employment and labor omnibus
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1548 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1548.
You're tracking SB 1548
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1548 — employment and labor omnibus
Last action — Senate Second Reading
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with Fifty-fifth Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced Version Current pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill adds new sections and amends existing statutes to establish protections for employees regarding wage disclosure and prohibits discriminatory wage practices based on wage history.
-
23-207
AN EMPLOYER MAY NOT: 1. REQUIRE NONDISCLOSURE BY AN EMPLOYEE REGARDING THE EMPLOYEE'S WAGE INFORMATION AS A CONDITION OF EMPLOYMENT. 2. REQUIRE AN EMPLOYEE TO SIGN A WAIVER OR OTHER DOCUMENT THAT DENIES THE EMPLOYEE THE RIGHT TO DISCLOSE THE EMPLOYEE'S WAGE INFORMATION. 3. TAKE ANY ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTION AGAINST AN EMPLOYEE FOR DISCLOSING THE EMPLOYEE'S WAGES OR DISCUSSING ANOTHER EMPLOYEE'S WAGES IF THE DISCUSSION WAS VOLUNTARY. 4. RETALIATE AGAINST AN EMPLOYEE FOR ASSERTING THE EMPLOYEE'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES UNDER THIS SECTION.
Employers are prohibited from enforcing wage nondisclosure agreements and retaliating against employees for discussing wages.
-
23-208
AN EMPLOYER MAY NOT DO ANY OF THE FOLLOWING: 1. RELY ON THE WAGE HISTORY OF A PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYEE IN CONSIDERING THE PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYEE FOR EMPLOYMENT, INCLUDING REQUIRING THAT A PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYEE'S PRIOR WAGES SATISFY MINIMUM OR MAXIMUM CRITERIA AS A CONDITION OF BEING CONSIDERED FOR EMPLOYMENT. 3. SEEK FROM A PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYEE OR ANY CURRENT OR FORMER EMPLOYER THE WAGE HISTORY OF THE PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYEE, EXCEPT THAT AN EMPLOYER MAY SEEK TO CONFIRM PRIOR WAGE INFORMATION ONLY AFTER AN OFFER OF EMPLOYMENT WITH COMPENSATION HAS BEEN MADE.
Employers cannot use prospective employees' wage histories to determine employment eligibility or compensation.
-
23-340
AN EMPLOYER SHALL MAY NOT pay any person in his THE EMPLOYER'S employ at wage rates less than the rates paid to employees of the opposite sex in the same establishment for the same quantity and quality of the same classification of work, provided, that nothing herein shall prohibit a variation of rates of pay for male and female employees engaged in the same classification of work based upon a difference in seniority, length of service, ability, skill, difference in duties or services performed, whether regularly or occasionally, difference in the shift or time of day worked, hours of work, or restrictions or prohibitions on lifting or moving objects in excess of specified weight, or other reasonable differentiation, factor or factors other than sex, when exercised in good faith.→ AN EMPLOYER SHALL MAY NOT pay any person in his THE EMPLOYER'S employ at wage rates less than the rates paid to employees of the opposite sex in the same establishment for substantially similar work, when viewed as a composite of skill, effort and responsibility and performed under similar working conditions, unless the employer can demonstrate: (1) the wage rate differential is based on one or more of the following factors: (a) a seniority system. (b) a merit system. (c) a system that measures earnings by quantity or quality of production. (d) a bona fide factor other than sex, such as education, training or experience.Strengthens equal pay protections by requiring employers to justify any wage differentials based on specific criteria rather than sex.
-
23-341
Any employer who THAT violates subsection A of this section is liable to the employee affected in the amount of the wages of which such THE employee is deprived by reason of such THE violation, INCLUDING INTEREST, AND AN ADDITIONAL EQUAL AMOUNT AS LIQUIDATED DAMAGES.→ Any employer who THAT violates subsection A of this section is liable to the employee affected in the amount of the wages of which such THE employee is deprived by reason of such THE violation, including interest, and an additional equal amount as liquidated damages. Any affected employee may register with the commission a complaint that the wages paid to such THE employee are less than the wages to which such THE employee is entitled under this section.Clarifies the process for employees to file complaints regarding wage violations.
-
23-340
"BUSINESS NECESSITY" MEANS AN OVERRIDING LEGITIMATE BUSINESS PURPOSE SUCH THAT THE FACTOR RELIED ON EFFECTIVELY FULFILLS THE BUSINESS PURPOSE THE FACTOR IS SUPPOSED TO SERVE.→ "BUSINESS NECESSITY" MEANS AN OVERARCHING LEGITIMATE BUSINESS REASON THAT ESSENTIALLY SATISFIES THE REASON THE FACTOR IS INTENDED TO SERVE.Revises the definition of 'business necessity' to enhance clarity on what constitutes a legitimate reason for wage differentials.
Action History
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
Sponsors
- Martin Quezada · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1548?
- SB 1548 is sponsored by Martin Quezada.
- What is the current status of SB 1548?
- This bill died with Fifty-fifth Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1548?
- Track SB 1548 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1548
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1548
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →