SB 1448 — Arizona department of agriculture; continuation.
Last action — Signed by Governor
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 27, 2021. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
3 sponsors
1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
-
Mixed recorded votes
2 passed, 3 failed in recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
56 added · 26 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to SB 1448 changes the focus from dissolving certain parts of the Arizona Department of Agriculture to outlining protections for agricultural operations. It clarifies that farming practices considered consistent with good agricultural methods are presumed not to be a nuisance unless they significantly harm public health. This matters because it strengthens the rights of farmers against nuisance claims while ensuring they follow established guidelines, aiming to balance agricultural interests with public health concerns.
SB1448Chapter 0218 - 551R - SH Ver of SB1448 SenateHouse Engrossed Senate Bill Arizona department of agriculture;
(now: State of Arizona Senate Fifty-fifth Legislature First Regular Session SENATE BILL 1448 AN ACT repealing section 41-3021.01, Arizona Revised Statutes;
amendingagricultural titleoperations; 41, chapter 27, article 2, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding section 41-3029.01;
relatingnuisance; to the Arizona department of agriculture.
costs;
damages) State of Arizona Senate Fifty-fifth Legislature First Regular Session CHAPTER SENATE BILL 1448 AN ACT amending section 3-112, Arizona Revised Statutes;
relating to agricultural operations.
Repeal Section 41-3021.01,3-112, Arizona Revised Statutes, is repealed.amended to read:
Sec. 2.START_STATUTE3-112.
TitleAgricultural 41,operations; chapter 27, article 2, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding section 41-3029.01, to read:
START_STATUTE41-3029.01.nuisance liability:
Arizonadamages; department of agriculture;
terminationstate Julypreemption 1, 2029 A.
TheAgricultural Arizonaoperations departmentconducted ofon agriculturefarmland that are consistent with good agricultural practices and allestablished divisions,prior offices,to councilsbefore surrounding nonagricultural uses are presumed to be reasonable and committeesdo organizednot withinconstitute a nuisance unless the departmentagricultural terminateoperation has a substantial adverse effect on Julythe 1,public 2029.health and safety.
TItleAgricultural 3,operations chapterundertaken 1,in articleconformity 1with federal, state and thislocal sectionlaws and regulations are repealedpresumed onto Januarybe 1,good 2030.END_STATUTEagricultural Sec. 3.practice practices and not adversely affecting the public health and safety.
PurposeC. Pursuant to section 41-2955, subsection B, Arizona Revised Statutes, the legislature continues the Arizona department of agriculture to provide for a uniform and coordinated agricultural program and policy in this state.
Sec. 4.In a nuisance action against an agricultural operation conducted on farmland:
Retroactivity1. Sections 1 and 2 of this act apply retroactively to from and after July 1, 2021.
The court may award costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, to the prevailing party.
2.
If the court determines that a party filed a nuisance action under one of the following circumstances, the court shall award reasonable costs and attorney fees to the other party:
(a) The action was not filed in good faith.
(b) The action was not grounded in fact or based on law.
(c) The action was filed for an improper purpose, such as to harass the other party, to cause an unnecessary delay or to increase the cost of litigation to the other party.
3.
The court may not award punitive damages for a nuisance action unless the alleged nuisance emanated from an agricultural operation that has been subject to a criminal conviction or a civil enforcement action taken by a state or federal environmental or health regulatory agency pursuant to a notice of violation for the conduct alleged to be the source of the nuisance.
D.
For the purposes of this section, costs and expenses may include attorney fees, deposition costs and other reasonable expenses as the court finds necessary to the full and proper presentation of the action, including any appeal.
E.
A city, town, county, special taxing district or other political subdivision of this state may not declare an agricultural operation conducted on farmland to be a nuisance if the agricultural operation's practices are lawful, customary, reasonable, safe and necessary to the agriculture industry as the practices pertain to an agricultural operation's practices as determined by the agricultural best management practices committee established by section 49-457, the Arizona department of agriculture or the department of environmental quality.END_STATUTE APPROVED BY THE GOVERNOR APRIL 9, 2021.
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE APRIL 9, 2021.
View plain text versions (7)
- Chaptered Chaptered Version Current html
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version html
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version html
- HOUSE - Land, Agriculture & Rural Affairs - Strike Everything View text html
- SENATE - Natural Resources, Energy and Water View text html
- Amended HOUSE - Amended by LARA - passed pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version html
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill modifies the definitions and conditions under which agricultural operations can be deemed a nuisance, establishes cost award provisions, and clarifies local authority over agricultural operations.
-
3-112
before surrounding nonagricultural uses→ surrounding nonagricultural usesRemoves redundancy in wording regarding agricultural operations established before nonagricultural uses.
-
3-112
practices→ practiceChanges plural 'practices' to singular 'practice' to streamline language.
-
3-112
The court may award costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, to the prevailing party.This section outlining cost awards to the prevailing party is simplified to enhance clarity.
-
3-112
as determined by the agricultural best management practices committee established by section 49-457, the Arizona department of agriculture or the department of environmental quality.Clarifies that local authorities cannot declare an agricultural operation a nuisance if it follows lawful best management practices.
Action History
-
Signed by Governor
-
Transmit to Governor
-
PASSED
-
PASSED
-
Transmit to Senate
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DPA/SE
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DP
-
DP
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
Sponsors
- Thomas "T.J." Shope · Cosponsor
- David Gowan · Cosponsor
- Sine Kerr · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 90 not signed on · 28 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (2)
- Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican
- David Gowan Republican
Not signed on (90)
90 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 90 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 23 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 34 | 26 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 43% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (60)
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 27 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 10% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Christine Marsh | — | Yea |
| Jamescita Peshlakai | — | Yea |
| Juan Mendez | — | Nay |
| Karen Fann | — | Yea |
| Kelly Townsend | — | Yea |
| Kirsten Engel | — | Yea |
| Lisa Otondo | — | Yea |
| Martin Quezada | — | Nay |
| Michelle B. Ugenti-Rita | — | Yea |
| Nancy Barto | — | Yea |
| Paul Boyer | — | Yea |
| Rebecca Rios | — | Yea |
| Rick Gray | — | Yea |
| Rosanna Gabaldon | — | Yea |
| Sean Bowie | — | Yea |
| Sine Kerr | — | Yea |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Tony Navarrete | — | Yea |
| Tyler Pace | — | Yea |
| Victoria Steele | — | Yea |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Yea |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Yea |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| David Livingston | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1448?
- SB 1448 is sponsored by Thomas "T.J." Shope (Republican), David Gowan (Republican), and Sine Kerr.
- What is the current status of SB 1448?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 27, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 1448?
- Track SB 1448 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1448
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1448
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →