HCM 2004 — reserved water rights; exclusion
Last action — transmit to secretary of state
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 54th Legislature - 1st Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
54 added · 25 removedPlain-language change summary
The recently amended bill HCM 2004 now emphasizes that any future federal lands designated in Arizona should specifically exclude federal reserved water rights. This change is important because it reinforces Arizona's authority over its water resources, allowing the state to manage these resources more effectively without federal interference. By clarifying the language, the bill aims to strengthen Arizona's control over its water supply planning and management, reflecting the unique water law needs in the region.
HCM2004 - 541R - H-NaturalH Resources,Ver Energy & Water-Adopted House Engrossed State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-fourth Legislature Legislature First Regular Session Session COMMITTEE ON NATURALHOUSE RESOURCES,CONCURRENT ENERGYMEMORIAL &2004 WATER HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESA AMENDMENTSCONCURRENT TOMEMORIAL H.C.M. urging the united states congress to exclude federal reserved water rights from any future designation of federal lands in arizona.
2004 (Reference to printed memorial) (TEXT OF PageBILL 1,BEGINS lineON 32,NEXT strikePAGE) "include a"To Strike line 33, insert "not include any water right that prevents the StateCongress of Arizonathe fromUnited comprehensivelyStates managing"of AmendAmerica: title to conform And, as so amended, it do pass GAIL GRIFFIN CHAIRMAN HCM2004NATURAL RESOURCES ENERGY WATER 02/19/2019 09:38 PM H:
raYour memorialist respectfully represents:
Whereas, states are the primary authority for allocating, administering, protecting and developing water resources, and are primarily responsible for water supply planning within their boundaries;
and Whereas, states have the ultimate say in managing their water resources and are best suited to speak to the unique nature of water law and hydrology, particularly in western states such as Arizona;
and Whereas, states have primary authority to issue and manage water rights and are responsible for controlling and managing surface water and groundwater located within their boundaries, subject to international treaties, interstate agreements and judicial decrees;
and Whereas, Congress recognized states as the sole authority over non‑navigable waters, including groundwater, and the United States Supreme Court has upheld this authority;
and Whereas, federal reserved water rights apply to waters within various types of federal land designations, including national parks, national forests and wildlife refuges;
and Whereas, federal reserved water rights differ from state appropriated water rights and may take priority over the water rights of individuals whose application dates are established later than the date of the federal withdrawal, even if the individuals are using the water at the time of withdrawal;
and Whereas, the exclusion of federal reserved water rights on any new federal designations in this state would allow Arizona to integrate the federal reserved water rights with the state administratively adjudicated water rights so that water sources can be managed with greater certainty.
Wherefore your memorialist, the House of Representatives of the State of Arizona, the Senate concurring, prays:
1. That the United States Congress take steps to require that any new federal areas designated within the State of Arizona not include any water right that prevents the State of Arizona from comprehensively managing its water resources.
2. That the Secretary of State of the State of Arizona transmit copies of this Memorial to the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives and each Member of Congress from the State of Arizona.
View plain text versions (4)
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version Current html
- HOUSE - Natural Resources, Energy & Water View text html
- Transmitted to Secretary of State View text html
- Introduced Introduced Version html
Action History
-
transmit to secretary of state
-
transmit to house
-
passed
-
dp
-
dp
-
senate second reading
-
senate first reading
-
transmit to senate
-
passed
-
dpa
-
dpa
-
house second reading
-
house first reading.
Sponsors
- Gail Griffin · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 40 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Gail Griffin Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 17 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 40% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Andrea Dalessandro | — | Nay |
| David Bradley | — | Nay |
| Eddie Farnsworth | — | Yea |
| Frank Pratt | — | Yea |
| Heather Carter | — | Yea |
| Jamescita Peshlakai | — | Nay |
| Juan Mendez | — | Nay |
| Karen Fann | — | Yea |
| Kate Brophy McGee | — | Yea |
| Lisa Otondo | — | Nay |
| Martin Quezada | — | Nay |
| Michelle B. Ugenti-Rita | — | Yea |
| Paul Boyer | — | Yea |
| Rebecca Rios | — | Nay |
| Rick Gray | — | Yea |
| Sean Bowie | — | Nay |
| Sine Kerr | — | Yea |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Tony Navarrete | — | Not Voting |
| Tyler Pace | — | Yea |
| Victoria Steele | — | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| David Livingston | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Sylvia Allen | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 31 | 28 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 52% | 47% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (60)
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HCM 2004?
- HCM 2004 is sponsored by Gail Griffin (Republican).
- What is the current status of HCM 2004?
- This bill died with 54th Legislature - 1st Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HCM 2004?
- Track HCM 2004 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HCM 2004
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HCM 2004
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →