Arizona 54th Legislature - 1st Regular Session Status: Passed House

HB 2182 — permit; license; denials; agency hearing

Last action — failed

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 54th Legislature - 1st Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

121 added · 95 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendments to House Bill 2182 introduce a new section that clarifies the licensing requirements for engaging in constitutionally protected activities. The updated text mandates that local authorities provide clear criteria for license approval, enhancing transparency for applicants. This change is important because it ensures that individuals know exactly what is required to obtain a license, which can prevent confusion and potential disputes in the future.

→
Previous
Latest
HB2182 - 541R - H Ver       House Engrossed       State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-fourth Legislature First Regular Session     HOUSE BILL 2182       AN ACT   amending title 9, chapter 7, article 4, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding section 9-843;
HB2182 - 541R - S Ver       Senate Engrossed House Bill       State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-fourth Legislature First Regular Session     HOUSE BILL 2182       AN ACT   amending title 9, chapter 7, article 4, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding section 9-843;
1.  A hearing may be conducted in an informal manner and without adherence to the rules of evidence required in judicial proceedings.  Neither the manner of conducting the hearing nor the failure to adhere to the rules of evidence required in judicial proceedings shall be grounds for reversing any administrative decision or order providing the evidence supporting such decision or order is substantial, reliable, and probative.
1.  A hearing may be conducted in an informal manner and without adherence to the rules of evidence required in judicial proceedings.
if the parties agree to an informal hearing, the agency is authorized by statute to use an informal hearing, there is no disputed issue of material fact or there is a disputed issue of material fact and the matter involves an amount of not more than $1,000.  The agency shall state the agency's selection of the informal hearing in the notice of hearing.  If a party objects to the use of an informal hearing, the party shall object in the party's pleading.  The presiding officer shall resolve an objection to the use of the informal hearing before the hearing on the basis of the pleadings and any written submission in support of the pleadings.  The presiding officer shall resolve an objection to the use of the informal hearing in a disciplinary proceeding involving an occupational license in favor of the licensee.  The presiding officer may deny use of the informal hearing or may require a formal hearing after an informal hearing is commenced if the presiding officer determines that cross-examination is necessary for proper determination of the matter and that the delay, burden or complication due to allowing cross-examination in the informal hearing will be more than minimal.  Irrelevant, immaterial or unduly repetitious evidence shall be excluded.  Every person who is a party to such the proceedings shall have the right to be represented by counsel,  and to submit evidence in open hearing and shall have the right of cross‑examination.  Unless otherwise provided by law, hearings may be held at any place determined by the agency.
Neither The manner of conducting the hearing nor or the failure to adhere to the rules of evidence required in judicial proceedings shall be is not grounds for reversing any administrative decision or order providing if the evidence supporting such the decision or order is substantial, reliable,  and probative.  A hearing may be conducted in an informal manner if any of the following is true:
2.  Copies of documentary evidence may be received in the discretion of the presiding officer.  Upon On request, the parties shall be given an opportunity to compare the copy with the original.
(a)  The parties agree to an informal hearing.
3.  Notice may be taken of judicially cognizable facts.  In addition, notice may be taken of generally recognized technical or scientific facts within the agency's specialized knowledge.  The parties shall be notified either before or during the hearing or by reference in preliminary reports or otherwise of the material noticed including any staff memoranda or data and they the parties shall be afforded an opportunity to contest the material so noticed.  The agency's experience, technical competence and specialized knowledge may be utilized used in the evaluation of the evidence.
(b)  The agency is authorized by statute to use an informal hearing.
4.  The officer presiding at the hearing may cause to be issued subpoenas for the attendance of witnesses and for the production of books, records, documents and other evidence and shall have the power to administer oaths.  Unless otherwise provided by law or agency rule, subpoenas so issued shall be served and, upon on application to the court by a party or the agency, enforced in the manner provided by law for the service and enforcement of subpoenas in a civil action.  On application of a party or the agency and for use as evidence, the officer presiding at the hearing may permit a deposition to be taken, in the manner and upon on the terms designated by him the officer, of a witness who cannot be subpoenaed or is unable to attend the hearing.  The officer presiding at the hearing may order prehearing depositions and subpoenas for the production of documents may be ordered by the officer presiding at the hearing, provided that if the party seeking such discovery demonstrates that the party has reasonable need of the deposition testimony or materials being sought.  All provisions of law compelling a person under subpoena to testify are applicable.  Fees for attendance as a witness shall be the same as for a witness in the superior courts of the state of Arizona court, unless otherwise provided by law or agency rule.
(c)  The agency is determining eligibility for a medical or welfare program.
(d)  There is no disputed issue of material fact.
(e)  There is a disputed issue of material fact and the matter involves an amount of not more than $1,000.
2.  The agency shall state the selection of the informal hearing in the notice of hearing.  Except for determining eligibility for a medical or welfare program, a party may object to the use of an informal hearing.  If a party objects to the use of an informal hearing, the party shall object in the party's pleading.  The presiding officer shall resolve an objection to the use of the informal hearing before the hearing on the basis of the pleadings and any written submission in support of the pleadings.  The presiding officer shall resolve an objection to the use of the informal hearing in a disciplinary proceeding involving an occupational license in favor of the licensee.  The presiding officer may deny use of the informal hearing or may require a formal hearing after an informal hearing is commenced if the presiding officer determines that cross-examination is necessary for proper determination of the matter and that the delay, burden or complication due to allowing cross-examination in the informal hearing will be more than minimal.  Irrelevant, immaterial or unduly repetitious evidence shall be excluded.  Every person who is a party to such the proceedings shall have the right to be represented by counsel,  and to submit evidence in open hearing and shall have the right of cross‑examination.  Unless otherwise provided by law, hearings may be held at any place determined by the agency.
2.  3.  Copies of documentary evidence may be received in the discretion of the presiding officer.  Upon On request, the parties shall be given an opportunity to compare the copy with the original.
3.  4.  Notice may be taken of judicially cognizable facts.  In addition, notice may be taken of generally recognized technical or scientific facts within the agency's specialized knowledge.  The parties shall be notified either before or during the hearing or by reference in preliminary reports or otherwise of the material noticed including any staff memoranda or data and they the parties shall be afforded an opportunity to contest the material so noticed.  The agency's experience, technical competence and specialized knowledge may be utilized used in the evaluation of the evidence.
4.  5.  The officer presiding at the hearing may cause to be issued subpoenas for the attendance of witnesses and for the production of books, records, documents and other evidence and shall have the power to administer oaths.  Unless otherwise provided by law or agency rule, subpoenas so issued shall be served and, upon on application to the court by a party or the agency, enforced in the manner provided by law for the service and enforcement of subpoenas in a civil action.  On application of a party or the agency and for use as evidence, the officer presiding at the hearing may permit a deposition to be taken, in the manner and upon on the terms designated by him the officer, of a witness who cannot be subpoenaed or is unable to attend the hearing.  The officer presiding at the hearing may order prehearing depositions and subpoenas for the production of documents may be ordered by the officer presiding at the hearing, provided that if the party seeking such discovery demonstrates that the party has reasonable need of the deposition testimony or materials being sought.  All provisions of law compelling a person under subpoena to testify are applicable.  Fees for attendance as a witness shall be the same as for a witness in the superior courts of the state of Arizona court, unless otherwise provided by law or agency rule.
1.  A hearing may be conducted in an informal manner and Informal hearings may be conducted without adherence to the rules of evidence required in judicial proceedings.  Neither the manner of conducting the hearing nor the failure to adhere to the rules of evidence required in judicial proceedings is grounds for reversing any administrative decision or order if the evidence supporting the decision or order is substantial, reliable and probative.  The presiding officer shall regulate the course of the hearing and shall allow the parties, and may allow others, to offer written or oral comments on the issues.  The presiding officer may limit the use of witnesses, testimony, evidence and argument and may limit or prohibit the use of pleadings, intervention, discovery, prehearing conferences and rebuttal.
1.  A hearing may be conducted in an informal manner and without adherence to the rules of evidence required in judicial proceedings.  Neither The manner of conducting the hearing nor or the failure to adhere to the rules of evidence required in judicial proceedings is not grounds for reversing any administrative decision or order if the evidence supporting the decision or order is substantial, reliable and probative.  The presiding officer shall regulate the course of the hearing and shall allow the parties to offer written or oral comments on the issues.  The presiding officer may limit the use of witnesses, testimony, evidence and argument and may limit or prohibit the use of pleadings, intervention, discovery, prehearing conferences and rebuttal.
ARTICLE 12.  LICENSE AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS START_STATUTE41-1094.  Right to clarity A.  In any case in which a license or permit is required before a person engages in constitutionally protected activity, an agency shall specify in clear and unambiguous language the criteria for approval of the license or permit.  B.  In any court proceeding involving a denial of a license or permit application for constitutionally protected activity, a court of competent jurisdiction shall determine whether the language is clear and unambiguous, without deference to the legislature or the agency.  If a written clarification is issued by an agency pursuant to section 41‑1001.02 or a rule is adopted pursuant to article 3 of this chapter, the language is presumed clear and unambiguous.
ARTICLE 12.  LICENSE AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS START_STATUTE41-1094.  Right to clarity A.  In any case in which a license or permit is required, other than by staTute, before a person engages in constitutionally protected activity, an agency shall specify in clear and unambiguous language the criteria for approval of the license or permit.  B.  In any court proceeding involving a denial of a license or permit application for constitutionally protected activity, a court of competent jurisdiction shall determine whether the language is clear and unambiguous, without deference to the legislature or the agency.  If a written clarification is issued by an agency pursuant to section 41‑1001.02 or a rule is adopted pursuant to article 3 of this chapter, the language is presumed clear and unambiguous.
C.  The appropriate agency shall approve or deny an application for a license or permit within thirty days after the application is submitted unless another period of time is specified by law or rule.  If the agency does not take action within the applicable time period, the application is deemed approved.
C.  The appropriate agency shall approve or deny an application for a license or permit for constitutionally protected activity within thirty days after the application is submitted unless another period of time is specified by law or rule.  If the agency does not take action within the applicable time period, the application is deemed approved unless the application is incomplete, and the applicant, after being notified of the deficiency, fails to correct the deficiency.
View plain text versions (6)

Action History

  1. failed

  2. dpa

  3. dp

  4. senate second reading

  5. senate first reading

  6. transmit to senate

  7. passed

  8. dpa

  9. dpa

  10. house second reading

  11. house first reading.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 43 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (92)

92 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 92 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

failed to pass

Passed 15 Yea · 14 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 6000
Democrat 0300
Unaffiliated 91101
Total 151401
% of votes cast 50%47%0%3%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Andrea Dalessandro — Nay
David Bradley — Nay
Eddie Farnsworth — Yea
Frank Pratt — Yea
Heather Carter — Nay
Jamescita Peshlakai — Nay
Juan Mendez — Nay
Karen Fann — Yea
Kate Brophy McGee — Nay
Lisa Otondo — Nay
Martin Quezada — Nay
Michelle B. Ugenti-Rita — Yea
Paul Boyer — Yea
Rebecca Rios — Nay
Rick Gray — Yea
Sean Bowie — Nay
Sine Kerr — Yea
Sonny Borrelli — Yea
Tony Navarrete — Not Voting
Tyler Pace — Yea
Victoria Steele — Nay
Lela Alston Democrat Nay
Lupe Contreras Democrat Nay
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Nay
David C. Farnsworth Republican Yea
David Gowan Republican Yea
David Livingston Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Yea
Sylvia Allen Republican Yea
Venden "Vince" Leach Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed

Passed 31 Yea · 29 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 192500
Republican 12000
Democrat 0400
Total 312900
% of votes cast 52%48%0%0%
How each member voted (60)
Member Party Vote
Aaron Lieberman — Nay
Amish Shah — Nay
Andres Cano — Nay
Anthony T. Kern — Yea
Arlando Teller — Nay
Athena Salman — Nay
Becky A. Nutt — Yea
Ben Toma — Yea
Bob Thorpe — Yea
Bret Roberts — Yea
Charlene R. Fernandez — Nay
César Chávez — Nay
Daniel Hernandez — Nay
David L. Cook — Yea
David Stringer — Yea
Diego Espinoza — Nay
Diego Rodriguez — Nay
Domingo DeGrazia — Nay
Gerae Peten — Nay
Isela Blanc — Nay
Jay Lawrence — Yea
Jennifer Jermaine — Nay
Jennifer Longdon — Nay
Jennifer Pawlik — Nay
Joanne Osborne — Yea
John Fillmore — Yea
John M. Allen — Yea
Kelli Butler — Nay
Kelly Townsend — Yea
Kirsten Engel — Nay
Lorenzo Sierra — Nay
Michelle Udall — Yea
Nancy Barto — Yea
Noel W. Campbell — Yea
Pamela Powers Hannley — Nay
Randall Friese — Nay
Raquel Terán — Nay
Regina E. Cobb — Yea
Reginald Bolding — Nay
Richard C. Andrade — Nay
Robert Meza — Nay
Russell Bowers — Yea
Travis W. Grantham — Yea
Walter Blackman — Yea
Alma Hernandez Democrat Nay
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Nay
Myron Tsosie Democrat Nay
Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat Nay
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
Gail Griffin Republican Yea
Jeff Weninger Republican Yea
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Kevin Payne Republican Yea
Leo Biasiucci Republican Yea
Mark Finchem Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican Yea
Tony Rivero Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 2182?
HB 2182 is sponsored by Travis W. Grantham.
What is the current status of HB 2182?
This bill died with 54th Legislature - 1st Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 2182?
Track HB 2182 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 2182

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 2182

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →