probation officers; assault; resisting arrest
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 2076 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 2076.
You're tracking HB 2076
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 2076 — probation officers; assault; resisting arrest
Last action — Senate Second Reading
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 55th Legislature - 1st Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
181 added · 193 removedPlain-language change summary
House Bill 2076 has undergone significant changes, focusing less on topics related to probation officers and assault, and instead shifting towards court fees and the management of digital evidence storage. The updated version now includes provisions that establish an additional fee for court filings, which will be collected by clerks and directed to a specific fund related to lengthy trials and digital evidence. This change is important because it ensures that there are dedicated financial resources for managing digital evidence, which is becoming increasingly crucial in modern legal proceedings.
HB2076 - 551R - H-JudiciaryH -Ver Strike Everything-Proposed Fifty-fifthHouse Legislature Engrossed Judiciary Firstprobation Regularofficers; Session H.B.
assault; PROPOSED HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO H.B.
2076resisting (Referencearrest to(now: printed bill) Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1.court fees;
digital evidence;
storage) State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-fifth Legislature First Regular Session HOUSE BILL 2076 AN ACT amending sections 12-115, 12-284.01, 12-284.02 and 21-222, Arizona Revised Statutes;
amending title 22, chapter 2, article 5, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding section 22-282;
repealing section 22-282, Arizona Revised Statutes;
relating to courts.
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
Section 1.
In addition to the filing or appearance fee charged pursuant to chapter 3, article 2 of this title or section 12-1705, the presiding judge of the superior court may assess each person required to pay a filing or appearance fee under such article or sections an additional fee of not to exceed fifteen dollars $24.
Delayed repeal Section 22-282, Arizona Revised Statutes, as added by this act, is repealed from and after December 31, 2026."2026. Amend title to conform FRANK PRATT 2076PRATT 02/15/2021 11:44 AM C:
SP
View plain text versions (4)
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version Current html
- HOUSE - Judiciary - Strike Everything View text html
- Amended HOUSE - Amended by JUD - passed pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version html
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill establishes a new fee structure for filings related to justice of the peace courts and modifies several fund management processes for the existing digital evidence and trial funds.
-
Section 12-115
In addition to any other assessment authorized by law, the supreme court shall establish an additional fee on each filing, appearance and answer or response fee charged by a clerk of the superior court.
This introduces a new additional fee that the supreme court must establish for various court filings.
-
Section 12-284.01
not to exceed fifteen dollars→ not to exceed twenty-four dollarsThis increases the maximum additional fee the presiding judge can impose from $15 to $24.
-
Section 12-284.01
C.→ C. The monies collected pursuant to section 12-284.02, subsection B shall be used to improve access to court records.This clarifies the use of funds collected under a related section for improving access to court records.
-
Section 21-222
the reasonable and necessary costs of administering the fund.→ the reasonable and necessary costs of administering the fund.While the sentence remains, it emphasizes that no more than 3% of the fund can be used for administration costs.
-
Section 22-282
In addition to any other assessment authorized by law, the supreme court shall establish an additional fee on each filing, appearance and answer or response fee received by the justice of the peace.
This creates a new additional fee system specifically for filings in the justice of the peace courts.
-
Section 22-282
The additional fee may be deferred or waived pursuant to sections 12-302 and 12-304.
This allows for the deferral or waiver of the newly introduced additional fee.
-
Section 22-282
In establishing the additional fee under subsection A of this section, the supreme court may designate by rule that the additional fee not be imposed on filings in types of cases that involve minimal use of court resources, that are not afforded the opportunity for a trial by jury or that do not involve the use of digital evidence.
This ensures that the new fee can be limited for certain case types, preserving resources for less complex filings.
-
Section 12-284.02
be used to improve access to court records.→ be used to improve access to court records.Reiterates that funds in the document evidence fund are dedicated to enhancing access to court records.
-
Section 22-282
The county treasurer shall transmit the fees to the state treasurer on or before the fifteenth day of each month for deposit, pursuant to sections 35-146 and 35-147, in the Arizona lengthy trial and digital evidence fund established by section 21-222.
This formalizes the process of transferring newly imposed fees to the existing Arizona lengthy trial and digital evidence fund.
-
Section 6
Section 22-282, Arizona Revised Statutes, as added by this act, is repealed from and after December 31, 2026.
This establishes a delayed repeal of the new section related to additional fees for justice of the peace filings after a specified date.
Action History
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
-
Transmit to Senate
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DPA/SE
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Prefiled.
Sponsors
- Frank Pratt · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 41 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 59 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (60)
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2076?
- HB 2076 is sponsored by Frank Pratt.
- What is the current status of HB 2076?
- This bill died with 55th Legislature - 1st Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 2076?
- Track HB 2076 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2076
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2076
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →