Arizona 54th Legislature - 2nd Regular Session Status: In Committee 1 R cosponsors

HB 2830 — traffic stops; police cars; uniforms

Last action — DPA

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 54th Legislature - 2nd Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

70 added · 72 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of HB 2830 has added new requirements regarding how law enforcement vehicles can be marked and how officers must dress while making traffic stops. Specifically, it stipulates that a law enforcement agency can only use a maximum of 10% of its total vehicles as specially marked for traffic enforcement, and mandates that officers wear proper uniforms that include identifying insignia when conducting traffic stops. These changes aim to increase transparency and safety during traffic enforcement by ensuring that the public can easily recognize official vehicles and authority figures.

→
Previous
Latest
HOUSE FLOOR AMENDMENT EXPLANATION Bill Number:
HB2830 - 542R - H Ver       House Engrossed         State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-fourth Legislature Second Regular Session       HOUSE BILL 2830       AN ACT   Amending section 28-622.01, Arizona Revised Statutes;
HB 2830 Kavanagh Floor Amendment The amendment to HB2830 on 2/26/2020 at 5:44 PM in Representative Kavanagh's name does the following:
amending title 28, chapter 3, article 2, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding section 28‑629;
1.
relating to traffic and vehicle regulation.
States that it is an affirmative defense to a violation that the driver fled from a pursuing law enforcement vehicle when:
    (TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)   Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
a.
Section 1.  Section 28-622.01, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
The vehicle was unmarked or specially marked;
START_STATUTE28-622.01.  Unlawful flight from pursuing law enforcement vehicle;
b.
The driver was in a desolate location;
c.
The driver was traveling to a non-desolate location;
and d.
The driver was following all traffic laws and turned on their emergency flashers.
2.
Defines desolate location.
3.
Removes limitations on the number of specially marked law enforcement vehicles an agency can use.
4.
Specifies that a law enforcement officer who operates a law enforcement vehicle for the primary purpose of enforcing traffic laws must be dressed in a uniform that identifies the officer's law enforcement agency.
Amendment explanation prepared by Eryn Streeter/Bryce Moore Phone Number 602-926-3046 es 2/26/2020 Fifty-fourth Legislature KAVANAGH Second Regular Session H.B.
2830 KAVANAGH FLOOR AMENDMENT HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO H.B.
2830 (Reference to printed bill) Page 1, between lines 1 and 2, insert:
"Section 1.
Section 28-622.01, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
28-622.01.
Unlawful flight from pursuing law enforcement vehicle;
definitions A.
definitions A.  A driver of a motor vehicle who wilfully flees or attempts to elude a pursuing official law enforcement vehicle is guilty of a class 5 felony if the law enforcement vehicle is either:
A driver of a motor vehicle who wilfully flees or attempts to elude a pursuing official law enforcement vehicle is guilty of a class 5 felony if the law enforcement vehicle is either:
1.  Being operated in the manner described in section 28‑624, subsection C and is appropriately marked to show that it is an official law enforcement vehicle.
1.
2.  Unmarked and either of the following applies:
Being operated in the manner described in section 28-624, subsection C and is appropriately marked to show that it is an official law enforcement vehicle.
(a)  The driver admits to knowing that the vehicle was an official law enforcement vehicle.
2.
(b)  Evidence shows that the driver knew that the vehicle was an official law enforcement vehicle.
Unmarked and either of the following applies:
b.  it is an affirmative defense to a violation of this section that the driver fled from a pursuing law enforcement vehicle when all of the following occur:
(a) The driver admits to knowing that the vehicle was an official law enforcement vehicle.
1.  the vehicle was unmarked or specially marked.
(b) Evidence shows that the driver knew that the vehicle was an official law enforcement vehicle.
2.  the driver was in a desolate location.
B.
3.  THE DRIVER WAS DRIVING TO A NON-DESOLATE LOCATION.
IT IS AN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE TO A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION THAT THE DRIVER FLED FROM A PURSUING LAW ENFORCEMENT VEHICLE WHEN ALL OF THE FOLLOWING OCCUR:
4.  THE DRIVER ACTIVATED THE VEHICLE'S EMERGENCY FLASHERS AND OBEYED ALL TRAFFIC LAWS WHILE DRIVING TO THE NON-DESOLATE LOCATION.
1.
c.  for the purposes of this section:
THE VEHICLE WAS UNMARKED OR SPECIALLY MARKED.
1.  "DESOLATE LOCATION" MEANS A LOCATION that is DEVOID OF PEOPLE WITHIN SIGHT AND SHOUTING DISTANCE CAPABLE OF WITNESSING THE law enforcement ENCOUNTER.
2.
2.  "SPECIALLY MARKED" MEANS UNMARKED EXCEPT FOR THE law enforcement AGENCY'S NAME AND LOGO ON THE PASSENGER DOOR of the vehicle.
THE DRIVER WAS IN A DESOLATE LOCATION.
END_STATUTE Sec. 2.  Title 28, chapter 3, article 2, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding section 28-629, to read:
3.
START_STATUTE28-629.  Enforcing traffic laws;
Show all 51 changed rows (11 more)
Previous
Latest
THE DRIVER WAS DRIVING TO A NON-DESOLATE LOCATION.
use of marked vehicles required;
House Amendments to H.B.
specially marked vehicles;
2830 4.
uniforms required A.  For The routine enforcement of traffic laws in this state, except for enforcement pursuant to title 28, chapter 3, article 21, a law enforcement agency must use a vehicle that is appropriately marked to show that it is an official law enforcement vehicle, except that a law enforcement agency may use a specially marked law enforcement vehicle that displays the name and logo of the law enforcement agency on the right door if, in the judgment of the law enforcement agency, the use of a specially marked law enforcement vehicle will contribute to the safety of the traveling public.
THE DRIVER ACTIVATED THE VEHICLES EMERGENCY FLASHERS AND OBEYED ALL TRAFFIC LAWS WHILE DRIVING TO THE NON-DESOLATE LOCATION.
B.  A law enforcement officer who operates a law enforcement vehicle for the primary purpose of making traffic stops and enforcing traffic laws shall be dressed in an official law enforcement uniform that identifies the employing law enforcement agency.
C.
END_STATUTE
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION:
1.
"DESOLATE LOCATION" MEANS A LOCATION THAT IS DEVOID OF PEOPLE WITHIN SIGHT AND SHOUTING DISTANCE CAPABLE OF WITNESSING THE LAW ENFORCEMENT ENCOUNTER.
2.
"SPECIALLY MARKED" MEANS UNMARKED EXCEPT FOR THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY'S NAME AND LOGO ON THE PASSENGER DOOR OF THE VEHICLE." Renumber to conform Page 1, strike lines 15 through 21 Reletter to conform Line 23, after "THE" insert "PRIMARY" Line 24, after "UNIFORM" strike remainder of line Strike line 25, insert "THAT IDENTIFIES THE" Amend title to conform John Kavanagh 2830FloorKAVANAGH 02/26/2020 05:44 PM H:
ES/ls/ra -2-
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. DPA

  2. DP

  3. House Second Reading

  4. House First Reading.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 91 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (1)

Not signed on (91)

91 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 91 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 2830?
HB 2830 is sponsored by Mark Finchem (Republican) and Travis W. Grantham.
What is the current status of HB 2830?
This bill died with 54th Legislature - 2nd Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 2830?
Track HB 2830 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 2830

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 2830

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →