law enforcement officers; database; rules
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 2295 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 2295.
You're tracking HB 2295
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 2295 — law enforcement officers; database; rules
Last action — Signed by Governor
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 20, 2021. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
-
Mixed recorded votes
3 passed, 5 failed in recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
54 added · 37 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Bill HB 2295 includes a clearer requirement for prosecuting agencies to give law enforcement officers at least ten days' notice, or as soon as possible, before deciding to add their names to a specific database. Additionally, it specifies that the officer's employer must also forward this notice to the officer's current or last known address. These changes are important as they ensure that law enforcement officers are properly informed and have a chance to provide input before any decision is made that could impact their careers.
HB2295Chapter 0336 - 551R - HS Ver of HB2295 HouseSenate Engrossed House Bill law enforcement officers;
rules State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-fifth Legislature First Regular Session CHAPTER HOUSE BILL 2295 AN ACT amending title 38, chapter 8, article 1, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding section 38-1117;
At least ten daysdays, or as soon as practicable, before a prosecuting agency considersmakes placinga determination to place a law enforcement officer's name in the rule 15.1 database, the prosecuting agency shall send a written notice by mail or email to the law enforcement officer's current or last known employment address.
On receipt of the noticenotice, and if the law enforcement officer's contact information is available, the law enforcement officer's current or last known employer shall providesend the written notice to the law enforcement officer.officer's current or last known address.
On receipt of the noticenotice, and if the law enforcement officer's contact information is available, the law enforcement officer's current or last known employer shall providesend the written notice to the law enforcement officer.officer's current or last known address.
The law enforcement officer's right to receive written notice at least ten daysdays, or as soon as practicable, before the prosecuting agency intendsmakes toa considerdetermination placingto place the law enforcement officer's name in the rule 15.1 database and the law enforcement officer's right to provide input to the prosecuting agency before the prosecuting agency makes a determination of whether the law enforcement officer's name should be added to the rule 15.1 database.
This section does not limit the duty of a prosecuting agency to produce rule 15.1 disclosure information in all cases as required by the united states constitution, the arizona constitution and the Arizona rules of criminal procedure.procedure, including after the initial placement of the law enforcement officer's name in the rule 15.1 database while the decision or a request for reconsideration is still under consideration.
A prosecuting agency thatshall maintainsuse athe rule 15.1 database shallfor use the database only to make a report that is required by the Unitedfollowing Statespurposes: Constitution, the Arizona constitution, rule 15.1, Arizona rules of criminal procedure, or any other rule that is adopted by the Arizona supreme court.
1.
To make a charging decision.
2.
To disclose information that is required by:
(a) The United States constitution.
(b) The Arizona constitution.
(c) Rule 15.1 of the Arizona rules of criminal procedure and any other rule that is adopted by the supreme court.
(d) Title 39, chapter 1, article 2.
3.
Any other legal obligation.
END_STATUTE APPROVED BY THE GOVERNOR MAY 7, 2021.
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE MAY 7, 2021.
View plain text versions (5)
- Chaptered Chaptered Version Current html
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version html
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version html
- Amended SENATE - Petersen flr amend (ref Bill) adopted html
- Introduced Introduced Version html
Action History
-
Signed by Governor
-
Transmit to Governor
-
PASSED
-
PASSED
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DP
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
-
Transmit to Senate
-
PASSED
-
PASSED
-
FAILED
-
DP
-
House Placed on Consent Calendar
-
DP
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
Sponsors
- Kevin Payne · Primary
- Beverly Pingerelli · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 91 not signed on · 42 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Kevin Payne Republican Voted No
Co-sponsors (1)
- Beverly Pingerelli Republican
Not signed on (91)
91 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 91 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 17 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 31 | 29 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 52% | 48% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (60)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 47% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Christine Marsh | — | Nay |
| Jamescita Peshlakai | — | Nay |
| Juan Mendez | — | Nay |
| Karen Fann | — | Yea |
| Kelly Townsend | — | Yea |
| Kirsten Engel | — | Nay |
| Lisa Otondo | — | Nay |
| Martin Quezada | — | Nay |
| Michelle B. Ugenti-Rita | — | Yea |
| Nancy Barto | — | Yea |
| Paul Boyer | — | Yea |
| Rebecca Rios | — | Nay |
| Rick Gray | — | Yea |
| Rosanna Gabaldon | — | Nay |
| Sean Bowie | — | Nay |
| Sine Kerr | — | Yea |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Tony Navarrete | — | Nay |
| Tyler Pace | — | Yea |
| Victoria Steele | — | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| David Livingston | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 17 | 24 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 31 | 28 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 52% | 47% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (60)
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 25 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 29 | 30 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 48% | 50% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (60)
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2295?
- HB 2295 is sponsored by Kevin Payne (Republican) and Beverly Pingerelli (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 2295?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 20, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 2295?
- Track HB 2295 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2295
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2295
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →