HB 2724 — GRRC; petition to request review
Last action — failed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 54th Legislature - 1st Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
32 added · 28 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent changes to Bill HB 2724 clarify the conditions under which individuals can request a review of certain agency practices related to rules and policies. Notably, the amendment removes references to "enforcement actions" and the "constitution," focusing solely on "agency practices," "substantiative policy statements," and "final rules." This matters because it narrows the scope of what can be reviewed, making the process more straightforward and potentially easier for council members and the public to navigate.
HB2724 - 541R - HS Ver HouseSenate Engrossed House Bill State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-fourth Legislature First Regular Session HOUSE BILL 2724 AN ACT amending section 41-1033, Arizona Revised Statutes;
H. A person may petition the council to request a review of an existing agency practice,practice substantivethat policyinvolves statement,interpreting enforcementa actionrule adopted by the agency, substantive policy statement or final rule of an agency established under title 16, chapter 6 based on the person's belief that the existing agency practice,practice substantivethat policyinvolves statement,interpreting enforcementa actionrule adopted by the agency, substantive policy statement or final rule does not meet the requirements of chapter 6 of this title, exceeds the agency's statutory authority or violates this state's constitution or the United States Constitution.
H. I. If the council receives information that indicates an existing agency practice or substantive policy statement may constitute a rule, that a final rule does not meet the requirements prescribed in section 41‑1030, or that an existing agency practice, substantive policy statement, final rule or regulatory licensing requirement does not meet the guidelines prescribed in subsection G of this section or that an existing agency practice,practice substantivethat policyinvolves statement,interpreting enforcementa actionrule adopted by the agency, substantive policy statement or final rule of an agency established under title 16, chapter 6 does not meet the guidelines prescribed in subsection H of this section and at least four council members request of the chairperson that the matter be heard in a public meeting:
(d) An existing agency practice,practice substantivethat policyinvolves statement,interpreting enforcementa actionrule adopted by the agency, substantive policy statement or final rule of an agency established under title 16, chapter 6 does not meet the guidelines prescribed in subsection H of this section.
(d) an existing agency practice,practice substantivethat policyinvolves statement,interpreting enforcementa actionrule adopted by the agency, substantive policy statement or final rule of an agency established under title 16, chapter 6 does not meet the guidelines prescribed in subsection H of this section.
J. K. An agency practice, substantive policy statement, final rule or regulatory licensing requirement considered by the council pursuant to this section shall remain in effect while under consideration of the council. If the council ultimately decides the agency practice or substantive policy statement constitutes a rule or that the final rule does not meet the requirements prescribed in section 41‑1030, the practice, policy statement or rule shall be considered void. If the council determines that the existing agency practice, substantive policy statement, final rule or regulatory licensing requirement is unduly burdensome or is not demonstrated to be necessary to specifically fulfill a public health, safety or welfare concern and meets the requirements of subsection G of this section, the council may modify, revise or declare void any such existing agency practice, substantive policy statement, final rule or regulatory licensing requirement. If, based on a person's belief that the existing agency practice,practice substantivethat policyinvolves statement,interpreting enforcementa actionrule adopted by the agency, substantive policy statement or final rule does not meet the requirements of chapter 6 of this title, exceeds the agency's statutory authority or violates this state's constitution or the United States Constitution, the council determines that the existing agency practice,practice substantivethat policyinvolves statement,interpreting enforcementa actionrule adopted by the agency, substantive policy statement or final rule of an agency established under title 16, chapter 6 does not meet the guidelines prescribed in subsection H of this section, the council may modify, revise or declare void any such existing agency practice,practice substantivethat policyinvolves statement,interpreting enforcementa actionrule adopted by the agency, substantive policy statement or final rule.
View plain text versions (6)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version html
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version Current html
- Amended SENATE - Quezada flr amend (ref Bill) failed html
- Amended HOUSE - Floor Amend to Bill - Salman - failed pdf
- Amended SENATE - Farnsworth E flr amend (ref Bill) adopted html
- Introduced Introduced Version html
Action History
-
failed
-
passed
-
passed
-
transmit to house
-
dpa
-
dp
-
senate second reading
-
senate first reading
-
transmit to senate
-
passed
-
dp
-
failed
-
house placed on consent calendar
-
dp
-
house second reading
-
house first reading.
Sponsors
- Leo Biasiucci · Primary
- Regina E. Cobb · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 91 not signed on · 40 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Leo Biasiucci Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
Not signed on (91)
91 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 91 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 25 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 30 | 28 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 50% | 47% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (60)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 40% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Andrea Dalessandro | — | Nay |
| David Bradley | — | Nay |
| Eddie Farnsworth | — | Yea |
| Frank Pratt | — | Yea |
| Heather Carter | — | Yea |
| Jamescita Peshlakai | — | Nay |
| Juan Mendez | — | Nay |
| Karen Fann | — | Yea |
| Kate Brophy McGee | — | Yea |
| Lisa Otondo | — | Nay |
| Martin Quezada | — | Nay |
| Michelle B. Ugenti-Rita | — | Yea |
| Paul Boyer | — | Yea |
| Rebecca Rios | — | Nay |
| Rick Gray | — | Yea |
| Sean Bowie | — | Nay |
| Sine Kerr | — | Yea |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Tony Navarrete | — | Nay |
| Tyler Pace | — | Yea |
| Victoria Steele | — | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| David Livingston | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Sylvia Allen | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 24 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 31 | 27 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 52% | 45% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (60)
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2724?
- HB 2724 is sponsored by Leo Biasiucci (Republican) and Regina E. Cobb.
- What is the current status of HB 2724?
- This bill died with 54th Legislature - 1st Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 2724?
- Track HB 2724 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2724
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2724
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →