE COURT TO RESOLVE THE PATIENT'S RIGHT TO VISITATION.
IT IS NOT THE HOSPITAL'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ASSIST WITH THE PETITION PROCESS.
F.
THE SUPERIOR COURT IN EACH COUNTY SHALL HEAR CLAIMS FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION WITHIN FORTY-EIGHT HOURS, EXCLUDING HOLIDAYS AND WEEKENDS, AND ENTER JUDGMENT WITHIN THAT TIME.
G.
THIS SECTION DOES NOT APPLY TO A MINOR CHILD, THE ARIZONA STATE HOSPITAL OR CHAPTER 5 OF THIS TITLE.
H.
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION:
1.
"HEALTH CARE PROVIDER" MEANS A PHYSICIAN WHO IS LICENSED PURSUANT TO TITLE 32, CHAPTER 13 OR 17, A NURSE PRACTITIONER WHO IS LICENSED PURSUANT TO TITLE 32, CHAPTER 15 OR A PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT WHO IS LICENSED PURSUANT TO TITLE 32, CHAPTER 25.
2.
"IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBER" MEANS A PATIENT'S SPOUSE, PARENT, CHILD, SIBLING, GRANDPARENT OR LEGAL GUARDIAN.
- 2 -
Show all 64 changed rows (24 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version Current pdf
- HOUSE - Judiciary View text pdf
- Amended SENATE - Barto flr amend (ref Bill) adopted pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
DPA
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DP
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
Sponsors
- Thomas "T.J." Shope · Cosponsor
- David Livingston · Cosponsor
- Venden "Vince" Leach · Cosponsor
- Warren Petersen · Cosponsor
- Nancy Barto · Primary
- Sonny Borrelli · Cosponsor
- David Gowan · Cosponsor
- Paul Boyer · Cosponsor
- Rick Gray · Cosponsor
- Sine Kerr · Cosponsor
- Kelly Townsend · Cosponsor
- Michelle B. Ugenti-Rita · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 11 co-sponsors · 81 not signed on · 13 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (11)
- Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican
- David Livingston Republican
- Venden "Vince" Leach Republican
- Warren Petersen Republican
- Sonny Borrelli
- David Gowan Republican
- Paul Boyer
- Rick Gray
- Sine Kerr
- Kelly Townsend
- Michelle B. Ugenti-Rita
Not signed on (81)
81 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 81 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 8 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 13 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 43% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Christine Marsh | — | Nay |
| Juan Mendez | — | Not Voting |
| Karen Fann | — | Yea |
| Kelly Townsend | — | Yea |
| Lisa Otondo | — | Nay |
| Martin Quezada | — | Nay |
| Michelle B. Ugenti-Rita | — | Yea |
| Nancy Barto | — | Yea |
| Paul Boyer | — | Yea |
| Raquel Terán | — | Nay |
| Rebecca Rios | — | Nay |
| Rick Gray | — | Yea |
| Rosanna Gabaldon | — | Nay |
| Sean Bowie | — | Nay |
| Sine Kerr | — | Yea |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Tyler Pace | — | Yea |
| Victoria Steele | — | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| Stephanie Stahl Hamilton | Democrat | Nay |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Nay |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| David Livingston | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1514?
- SB 1514 is sponsored by Thomas "T.J." Shope (Republican), David Livingston (Republican), Venden "Vince" Leach (Republican), Warren Petersen (Republican), Nancy Barto, Sonny Borrelli, David Gowan (Republican), Paul Boyer, Rick Gray, Sine Kerr, Kelly Townsend, and Michelle B. Ugenti-Rita.
- What is the current status of SB 1514?
- This bill died with Fifty-fifth Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1514?
- Track SB 1514 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1514
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1514
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →