psychologists; licensure requirements
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 2599 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 2599.
You're tracking HB 2599
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 2599 — psychologists; licensure requirements
Last action — DP
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 54th Legislature - 2nd Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced Version Current html
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill modifies the licensure requirements for psychologists in Arizona by refining applicant qualifications and clarifying conditions under which licenses may be issued.
-
32-2071.01
If the act or conduct has not been resolved before issuing a license, the board must determine to its satisfaction that mitigating circumstances exist that prevent its resolution.
The bill establishes a condition related to the resolution of disciplinary actions before a license can be issued.
-
32-2071.01
an applicant for licensure meets the requirements of section 32-2071, subsection A, paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8 if the applicant earned a doctoral degree from a program that was accredited by the American psychological association, office of program consultation and accreditation, or the psychological clinical science accreditation system at the time of graduation.
The bill clarifies that having an accredited doctoral degree from specified programs satisfies multiple licensure requirements.
-
32-2071.01
An applicant for licensure who is licensed to practice psychology at the independent level in another licensing jurisdiction of the United States or Canada meets the requirements of subsection A, paragraph 1 of this section if the applicant meets any of the following requirements: 1. Holds a certificate of professional qualification in psychology in good standing issued by the association of state and provincial psychology boards or its successor. 2. Is currently credentialed by the national register of health service providers in psychology or its successor and submits evidence of having practiced psychology independently at the doctoral level for a minimum of five years. 3. Is a diplomate of the American board of professional psychology.
The bill introduces specific alternative qualifications for applicants licensed in other jurisdictions, enhancing the criteria for licensure recognition.
Action History
-
DP
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
Sponsors
- Leo Biasiucci · Cosponsor
- Frank Carroll · Cosponsor
- Mark Finchem · Cosponsor
- Alma Hernandez · Cosponsor
- David Bradley · Cosponsor
- Michelle Udall · Cosponsor
- Ben Toma · Cosponsor
- Amish Shah · Cosponsor
- Diego Rodriguez · Cosponsor
- Warren Petersen · Cosponsor
- Regina E. Cobb · Cosponsor
- Bret Roberts · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 11 co-sponsors · 81 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (11)
- Leo Biasiucci Republican
- Frank Carroll Republican
- Mark Finchem Republican
- Alma Hernandez Democrat
- David Bradley
- Michelle Udall
- Ben Toma
- Amish Shah
- Diego Rodriguez
- Warren Petersen
- Regina E. Cobb
Not signed on (81)
81 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 81 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2599?
- HB 2599 is sponsored by Leo Biasiucci (Republican), Frank Carroll (Republican), Mark Finchem (Republican), Alma Hernandez (Democrat), David Bradley, Michelle Udall, Ben Toma, Amish Shah, Diego Rodriguez, Warren Petersen, Regina E. Cobb, and Bret Roberts.
- What is the current status of HB 2599?
- This bill died with 54th Legislature - 2nd Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 2599?
- Track HB 2599 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2599
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2599
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →