SB 1592 — governor's declaration; fiscal impact analysis
Last action — Vetoed by Governor
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with Fifty-fifth Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
177 added · 31 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to SB 1592 clarifies the language regarding the governor's declaration of a state of emergency and its impact on cities’ funding. Specifically, it ensures that during a declared emergency, the state treasurer cannot withhold funds from eligible cities. This change matters because it aims to provide financial stability to cities during emergencies, allowing them to continue operations without interruptions in funding.
BillSenate Number:Engrossed governor's declaration;
S.B.fiscal impact analysis State of Arizona Senate Fifty-fifth Legislature Second Regular Session SENATE BILL 1592 AN ACT AMENDING SECTION 9-626, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
1592RELATING GrayTO FloorCONVENTION AmendmentCENTER ReferenceDEVELOPMENT. to:
printed(TEXT billOF AmendmentBILL draftedBEGINS by:ON NEXT PAGE) - i - S.B.
Mike1592 HansBe FLOORit AMENDMENTenacted EXPLANATIONby • Specifies that the prohibitionLegislature of withholding state shared revenues from a city with a convention center project applies to the yearState inof whichArizona: a public health emergency is initially declared.
•Section Specifies1. that the modified economic impact estimate for an eligible convention center project by the Auditor General applies to the year of an initial public health emergency declaration and the year following that declaration.
•Section Makes9-626, conformingArizona changes.Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
Amendment9-626. explanation prepared by Mike Hans 02/24/2022 Fifty-fifth Legislature Gray Second Regular Session S.B.
1592Construction GRAYprogress FLOORreports; AMENDMENT SENATE AMENDMENTS TO S.B.
1592auditor (Referencegeneral toperformance printedmeasures bill)A. Page 4, Line 4 strike "THE GOVERNOR HAS DECLARED" Line 5 after the third "EMERGENCY" insert "IS INITIALLY DECLARED BY THE GOVERNOR" Line 10 after the first "THE" insert "INITIAL" Line 13 after the second "THE" insert "INITIAL" Line 16 after "AN" insert "INITIAL" Amend title to conform RICK GRAY 1592GRAY0750.docx 02/24/2022 07:50 AM S:
MH/slpThe -eligible 1city -shall report progress on the development of any eligible project to the joint committee on capital review twice annually during construction of the eligible project.
B.
Within five years after the filing of the certificate of completion of construction of an eligible project pursuant to section 9-622, and after consultation with the eligible city, the auditor general shall conduct or contract for an economic and fiscal impact analysis of the eligible project in its fifth year of operation following the filing of the certificate of completion of construction.
At a minimum, the analysis shall:
1.
Estimate the effects of direct, indirect and induced economic activity in this state associated with:
(a) Regional and national conventions and trade shows held at the site of the eligible project, the total amount of state general fund revenues derived from that economic activity and the estimated average annual attendance at those events assuming:
(i) The eligible project had not been completed.
(ii) The eligible project has been completed.
(b) The construction of the eligible project and the total amount of state general fund revenues derived from the construction activity.
2.
Compute the total cumulative amount of distributions pursuant to section 9-602 for the first through fifth years following the filing of the certificate of completion of construction for the eligible project pursuant to section 9-622 and from the first through each subsequent fifth year.
3.
Compute the net cumulative distributions for the eligible project by subtracting the amount determined pursuant to paragraph 1, subdivision (b) of this subsection from either the amounts determined pursuant to paragraph 2 of this subsection or, if applicable, the amount of state monies paid under a lease purchase agreement pursuant to section 41-791.04.
4.
Based on the analysis conducted pursuant to this subsection, estimate the minimum required attendance at the eligible project for the fifth year following the filing of the certificate of completion of construction of an eligible project pursuant to section 9-622 and each year thereafter.
The estimates shall be computed as follows:
(a) Divide the total state general fund revenues estimated pursuant to paragraph 1, subdivision (a), item (ii) of this subsection by the attendance estimated pursuant to paragraph 1, subdivision (a), item (ii) of this subsection.
- 1 - S.B.
1592 (b) Divide the net cumulative distribution amounts for the fifth year following the filing of the certificate of completion of construction of an eligible project pursuant to section 9-622 and each year thereafter computed pursuant to paragraph 3 of this subsection by the quotient computed pursuant to subdivision (a) of this paragraph.
(c) Add the average annual attendance estimated pursuant to paragraph 1, subdivision (a), item (i) of this subsection to each of the quotients determined pursuant to subdivision (b) of this paragraph.
The resulting sums are the minimum required attendance amounts for each year.
C.
Beginning in the fifth calendar year following the filing of the certificate of completion of construction of an eligible project pursuant to section 9-622 and each year thereafter, the auditor general shall:
1.
Estimate the average annual attendance at regional and national conventions and trade shows held at the site of the eligible project using any appropriate method to estimate the attendance.
The eligible city shall cooperate with and assist the auditor general in developing the estimates.
2.
Compute the ratio of the cumulative sum of the estimated attendance amounts developed pursuant to paragraph 1 of this subsection for all years through the current year to the cumulative sum of the minimum required attendance amounts for those years computed pursuant to subsection B, paragraph 4, subdivision (c) of this section.
3.
Show all 80 changed lines (40 more)
Notify the president of the senate, the speaker of the house of representatives and the governor of:
(a) The minimum required attendance amounts for those years computed pursuant to subsection B, paragraph 4, subdivision (c) of this section.
(b) The attendance estimate developed pursuant to paragraph 1 of this subsection.
(c) The ratio computed pursuant to paragraph 2 of this subsection.
D.
Except as provided in paragraph PARAGRAPHS 4 AND 5 of this subsection, if the ratio computed pursuant to subsection C, paragraph 2 of this section is less than one:
1.
The auditor general shall compute the difference between the estimated state general fund revenues and the net cumulative distributions by multiplying the net cumulative distributions computed pursuant to subsection B, paragraph 3 of this section by the difference between the ratio computed pursuant to subsection C, paragraph 2 of this section and one.
2.
The auditor general shall notify the state treasurer of:
(a) The ratio computed pursuant to subsection C, paragraph 2 of this section.
(b) The difference computed pursuant to paragraph 1 of this subsection.
- 2 - S.B.
1592 3.
At the time of the next regularly scheduled distribution, the state treasurer shall withhold from the amount that would otherwise be distributed to the eligible city pursuant to section 42-5029 an amount equal to the amount stated in the notice received pursuant to paragraph 2 of this subsection.
If the amount available for distribution is less than the amount to be withheld, the state treasurer shall continue withholding from subsequent distributions until the full amount stated in the notice has been withheld.
4.
The eligible city may request and the auditor general shall conduct or contract for a complete economic and fiscal impact analysis of the eligible project.
If an analysis is requested:
(a) The auditor general shall not notify the state treasurer pursuant to paragraph 2 of this subsection, and the state treasurer shall not withhold pursuant to paragraph 3 of this subsection, pending completion of the analysis.
(b) The analysis shall be similar to the analysis described in subsection B of this section, except that the analysis shall examine the operations of the eligible project in the year for which the ratio is less than one.
(c) The analysis, at a minimum, shall estimate the total cumulative incremental revenues to the state general fund resulting from the completion of the eligible project including the revenues resulting from the construction activity associated with the completion of the eligible project.
(d) And the analysis demonstrates that the total cumulative incremental revenues to the state general fund exceed the total cumulative amount of distributions pursuant to section 9-602 as computed in subsection B, paragraph 3 of this section, the auditor general shall not notify the state treasurer pursuant to paragraph 2 of this subsection and the state treasurer shall not withhold pursuant to paragraph 3 of this subsection.
(e) And the analysis demonstrates that the total cumulative incremental revenues to the state general fund are less than the total cumulative amount of distributions pursuant to section 9-602 as computed in subsection B, paragraph 3 of this section:
(i) The auditor general shall subtract the amount of the total cumulative incremental revenues to the state general fund from the amount of the total cumulative distributions.
(ii) The auditor general shall notify the state treasurer of the difference computed pursuant to item (i) of this subdivision.
(iii) At the time of the next regularly scheduled distribution, the state treasurer shall withhold from the amount that would otherwise be distributed to the eligible city pursuant to section 42-5029 an amount equal to the amount stated in the notice received pursuant to item (ii) of this subdivision.
If the amount available for distribution is less than - 3 - S.B.
1592 the amount to be withheld, the state treasurer shall continue withholding from subsequent distributions until the full amount stated in the notice has been withheld.
5.
IN ANY YEAR IN WHICH A STATE OF WAR EMERGENCY OR STATE OF EMERGENCY FOR A PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY IS INITIALLY DECLARED BY THE GOVERNOR AS PRESCRIBED IN SECTION 36-787, THE STATE TREASURER SHALL NOT WITHHOLD ANY AMOUNT FROM THE ELIGIBLE CITY FOR THAT YEAR PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH 3 OF THIS SUBSECTION.
IN CONDUCTING THE ANALYSIS OR ESTIMATE OF THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF ANY ELIGIBLE PROJECT PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION IN SUBSEQUENT YEARS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL EMERGENCY DECLARATION, THE AUDITOR GENERAL SHALL ASSUME THE FOLLOWING:
(a) THE ELIGIBLE CITY SATISFIED THE MINIMUM REQUIRED ATTENDANCE IN THE YEAR OF THE INITIAL EMERGENCY DECLARATION AND THE YEAR FOLLOWING THAT DECLARATION.
(b) THE INCREMENTAL REVENUES TO THE STATE GENERAL FUND IN ANY YEAR OF AN INITIAL EMERGENCY DECLARATION AND THE YEAR FOLLOWING THAT DECLARATION AT LEAST EQUALED THE AMOUNT OF DISTRIBUTIONS BY THIS STATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 9-602, SUBSECTION D.
E.
The eligible city shall reimburse the auditor general for any costs incurred in complying with the requirements of this section.
Sec.
2.
Retroactivity Section 9-626, Arizona Revised Statutes, as amended by this act, applies retroactively to from and after December 31, 2019.
- 4 -
Show all 80 changed rows (40 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version Current pdf
- Amended SENATE - Gray flr amend (ref Bill) adopted pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
Vetoed by Governor
-
Transmit to Senate
-
Transmit to Governor
-
PASSED
-
House Placed on Consent Calendar
-
DP
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DP
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
Sponsors
- Rick Gray · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 10 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 13 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 49 | 4 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 7% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (60)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 6 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 20% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Christine Marsh | — | Yea |
| Juan Mendez | — | Not Voting |
| Karen Fann | — | Yea |
| Kelly Townsend | — | Nay |
| Lisa Otondo | — | Yea |
| Martin Quezada | — | Yea |
| Michelle B. Ugenti-Rita | — | Nay |
| Nancy Barto | — | Nay |
| Paul Boyer | — | Yea |
| Raquel Terán | — | Yea |
| Rebecca Rios | — | Yea |
| Rick Gray | — | Yea |
| Rosanna Gabaldon | — | Yea |
| Sean Bowie | — | Yea |
| Sine Kerr | — | Yea |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Tyler Pace | — | Yea |
| Victoria Steele | — | Not Voting |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Yea |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Yea |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Stephanie Stahl Hamilton | Democrat | Yea |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Not Voting |
| David Livingston | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Nay |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Nay |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Nay |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1592?
- SB 1592 is sponsored by Rick Gray.
- What is the current status of SB 1592?
- This bill died with Fifty-fifth Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1592?
- Track SB 1592 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1592
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1592
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →