Arizona 55th Legislature - 1st Regular Session Status: Enacted 2 R cosponsors

SB 1448 — Arizona department of agriculture; continuation.

Last action — Signed by Governor

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 27, 2021. Enacted.

Prognosis

Advancing 60% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 3 sponsors

    1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).

  • Mixed recorded votes

    2 passed, 3 failed in recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

56 added · 26 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment to SB 1448 changes the focus from dissolving certain parts of the Arizona Department of Agriculture to outlining protections for agricultural operations. It clarifies that farming practices considered consistent with good agricultural methods are presumed not to be a nuisance unless they significantly harm public health. This matters because it strengthens the rights of farmers against nuisance claims while ensuring they follow established guidelines, aiming to balance agricultural interests with public health concerns.

→
Previous
Latest
SB1448 - 551R - S Ver       Senate Engrossed   Arizona department of agriculture;
Chapter 0218 - 551R - H Ver of SB1448     House Engrossed Senate Bill   Arizona department of agriculture;
        State of Arizona Senate Fifty-fifth Legislature First Regular Session     SENATE BILL 1448       AN ACT   repealing section 41-3021.01, Arizona Revised Statutes;
(now:
amending title 41, chapter 27, article 2, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding section 41-3029.01;
agricultural operations;
relating to the Arizona department of agriculture.
nuisance;
costs;
damages)       State of Arizona Senate Fifty-fifth Legislature First Regular Session       CHAPTER   SENATE BILL 1448     AN ACT   amending section 3-112, Arizona Revised Statutes;
relating to agricultural operations.
Repeal Section 41-3021.01, Arizona Revised Statutes, is repealed.
Section 3-112, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
Sec. 2.
START_STATUTE3-112.
Title 41, chapter 27, article 2, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding section 41-3029.01, to read:
Agricultural operations;
START_STATUTE41-3029.01.
nuisance liability:
Arizona department of agriculture;
damages;
termination July 1, 2029 A.
state preemption A.
The Arizona department of agriculture and all divisions, offices, councils and committees organized within the department terminate on July 1, 2029.
Agricultural operations conducted on farmland that are consistent with good agricultural practices and established prior to before surrounding nonagricultural uses are presumed to be reasonable and do not constitute a nuisance unless the agricultural operation has a substantial adverse effect on the public health and safety.
TItle 3, chapter 1, article 1 and this section are repealed on January 1, 2030.END_STATUTE Sec. 3.
Agricultural operations undertaken in conformity with federal, state and local laws and regulations are presumed to be good agricultural practice practices and not adversely affecting the public health and safety.
Purpose Pursuant to section 41-2955, subsection B, Arizona Revised Statutes, the legislature continues the Arizona department of agriculture to provide for a uniform and coordinated agricultural program and policy in this state.
C.
Sec. 4.
In a nuisance action against an agricultural operation conducted on farmland:
Retroactivity Sections 1 and 2 of this act apply retroactively to from and after July 1, 2021.
1.
The court may award costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, to the prevailing party.
2.
If the court determines that a party filed a nuisance action under one of the following circumstances, the court shall award reasonable costs and attorney fees to the other party:
(a) The action was not filed in good faith.
(b) The action was not grounded in fact or based on law.
(c) The action was filed for an improper purpose, such as to harass the other party, to cause an unnecessary delay or to increase the cost of litigation to the other party.
3.
The court may not award punitive damages for a nuisance action unless the alleged nuisance emanated from an agricultural operation that has been subject to a criminal conviction or a civil enforcement action taken by a state or federal environmental or health regulatory agency pursuant to a notice of violation for the conduct alleged to be the source of the nuisance.
D.
For the purposes of this section, costs and expenses may include attorney fees, deposition costs and other reasonable expenses as the court finds necessary to the full and proper presentation of the action, including any appeal.
E.
A city, town, county, special taxing district or other political subdivision of this state may not declare an agricultural operation conducted on farmland to be a nuisance if the agricultural operation's practices are lawful, customary, reasonable, safe and necessary to the agriculture industry as the practices pertain to an agricultural operation's practices as determined by the agricultural best management practices committee established by section 49-457, the Arizona department of agriculture or the department of environmental quality.END_STATUTE       APPROVED BY THE GOVERNOR APRIL 9, 2021.
  FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE APRIL 9, 2021.
View plain text versions (7)

How this bill changes current law

4 changes Share ↗

AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.

The bill modifies the definitions and conditions under which agricultural operations can be deemed a nuisance, establishes cost award provisions, and clarifies local authority over agricultural operations.

  • 3-112

    before surrounding nonagricultural uses → surrounding nonagricultural uses

    Removes redundancy in wording regarding agricultural operations established before nonagricultural uses.

  • 3-112

    practices → practice

    Changes plural 'practices' to singular 'practice' to streamline language.

  • 3-112

    The court may award costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, to the prevailing party.

    This section outlining cost awards to the prevailing party is simplified to enhance clarity.

  • 3-112

    as determined by the agricultural best management practices committee established by section 49-457, the Arizona department of agriculture or the department of environmental quality.

    Clarifies that local authorities cannot declare an agricultural operation a nuisance if it follows lawful best management practices.

Action History

  1. Signed by Governor

  2. Transmit to Governor

  3. PASSED

  4. PASSED

  5. Transmit to Senate

  6. PASSED

  7. DPA

  8. DPA/SE

  9. House Second Reading

  10. House First Reading.

  11. Transmit to House

  12. PASSED

  13. DP

  14. DP

  15. Senate Second Reading

  16. Senate First Reading

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 90 not signed on · 28 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (2)

Not signed on (90)

90 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 90 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed

Passed 34 Yea · 26 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 192300
Republican 14000
Democrat 1300
Total 342600
% of votes cast 57%43%0%0%
How each member voted (60)
Member Party Vote
Jasmine Blackwater-Nygren — Nay
Aaron Lieberman — Nay
Amish Shah — Nay
Andrea Dalessandro — Nay
Andres Cano — Nay
Athena Salman — Nay
Becky A. Nutt — Yea
Ben Toma — Yea
Brenda Barton — Yea
Bret Roberts — Yea
Charlene R. Fernandez — Nay
César Chávez — Yea
Daniel Hernandez — Yea
David L. Cook — Yea
Diego Espinoza — Nay
Diego Rodriguez — Nay
Domingo DeGrazia — Nay
Frank Pratt — Yea
Jacqueline Parker — Yea
Jennifer Jermaine — Nay
Jennifer Longdon — Nay
Jennifer Pawlik — Nay
Joanne Osborne — Yea
Joel John — Yea
John Fillmore — Yea
Judy Burges — Yea
Judy Schwiebert — Nay
Kelli Butler — Nay
Lorenzo Sierra — Nay
Melody Hernandez — Nay
Michelle Udall — Yea
Pamela Powers Hannley — Nay
Randall Friese — Nay
Raquel Terán — Nay
Regina E. Cobb — Yea
Reginald Bolding — Nay
Richard C. Andrade — Nay
Robert Meza — Nay
Russell Bowers — Yea
Steve Kaiser — Yea
Travis W. Grantham — Yea
Walter Blackman — Yea
Alma Hernandez Democrat Yea
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Nay
Myron Tsosie Democrat Nay
Stephanie Stahl Hamilton Democrat Nay
Beverly Pingerelli Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
Gail Griffin Republican Yea
Jake Hoffman Republican Yea
Jeff Weninger Republican Yea
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Joseph Chaplik Republican Yea
Justin Wilmeth Republican Yea
Kevin Payne Republican Yea
Leo Biasiucci Republican Yea
Mark Finchem Republican Yea
Quang H Nguyen Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed

Passed 27 Yea · 3 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 2100
Unaffiliated 18200
Republican 7000
Total 27300
% of votes cast 90%10%0%0%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Christine Marsh — Yea
Jamescita Peshlakai — Yea
Juan Mendez — Nay
Karen Fann — Yea
Kelly Townsend — Yea
Kirsten Engel — Yea
Lisa Otondo — Yea
Martin Quezada — Nay
Michelle B. Ugenti-Rita — Yea
Nancy Barto — Yea
Paul Boyer — Yea
Rebecca Rios — Yea
Rick Gray — Yea
Rosanna Gabaldon — Yea
Sean Bowie — Yea
Sine Kerr — Yea
Sonny Borrelli — Yea
Tony Navarrete — Yea
Tyler Pace — Yea
Victoria Steele — Yea
Lela Alston Democrat Yea
Lupe Contreras Democrat Yea
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Nay
David Gowan Republican Yea
David Livingston Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Venden "Vince" Leach Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Yea
Wendy Rogers Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 1448?
SB 1448 is sponsored by Thomas "T.J." Shope (Republican), David Gowan (Republican), and Sine Kerr.
What is the current status of SB 1448?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 27, 2021. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 1448?
Track SB 1448 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1448

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1448

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →