SB 1049 — parents' bill of rights; violation
Last action — House First Reading.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with Fifty-fifth Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
32 added · 14 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised version of SB 1049 removes the classification of violations as criminal misdemeanors and instead introduces a civil penalty system for violations of parents' rights. This means that instead of potentially facing criminal charges, school districts or charter schools that violate parents' rights could now face financial penalties—up to $5,000 for each violation. This change aims to provide a more straightforward way for parents to hold schools accountable while potentially reducing the legal consequences for educators.
Fifty-fifthSenate LegislatureEngrossed Judiciaryparents' Secondbill Regularof Sessionrights; S.B.
1049violation PROPOSEDState of Arizona Senate Fifty-fifth Legislature Second Regular Session SENATE AMENDMENTSBILL TO1049 S.B.AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 1, CHAPTER 6, ARTICLE 1, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 1-603;
1049RELATING (ReferenceTO toPARENTS' printedRIGHTS. bill) Page 1, line 3, strike "sections" insert "section";
strike(TEXT "andOF 1-604"BILL StrikeBEGINS linesON 4NEXT throughPAGE) 6- Linei 7,- strikeS.B. "1-604." insert "1-603." Amend title to conform WARREN PETERSEN 01/26/2022 02:17 PM S:
SR1049 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
Section 1.
Title 1, chapter 6, article 1, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding section 1-603, to read:
1-603.
Legal standing;
parental enforcement;
school districts and charter schools;
civil penalty A.
A PARENT OR LEGAL GUARDIAN OF A MINOR CHILD SHALL HAVE LEGAL STANDING TO SUE ANY PERSON WHO VIOLATES THE PARENT'S OR LEGAL GUARDIAN'S RIGHTS UNDER THIS CHAPTER.
B.
IF A SCHOOL DISTRICT OR CHARTER SCHOOL IS ALLEGED TO HAVE VIOLATED THIS CHAPTER:
1.
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OR THE COUNTY ATTORNEY FOR THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THIS CHAPTER OCCURRED MAY INITIATE A SUIT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OR CHARTER SCHOOL IS LOCATED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ENFORCING THIS CHAPTER.
2.
FOR EACH VIOLATION OF THIS CHAPTER, THE COURT MAY IMPOSE A CIVIL PENALTY OF NOT MORE THAN $5,000 ON THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OR CHARTER SCHOOL WHERE THE VIOLATION OCCURRED.
- 1 -
View plain text versions (4)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version Current pdf
- SENATE - Judiciary View text pdf
- Amended SENATE - Townsend flr amend (ref Bill) (Corrected) adopted pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
House First Reading.
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DP
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
-
Prefiled.
Sponsors
- Kelly Townsend · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 12 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 7 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 12 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 40% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Christine Marsh | — | Nay |
| Juan Mendez | — | Not Voting |
| Karen Fann | — | Yea |
| Kelly Townsend | — | Yea |
| Lisa Otondo | — | Nay |
| Martin Quezada | — | Nay |
| Michelle B. Ugenti-Rita | — | Yea |
| Nancy Barto | — | Yea |
| Paul Boyer | — | Yea |
| Raquel Terán | — | Nay |
| Rebecca Rios | — | Nay |
| Rick Gray | — | Yea |
| Rosanna Gabaldon | — | Nay |
| Sean Bowie | — | Nay |
| Sine Kerr | — | Yea |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Tyler Pace | — | Yea |
| Victoria Steele | — | Not Voting |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| Stephanie Stahl Hamilton | Democrat | Nay |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Nay |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| David Livingston | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1049?
- SB 1049 is sponsored by Kelly Townsend.
- What is the current status of SB 1049?
- This bill died with Fifty-fifth Legislature - Second Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1049?
- Track SB 1049 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1049
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1049
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →